Search News


Browse Archives

News

Down 36 Students, College Will Lose 40 Jobs

November 10, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As the economy has declined rapidly this fall, experts on liberal arts colleges have warned many times that it doesn't take more than a few dozen students not showing up to upset an institution's economic assumptions -- with serious consequences for students and professors. On Friday, Beloit College provided a perfect example of this reality:

The college announced that it will eliminate 40 positions (with faculty jobs included in the mix) -- about 10 percent of the college's total employees. The reason is that this year's total student enrollment is smaller, by 36 students, than the college had planned. (Total enrollment ended up at 1,289.) At Ohio State, 36 students would be a rounding error. But at Beloit -- and at many liberal arts colleges -- that's enough to create real problems and force real change, including layoffs.

Beloit is not among the colleges that need to explore mergers to survive -- and is by most measures highly successful, known for the strength of its liberal arts programs and as a Wisconsin alternative to the large public universities that thrive in the Midwest. But at a time that even institutions the likes of Williams College -- with an endowment more than 10 times the size of Beloit's -- are talking about economizing, it's no surprise that the choices aren't easy.

Leading the effort to cut is Dick Niemiec, an alumnus who, after 33 years at Blue Cross Blue Shield, left his role as a trustee of the college to become interim president while a search goes on for a permanent president to replace John Burris, who left to become head of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. Niemiec -- who makes no attempt to hide his non-academic perspective, but who has been praised by many on the campus for keeping students and faculty in the loop on budget problems -- is not a candidate for the job on a permanent basis.

In an interview Saturday, Niemiec described the limitations on how the college can respond to the $1 million deficit it faces because of the students who didn't arrive this fall. About three-quarters of the college's $55 million budget comes from tuition, and other sources -- including endowment income -- aren't going to be much help this year, he said. At the end of the college's last fiscal year -- May 31 -- the endowment was valued at $135 million. Now the value is less than $100 million.

There was no one reason for the enrollment decline. Some students who had been expected to start decided not to. Others who were expected back didn't return. In boch cases, some students cited the economy, opting either to delay their educations or to seek one elsewhere. And part of what Niemiec said he's trying to do is position the college to be able to thrive if there is another such evaporation of students next year. "What if there are 50 fewer next year?" he asked, adding quickly that he is hopeful that won't be the case.

Total costs at Beloit are about $38,000, but the college's discount rate -- the percentage that the college doesn't end up receiving in tuition revenue, because of aid awarded -- is 42 percent, a figure Niemiec said he's comfortable with but doesn't want to see go up.

While the college has looked for various ways to save money, Niemiec said that cutting positions needed to be part of the solution. He said he has been analyzing comparative data from other colleges and believes that the college can function with a smaller employee base. As a first step, the college has asked all employees who think they may retire this year to come forward and identify themselves to supervisors so Beloit can get a handle on how many may leave naturally. Niemiec said he hoped that would make up a chunk of the 40 slots, although some of those who come forward may need to be replaced, in which case another job would have to go. Tenured professors will be protected, he said, but some of the faculty jobs that could be eliminated may be lines that are used when professors are on sabbatical, or adjunct positions that fill out a department.

"Any time you do a layoff it's not an easy situation," he said. "But we have to do this for the long-term view."

As part of that perspective, Niemiec also has asked a panel of faculty members -- who already were working on a curricular review -- to also consider how the college can remain competitive for faculty talent and adjust to tighter economic times. He has delayed -- pending this review -- the approval of tenure-track faculty lines (a process that typically happens when a tenured faculty member retires), and asked that this year's and next year's consideration of such slots take place together, rather than on a department-by-department basis.

Niemiec said he is not trying to push any one model on the faculty, and wants professors' ideas. But he suggested that at least some of the questions must involve numbers of jobs. "You have to look at how you fill slots in a department," he said. "Do you need six chemistry teachers as opposed to five?"

