Search News


Browse Archives

News

Accusations and Suicides

November 14, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

For the second time this year, a professor at the University of Iowa has taken his own life after being accused of sexual harassment.

For the university, which also has faced a scandal involving alleged sexual assault by athletes and a devastating flood this year, the latest incident added to an unsettling semester.

On Wednesday, just a week after he was accused of sexual harassment in a lawsuit, Mark Weiger killed himself. He was a professor of music known for his oboe performances and teaching. A former student and teaching assistant's lawsuit, filed in federal court against Weiger and the university, charged that he had a romantic relationship with another student, engaged in repeated classroom banter and touching of an inappropriate nature, and created a sexually hostile environment. According to the suit, the university conducted its own investigation of the situation last year, found Weiger had violated policies against sexual harassment, and then resolved the issue "informally." He was found in his car, dead from carbon monoxide poisoning, with the garage door at his home closed. Authorities said he left a note.

In August, Arthur H. Miller was arrested on bribery charges and accused of telling female students that he would give them higher grades if they let him fondle their breasts. In one case, he is alleged to have grabbed and sucked on a student’s breast and then sent her an e-mail telling her that she had earned an A+. He then shot himself in a local park.

"This has been a pretty big shock. I don't know of anything like this ever," said Emileigh Barnes, editor in chief The Daily Iowan. Some students who knew the professors have praised them, while others have wondered what it means to have multiple high profile cases in a year, she said.

The professors' deaths make it "hard to tell who is innocent and who is guilty," she said. But many students are left with many questions, especially since the university hasn't released many details about the allegations. "The university needs to give us more answers. And they may need to look at how they can protect students," Barnes said.

Michael W. O’Hara, president of the Faculty Senate at Iowa and a professor of psychology, called the two deaths "a horrible coincidence." He added that "sometimes in the great big wide world, events converge that are totally coincidental yet you begin to wonder if there is a pattern, and my view is that this is like having our 500-year flood. It seems inexplicable but it happened."

O'Hara said he knew both of the professors who died, but not the specifics of their cases. He said that Weiger "had a lot of support in the music school."

After Miller was arrested in August, the university announced that it would require all faculty members to undergo training about sexual harassment. That process is now going on.

Asked what the university should do following this latest incident, O'Hara said that "we have to separate the issue of sexual harassment from the issue of why a professor or anybody for that matter would commit suicide in the face of kind of public disclosure of something that is personally extremely embarrassing if not humiliating. Those are two different issues -- people face criminal charges all the time and don't commit suicide. It's not an inevitable consequence."

O'Hara added: "We have to continue on campus to educate ourselves and to be vigilant about sexual harassment and help everyone understand that as an academic community, these things aren't to be tolerated." At the same time, he said that the two deaths made him wonder about the treatment of "alleged perpetrators." It is important to remember, he said, that "being accused doesn't mean that something happened."

When Miller was arrested and before he killed himself, the university suspended him. In the case of Weiger, university officials said that he remained "in good standing" at the time of his death. Sally Mason, president of the university, on Thursday issued a statement expressing condolences to Weiger's family and friends, and letting people know of the availability of counseling services. She also urged people "to refrain from speculation about this event, but to support all who need assistance."

A spokesman for the university said that officials could not comment on the allegations against Weiger because the university remains a defendant in the suit filed by his former student.

Alison Smith, the lawyer for the plaintiff in the case, said that the lawsuit would continue. She said that her client left the university after the investigation of her allegations, when she didn't feel secure in continuing at Iowa. When she informed her client about the suicide, she was "very saddened and shocked," Smith said.

Much of the discussion in Iowa City this week has focused on Weiger, with friends and colleagues talking about how they did not believe the allegations against him. But Smith said that the university itself found violations a year ago and said she was "concerned" about the way the case was being viewed. "We offer condolences, but it's important that we remember that this young woman was a victim. It's important that we focus on the whole story."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Accusations and Suicides

  • accusations and suicides
  • Posted by Gary Davis , Principal at Board Solutions on November 14, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • These tragic stories create a teachable moment for faculty and graduate students everywhere. Since the days of Plato's Academy, students and faculty have been fooling around - often with tragic results. Just ask Abelard and Heloise. In my first semester as a grad assistant at the University of Iowa, my department chairperson, Dr. George Forell, warned us sternly not to attempt romantic or sexual relationships with anyone in our classes. At the time, I thought the warning was a little over the top but after decades of college teaching and administration, I marvel at Dr. Forell's wisdom and foresight. Such training should be provided for every faculty member of every college and university. They need it to avoid a danger that is inherent in college teaching. In the meantime, my condolences go out to all affected by the current events in Iowa City.

  • He Wasn't Guarateed Fairness
  • Posted by Jon S on November 14, 2008 at 1:50pm EST
  • Is it possible that, as a white male in academia, he was already tried and convicted before anyone had said anything?

    I think this is a desperate act from a person who didn't feel that he had a hope of being tried in a just way.

