Search News


Browse Archives

News

Clicker U.

November 3, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

ORLANDO -- To some academics, clickers are a great new technology, allowing professors to measure instantly whether students in a large class are grasping new concepts (or are even in class). To others, clickers represent a depersonalizing influence.

At the annual meeting of Educause, an organization of college technology officials, the former appeared solidly in the majority. Indeed, at a session on the use of clickers, officials of three large universities reported that once professors start to use clickers, the devices' popularity took off, and not just in mammoth lecture classes. To these officials, the questions about clickers weren't of the "Should we use them or not?" variety but of the policy variety: Should institutions support only one model on campus or whatever professors pick? Who is responsible for training professors in their use? Should certain uses of clickers be discouraged or encouraged?

To inform the discussion, officials of the Universities of Delaware, Maryland at College Park, and Pittsburgh each conducted surveys of students and faculty members on clicker use. The findings and their implications were discussed here Friday at the Educause meeting.

Why click: By far, the top reason cited by faculty members using clickers was to see instantly whether students were understanding a concept. Every Maryland professor identified that as a reason while more than 80 percent of those at Pitt and Delaware cited that use. Measuring student opinion and obtaining anonymous responses from students were other reasons cited. Smaller percentages were using clickers to monitor attendance (about half at Delaware and less than 40 percent at other institutions) or to administer quizzes (popular at Delaware but rare elsewhere). Whatever their reasons, the survey data suggest that professors are repeat users of clickers, with large majorities reporting that they have used them previously and are continuing to do so.

Clicking and attendance: Officials of all three universities generally spoke more enthusiastically about the use of clickers to promote student understanding than to check up on students. Christopher Higgins, manager of learning technologies at Maryland, said that while professors report that using clickers for attendance tends to get students to class more consistently, he's not sure that's "the best practice" for the technology. One concern is students will trade off, and one student may show up in class with clickers for a few friends and click them all present. Nancy J. O'Laughlin, instruction designer at Delaware, said that the student code of conduct there was specifically amended to make it a violation to click for someone other than yourself. There haven't been many problems, but "we felt it was important to give the faculty confidence" that there would be a way to deal with clicker abuse, she said.

Large classes and small: When the clicker concept started to attract attention, it was generally discussed in terms of large lecture courses, but the use of clickers appears to extend beyond that. More than a quarter of the courses using clickers at Pitt and Maryland have at least 200 students. But at Delaware more than a quarter of clicker classes enroll fewer than 50 students, and at Pitt, more than 20 percent of courses using clickers have fewer than 25 students. At Delaware, the courses with the greatest clicker use are in chemistry, biology, physics, psychology, nursing and political science. At Maryland, clickers are most prominent in the sciences and business. At Pitt, clickers are most commonly used in the biological sciences, nursing and pharmacy.

Critical mass: At these universities, clickers have in the past few years changed from being something used by a few professors to becoming, if not standard, certainly not unusual. Maryland has more than 12,000 students using clickers in at least one course, for example.

Training and support: While students typically are comfortable with clickers from day one, not all professors are. O'Laughlin said that "students know some faculty who are not comfortable with any technology, let alone clickers," and that students "want their faculty to be prepared and comfortable." Michael Arenth, assistant director for instructional media services at Pitt, said faculty members need training not just on how to use clickers, but on security and privacy issues, so that they are used in ways that don't create problems. All three officials said that if colleges want to encourage clicker use, it is important to have designated staffers available for support, especially just prior to the start of the semester and the first few weeks of the semester.

Uniformity vs. personal preference: At Maryland and Delaware, once more professors started to use clickers, the universities created committees to try to make clicker use more consistent. IT departments didn't want to support multiple systems, and students didn't want to have to buy multiple clickers to satisfy the preferences of different professors. At Pitt, however, Arneth said that "we didn't succeed in mandating a standard." Even with standardized systems, however, there are pressures on campus technology officials when, for example, a system works well with a PC but not a Mac or vice versa.

One reason that clickers are likely here to stay is that students are generally pleased with them. While there were complaints that some professors didn't know how to use them or take full advantage of them, support was high and enthusiastic when faculty members knew what to do. In many cases, students reported that clickers transformed their student experience.

A quote from a Delaware student: "I absolutely loved using the clickers. It encouraged me to go to class every day and truly enhanced my overall learning experience in this class," the student wrote. "I'm the kind of person who never raises their hand to talk during a class whether it's to ask a question or to answer a teacher's question, so with the clickers being individual and anonymous (to my classmates), it allows me to be able to participate in class without being in front of anyone… I hope all of my classes from now on will use this clicker system!!!"

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Clicker U.

