Search News


Browse Archives

News

Weathering the Storm

Exceptions to the Rule

November 25, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In sunny Orlando, Fla., where the temperature rarely dips below 32 degrees, residents seldom talk of a “freeze.” And even now, 12 months after the University of Central Florida placed a “freeze” on hiring, Terry Hickey remains reluctant to use the term.

“We’ve allowed people to apply for exceptions, so I tend to describe what we’ve done as a hiring ‘heavy frost’ rather than a ‘freeze,’” says Hickey, provost at Central Florida.

As budget cuts force more colleges across the country to curtail hiring, many are still finding ways to fill positions in crucial areas.

While definitions of “crucial” vary from college to college, most are trying valiantly -- or desperately -- to preserve basic teaching functions. Universities such as Cornell and Brown have managed to move forward with faculty searches while freezing staff hirings, but less wealthy institutions increasingly lack that luxury.

In the early weeks and months of Central Florida’s “frost,” Hickey approved a number of exceptions, allowing hires of academic advisers and faculty who would teach a significant number of core curriculum courses.

“Hiring a researcher in an area was a smaller priority,” he says. “We didn’t necessarily need that to survive.”

In recent months, Hickey says, fewer deans are even seeking exceptions at all. If state lawmakers cut higher education by another 6 percent or 7 percent this fiscal year, as Hickey suspects they will, Central Florida will have lost about $44.5 million, or 16 percent of its state budget, since July 1. Given these dire fiscal circumstances, Hickey has warned deans that moving ahead with hires may not be in their best interest.

“Given the cuts they’ve already had to make, they understand it’s a hell of a lot easier to take money out of a vacant position than it is to decide who you are going to send a pink slip,” Hickey says.

Williams Stresses Tenure Track Hires

The economic downturn is forcing a conversation about priorities on even some of the most well-heeled of college campuses, as evidenced by the recent deliberations of the Committee on Appointments and Promotions at Williams College. The six-person committee, which is made up of high-level administrators and some elected faculty, recently reviewed faculty searches that had been authorized last spring before the economy took a dive.

Bill Wagner, dean of faculty at Williams and a member of the committee, says the group outlined a series of criteria required for moving ahead with searches. A premium was placed on filling vacancies that, if unfilled, would prevent students from progressing through majors. Beyond that concern, the committee focused on meeting a few long-term hiring goals, rather than simply plugging a lot of holes with temporary solutions.

“It would make more sense to give preference, therefore, to those [tenure track] positions, as opposed to trying to replace tenure track positions with visiting positions in the short term,” Wagner says. “We think that’s a shortsighted policy.”

The committee ultimately approved six of 14 previously authorized searches for tenure track faculty, and approved about one-third of the more than 20 proposed visiting professorship searches.

Tough Choices in Washington

Given the bleak economic outlook for many colleges, it might make sense for deans to fight for every position they can get right now -- in the fear that things are only going to get worse. But Ana Mari Cauce, dean of the College of Arts & Sciences at the University of Washington, says it would be a strategic misstep to rush to fill every vacancy at this point. Faculty retirements may be slowing in the economic downturn, but as for the coming years, Cauce says she’s concerned about losing faculty in vital positions.

“When I say ‘yes’ to any of these hires, I’m making a very serious commitment of resources,” she says. “I can’t imagine playing the game where I say I’m going to go ahead and fill this position which would have been my 15th priority.”

Washington, which took a $10 million cut from its $402 million state budget earlier this year, is in the midst of a hiring freeze. At the same time, the university is about 1,100 students over its enrollment goal -- a fact Cauce attributes to students deciding to pursue double majors or additional courses rather than take their chances in the tightening job market.

“Here we are in a situation that is unusual in a market economy, where demand is up but we’re cutting back,” she says. “I think that’s the management conundrum that makes it so difficult.”

In short, deans at Washington are struggling with how to teach more students with less money. In that environment, Cauce says she’s stressed the need to maintain offerings of “gateway courses” that students need as prerequisites. To do that, the college may have to hire more contingent faculty in the short-term, she said. But tenure track faculty may see their job descriptions changing, too.

“If we have someone that has not been as productive in research recently, I am raising the question with chairs: Should that person have the same teaching load as someone who is more research productive?”

“It’s complex,” Cauce says, “and quite frankly I’m not making anybody real happy.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Exceptions to the Rule

  • Hiring freeze
  • Posted by Dane on November 25, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • Maybe the thing to do is close all business
    schools, move the funds that support them to
    the colleges of liberal arts. These were the
    people that trained the guys who got us in to
    this mess.

  • Posted by Perry on November 25, 2008 at 9:15am EST
  • An increase in workload for the same pay is essentially a cut in pay. These increases in the number of students enrolled without concurrent increase in faculty to teach them amount to larger class sizes and a decrease in the quality of education. One needn't reevaluate the teaching load of unproductive researchers to increase workload. It is already happening for all of us. When an article on this subject fails to notice, I find myself wondering about complicity and sleight of hand. A hiring freeze affects all of us currently teaching, not solely the job seekers, because we are the ones taking up the slack when depts are understaffed. Administrators count on us doing so because they know we care about students and are unwilling to see them harmed. It is the same bind that prevents successful union action. At least lets talk about this honestly.

  • Posted by Meredith on November 25, 2008 at 9:15am EST
  • I got out of an Ivy League university with student loans equal to the annual salary of my first job, and I was greatful to get through college with so little debt. Today, graduates get out with zero debt in their financial aid packages, thanks to the soaring endowments of recent years. I hope that well-endowed colleges such as Williams have the good judgment to maintain their excellent programs and faculty and, instead, ask their students, who will earn $50,000 or more when they graduate, to take on $10,000 of loans a year.

