Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Athletic Oversight Found Lacking at Rutgers, College Blasted Over Use of Bond Funds, Gift Doubles Le Moyne Endowment, IPO for For-Profit College, Tenn. State Bans 'Juicy' Web Site, Conversation Monitors at a Canadian University

November 20, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • As Rutgers University has moved into big-time college athletics, it has faced a series of controversies over spending and the power of athletics officials, leading the university to appoint a panel to examine the various issues. Its report, released Wednesday, found that the university lacked basic oversight of its athletic programs. The university lacked "internal controls," suffered from poor communication, and experienced "limited presidential leadership," the report said. The president didn't oversee athletic operations and key matters were not brought to the board's attention, it added. On many issues, it wasn't even clear what procedures the university had for deciding what required board oversight. Richard L. McCormick, president of Rutgers, released a statement pledging to carry out the panel's recommendations.
  • California auditors are blasting San Joaquin Delta College for using bond funds that were supposed to pay for vital academic facilities to instead build a state-of-the-art athletic facility and two large electronic message boards. There could be "no rationale" for supporting such projects, based on information provided to voters who decided to approve the bond measure, the auditors' report found. College officials responded by saying that the spending was appropriate and necessary.
  • Le Moyne College on Wednesday announced a $50 million gift that will double the size of the Syracuse, N.Y. institution's endowment. The funds, which come from the estate of a couple that long supported Le Moyne and Jesuit education, will be used for computer science, information processing, physics and religious philosophy.
  • Grand Canyon Education Inc., the holding company for Grand Canyon University, which has expanded rapidly since being transformed from a nonprofit institution into a for-profit college, will begin operating as a publicly traded company on the Nasdaq stock market today, the Phoenix Business Journal reported. Grand Canyon had announced several months ago that it would make an initial public offering, and it did so Wednesday, selling 10.5 million shares at $12 a share, down from an anticipated $16 a share, the business journal reported. The IPO is the first by an American company in four months, and comes despite the shaky financial situation on Wall Street.
  • Tennessee State University has banned Juicy Campus, the popular and controversial gossip Web site, from its network, The Tennessean reported. Juicy is known for allowing students to trash fellow students, often related to sex and with names named (of the person mocked, not the person providing the gossip). Tennessee State said that the site wasn't consistent with the university's mission. While many colleges would likely feel the same way, Tennessee State is the first public institution to take the step of barring Juicy. Matt Ivester, founder of the site, said of the decision: "It's just shocking that the school administration will not allow it. It's censorship and insulting. They are basically saying they don't trust their students."
  • Queen's University, in Canada, is hiring students to serve as "facilitators" who will join conversations when they hear offensive words like "homo" and "retard" used in student conversation, and try to point out why people can be hurt by such terms, The Globe and Mail reported. Some students are criticizing the program as an invasion of privacy.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Athletic Oversight Found Lacking at Rutgers, College Blasted Over Use of Bond Funds, Gift Doubles Le Moyne Endowment, IPO for For-Profit College, Tenn. State Bans 'Juicy' Web Site, Conversation Monitors at a Canadian University

  • Slippery Slope
  • Posted by MartinT on November 20, 2008 at 10:05am EST
  • I am a huge fan of the First Amendment, however, in this case I agree with Tennessee State. I do not believe that freedom of speech allows for the freedom of ALL speech, especially when that freedom infringes on the rights and privacy of others. People often hear me say that we can not legislate morality, however, we should not have to condone immoral acts.

  • Speech and thought police
  • Posted by Virgil C on November 20, 2008 at 10:25am EST
  • All these speech articles are demonstrating a scary trend that is accelerating with regards to the thought police. The East German secret police, Hitler's Brown Shirts, and the Revolutionary Guard would be proud. There are offensive, bigotted morons in this world so deal with it. Who do "they" come after next. Be a grown up and not a porcelain doll.

  • Bravo Tenn
  • Posted by Marjorie on November 20, 2008 at 12:15pm EST
  • I am proud of Tenn for taking this step. Juicy is vicious and unfounded. Schools and workplaces block sites all the time. Why not do it to protect students. There is nothing to be gained from a student's name being slandered or outright lied about. If I posted Virgil is ia (insert sexually inappropriate term) because of (some action) with the entire football team and I saw it happen. That would be ok? I think not.

  • Checks on Freedom of Speech
  • Posted by Barrgain , Real World Practitioner on November 20, 2008 at 12:35pm EST
  • "Your freedom to swing your arm ends at my nose"

    So far freedom to talk in this society has had no such limit, but now it is being applied. Your freedom to wag your tongue now ends at my eardrum. If you want to speak your mind, go where no one can hear you. Otherwise, mind your speech, as someone will be offended, and the offendee has rights you do not have.

    I wonder if this new enlightenment could be applied in the family arena, using recording devices ... no one would be disrespected. And there could be a huge army of enforcers, on the public payroll, actually doing something, not just on welfare.

  • Virus
  • Posted by Marci on November 20, 2008 at 3:55pm EST
  • Hi read the article about Juicy Campus being banned from Tenn. State. I had never heard of the site, so I decided to visit and about 3 minutes later I had a virus that took 3.5 hours to get off my computer. DON'T visit the site if you don't want a virus!

  • Juicy
  • Posted by bill q on November 20, 2008 at 4:30pm EST
  • What IS all the fuss about? Last I heard, slander, and libel, ARE against the law in the US of A.

    And btw, what would those of you who oppose the university's decision do and say if YOUR privacy were invaded by some spiteful fellow student who smeared your name all over campus by telling untruths or stretching the truth about you on Juicy, a poster, the campus newspaper or other media? Sorry, but there is a definite lack of common decency when something like that happens.

  • Rutgers is just a microcosm of NJ as a whole
  • Posted by NJ Resident on November 20, 2008 at 7:25pm EST
  • Rutgers, New Jersey's state school, operates just like the state itself. Wasteful spending on things residents don't need and don't want while things that are needed and are wanted are cut, reduced or ignored completely.

    Especially in this economy, Rutgers and New Jersey need to tighten their belts and cut, not just trim, the fat. At RU professors have been let go, classes have been cut and everyone else has been forced to absorb budget cuts while their athletic department, especially the football team, has been allowed to spend and spend on whatever they want and actually had their budget increased (while everyone else was cut) with no accountability. Something is very wrong with this.

    Why can't RU compete with the other NJ state schools and save the state some much needed money (NJ's budget deficit will be three times what they originally thought) while still giving students the opportunity to compete?