Search News


Browse Archives

News

Left Out by the Bailout

November 26, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Every month, about 18,000 people reach an important milestone on the road to personal financial recovery. Having previously defaulted on their student loans -- because of lost jobs, chronically poor health or, yes, sometimes less sympathetic reasons -- they have gotten their acts together and consistently made on-time payments such that their loans are deemed ready for "rehabilitation." Once a new lender buys such a borrower's loan, his or her credit record is wiped clean, as if the default never happened.

Here's the rub: The country's current economic mess has obliterated the market in which banks or other investors buy existing student loans, and while the U.S. Education and Treasury Departments have taken several steps to buttress that market, what they've done so far has not included rehabilitated loans. And as of Friday, Suntrust -- the lone lender that has been buying up nearly rehabilitated loans from the guarantee agencies (and the government) that hold them -- will no longer do so, which would leave borrowers who qualify for rehabilitation starting in December without a means of getting back into good graces.

Guarantee agencies believe the Education Department may have the authority to declare rehabilitated loans to be "new" loans that would qualify them for repurchase under one of the government's new efforts to prop up or rescue student loan funds, and argue that even if department officials decide that's not the case, that Congress should tweak the law to cover rehab loans. Officials at the Education Department say that its rules declare otherwise, but that they are aware of the issue and seeking potential solutions.

In the meantime, though, thousands of borrowers are likely to be hurt, loan industry officials say.

"These are a bunch of individuals who appear to have been forgotten in the programs that have been announced so far," said Tim Fitzgibbons, vice president for debt management services at the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, which represents guarantee agencies and other lending organizations. "And that's a shame, because there's an opportunity to invest in individuals who have turned their lives around, and done exactly what we want them to."

Although consumer protection and student advocacy groups have some qualms about how the rehabilitation program is operated -- focusing on whether too many borrowers are funneled into the repayment option when they might have better alternatives -- they generally agree that these borrowers deserve help to overcome this hurdle.

"People who, for whatever reason, had trouble repaying their loans, went into default, and then met all the requirements for rehabilitation deserve to have their loans rehabilitated," said Lauren Asher, associate director of the Institute for College Access and Success, which advocates on behalf of students on loan issues. "This procedural obstacle, which has nothing to do with the behavior of the borrower and is dependent on a random event in external markets, needs to be removed."

A Second Chance

Student borrowers in a position to have their loans rehabilitated have generally fallen far -- and climbed a long way back, too. They are among the significant minority of borrowers of federal student loans who are declared to have defaulted on their loans, a status that typically comes after they've been delinquent on their loans for nine months, usually after other efforts to help them (and forestall default) have failed.

At that point, the guarantee agency to which the original lender has turned over the loan has often alerted collection agencies, and it is at this point that the prospect of seeking rehabilitation, or repaying on terms that are meant to be reasonable and affordable for the borrower, becomes available.

(While Deanne Loonin, a lawyer for the National Consumer Law Center, supports the idea that borrowers on track to rehabilitating their loans deserve to have their loans recognized so they can get out from under their defaulted status, she is nonetheless concerned that the ranks of such borrowers have been inflated because guarantee agencies too often present rehabilitation as troubled borrowers' only option. Based on her clients' experiences, Loonin says, borrowers who are in default are often not told that they can consolidate their loans into the federal government's direct loan program, which would allow them to repay their loans using the government's income-contingent repayment program.

"The guarantors think rehabilitation is better for consumers, and sometimes it is," says Loonin. "But sometimes it isn't, and the key thing is that it's the consumer who should be making that choice, but he or she needs to be given all the options." Loonin also says that guarantors do not always peg the repayment terms of such loans at the "reasonable and affordable" level that federal law requires.)

Defaulted borrowers who decide to try to repay their loans become eligible once again to receive federal financial aid once they have made six consecutive payments, under Education Department rules, and a borrower who makes 9 out of 10 on-time payments qualifies to have his or her loan -- once an investor buys it -- deemed "rehabilitated."

In normal times, guarantee agencies have sold bunches of such loans to banks or other investors that see them as a worthy asset, and "under normal market conditions, these loans were actively sought out," because the borrowers have shown their willingness and ability to overcome the odds and pay them off, says Fitzgibbons of the council of loan programs. (The Education Department, to which guarantee agencies turn over some of the defaulted loans that they have given up on collecting, uses much the same process to rehabilitate an additional number of federally guaranteed loans.)