  • To click or not to click
  • Posted by Fred Flener , retired on November 3, 2008 at 8:30am EST
  • I sat in a seminar that used these and it seemed to be okay. However, what I wanted to do was to take the data and go much deeper than a clicker allowed. The seminar was called "Race in the race." It may be nice to know that, 75% of us believe that racial factors influence our vote, but isn't the "meat" of that in discussing what supports our belief, or for that matter what triggers the belief? A clicker doesn't seem adequate.

  • Clickers are great!
  • Posted by John Farley , Professor of Physics at Univ Nevada, Las Vegas on November 3, 2008 at 9:35am EST
  • I've been using clickers for a half dozen years, and they're great. If I ask students to raise their hands to answer a question, many of them won't do it. Clickers allow them to answer anonymously, so I get much higher participation rate. For optimum results, I ask a question, the students answer, then discuss it among themselves, and then answer again. The discussion is crucial because it keeps them engaged in the class.

    I'd never go back to life B. C. (before clickers)!!

  • Adapting to clickers
  • Posted by George , Also retired on November 3, 2008 at 9:45am EST
  • Fred, you're right that clickers don't do the heavy lifting by themselves. As with any new technology, it takes a while to figure out how to use them most effectively. Extra time is needed to design the right questions to ask and the right follow-up to each question. The clickers then provide useful information that provide the stimulus for deeper discussion.

  • Clickers
  • Posted by George2 at csulb on November 3, 2008 at 11:00am EST
  • I use clickers in my physics and physical science class of over 100 students. I concur with George's comment. The best use is to ask the question, then have the students discuss the question and then answer the question again. The correct answers increase by about 40% most of the time. The American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) has a section on clickers in their last national conference. They have identified areas that I thought the students should know cold but do not. Clickers seem to work well with Eric Mazur's Peer Instruction philosophy. I will continue to use them although not getting the learning gains that I have anticipated because the students seem to enjoy their use. It is the only way I can get any interaction with my students in the large classes.

  • Clickers
  • Posted by Kenneth C. Green at The Campus Computing Project on November 3, 2008 at 11:00am EST
  • New national data on clickers from the 2008 Campus Computing Survey (campuscomputing.net) reveal that while the overall use level is low (about 7 pct. of all classes in four-year colleges and universities and just over 4 pct in two-year colleges), the use levels have almost doubled since 2004. These gains are striking as clicker deployment is largely limited to large, lower-division undergraduate courses.

  • Student-owned vs Institutionally-owned
  • Posted by Mathieu Plourde , One more consideration at University of Delaware on November 3, 2008 at 11:05am EST
  • At the University of Delaware, clickers are usually bought by students, which is great in terms of associating a clicker ID with a student ID. Tracking and quizzing is easier this way, but other ownership models might suit your needs, especially if you're not using the clickers for grading.

  • Getting the data you want
  • Posted by anonymous on November 3, 2008 at 11:05am EST
  • Fred and George-I just wanted to respond. I work as a sales rep for a major developer of clicker or Student Response System technology. I am happy to let you know that there are many ways to go "deeper" into the data gathered. Our particular system offers hundreds of reports as well as a way to customize reeports and gather the data you need.

    For example, there are ways to demographically sort your questions and run opinion type polls where you can have engaged discussions and have students "poll in" every two seconds so you can see if your discussions are actually changing opinions in real time, on a live graph. As George said, it is all about your knowledge and skill with the software as a presenter. Good luck to you!

  • re: Clickers--a Different View
  • Posted by Peter C. Herman , Professor at San Diego State University on November 3, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • While I am glad that some find clickers useful, I do not think it is accidental that their popularity is greatest in the sciences. I notice that such disciplines as History and English (my own area) are missing, and I think that is because the questions we ask do not lend themselves as readily to multiple-choice questions. In an upcoming class on Macbeth, for instance, I will ask my students how the play's engagement with early modern political theory. It's hard to see how an "a" or "b" question would usefully forward the discussion.

    In addition, clickers are promoted (at least, at my institution) as an excuse for further increasing class sizes and the numbers of huge classes (over 250), and while I have no doubt that they have their uses, clickers seem to promote the reduction of education to a scantron sheet. Finally, as for the student who is quoted as saying “I’m the kind of person who never raises their hand to talk during a class whether it’s to ask a question or to answer a teacher’s question . . . ," I'm not sure that enabling such passivity and refusal to engage is necessarily a good thing.

  • Am I In The Truman Show?
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on November 3, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • Have you ever been somewhere where everyone around you seems to have completely lost their marbles and you’re the only one with his sanity intact, sort of like Randle McMurphey in “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” or Charles Plumpick in “King of Hearts?” But then, after awhile , you start questioning yourself ... could it be that everyone else is sane (i.e., clickers is how far we’ve come in adapting technology to the classroom) and you’re the only one who is bonkers. Well, that’s how I feel at the moment.

    My recommendation: Go here ...