  • Posted by Katherine on November 25, 2008 at 10:30am EST
  • To Dane, yes, we professors in the business schools trained some of the people who got us into today's economic mess, but it is the business schools that bring in the money. We receive more support in the form of monetary and in-kind donations from our alumni and alumnae. Often the professorships present in some business schools have been funded by endowments established by the same alumni. Sometimes, we even get money from people who did not attend our business schools, but think we have top-notch programs. Oh, I nearly forgot that at the majority of colleges and universities the bsiness school consistently has the most majors. At least a tiny part of their tuition pays some of your salary. It also happens that accountants, whom everybody always blames when there is an economic catastrophe, give the most money of all. Before you take the money you pay the business professors, be sure you understand that much of the money you might see in the business school does not come from the state or the college or university and would disappear if the business school closed along with all of those students. All faculty at business schools work for the money we bring in. We attend countless receptions and events designed to promote our schools. How many students major in your subject; how many times have you been 'firmly asked' to attend a function for a possible contributor or contributors?

  • Hiring Freeze
  • Posted by Jim Morgan on November 25, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • Dane, it wasn't the business classes, but the ethics, philosophy, and history classes that led the business grads to make short-term, short-sighted, unethical decisions in their personal interest rather than their organizations. ;)

  • Not Quite, Mr. Morgan
  • Posted by Jarod HM on November 25, 2008 at 12:30pm EST
  • It was the lack of ethics, philosophy, and history classes that, in part, led to our current economic downturn.

    The problem that universities face is that there are no good solutions. Asking students to take out loans is difficult since I might turn students way who are afraid that can't afford to carry the debt or have tried and failed to obtain loans. Some parents and students are worried that some institutions are going to provide a significantly poorer quality of education are turning away from institutions that need to make large cuts. Now is time for everyone to evaluate the importance of programs (both academically and financially) and how to create efficiencies in departments and schools.

  • Revenue in Tough Economic Times
  • Posted by Wossamotta U. on November 25, 2008 at 3:45pm EST
  • I might suggest that selective colleges and universities consider expanding right now. For those who can afford it, college attendance should rise during tough economic times. If we continue striving to become more selective by maintaining our current enrollments (and succeeding only in maintaining the status quo of the rankings), then neither our campuses nor the economy will benefit.

  • Closing Down the Business School
  • Posted by Bob Jensen , Professor of Accounting Emeritus at Trinity University on November 25, 2008 at 5:20pm EST
  • For those of you wanting to cleanse your college of its School of Business, I think it would be a great idea to do so and then carefully track the impact on student recruitment and quality.

    The University of Denver once came close to this and the result almost ended the University. Then the new President of the University decided to make a very strong university and the entire university, including the liberal arts programs, commenced to prosper.

    Many liberal arts professors would like the universities to turn back to the purism of Oxford and Cambridge, but today even Oxford amd Cambridge thriving colleges of business that will continue to thive when your university tries to go it alone with liberal arts monopolies on campus.

  • Posted by Elrod Weinstein on November 25, 2008 at 6:45pm EST
  • The US is the only country in the world where professional sports are integrated into the university system. Cut out this cancer and the host will survive.

  • Let's deregulate liberal studies
  • Posted by Peter Daly on November 25, 2008 at 6:45pm EST
  • I am a graduate from a non USA university and a history and philospohy major. However I cannot see why US Universities hang on to the rather arcane idea of a 'liberal education'.

    It really only serves to lengthen the time it takes students to get a degree, put students into more debt and keep (mostly theoretically outdated) liberal professors in employment teaching obscure atomised aspects of 'the humanities'.

    It is a quaint nineteenth century hangover. Heavens, most of the epistemological silos supporting the idea have been swept away.

    Abolish compulsory general education, reduce the time it takes to get a degree, provide fast track options to students and this will solve a lot of higher education financial problems quickly.

    Then again, it would be interesting to see if all the 'liberals' who believe in access would accept these changes.

  • Freezing
  • Posted by Dane on November 25, 2008 at 7:40pm EST
  • Three comments: (1) At many collegs more students want to study business than other subjects because they want to get in on the
    'gravy train.' (2) Business schools probably bring in a lot of contributions because the business class makes a lot of money and don't know what to do with it. (3) The wealthy
    muck-a-mucks on Wall Street make no useful
    contribution to society and ought to be recognized for the parasites they are.

  • Cutting the Business School
  • Posted by not in cinci on November 26, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • Dane,
    By closing the business schools, which bring in more revenue to the institution than they costs to operate, you must also get rid of the faculty, staff, and administrators in other areas whose salaries are paid by these net additional revenues.
    If you wish to get rid of the business schools, you must also propose what other departments you wish to close.

  • Cleanse the Education System
  • Posted by Ardis VanMeerten on November 26, 2008 at 1:10pm EST
  • I do not see any deans or administrators offering to cut their jobs when there are going to be some great teachers laid off due to the fact that they do not have seniority. We need to cleanse the education system and get rid of useless teachers, programs and other positions pulling money out of the education system. As someone going into the education system, I see how some unions protect the weak when they need to be fired or retire to open up positions for us better teachers who are not burned out and actually still care about out students.

  • articles
  • Posted by Ryan on January 25, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • Will finanical aid have a trickle down effect these next couple of years? It seems that admissions will no longer be the front porch of the university. Instead schools throughout the country are going to have to decide whether to set admissions numbers or not. If they do set admissions, it will be easier to budget for the increase in financial aid dollars, but those that do not could face serious consequences. Does anyone else see this occuring?