But as the credit markets have seized up in recent months, making it much more difficult -- and in some cases impossible -- for lenders to find investors willing to buy many types of student loans, the federal government has taken a series of steps to make the loans more attractive to potential investors. To date, though, the various programs -- most of which were enabled through a new law called the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act -- have applied only to newly issued loans, and at this point, at least, the U.S. Education Department appears to be interpreting the law in a way that excludes rehab loans, says Brett E. Lief, NCHELP's president.

Lief's organization and guarantee agencies acknowledge that the federal efforts so far to buttress the student loan industry have focused, appropriately, on the biggest fish -- the millions of students who take out federal loans each year -- and that the tens of thousands of holders of rehabilitated loans may seem like a distant second priority.

But they are hoping that the government sees fit to take one of several possible steps -- declaring the loans eligible for the "lender of last resort" program, for instance -- that would make rehabilitated loans attractive enough to investors to allow them to be sold. If the department does not believe it has the authority to make rehabbed loans eligible for funds through student loan law on its own, Lief says, guarantors are hopeful that Congress will consider tweaking the law to make it so.

Education Department officials have taken the position that rehab loans cannot be declared to be "new" because they remain the same loans throughout the process. The department continues to discuss ideas with loan industry officials, including the prospect that a lender could purchase some of these loans and include them in "conduits" that would issue "asset-backed commercial paper" to attract money from private investors. This was one of the new ideas that the department unveiled earlier this month to buttress the federal student loan system.

With Suntrust's agreement to purchase rehab loans expiring Friday, and no solution in place, it seems unlikely that any remedy will be available in time to help borrowers who will be eligible to have their loans rehabbed next month.

"Without some action," says Fitzgibbon, "we'll be saying to borrowers, 'Sorry, we know you've worked hard to pay off your loans, but you have to stay in default because we can't find a buyer for your loans.' "

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Left Out by the Bailout

  • The truth about loan rehabilitation
  • Posted by Alan Collinge , Founder at Studentloanjustice.org on November 26, 2008 at 6:45am EST
  • resent strongly the tone of this article, and dispute the substance of the piece for the following reasons:

    1. This piece presupposes, and promotes with dogmatic simplicity the image of defaulted borrowers as deadbeats, irresponsible, almost criminal in their disregard for repaying their debts. This is not accurate.

    In fact, it is my direct experience that most defaulted borrowers faced significant and legitimate financial crises that led them to default on their loans. Some had severe medical issues, prolonged periods of un- or underemployment. Others never graduated, but were stuck with the loans nonetheless. Of the thousands of defaulted borrowers I have interacted with, the number who I believe never had any intentions of repaying their debt could be counted on one hand.

    Many were actually railroaded into default without their knowledge, and often despite their best efforts to maintain their loans in good stead.

    I know it is tempting to trivialize the plight of these borrowers. Indeed, one unfortunate aspect of human nature is the tendency to subtly mock or chide those in unenviable, exposed, and vulnerable situations.

    2. This piece also states that defaulted borrowers represent a relatively small percentage of the borrowing population. This is totally false.

    The Seattle Times reported recently that according to the Department of Education's own forecasts, between 19% and 31% of all student loans wind up in default. This is 1 in 4, if not 1 in 3. This is an astonishingly large percentage, unparalleled, by any other type of loan that I know of.

    Why so many defaults?

    This piece doesn't even mention that lenders like Sallie Mae can make far more money from defaulted loans, since they often have collusive relationships with the guarantors where after default, the lender's collection companies get to come after the borrower for a "second bite of the apple".

    In fact, Sallie Mae and other lenders have been caught on numerous occasions for defaulting loans without even attempting to contact the borrowers...in other words...without even trying to collect on the loan! What kind of fatally flawed loan would so pervert the motives of the lenders to cause this outcome to happen?

    3. This piece also seems to paint an image of a "Rocky" like transformational process where the "bad" borrower overcomes the odds, and with hard work, the moral support and encouragement of the guarantor, and a positive attitude, rehabilitates his/her loans and turns over a new leaf.

    This is highly offensive to borrowers who for years have been attempting to deal with their defaulted loans and the predatory infrastructure that comes with them.

