Search News


Browse Archives

News

History Employment -- Public and Private

November 21, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Enrollment drives many hiring decisions -- so prospective faculty members tend to watch trends in their disciplines. If students flock to departments, jobs follow -- at least in theory. And that explains job openings in fields as diverse as nursing, forensics and Spanish -- deans and department chairs need teachers for all the sections.

But new data and analysis from the American Historical Association show the emergence of a sector-based gap in history positions. During the last decade, enrollment in history programs -- as measured by degrees awarded -- increased in public institutions at twice the rate as at private institutions. But while the addition of new full-time faculty slots at private institutions outpaced enrollment growth in the sector, the opposite was true for public institutions.

During the last decade, the number of history degrees awarded by public institutions was up by 28.4 percent, while the number of full-time faculty teaching history increased by 24.0 percent. At private institutions, the increase in degrees awarded was 14.4 percent while the number of full-time positions increased by 21.4 percent.

“The greater disparity between the growth in the number of history students and faculty members at public institutions (in contrast to the narrower gap between the respective increases at private institutions) may partially explain why faculty at state colleges and universities talk of increasingly burdensome class sizes and teaching loads,” Robert B. Townsend, assistant director for research and publications at the AHA, writes in his analysis of the data.

While undergraduate enrollments are expected to continue to increase, Townsend notes that the public-private gaps show that an increasing student population “can be something of a mixed blessing for the discipline.” He notes that “as faculty at the state schools know, institutions can respond to further enrollment increases by increasing class loads or adding to the number of part-time and adjunct faculty.”

Generally, the analysis found several healthy signs for the history discipline, with most data coming from the U.S. Department of Education and covering the 2005-6 academic year:

  • American colleges and universities conferred 33,153 new baccalaureate degrees in history -- a 5.6 percent increase from the year before. This total was the largest number of degrees ever conferred in the discipline, except for a few years at the peak of the baby boom.
  • While the increase took place in a year when the total number of all degrees conferred was up, history gained in market share because its percentage increase outpaced the total increase of 3.2 percent.
  • Despite the popularity of history and its role in liberal education programs, history degrees accounted for only 2.2 percent of all degrees conferred.
  • Degrees awarded also increased at the graduate level, with totals reaching 2,992 for master’s degrees (a 3.4 percent increase in a year) and 852 doctoral degrees (a 4.0 percent increase).
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on History Employment -- Public and Private

  • Legislatures and Boards
  • Posted by dundermifflin on November 21, 2008 at 11:35am EST
  • So here is the problem with having too many, mostly republican, non-academic business types involved; during tough times they are great at gutting spending to get to that "bottom line paradise" they all crave.

    However, when times are good they are opposed to moving nimbly and adeptly at helping these public institutions obtain the resources they need. They are not real good at mission!

    Ironically, this is not what they would advise or do in their own businesses which they always tout as being more "flexible and quicker to meet their customers needs than is government".

    Many of these folks see government as a competitor. Does anyone see the conflicts here? Not only do they get to keep their business profits directly, but they deny the publics the right to try to meet their mission to serve their "customers" knowing full well that taxes and tuition are the main tools that Publics have as a resource. Talk about the fox gaurding the henhouse, or is that the wolf gaurding it's own narrow self interest.