  • Not Just Iowa
  • Posted by Old Professor at Southern Illinois University on November 14, 2008 at 1:50pm EST
  • Interesting article. Here at Southern Illinois University we also have two prominently discussed cases of sexual harassment by two older professors. One prof died within months of being removed from campus (probably due to the shock of such an event) while the other prof (after being escorted off campus) is seeking legal recourse. I wonder if we are seeing a reawakening of sexual drive by older profs (Viagra comes to mind) or if students are no longer tolerating even the hint of a sexual advance. Maybe both.

    I'm an older prof and extremely embarrassed by any of my colleagues who are involved in such unethical activities. Over the years, I have been approached by several students (male and female) who appeared to be interested in amorous liaisons. Although shocked by these attempts, I deflected the situation and re-focussed the student on more productive efforts in the classroom. For myself, I must admit being powerfully attracted to some of my students but I never considered taking the next step. It just seemed wrong to me.

  • Posted by Roger on November 14, 2008 at 2:45pm EST
  • ONLY NOW is the U of Iowa instituting sexual harrassment training for faculty and staff? At Florida International, it has been required for all employees for a decade or so.

  • It Doesn't Matter
  • Posted by DFS on November 14, 2008 at 4:35pm EST
  • These days, it's like this:

    Accused = Convicted = Toast.

    (There ought to be a law . . .)

  • Posted by punditius on November 15, 2008 at 8:25am EST
  • Having been falsely accusation of sexual harassment, I can affirm that even a false accusation can be embarrassing, and career damaging. And unlike with other accusations, the accused is assumed guilty unless proved innocent. If a real crime - battery or blackmail - occurred, then that should be the charge. If university policies regarding fraternization have been violated, let that be the charge. But if a woman merely feels violated in some way, I don't see why she should have the option of inflicting vastly disproportionate and lasting damage on a man.

    As far as I'm concerned, a charge of sexual harassment is no different than an accusation against an alleged witch in the 15th century.

  • Posted by Sluggh on November 15, 2008 at 8:25am EST
  • I married one of my students. It's turned out pretty well.

  • Posted by EP on November 15, 2008 at 8:25am EST
  • Being male on campus is already a crime. An accusation means the Inquisition is coming after you. For many, suicide could be the easiest way out.

  • Sexual harassment on campus
  • Posted by Kathleen Wagar , Sexual Harassment on November 15, 2008 at 1:25pm EST
  • I was a student on campus in the 1970s before there were any rules about sexual harassment. A few times in signing up for a parttime campus job, I would be contacted by an otolarynologist who would offer me a job. But I had already worked for him and knew he would put the moves on me if I worked for him again. I didn't take the job, but my finances suffered. In my day there were manners on campus, and I had no difficulty working for anyone else. Simply put, people behaved. Once I had my butt pinched at a fancy party by an old man. I thought it was funny rather than being offended by it. Life was simpler then.

  • This sentence is very telling
  • Posted by EngProf on November 15, 2008 at 6:15pm EST
  • “We offer condolences, but it’s important that we remember that this young woman was a victim.”

    Note the absence of the word "alleged" modifying "victim."

    Which ties into the scenario accused = guilty.

  • Oh please...
  • Posted by A. Somebody , Grad student at AnyState University on November 16, 2008 at 5:10am EST
  • I'm at the point where I have no patience for those from a different generation when sexual harassment was considered OK. Two of my friends at my big public university have been repeatedly sexual harassed by their (much older) advisers. When reporting it, a dean told one friend that she should keep it on the "DL" while the other friend spoke up and now the professor is retaliating....and getting away with it.

    Seeing that fewer people are actually prosecuted/disciplined for sexual harassment, I'm all for making an example out of those who are. I have no pity.

  • Sexual Harassment
  • Posted by history_mom on November 16, 2008 at 4:40pm EST
  • EngProf: You might want to brush up those reading skills, as the article noted that the professor in question had already been found in violation of the university's sexual harassment policy during an internal investigation. By definition, the student suing him in civil court is indeed a victim.

    The comments on this thread deeply, deeply sadden me. I love how the assumption is that women lie about sexual harassment or just take things too seriously and should lighten up because sexual harassment allegations make life for men difficult. Never stop to consider how pervasive sexual harassment really is or the chilling effect it has on women pursuing careers in academia.

  • Sympathy as a Limited Resource
  • Posted by cts on November 17, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • I'm struck that some of the posts, here, seem to be based on an emotional zero-sum model: either one must sympathize with the graduate student whose accusations of harassment were vindicated or with the professor whose sense of humiliation drove him to suicide. Why should we feel this way?

    Professor Weiger had been accused of such misconduct on at least one previous occasion [one which made the news], including vulgar behavior and affairs with students. He appears to have had problems controlling himself, and this finally could no longer be ignored by his university. Two graduate students were made so miserable by his conduct that they left their programs, with no support or recompense from the university.

    Why can't we feel appropriate sympathy for everyone involved, while noting that one recipient of our concern was at fault? Must we regard these women and this professor as competitors, so that to feel for him requires derision of the women?