    Some straight talk:

    Defaulted loans are a huge money maker for everyone involved, except the borrower. The guarantors derive a huge amount of their income from the business of collecting on defaulted loans, and they know it. In fact, guarantors, would barely exist were it not for the obscene amounts of unearned revenue money- over and above the original debt, that they extract from the hide of the defaulted borrower.

    Even the Federal Government forecasts that they will retrieve every dollar of principle, plus almost 20% in interest and fees from defaulted loans.

    Rehabilitation forces the borrower, who was facing significant financial challenges in the first place, to come hat in hand to the guarantor and make ontime payments for a year...all this for the privilege of signing a new, larger loan document, thus legitimizing the increase in the debt, and allowing the guarantor to cash it out.

    The guarantors, are not on the borrowers side. The guarantors are largely predatory middlemen whose only goal is to extract as much unearned wealth from the borrowers as possible, under the full threat and weight of the power of the federal government. Just look at their executive salaries from year to year. Read their ridiculously ambiguous mission statements.

    The folks at NCHELP, and their lobbying machine are on the side of the defaulted borrower about as much as a monkey is on a man's back. Just look at how they systematically, and successfully lobbied Congress- over the course of years- to remove nearly every standard consumer protection from student loans, and to give them collection powers that are without peer or precedent in the history of lending in the United States.

    What other type of loan is largely exempted from standard bankruptcy protections? None.

    What other type of loan has no statute of limitations? None.

    For what other type of loan can a borrower's wage, income tax return, Social Security and Disability checks be attached...all without a court order? None.

    Only student loans...And we have the friendly, concerned good people at Sallie Mae, USA Funds, The CBA, NCHELP, and the rest of the predatory student loan mafia to thank. You guys really broke the mold when it came to lobbying Congress at the expense of citizens, and for personal enrichment.

    Those of us who have seen our loans, triple, quadruple, or even far more, without negotiation power, and who are now relegated to lives off the grid, in fear of our government, resentful of our college educations that we cannot now use as we enter our forties, fifties, and beyond are really glad you guys were there to help us, there to make sure that we either paid you the astonishingly inflated amounts, or be trapped in a netherworld for years, just out of reach of even the most modest of American Dreams.

    We're also thankful that you all will be receiving bailouts from the federal government so that you can continue your most useful and helpful work on the next generation of students.

  • Shame on this country
  • Posted by kgotthardt on November 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • "Defaulted borrowers who decide to try to repay their loans become eligible once again to receive federal financial aid once they have made six consecutive payments"

    So ED encourages these same students to borrow more than they obviously can pay instead of finding alternative funding to prevent borrowers from living under the burden of debt their entire lives.

    Once students are in this system, they literally can never get out considering the high cost of college, related expenses, interest and fees.

    And now the government wants to bail out the lenders without aiding students who have legitimate problems? What a sham and a shame.

  • I got dem Bailout Blues again....
  • Posted by feudi pandola on November 26, 2008 at 9:15am EST
  • You can always count on Alan Collinge and KGotthardt to cut to the skinny! I agree with most of what Alan wrote, although I'm not sure where he gets those default rates of 19% to 31%. First question I'd have is why is that range so broad? One would think we'd have harder data than that on such an elemental piece of the risk equation for student loans. I do know, from family members experience, that defaulted loans are very lucrative for certain lenders whose initials begin with S and M.

    One thing in this whole credit bust that I've never understood...where the hell did all the cash go? From credit cards, to mortgages, to students loans, to listen to the talking heads, you'd think that NOBODY is paying their bills. That is certainly not been my experience or that of nearly everyone I know. So the question is: Why aren't the banks doing their job? The business of any bank is to earn profits through lending. No loans, no profits.

    If the charlatans who ran us into this ditch won't do their jobs, let's get rid of the whole damn bunch of them and start over.

    What, exactly, do we have to lose?

  • Sharks in the water
  • Posted by George DeSkeptic on November 26, 2008 at 9:20am EST
  • Once the student loan debt is consolidatied, it is in a different legal category for collection. These sharks (one collection company actually has a shark tank in the office) have few restrictions on collection, interest rates and tactics, which are subhuman at best. Garnishing disability without as much as a court order? God have mercy.

    I ran the numbers on this, you can too. If a 24 year old enters college and takes the student loans to the max (which schools and lenders push), that graduate, after making their loan payment would be better off skipping college and working at a burger joint. The loan payments are horrendous and are a promise against have a decent car or owning a home. Then the next trick is loan consolidation where collectors are allowed to capriously assign fees, penalties, and interest at rates that are ever increasing and approaching the defaulted credit card rate of 30%.