On Friday, Niemiec held an open meeting where he announced the decision to eliminate 40 positions, and took questions.

Diane Lichtenstein, a professor of English and chair of the faculty panel reviewing the college's options, said that professors are "very positive" about the president's "honesty and transparency." While people don't want to see positions eliminated, she said that Niemiec has been talking openly about the financial problems throughout the fall, and has been receptive to input from all.

The faculty members reviewing the curriculum have been talking about these issues for some time, well before this fall's financial concerns, she stressed. So the idea that it's time to think about how and what students are taught is generally accepted. What will be more difficult, she said, will be to consider these issues in light of the economic constraints that weren't present when professors first planned the review. The goal, with the review and job eliminations, she said, is a good one: "Get the place in a position where a new president can come in and build, and not have to deal with crises."

But the faculty is just starting the conversation, she stressed. At a meeting last week, Lichtenstein said she was trying to get a sense from colleagues about "how much change they are interested in," and she's not sure of the answer.

Mitchell Young, student body president, also praised the way the administration has kept everyone informed. "He's not sugar-coating things," Young said of the interim president, and that's good. He said some students realized that, and were appreciative, while others were stunned Friday by the news that jobs would be eliminated, and were angry.

Young said he views the cuts as "highly unfortunate but necessary." He said it is more difficult than people realize for students and faculty members to talk about which positions could be eliminated. The classics department has two full-time faculty members, he said, and some worry that smaller departments like that could disappear. To students outside the department, that might seem OK, but what about the college's overall offerings as a liberal arts institution, he asked?

And the value of individuals, he added, isn't apparent in a job title or even official responsibilities. Young said that Beloit is a college where every student thinks about some professors or others who have personally connected with them, even if not part of their official jobs. That makes it more difficult, he said, to say any position is expendable. "People seem to be asking us what programs keep us here," he said. "But at Beloit it's who keeps them here, not what."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Down 36 Students, College Will Lose 40 Jobs

  • College Layoffs
  • Posted by George on November 10, 2008 at 12:20pm EST
  • One assumption that most professors make is that colleges are immune to economic conditions. This is a good article showing they are not. Most large public universities are run as a socialist republic and so think they are immune to market forces. They also are not. California is talking about not taking all eligible students into the CSU system this year because of budget problems. This will only make the problem worse for them because the taxpayers and future taxpayers will be upset. Colleges need to contain costs just as a business works to contain costs. Glad to see some reality setting in at last. Just remember this next time you vote Democrat, this crisis was brought to you by Fannie May and Freddie Mac courtesy of Democrats Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.

  • 42 percent?
  • Posted by Lisa on November 10, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • I wonder what percentage of the tuition discounts are directed toward non-need-based aid? If the situation is this dire, perhaps that practice should be reconsidered before positions are eliminated.

  • Senior salaries
  • Posted by James on November 10, 2008 at 1:50pm EST
  • Did anyone propose cutting the salaries of senior faculty and administrators by, say, 30% across the board as a way to preserve existing positions?

  • Whoa There George!
  • Posted by Bob on November 10, 2008 at 2:30pm EST
  • "One assumption that most professors make is that colleges are immune to economic conditions."

    Really? Which professors? Out of how many? Cite your research please or point us to it.

    I don't know of even one professor that makes the assumption that you say "most" do.

    Your bias is showing itself...or so I assume.

    I have worked in Higher Ed for 22 years, and I know firsthand about two colleges that have closed in my area. No George, I am afraid that it did not start whith your raised awareness after reading this article.

  • Re: 42 Percent?
  • Posted by freelancewriter on November 10, 2008 at 2:40pm EST
  • In response to Lisa,

    Total costs at Beloit are listed at around 38,000, per the article.

    Discount rate = 42%

    Average cost is around 22,000.

    Working in the upper Midwest where the private college higher ed market is competitive in terms of pricing and discounting, I suspect Beloit is pulling in an above-average amount of revenue per student.