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/07/18/clickers

    and read the first post ... and then “attend” the lecture by Michael Welch.

    I just love high tech ... Blackboard ... PowerPoint ... clickers. Wow!

  • Posted by Sam R. on November 3, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • For those of you already using clickers in the classroom, how do you navigate the ADA accessibility problems with the devices? What do you do for students who need extra time on their tests and quizzes when you use the clicker and can't personalize the time limits? Or for students who are blind/low vision and can't see the clicker buttons or read-out? Or for students who have dexterity issues, such as quadriplegia, and can't press the tiny buttons on the clickers?

    Just curious how this very important issue is being handled by those who are using the clickers in the classroom, given that Federal law requires that everything in the classroom be accessible to students with disabilities.

  • Posted by SP on November 3, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • Thanks, Peter Herman. You've just about summed up my thoughts, though I can imagine some use for clickers even in idea- and discussion-oriented classes. Example: "Do you guys have *any idea* what I'm talking about when I ask you to make connections between Macbeth and early modern political theory?" Anonymous clicker answers would be more revealing than the usual blank stares and half-nods.

  • other purposes served well by clickers
  • Posted by Kimberly Green , Educational Designer at Washington State University on November 3, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • Clickers, like any technology, can be used well (or not) for many purposes.

    We have faculty here who use clickers for activities besides embedded questions in a lecture:

    *students can generate clicker questions they are interested in during class
    *students give peers feedback on oral presentations using a rubric and a clicker
    *students giving a presentation can prepare clicker questions to ask the class

    More about rubrics
    The honesty and anonymity factor can be used in other educative activites. I got my first taste of that when we had faculty use clickers in a norming session -- we all read samples of student work, scored them on a rubric using clickers, and then discussed the results to establish consensus. In the past, we had faculty raise their hands to report their initial scores -- lots of potential for peer pressure there.

    Similarly, an instructor could use clickers to have students score a sample paper in class using a rubric, and then discuss those scores. The class can come to consensus on the overall score, developing their understanding of the criteria on the rubric and how they are applied.

    For rubrics to be educative, it's important to spend time looking at them with students. It seems that clickers can contribute to this process.

  • Little empirical support
  • Posted by bevo on November 3, 2008 at 2:20pm EST
  • To add on to Dr. Herman's astute observation, clickers provide little perceived value to the user (i.e., students).

    I have collected data from three different classes ranging in enrollment from less than 30 to more than a hundred. It is the same instructor using the clickers in the same fashion. None of the students have been measured twice.

    Guess what? Students perceive clickers to add little or no additional knowledge. Further, they do not help students perform better on exams.

    Like much technology, it has become an oversold, overprescribe crutch.

    And for those of you teaching in large sections try this technique:
    1) Ask your question
    2) Wait silently and patiently while counting to 10 in your head
    3) If no response is provided, then point at a student and ask them for the answer.
    4) Repeat

    Also, try asking questions that go beyond "The definition of blah is..." Ask them to apply the material to a specific scenario. Ask them to provide consequences of actions. If I do X, then what will happen?

    All these types of question illicit wonderful exchanges between myself and the students as well as between the students.

    Now, through away your clickers. You have nothing to fear but fear of a silent classroom.

  • what if they don't bring their clickers?
  • Posted by Kurt on November 3, 2008 at 4:30pm EST
  • A question for those who use clickers: what happens when a student doesn't bring it to class? It would seem the added effort on my part to create a separate way to grade that student (attendance, participation or quiz) would negate the overall time savings if everybody would bring a clicker. Or do you not recommend grading any use of clickers?

  • to click is to answer?
  • Posted by sceptic on November 3, 2008 at 5:20pm EST
  • Let's see if I understand this. According to more than one post here, clicking a clicker is the same as participating in class...and instructors can tell if students understand a concept by the clicks. How?

    To participate verbally requires sequencing thought. it requires taking intellectual risks. It requires a high order of critical thinking and explanation. To ex-plain is to lay out to see how the parts fit, no? In no way does clicking do any of these things.

    Clicking also does not necessarily signify understanding. First, how does a student know if he/she understands without trying to express that understanding in some form? So, clicking is simply the act of someone who may or may not think he/she understands. And, secondly, students can click for effect, knowing that the clicks are counted in some form...even when they know they do not comprehend. Safer that way.

    I fear the instructors who remake courses to ask yes/no or other binary questions to allow for clickers. I fear that clicking can take the place of nuanced responses to questions designed to get students to think about what they are hearing/seeing.

  • Posted by Andrea , Science Ed Initiative at University of Colorado on November 3, 2008 at 5:25pm EST
  • As others have pointed out, clickers can be useful or not depending on how they are used.

    The technology of clickers, does, however, offer three powerful features you just can't get simultaneously with any other tool: student accountability, individual anonymity, and instant feedback on aggregate student responses. Together, these can really positively impact student motivation, behavior, and valuing of the questioning process.

