Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Dead Bear With Obama Posters Left on Campus, More Criticism for VCU, Education Doctorates, Tops in Enrollment, Madison's Quest for Military Historian, Interim Leader Quits at Miss. State, Fake Degrees Probed, McGill Chancellor Called Racist

October 21, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • Authorities are investigating a bizarre incident in which a 75-pound bear cub was shot and left at the campus of Western Carolina University, draped in Obama campaign posters, The Asheville Citizen-Times reported. University officials said that they couldn't determine the motive for the incident, but were troubled by it.
  • Virginia Commonwealth University is facing new pressure to revoke a degree that the university has admitted never should have been awarded. State legislators have reviewed the incident and on Monday they told university leaders that they have the power to rescind the degree and should do just that, The Richmond Times-Dispatch reported. Some legislators hinted that they might seek a way to do so if the university doesn't act, the newspaper said. Virginia Commonwealth officials have acknowledged that numerous rules were violated in awarding a bachelor's degree to Rodney Monroe, former chief of police in Richmond, but have maintained that their rules (which are being changed for the future) barred rescinding a degree unless the student who received it engaged in misconduct, which the university says was not the case.
  • Education doctorates are becoming a popular topic for review. On Monday, the American Educational Research Association and the National Academy of Education announced a joint review of education research doctoral programs. Although more than 1,800 such doctorates are awarded each year, a joint announcement by the two groups said that there has never been a comprehensive review of these programs. Last year, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching announced a three-year project to re-invigorate Ed.D. programs.
  • The main campus at Ohio State University is holding on to its status of having more students than any other campus in the United States. Ohio State announced Monday that fall enrollment at the main campus in Columbus is 53,715. That beats out other large universities, such as Arizona State University's main campus (52,734), the University of Florida (51,413), the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (51,140) and the University of Texas at Austin (50,006).
  • When historians debate whether their discipline has lost interest in military history, the prime evidence by those who think liberal academics just don't care about the military is the University of Wisconsin at Madison. The reason is that Stephen Ambrose, the late military historian and Madison alumnus, left a bequest to the university for just such a purpose in 2002, and the position hasn't been filled. The university has noted that the bequest didn't cover the full costs of a position. Now the university has added to the bequest, a search is ongoing, and the quality of candidates has university officials encouraged that a hire will be made, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.
  • Vance Watson quit Monday as interim president of Mississippi State University following a scandal in which a state audit found that he authorized landscaping work by the university at the home of the state's commissioner of higher education. In a statement, Watson noted that he personally repaid the university for the costs involved, and that the matter was considered a civil claim and not a criminal one.
  • Nine state troopers in Washington State have been placed on leave while authorities investigate whether they obtained fraudulent college degrees to earn pay raises, The Seattle Times reported. A police official told the Times: "It appears these may be fraudulent institutions.... These nine [schools] were not readily apparent institutions of higher education and they weren't easily determined institutions of education by looking at a Web site or [making] a phone call."
  • McGill University's chancellor, Richard W. Pound, is facing widespread criticism and calls for his resignation after he was quoted as saying that Canada was a nation of "savages" 400 years ago, before European settlement. The comments came in an interview in which Pound, a longtime official in the international Olympic movement, was offering praise for Chinese civilization -- in contrast with Canada's history prior to the arrival of Europeans -- in the context of discussing this year's Olympic games. Numerous McGill figures as well as leaders of Indian groups in Canada have condemned the comment. At McGill as at other Canadian universities, the role of chancellor is not like that of an American president or chancellor, but more like that of an influential board member, with additional ceremonial duties. Still, the position is closely associated with the university. McGill issued a statement over the weekend stating that Pound's comments "are his own and are not made on behalf of McGill," The Montreal Gazette reported.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Dead Bear With Obama Posters Left on Campus, More Criticism for VCU, Education Doctorates, Tops in Enrollment, Madison's Quest for Military Historian, Interim Leader Quits at Miss. State, Fake Degrees Probed, McGill Chancellor Called Racist

  • Not IF but HOW we teach military history
  • Posted by Carl Weinberg , Editor, OAH Magazine of History on October 21, 2008 at 10:00am EDT
  • Regarding the story about the unfilled position in military history at UW/Madison, the controversy over military history is really about how to teach and write about it, not whether it should be taught. For anyone who has not followed the field, you should know that it has changed much in the last few decades. So much so that what was dubbed the "new military history," starting in the 1970s and 80s, is getting rather established and "old."

    Military history, as taught and written today, now tends to be much more integrated with social, cultural and political history than it once was. It is less likely to embrace the "great man" theory of history. And it is more likely to tackle topics that raise uncomfortable questions about America's past.