    Scale back or eliminate the no-need discount and even less students enroll, compounding the budget problems and future layoffs...

    When East Coast schools engage in no-need discounting, it is not a surprise that a school in the frugal Midwest relies on discounting.

    (For the sake of Beloit's finances, I hope a significant percentage of the discounting is no-need. The families with wealth will be perhaps less shaken by current conditions in the economy.)

  • Merit versus Need-Based Assistance
  • Posted by dm on November 10, 2008 at 2:50pm EST
  • The distinction between merit and need-based aid can become blurred. Schools with steep tuition discounts (and 42% is getting into that area) greatly "need" the high pays to balance the load and pay for all the high need-based students. So schools have to consider the option of offering a $5,000 or $6,000 merit scholarship to reel in a student who otherwise may go elsewhere even if his or her family finances might not justify need-based aid. For a school that's having a tough time making its enrollment targets, an 80% merit-based student trumps a would-have-been full-pay who goes elsewhere.

  • Posted by S on November 10, 2008 at 3:30pm EST
  • While James's suggestion clearly isn't quite serious ("Did anyone propose cutting the salaries of senior faculty and administrators by, say, 30% across the board as a way to preserve existing positions?"), he makes a good point.

    Pilots' unions sometimes take voluntary pay cuts. Why can't academics do the same thing? Even in low-paid fields such as English, senior faculty can make ten times what junior faculty do, despite not being ten times as productive. Surely, for the good of the whole, they could manage to get by on less. God knows it wouldn't be hard to replace them.

  • Mortgage Bailout is just the beginning
  • Posted by ACF on November 10, 2008 at 3:45pm EST
  • In order for colleges to make college "more affordable," they take more from the most economically productive in society by raising the sticker price for tuition. Then, they redistribute this to the least economically productive in society through grants. Of course, this leads to a high retail cost which brings cries for making college more affordable, after which, colleges take EVEN MORE from the most economically productive through EVEN HIGHER retail tuition rates, etc. etc. etc.

    Imagine going to a grocery store and being told that the price of an apple depended on how economically productive you were. Of course, higher education must be more important than food, right?

  • Posted by huw on November 10, 2008 at 4:45pm EST
  • Beloit, a small lac in a dismal mid western
    town just isn't that attractive a destination for many kids, especially those
    on the east coast. For that same price, qualified kids have strong public options, Penn State, Binghamton, Maryland etc. Lower
    income kids with strong stats can go honors
    programs at local states for less. Beloit needs to find a way to lower its price. Student debt at Beloit has soared, you can't weather
    hard times depending on student borrowing.
    Build the endowment and cut prices - take
    whatever steps necessary to do that.

  • Pay cuts for senior faculty
  • Posted by Faculty Person on November 10, 2008 at 6:05pm EST
  • S I don't know where you get the idea that senior faculty in a department like English make 10 times as much as new faculty. Assuming we're comparing full-time positions I suggest maybe twice as much. Given salary compression issues common at colleges the differential may be even less.

  • Socialism
  • Posted by George K on November 11, 2008 at 12:45pm EST
  • Is anyone like me, weary of people like my namesake, who invoke some weird notion of "socialism" to bash away indiscriminately? To say that state institutions are run like socialist republics is just silly and, yet again, betrays a sloppy use of the term.

    My guess is that this "George" would have loved the letter in my daily paper today which worried that Obama would create an evil Marxist-socialist State with gestapo troops and secret service to enforce the tyranny.