    What ever happended to love one another? I close with this: in some countries, education is free.

    "Nothing is officially confirmed until officially denied." Julian Snyder

  • The Big Picture
  • Posted by Deanne Loonin , Director at NCLC's Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project on November 26, 2008 at 9:20am EST
  • As noted in the article, we support the current efforts to help find buyers for rehabilitated loans. We also view this as an opportunity to reexamine how well the rehab. program works for borrowers. Even before the credit crunch, borrowers that finished making their rehab. payments have often been left in the cold at the end of process b/c no buyer could be found. Why should resale be a condition of a successful rehabilitation?

    Among other problems, the GAs administer the program with the private buyer in mind. Our clients are repeatedly told that they must make certain minimum payments during rehab. (always higher than they can afford) b/c this is the only way the loan can be sold at the end of the period. But the law says only that borrowers must make payments that are reasonable and affordable for them (not reasonable and affordable for the GA or prospective buyers etc..) AND that the GA cannot set a minimum payment level. This program as administered simply doesn't work for most lower income borrowers. And unfortunately, as noted in the article, borrowers are rarely told about other options, including consolidation with DL. This is even though consolidation allows them to get out of default faster, has a set ICR (and soon to be IBR) formula to determine reasonable and affordable payments, and has no resale requirement.

    A few suggestions to fix these problems:
    1. Tie the reasonable and affordable rehab. standard to the IBR formula.
    2. Eliminate the resale requirement. Alternatively, require GAs that can't hold a rehabiliated loan or sell it to assign the loan to DOE instead. (somewhat similar to the lender of last resort concept).
    3. Require lenders to offer IBR (once it's available) to all borrowers in late state delinquency to help prevent borrowers from getting into default in the first place.

  • Posted by Kathryn on November 26, 2008 at 9:35am EST
  • I am a student loan borrower who took out loans totalling $42,000 and then became disabled for seven year. Thanks to that period of time, my loans have ballooned to nearly $100,000 and I am facing default after using up nearly every forbearance available.

    Every other creditor made deals with me to cut interest rates, cut fees, cut excessive ballooning, but those options are not available to me as a student loan borrower.

    It's nice that they would offer me a chance to 'rehab' the loans, but I will never make enough money in my lifetime to pay it off anyway. I only got a BA for my $100,000, not a professional-level degree.

  • Default rates
  • Posted by Alan , Founder on November 26, 2008 at 10:35am EST
  • That default range came from a study (2003 IG study, I believe) and was reported by Nick Perry of the Seattle Times a few months ago. NCES also fairly recently did a 10 year longitudinal study that found a 20% default rate for borrowers who left school (in 1992) with more than $15k in loans. The default rate for African Americans was 40% in this study.

    Also, recent data released by the Department of Education showed a 9.6% default rate after only 5 years for ALL graduates leaving school in 2002 (if memory serves).

    One can only guess what defaults will do in the coming months, but a glance at Sallie Mae's stock chart in the tail of the Dot Com recession showed that Sallie Mae didn't mind the recession at all. In fact, their stock price accelerated during this time period, and Albert Lord commented to shareholders in the 2003 annual report that their record earnings that year were attributable to collections on defuaulted loans (in addition to loan originations).

    So the record is quite clear and compelling on this issue. Sallie Mae executives never respond directly to honestly debate this argument, but instead brush it aside with grandiose, meaningless statements. (Usually personal attacks, these days). They even declined to sit down with Leslie Stahl of CBS News on this issue a few years ago.

  • Double and Triple Principal
  • Posted by iizevbizua on November 26, 2008 at 10:45am EST
  • Extremely Sad.. Government and Education Department that failed her citizens because of the un-regulated predatory Student Loan institution as in Sallie Mae.

    We all need help. The defualters, those that see their principal double or triple, the late or the forebearance entities, we all need a bailout.Many defaulters are in pipe line on their way to materialize.

    Negiotiation should be made available to everyone. Limit must be set on interest rates. The refinance issue must be addressed. The bankcruptcy laws must be revisited. Repayments should not amount to twice or triple of the prinpal borrowed.

    Wake up America. We are jeopardizing our educational system by depriving our bests or finests to function efficiently without duelling on how to repay these unscapoulous institutions.

