Search News


Browse Archives

News

Weathering the Storm

Benevolent Budgeting

October 30, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As Shenandoah University administrators contemplated salary increases for faculty and staff this year, compassion trumped conventional wisdom.

Instead of awarding across-the-board raises based on a percentage of each employee's pay, as history dictates at Shenandoah and many other universities, Shenandoah officials have opted to add $1,000 to every employee's base pay. That means some of the university’s prized faculty and highest-paid administrators will see relatively small salary increases next month, while assistants and other lower-paid staff will get more help than usual during a period of national economic turmoil.

Cal Allen, dean of Shenandoah’s College of Arts and Sciences, was among the chief advocates for changing the formula this year. As administrators started discussing salary hikes, Allen said he couldn’t help thinking that some of his lower-paid staff needed help now more than ever.

“For several people in my office -- a couple of them single income -- for them it’s a matter of [asking] are you going to fill your car with gas, are you going to pay rent or are you going to pay for groceries? People are really hurting,” Allen said.

In a letter sent to faculty and staff explaining the decision, President Tracy Fitzsimmons cited a commitment to the university’s stated mission.

“This salary increase attempts to strike a balance between the need to give well-deserved raises for our many outstanding faculty and staff members and a responsible recognition of, and response to, the uncertain state of the economy,” Fitzsimmons wrote on October 24. “We trust that this decision reflects our university’s commitment to be ‘ethical, compassionate citizens who are committed to making responsible contributions within (our) community.' ”

Deans at Shenandoah, who make an average of $110,000, will see raises of just below 1 percent after this salary increase. Full professors, who make about $72,000 on average, will see increases of about 1.4 percent. But for the staff members on the low end of the salary scale, a $1,000 base pay increase will translate into a 4 percent raise over their $25,000 salaries.

Weathering the Storm

This is one in a series of articles about how colleges and universities are responding to troubled economic times.

Send suggestions for future installments to jack.stripling@insidehighered.com

 

Bryon Grigsby, senior vice president and vice president of academic affairs, said the university did not save any money by changing the salary formula. The pool of money used for raises would have been the same, even if the university had opted to give a traditional mix of across-the-board raises and a merit pool, he said.

Retaining faculty is still very much a priority at Shenandoah, and Grigsby acknowledged that officials had discussed whether the salary formula posed a risk.

“Those were issues we struggled with, but culturally we feel this fit what we needed to do facing the economic future we have right now,” he said. “This isn’t going to be the process we do all the time, and the community realizes that.”

Rachel Carlson, president of Shenandoah's Faculty Senate, said the decision has been well-received by professors.

“The overwhelming consensus was this was the right thing to do and just an example of what kind of compassionate university we have here," she said.

Carlson further noted that the decision has built some good will between people on the campus and Fitzsimmons, who was recently named president at Shenandoah.

According to Fitzsimmons, there have been a few senior-level administrators who have decided to forgo their raises altogether, placing the money in an emergency fund that is being used to help existing students who are struggling to afford to stay enrolled.

Shenandoah is taking other steps to help faculty and staff in the near-term, including offers of low-interest loans of up to $5,000 to help any professors who are facing particular struggles. The money is drawn from the university’s relatively small endowment, which is less than $50 million.

“So far no one has come forward needing [a loan], so that’s good,” Grigsby said. “It’s kind of a rainy day fund for the faculty and staff.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Benevolent Budgeting

  • Posted by Steven D. Aird , Genuine Leadership a Rarity in Academia Today on October 30, 2008 at 6:50am EDT
  • The actions of Shenandoah's administration demonstrate genuine leadership at a time when the nation, in general, and academia, in particular, have seen precious little of it. At my former institution (Norfolk State University), salaries of upper level administrators and the department chairman they use to control the faculty, have rapidly outpaced those of faculty and staff, essentially creating a class of royalty. Not surprisingly, NSU administrators have also lost the trust and respect of the faculty. The situation parallels that which we have seen in the White House, in Congress, and in corporate America (Enron, AIG, Fannie Mae, Delta Airlines, GM, etc.)