    To get an overview of recent trends in the field and some great ideas for teaching it in today's classrooms, see the latest issue of the Organization of American Historians Magazine of History:

    http://oah.org/pubs/magazine/milhist/index.html

    Carl Weinberg
    Editor, OAH Magazine of History

  • Military History
  • Posted by Labyrinth on October 21, 2008 at 11:05am EDT
  • "Military history, as taught and written today, now tends to be much more integrated with social, cultural and political history than it once was. It is less likely to embrace the “great man” theory of history."

    Thuis is the beauty of the History and military channels on cable TV. Here you get to see the actual history without all the associated revisionism that Leftist professors of history want so badly to foist upon us. The Truth shall set you free.

  • "Revisionism" versus "actual history"
  • Posted by Carl Weinberg , Editor, OAH Magazine of History on October 21, 2008 at 12:20pm EDT
  • All presentations of history have a point of view--an interpretation. This includes documentaries on TV. It's just that many viewers of the History Channel and Military Channel tend to share the viewpoint of the documentaries being broadcast, so they, like Labyrinth, don't recognize any "bias" "agenda" "interpretation" etc. They think they're seeing "just the facts, mam." But the idea that facts speak for themselves is a myth. Every documentary on military history will include some facts and exclude others. It will emphasize some points, and deemphasize others. What Labyrinth views as evil leftist "revisionism" is simply a set of interpretations that happen to clash with his own interpretations. I do once again encourage readers to take a look at our Military History issue of the Magazine, edited by prominent military historian Carol Reardon. Thanks, Labyrinth, for getting the conversation started.

  • Posted by Retired Prof on October 21, 2008 at 12:25pm EDT
  • A reading of the dead bear covered with Obama posters: the bear is an obvious symbol for the former Soviet Union, while the Obama posters symbolize Obama's communist leanings (reflected in his working with and friendship with Ayers and others of the extreme left). Those who left the symbols on the campus are obviously suggesting that Obama's campaign is orchestrated ultimately by Communist Party leaders in Europe or Russia. There's really no ambiguity about the symbols.

  • History Channel?
  • Posted by John Farley on October 21, 2008 at 12:25pm EDT
  • The History Channnel has some valuable documentaries, but they also have a lot of junk. They're very big on UFO's, which are treated without an iota of skepticism. So if you watch the History Channel, bring your own baloney detector, because theirs is turned off.

  • Salvation!!
  • Posted by Really?? on October 21, 2008 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Oh thank God (or the gods) for cable TV. Sheesh. If this is the source of the "truth" that sets you free, and others, we're all in some really serious trouble. I can only imagine someone saying, "I earned my degree from Discovery Channel."

  • Dead Bear?
  • Posted by cts on October 21, 2008 at 1:55pm EDT
  • I'm intrigued by Retired Prof's explanation of the dead [killed] bear cub and Obama signs. If this correctly captures the intentions of those who killed the bear and draped its body with political imagery, I can only say, "Weird, sick, bizarre." Not only is the equating of Obama with Russian communism inane, the killing of a young animal to express one's looniest political fantasies is criminal. I hope they find these creeps and prosecute them.

  • Bear down?
  • Posted by miller m on October 21, 2008 at 3:20pm EDT
  • Um, it's bear hunting season in North Carolina. Maybe the crime is littering?

  • history and bears
  • Posted by Les on October 21, 2008 at 5:05pm EDT
  • I learned something--didn't know about latest thought in military history. Thanks!

    re: the bear.
    Some guys got drunk either before or after killing a bear and thought it would be funny to add some signs they stumbled across and dump the whole thing. Reminds me of stupid goings on when I was in college with dead skunks, live cows, mailboxes, and kegs.

  • Les is right
  • Posted by DFS on October 21, 2008 at 7:25pm EDT
  • and I wonder if Retired Guy's using tongue-in-cheek? If not, then just the threat of Obama maturing into adulthood was the actual reason the Soviet Empire fell, I suppose.

    They used Obama signs for some reason. Perhaps those were all they could find in or around the campus. Perhaps not?

    But, officials are "troubled," and it happened at a campus, and so we have the obligatory teaching moment.

    I'm sure that right now someone is writing a paper about this, using "psychological constructs."

  • Military History
  • Posted by Michael D. Cook , academic program director at Everest College--Phoenix on October 22, 2008 at 5:15am EDT
  • Anyone who teaches survey courses in history without incorporating military history leaves out important aspects of the past. Anyone who watches the History Channel uncritically never learned anything from serious historians.