    Developing countries provide more encouragement to their brilliant students without weighing them down with high intrest loan payments.

    The consequence of student loans institutions will continue hampered and degenigrate our educational systems as a result of overwhelmed debts collectors.

    Words for the wise, Imagine everyone with poor credit rating? There goes the capitalist society.

    Thanks

  • Posted by Jean SmilingCoyote on November 26, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • Much of this wouldn't be necessary if this country made a commitment to full employment of college graduates as such before we had to start paying back our loans, if any. The pols talk a lot about the need and worth of higher education, but don't back it up with commitment to its employment. It's easy for neo-Social Darwinists to allege an unemployed/underemployed college grad is superfluous or has a useless major, but you don't have to be a grad to learn that Social Darwinism was discredited years ago, and that employers aren't qualified to supplant Nature in making decisions about a person's fitness for survival.

  • dogmatic simplicity
  • Posted by miller mcpherson on November 26, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • Well, I've been waiting for someone else to say it, but nobody is stepping in. Did I read the same article as the person making the first comment?

  • Bailout
  • Posted by 4students on November 26, 2008 at 11:25am EST
  • Unfortuantely, ploiticians were too myopopic when they went throught the bailout process. They failed to fully consider auto and student loans as contributors to the credit crunch. Students should look at www.buzzfund.com for an alternative to student loans. Online scholarships!

  • More bad news
  • Posted by Josephus on November 26, 2008 at 11:30am EST
  • I wonder how bad things need to get in the realm of student debt peonage before a change is made. Student loan debt is the only kind of debt that adheres to a 16th century regime wherein bankruptcy is unavailable. Utterly preposterous, incredibly destructive, totally absurd, and quite damaging to the United States' national interest.

  • Censorship
  • Posted by Sam on November 26, 2008 at 1:10pm EST
  • Bravo Alan! Your comments really put the issue into perspective. Like the bailouts on Wall St. the student loan crisis is at first glance difficult to understand to the uninitiated.

    Unfortunately, there is a lot of misinformation and static that prevents an honest look at this issue. For example, when I Google "student loan default" I find only links to government agencies and guarantors. Censorship?

    Yes. If the government controls your perception of reality by blotting out the opposition and forcing you to see only what they want.

    Remember, that like the auto industry and credit card companies student loans are big business. They make a lot of money for investors, business owners and employ a lot of people to make this happen. This is why the government is on their side and not on yours - money & jobs. (oh, yeah, don't forget those massive campaign contributions.)

    Typically, dictators like Hitler or Stalin made it a priority to silence their opposition first. This was typically done at gun point and was aimed at the intellectuals and educational institutions. Next, the government forms the citizenry into what they need to become to promote the interests of the rich & powerful.

    Naturally, we see this also in America. These are the same people that gain from the misery of those who default and then spend the rest of their lives repaying 2 or 3 times what they originally borrowed. All the while, borrowers are living in the basement of our society.

    Greed and poor engineering has torpedoed the auto industry. Student loans are another example of poor engineering but propelled by greed and backed by the government, Sallie Mae, guarantors and collection agencies are free to rape and pillage the most vulnerable in our society. Like slavery and share cropping, student loans are the next generation of exploitation. Way to go America - your the best! Now just keep paying!

  • No more excuses, please!
  • Posted by Ed on November 26, 2008 at 1:30pm EST
  • In a recent article published in the Wall Street Journal, 2007 statistics show only 5% of students defaulting within two years after they leave school and begin repaying their loans. Experts think that rate could begin rising as the effects of the credit crunch and slowing economy take hold.

    The WSJ continues: "That's a far cry from the late 1980s, when student-loan default rates skyrocketed to as high as 30%. That prompted state and federal governments to pass legislation allowing them to seize income-tax refunds, withhold professional licenses and enlist collection agencies to gather payments. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Education withheld eligibility from federal financial-aid programs from institutions that didn't keep their default rates low."

    Most of those commenting blame the banks, but this problem is also propagated by the borrowers. Sort of like the sub-prime mess -- banks were giving away money to those who were not qualified, yet the borrower signed the loan agreement. "Hey, I'm working two jobs at minimum wage, the bank says I can buy a $350,000 home with no money down. Why not, the bank knows my finances better than I do."

    Get serious.