    The administrators who enabled Professor Weiger's conduct over the years are the only ones for whom we should feel no pity in this mess.

  • Are you kidding me?
  • Posted by NewProf , Assistant Professor on November 17, 2008 at 4:55pm EST
  • I read of Dr. Wieger's suicide following a SECOND allegation of sexual harrassment via the Chronicle of Higher Education and googled my way to Insider Higher Ed. What is remarkable to me is that A)academics are still nitpicking details such as whether or not the plaintiff in the lawsuit against him is a victim and B)That White males think they are disappearing and so should somehow qualify for special status even though for YEARS they have failed to acknowledge that they were in a majority and in control when two young women felt victimized enough to change graduate programs and two men at the same university are dead. The issue of guilt on the part of Dr. Wieger was dealt with and handled "informally" at the U of Iowa which speaks volumes. And for those of you who haven't had training in sexual harrassment, the person experiencing the harrassment gets to decide what she/he feels is harrassment. Your personal opinions on things such as fanny pinching (can't believe there is a women with ovaries enough to say she felt things were simpler when women just dealt with that sort of thing without being shrill, i.e. bitchy) asking your students out or even using vulgar language is irrelevant---what matters is how such actions are perceived. Isn't America a great country?

  • Students Hurt Too
  • Posted by Alcibiades , Students Hurt Too on November 17, 2008 at 5:30pm EST
  • I'd be surprised if policies like the University of Iowa's banning both sexual harassment AND consensual relationships haven't led graduate students to suicide. I know I've considered it.

    Grad students don't get off campus, often spend a decade or more in their program undergoing intense social isolation, and are discouraged or forbidden to pursue anyone on campus romantically. Other students are off-limits because the grad student is typically a teaching assistant and professors are off-limits because graduate students are students.

    Moreover, some students have a thing for teachers, but no teacher can ever reciprocate their feelings because of fear that a successful relationship will be punished under the university's consensual relationships policy and an unsuccessful one will lead to an accusation of sexual harassment.

    If professors end up dead because the shame and social stigma of a student/professor relationship is too great, how do you think that makes students feel who are attracted to professors who can never express their feelings or experience requited love?

  • Hey, Newprof
  • Posted by DFS on November 17, 2008 at 5:30pm EST
  • Take a break! Learn the context. There's nothing like a new professor coming in and using that big ol' wide paintbrush.

    In your opinion, since the "victim" gets to decide the guilt, I guess it follows that the professor falsely accused of racism is indeed guilty -- since the accusers get to decide the parameters there, the Law be damned.

    NewSpeak, eveyone. NewSpeak!

  • New Speak
  • Posted by NewProf on November 17, 2008 at 7:05pm EST
  • Speaking of context....my point is simply that when complaining of sexual harrassment the recepient of said harrassment determines what is and what isn't harrassing in terms of legality which is the thrust of most sexual harrassment training. The intent behind any content is "trumped" so to speak by how the content is received. I made no comparison between accusations of racism and sexual harrassment so maybe the guilty doth protest too much!

    And as for any wide brush.....I was responding to comments already posted and not males in academia in general....someone is way touchy and a bit defensive!

  • Thanks, NewProf
  • Posted by DFS on November 19, 2008 at 4:45pm EST
  • I bow to your clarifications. I enjoy such banter, but some times I am "touchy." :)

    Except for this -- there is no way that I could be considered "guilty" only because I protested the wide brush! I have seen the success of such wide brushes in the past, and reflexively oppose the notion.

  • On Findings of Guilt and False Assumptions
  • Posted by Stubbornly Rational on November 20, 2008 at 12:35pm EST
  • history_mom wrongly equates "guilt" with a finding of guilt by a sexual harassment committee on a campus. This is questionable, although as cts wisely points out, in some cases there is enough evidence that guilt is highly likely, *and* we can sympathize with all concerned.

    The truth is, at many universities a finding of "sexual harassment" guilt is similar to a finding of witchcraft, i.e., the product of a witch hunt. How many witches were actually guilty?

    Modern sexual harassment committees, often staffed by ideologically slanted feminists, are hardly impartial. They confirm their own importance with findings of guilt. There are dozens of stories of ridiculous "guilty" findings by such committees.

    In short, history-mom's point is exceedingly weak in general, although it has relevance in the particular case.

  • Sexual harrassment-Whistle-blowing
  • Posted by Ray DeRusse , Researcher on February 16, 2009 at 7:25am EST
  • In balancing the relationship between victim and victimizer. The readers-posters failed to mention that often times the victim is locked in undulating emotional choppy waters, thought long and hard about coming forward, knowing they can be ruined by proponents supporting the perpetrator. The resulting wave of derision from coming forward can be emotionally devastating to what is tantamount to whistle-blowing. Retaliations for whistle-blowing can be severe further isolating the victim resulting in a PTSD type of syndrome. It can all lead to erratic class attendance, poor academic performance and it's downhill from there resulting in a lose-lose for all parties.