Search News


Browse Archives

News

More U.S. Help for Student Loan Providers

November 10, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The U.S. Education Department will announce today that it is adding a third major component to its existing effort to ensure that, despite the worsening economic picture, student loan providers have sufficient financial backing to ensure, in turn, that students and families have enough federal help to pay for college. The new arrangement --

In May, in response to a federal law enacted quickly last spring in response to the credit crunch that was then seizing the financial markets, the education agency and the Treasury Department crafted a short-term plan designed to make sure that federal loan funds continued to be available to college students in the 2008-9 academic year (in addition to expanding access to the government's competing direct loan program). Under that two-part arrangement, the government (1) agreed to buy from lenders certain federally guaranteed loans made between May 1, 2008 and July 1, 2009, in an effort to reassure investors wary of buying loans because they might later be unable to sell them; and (2) to invest in pools of loans held by a custodian, in order to provide short-term liquidity to student lenders.

Those programs have largely worked, according to U.S. officials and most lenders. So far, under the first plank, only two lenders have sold $62 million in loans to the department, and four more are expected to sell another $350 million in November, the department reports. But nearly 800 lenders have indicated to the department that they would like to be able to sell loans originated for the 2008-9 academic year.

And 12 lenders have made use of the pool investment program to receive $8.7 billion in department payments, which represents nearly half of the total federal student loan disbursements made to students so far in 2008-9. A total of 19 lenders have been approved to participate in the latter program, in which the department purchases a 100 percent stake in pools of loans.

Department officials also said in May (encouraged by student loan providers) that in addition to those short-term efforts to reimburse lenders for loans they've already made, the government would consider some longer-term steps if the financial markets continued to be restricted. Since then, the overarching financial situation in the country has taken a turn for the worse, and many lenders have opted not to participate in the federal loan programs, finding themselves unable to persuade outside investors to give them the money they need to make loans.

"The continued tightening of the credit markets has created conditions making it difficult for lenders to secure the needed private capital," raising questions about whether sufficient loan funds will be available for disbursements to students next semester or to make loans for 2009-10, the Education Department said in a statement Friday. To put another way, a department official said, "We got a sense that if we simply replicated [what was done in 2008-9], and lenders didn’t see any hope for the long haul, they might not participate" in the loan programs.

That explains the third plan the department is unveiling. In addition to replicating the loan purchase and pool investment programs it put in place for 2008-9, which would cover loans made through September 30, 2010, the department plans to allow for the creation of "conduits" (likely to be banks or big student loan providers like Sallie Mae) that are designed to be a middleman between groups of lenders and outside investors. Under these arrangements, the conduits would (using funds from private sources, not federal money) purchase student loans that were fully disbursed between October 2003 and July 2009 (only non-consolidated loans would qualify), and the entities would then issue "asset-backed commercial paper" (a form of short-term investment vehicle) to private investors.

The key is that the U.S. government would agree up front to purchase, at a later date and at a set price, the commercial paper that is issued in exchange for the student loans if other investors cannot be found. This is designed to assure investors that their investment in student loans is a sound one, and to set it up in such a way that a borrower's loans remain with the same lender and are serviced by the same loan servicer. The repurchase would be done in a way that is cost neutral to the government.

The overall goal is to "reengage the private market back in student lending," a department official said.

Lenders welcomed the government's announcement. "The department kept its word," said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Providers. "They described what they did in May as a backstop to ensure that schools and students would be okay in 2008-9, and everyone believes they succeeded in those goals. But they also said they might need to do more if the credit markets remained in a seized state and there was no liquidity, and in fact the markets have worsened in the last couple months."

While the department's plans so far to ensure the flow of student loans have generally won support from advocates for students and some lawmakers who are frequently critical of excessive federal backing of lenders, the newest effort is likely to get scrutiny from those who have feared a bailout of lenders. Early reviews from Democratic lawmakers in Congress, though, were cautiously supportive.

"I'm glad that the department is continuing to use the authority granted by Congress to provide students and families with access to the federal student loans they are counting on to help pay for college, while protecting American taxpayers," said Rep. George Miller, the California Democrat who heads the House Committee on Education and Labor. "I look forward to learning more details about the department's additional proposal to further safeguard federal student aid from the turbulence in our economy."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on More U.S. Help for Student Loan Providers

  • Better Option
  • Posted by Scorekeeper on November 10, 2008 at 5:05am EST
  • This amounts to a sweeping bailout for lenders, as in eating the whole cake and having it, too. Instead, the Department of Education should buy FFEL loans back, score savings while providing lenders liquidity, and reinvest the savings in need-based student grant matching programs with institutions and states, weaning them away from their wasteful merit grants. Congress can make it happen in the upcoming stimulus package at no net taxpayer cost, to help students, not just lenders. That's what federal student aid is presumably about.