    In contrast, at Shenandoah, administrators thought more about those on whom they depend for their success. That merits loyalty and respect. I hope other university administrations are paying attention.

  • Amazing Grace
  • Posted by Justa Prof at Southern Illinois University on October 30, 2008 at 9:10am EDT
  • For once, something uplifting to read over morning coffee! At a time when university football coaches are making absurd salaries (more than university chancellor/presidents, in some cases), this approach to salary raises shows not only enlightened leadership but a genuine compassion we seldom see in higher education. As for the fear of losing (or the failure to attract) good faculty due to salary issues, chances are that they would not stay for long anyway. "Good" faculty are able to attract good students, increasing enrollment and strengthening the research infrastructure. Besides, a good faculty person should be able to attract funding to augment their salary. I've always felt that there should be no cap on faculty salaries--as long as said faculty attract the funding outside the system. Let "good" faculty become the next football coach, at least in terms of salary. Just a pipe dream........

  • Benevolence
  • Posted by Mary Nienaber , Director of Human Resources at Lake Superior College on October 30, 2008 at 10:50am EDT
  • It was heart warming and reassuring to read about the compensation decisions at henendoah University. Just when you think that corporate and individual greed has completely turned this county on it's heels, I am pleased to read about this socially responsible act of benevolence.

  • Good way to get rid of your best people.
  • Posted by Common Sense on October 30, 2008 at 11:00am EDT
  • If your top earners are not your best people then fire them. If they are then reducing their salary provides a great incentive for them to look for a job elsewhere.

    This is a good time to slash salaries across the board since no one wants to be out looking for a job but whatch out when the economy rebounds because it is your best people who will be getting the tempting job offers first.

    Slashing the salaries of your top performers is another way of saying: "we value mediocrity".

  • Posted by SP on October 30, 2008 at 11:15am EDT
  • Great. About time.

  • Bravo!!
  • Posted by Lerin Roberts on October 30, 2008 at 1:40pm EDT
  • For once someone realizes your most valuable asset is your employees all the way down to the janitor. AIG Insurance, learn a lesson here!!

    Lerin Roberts
    http://www.debtrelieftoolkit.com

  • Posted by Another Damned Medievalist on October 30, 2008 at 2:35pm EDT
  • Common Sense displays a lack of it. Oftentimes, the top faculty earners are those who teach in the hard science, Health Professions and Business schools, i.e., people who could make equivalent or higher salaries outside academia. At institutions like Shenandoah -- and even at larger research-oriented universities, the salaries of these "top earners" far outstrip those of faculty in the arts and humanities. While it may seem sensible to pay for the best, that simply doesn't happen across the board. Those who teach more undergraduates are regularly expected to suck it up for the good of the overall reputation of the institution -- after all, we understand about the market and accrediting agencies that help to drive higher wages in some fields. But don't for a minute believe that the top earners are somehow more important or more deserving over all. They are the offspring and the beneficiaries of a bastard system that devalues the work of productive scholars and teachers in the humanities and social sciences because there are plenty of us around. Frankly, if those 'top earners' have complaints, they should reassess their priorities.

  • No Merit?
  • Posted by Meritless , Faculty at Shenandoah University on October 31, 2008 at 5:00am EDT
  • While I'm not objecting to helping those at the middle and bottom of the pay scale, I think that removing merit from the equation was a mistake.

    I'm not with administration (quite below that, actually) and appreciate my raise, but the quality of my work didn't get taken into account at all. Call me old-fashioned, but that just doesn't sit right.

  • Ethics in hard times
  • Posted by PB on October 31, 2008 at 10:55am EDT
  • Shenandoah and Dr. Fitzsimmons have set a standard of ethics and compassion that should cause us all to pause. Perhaps it is a small beacon that will inspire us all, individuals and institutions, to remember our committment to the common good.