    There's research out there on this, but not in the science and math education realm - yet (we're working on it).

  • Clickers and History
  • Posted by Anne Paulet , Associate Professor History at Humboldt State University on November 3, 2008 at 8:00pm EST
  • Personally I have found clickers to be useful on a number of levels in my US history survey course (I regularly teach the second half--US since 1877). The first thing I'd like to note is that clickers are part of an overall scaffolding of knowledge and are not the only assessment of student understanding. When our class size was raised to 75 (not a lot for some but we have no grad students), I wanted to do something to keep students engaged. I place clicker questions on the previous lecture and that day's reading (basically the important people places and things I want them to know) in my Powerpoint lectures. Students get one point for clicking and two points for the right answer (no points if they are not there). I ask more questions then are needed for the point total on the syllabus thereby allowing students to either make up for days they miss for whatever reason or to earn extra points (and sparing me requests for make-ups). Many of the clicker questions reappear in a slightly different form on the fill-in-the-blank midterms and final and often they stress important things that students can use to support the three essays they write. Finally, I do have two separate days set aside for class discussion of additional reading they have. The overall concept is to provide a way for students to build and reinforce their knowledge and thereby create a deeper understanding.

    The feedback I have is students say clickers make them come to class; they feel clickers are more interactive; they enjoy the clickers; and they often feel the clickers helps them know what they do and do not know for tests. Last semester (the second I have used the clickers), I had an incredibly high success rate with about 2/3s of the students getting As or Bs in the class and a less than 7% failure rate.

    As a side note, when students do not remember their clickers, I have them right the answers on a sheet of paper and have them checked off by my TAs (or myself) before I put up the right answer.

  • Critical Thinking and Student Enagement
  • Posted by Derek Bruff on November 4, 2008 at 12:30pm EST
  • I would like to respond to Peter Herman, bevo, and sceptic about the use of clickers in courses designed to develop students' critical thinking skills, particularly courses in the humanities. I think it's important to note that multiple-choice questions asked via clickers during class can function very differently than multiple-choice questions asked on tests and quizzes. It's tough to ask a multiple-choice question on a test that gets at students' ability to think critically. However, during class, a clicker question can be used to engage students in small-group or classwide discussions that are focused on critical thinking.

    For instance, a history professor might ask students, "Which of the following events had the largest impact on the start of World War One?" and provide four or five options. Is there a single correct answer to this kind of question? Probably not. Is it useful to know if a particular student answers A, B, C, or D to this question? Not very. However, by asking this as a clicker question, the instructor is asking each and every student to think critically about the question and commit to a response. If discussion isn't allowed (at least on the first "vote") then students must think independently of their peers. This lays the foundation for productive small-group or classwide discussions of the question since all students have had the chance to thoughtfully consider the question and thus are more likely to bring something to the discussion.

    Can such discussions happen without clickers? Sure. However, clickers provide instructors with the ability to request a response from every student. Simply posing a verbal question and having a few students volunteer verbal answers means that only a few students respond publicly. It's very easy for the other students to sit back and let others do their thinking for them. Not only does a clicker question request a response from all students, students are asked to do so independently before hearing from their peers. Since individual student responses to clicker questions can be tracked, students can be held accountable for their participation. That doesn't happen with verbal questioning, except perhaps in small classes where instructors can track student participation individually.

    Classroom response systems also let instructors and students know how students respond to a clicker question. These bar charts can help generate discussion as students see that choices they hadn't considered were chosen by their peers. The anonymity that clickers provide is very important, too. Students are often hesitant to speak up in front of their peers for fear of being wrong. Clickers provide these students a chance to voice their thoughts. Often when the results of a clicker question are shared, these students find it encouraging that many of their peers agree with them, which encourages them to speak up verbally, as well.

    Don't think that clicker questions are limited to factual recall or yes/no questions. Clickers can be used very effectively to have students engage with conceptual understanding, application, and critical thinking questions. It's helpful to think of clickers not just as assessment tools (although they serve that function very well) but also as engagement tools.

    As for student perceptions of the value of clickers, bevo's results are most definitely atypical. Students are generally very positive about the use of clickers and perceive clickers as beneficial to their learning, according to several campus surveys of students. References are available here:

    http://tinyurl.com/6a5wkq

    I would be interested in hearing how clickers were used in the courses bevo surveyed. Without some indication of the pedagogies used with a particular technology, results such as bevo's don't mean much. I'm sure in some courses, chalkboards don't add much value. In other courses, they're important and effective teaching tools. The instructor's use of the tool determines the outcome. It may be that in bevo's study, clickers were used in ways that didn't impact student learning. When used to generate small-group and classwide discussion, clickers are generally very well received by students.