  • Posted by collegeloanconsultant on November 10, 2008 at 6:50am EST
  • Cost neutral? What about administrative costs- who's eating those?

  • Scorekeeper
  • Posted by Alex Hamilton on November 10, 2008 at 8:50am EST
  • Will you then have Congress pass a law requiring financial institutions to make federal student loans? There's a reason they call them lenders and not originators. That's what they do for a living.

  • Posted by Student Debtor on November 10, 2008 at 8:50am EST
  • What about the student debtors who never anticipated the kind of payments they are expected to pay?????

  • Sallie wins Again
  • Posted by Anita Loan on November 10, 2008 at 10:46am EST
  • That's it, put them at the center with no risk and all the administrative fees they can create. Sallie Mae is the Haliburton of the financial aid industry. Thank you governor Cuomo for starting this mess. My rich uncle isn't rich anymore, Sallie's monopoly is enhanced and the students can't access loans.... rates are up, fees increased and student benefits gone.
    But not one financial aid counselor is taking donuts or sticky pads from lenders anymore. The country has been saved. Now that's leadership.

  • To: Student Debtor
  • Posted by FFEL not Private on November 10, 2008 at 12:15pm EST
  • SD - I think you are confusing Federal loans made under FFELP with Private Loans. Federal Stafford and PLUS loans now have fixed rates. For earlier FFELP loans made with variable rates - they are still at historic lows due to the Fed lowering it's rates.
    It's the private loans that were variable and tied to market based indexes which have skyrocketed.
    This program only addresses loans in the FFELP.

  • Stability in markets = win for students
  • Posted by Scooter on November 10, 2008 at 12:20pm EST
  • Scorekeeper, I believe the government is buying back FFELP loans under the put option currently available to lenders. This is a better option because it ensures that ED won't lose money on the assets and doesn't interrupt the servicing for the borrower. There's also a reasonable chance they'll make money through the conduit function if private investors don't appear.

    Seems to me this serves the borrowers' interests at least as much as it does the lenders.

  • Make-work for the student loan industry
  • Posted by Barmak Nassirian on November 10, 2008 at 1:10pm EST
  • While the Administration has accomplished little by way of constructive improvements on the higher education front, it certainly has outdone all its predecessors in pandering to the student loan lobby. This last act of largess (with the taxpayers' money) strikes me as a fitting final favor before current political appointees at the Department leave for lucrative jobs with student loan companies.

    This program, authored by the loan industry and promoted by its surrogates, is an expensive give-away that serves no public purpose whatsoever. Privatizing profits and socializing risks is an idiotic way of "stabilizing" the financing system, but it sure works for the lenders.

  • Scorekeeper Replies
  • Posted by Scorekeeper on November 10, 2008 at 4:05pm EST
  • Under the Department's latest lender bailout, few new or old loans will likely be bought. Taxpayers will not be getting much in the way of loan assets or the savings from not having to pay lenders for the life of the loans, but rather will be putting a floor under prices to rescue lenders in trouble.

    It would be better to think of students as students, not as "borrowers." Most if not all students would rather get grants from savings than take out loans from lenders rescued by taxpayers.

  • Sallie Mae - taking after big sis Fannie or bro Freddie
  • Posted by Disgruntled on November 10, 2008 at 6:05pm EST
  • Look - there's a reason that there were problems in the banking industry - most of it from bad home loans, allegedly - although most it as it appears to me is "bad paper" - But, who caught the brunt of this? Our students! The Student Loan industry was the FIRST to get hit and at a great cost to students. In PA when American Education Services was no longer eligible to sell their loans, they were also no longer eligible to match state grant funds and provide other great programs to our students with their profits (remember they are a non-profit organization) - The state of PA has lost millions - Sure they increased loan limits, but wasn't Governor Cuomo's plan to have more diversity and transparency in lending? Well that worked out really great -and now we are going to be subjected to using Sallie Mae as a lender?! They outsource their collections to another country!! I'm truly appalled at the prospect of having to use the government as a lender through Direct Loans(a future enormous burdon to taxpayers) or a lender who is too big for the government to handle (remember Fannie and Freddie) - this will be a tremendous burdon to our young people, who will likely pay much higher taxes than our generations ever had to pay - what's next? Oh yeah, socialism.