  • Posted by Mike on November 11, 2008 at 3:40pm EST
  • I teach at another private Midwestern university and believe that many professors are detached from the real world of market forces. I think that the economy will continue to slide unless somebody grabs Obama and enlightens him as to how an economy actually works. They should be pouring money into small business activities since these companies provide real job and market growth - let a company like GM go out of business - they have decades of poor products and poor decision-making in the marketplace - plus an overpaid union workforce - and propping them up does nothing but protect bloated union jobs, it grows no jobs at all. As long as the Dems in power bring us FDR economic solutions, which failed then and will fail again, we will be in a freefall. I just spent two years watching our students gush about how inspiring Obama was, totally unaware that on election day they voted their employment futures down the tubes. I fear all of us in academia are in for years of frozen budgets and frozen wages.

  • Reality Bob
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on November 11, 2008 at 4:50pm EST
  • Bob, Though not documented by an independent accounting firm, I'll suggest that 80% of faculty don't give a rip about retention and recruiting issues that keep many administrators awake at night.

    (again, no documented studies, but I have seen a number of the latter knashing their teeth at meetings)

    My points of reference? Faculty complaining in the break room after the last college faculty development meeting. ("why should we have to worry where the students/money for our salaries are coming from?" "leave those questions to those highly paid administrators!")

    Unless a lot more faculty and administrators start considering how well we are educating our students, I'll bet that faculty and administrative positions will be reduced.
    (furthermore, most tenured faculty probably will not consider year by year appointments with no cap on the number of weekly hours worked, but the state and or federal gov't. will certainly continue to pile on the reporting and control requirements for those college administrators)

    It is only in times where faculty and staff positions are reduced that we discover why the top level administrators are often called execut(e)-ives.

  • Beloit
  • Posted by SK on November 13, 2008 at 10:00pm EST
  • huw,
    Have you been to Beloit within the last few years? The "dismal midwestern town" that you mention has been having quite an exciting urban renewal. It has a beautiful riverside with biking and skiing paths, nice new boutiques and an organic/ local farmer's food store, and many arts events -- including the Beloit Film Festival -- throughout the year. You are selling the place (quite literally) very short.

  • Just a Few Points
  • Posted by Beloiter on December 3, 2008 at 6:35am EST
  • I am a Beloit student. Additionally, I am a resident of the city of Beloit. Just a couple of points:

    1) The city may have its detractions, but the college neighborhood strives to remain pretty nice. I don't live on-campus but those who do seem to be able to enjoy and immerse themselves in the residential culture that Beloit offers. And, to defend this city, there are people who are trying to help this city regain some of its former glory. I believe more can (and should) be done, but that's a city issue rather than a college issue. The college is an amazing asset and harbinger of culture and prestige to this community, and it would be devastating if we were to lose it.

    2) Beloit faculty, in my experiences, are some of the most dedicated educators I have ever met. One of you has proposed pay cuts. I do not have exact figures, but in comparison with colleagues of equal experience and prestige, Beloit faculty do not make as much. These professors are here because they love educating. Look at some of the amazing educational programs that are housed at Beloit (i.e., BioQUEST). These programs afford opportunities not only to Beloit students, but to students all over the midwest, the country, and even the world.

    3) Beloit aid is necessary, and I don't just say that because I receive it. I say that because there seem to be a large number of students whose families can afford this education who choose Beloit because 1) they make it a little more affordable and 2) the excellent programs they offer. In my humble opinion, Beloit is suffering not only because of lower enrollment, but because of more globalized budget cuts and lack of available funds (i.e., Howard Hughes scholars). With budget shortfalls across the board, ALL colleges are suffering. A family friend performs stem cell research in a lab at a large state university - and even she cannot find all the money that her lab needs. So how is a smaller school who only produces the future researchers (but does not actually do the research) supposed to get a hold of any money? One may point fingers at whomever they choose - I'm not going to sling accusations at a singular political party, financial institution, or individual. However, I am certain that we can all agree that this is a crisis and that there is neither one cause nor one solution to this issue.

    It is going to take a concerted effort on the part of schools, governments, and communities to save their local institutions. I challenge everyone to do this - the quality of American education is at stake. I sincerely hope we are able to rise to this challenge.

    Thanks for reading.