    If you're either un- or underemployment there are repayment, deferment, and forbearance options available for federal loans. However, there are limits, eventually you have to pay them back.

    School administrators, lenders, the federal government and borrowers -- they all share the blame in this mess. Schools keep increasing tuition, the Federal Loan program sets rates and loan maximums. And the borrower, majoring in philosophy at a private school paying $40,000 a year in tuition, borrowing the annual maximum actually believe they'll make enough money when they graduate to pay them off. It's the typical "buy now, pay later" mentality. Schools do not care how much you borrow, because if you cannot afford to pay, someone else on the wait list will. As long as they keep their default rate under 10% they're FFELP eligible. Over 10%? They're still eligible under the Federal Direct Loan Program.

    Lenders become more of the problem in the private loan market because of the astronomical rates they charge. Some states have caps, but most lenders circumvent those caps by originating the loans from a state that does not impose rate caps -- like South Dakota.

    If a borrower was permitted to discharge a federal student loan through bankruptcy, who ends up paying? Not the lender, they were already paid by the guarantor when the loan when into default. The guarantor was paid by the federal government. Who gave the money to the federal government? The TAXPAYER.

    As far as un- or underemployment, I found myself in that situation last year. The first thing I did was contact my lender and discuss my situation. I received an forbearance for unemployment. My forbearance expires in January, I have been fortunate to find new employment and will continue to repay my loans. I made the debt, blamed no one, and I intend to pay it back.

  • Equal treatment please
  • Posted by George W on November 26, 2008 at 2:20pm EST
  • The solution is obvious: Return the standard consumer protections, such as bankruptcy to student loans. This right should have never been taken away, and should be restored at the first possible opportunity for both private and federal loans. This is common sense. Student loan borrrowers should not be singled out exclusively and denied this basic right. We are grown-ups, not children, and deserve the same rights as borrowers for EVERY other type of loan, not to mention the banks who make these loans.
    Why are all the "Advocates" so silent on this issue? What is the game here? "

  • loan rehab
  • Posted by Dan Lozer , Pastor on November 26, 2008 at 3:40pm EST
  • I was offered loan rehab and turned it down. My "rehabilitation" was in the hands of the very people who were breaking the law (civil and criminal) in trying to collect in other ways. Ultimately, DOE recalled the loan and we have both lived hassle-free since.

  • Student loan Default rate methodology
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on November 26, 2008 at 4:20pm EST
  • Alan's figures come from IHE, last year.

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/12/04/qt

    "As if on cue, the U.S. Education Department on Friday released data that suggest how much higher student loan default rates would be if they were reported over a longer time frame, as legislation pending in the House of Representatives would require. The data released by the department show that the average cohort default rate — the rate at which a group of borrowers default on their loans by a certain point after the loans enter repayment — climbs by at least a percentage point a year for every year that is added to the term. And the statistics also show great variation by sector in the rates of default. Five years after a cohort of borrowers entered repayment in 2002, the average “cumulative lifetime default rate” for the group of borrowers was 10.6 percent. But the rate was 6.4 percent for borrowers from four-year private colleges, 7.9 percent for borrowers from four-year public colleges, 19.3 percent for students from two-year public colleges, and 22.9 percent for borrowers from for-profit colleges, according to the department. "

  • Turn My Life Around?
  • Posted by JasonPaskoiwtz , New jersey State Lead at studentloanjustice.org on November 27, 2008 at 5:45am EST
  • "Turn [my] life around?!" Mr. Fitzgibbons, I am not a drug addict with a felony prison record. My life doesn't need "turning around."

    A quarter-century ago, I borrowed less than $20k to attend college and a few semesters of graduate school. In the early 90's, I had a series of medical and professional setbacks which led my student loans to default. The latest beggar/bounty hunter collection agency to try to collect from me, the one with the actual sharks in its lobby, alleges my debt is now about $54k, including $25k in accumulated interest and $10k in "fees and costs."

    I lead a productive, everyday middle class life with a family, friends, and a career. I don't need to "turn around" my life. As my colleague Alan Collinge stated so eloquently, the student debt mafia has perpetuated the myth that anyone who owes a delinquent or defaulted student loan is a lazy, scheming screwup who sets out from the very beginning to not pay back their loans.

    I am hopeful for the future. If there's anything American's abhor, it's a bully -- and the student debt industry is one of the biggest and meanest around. I am confident the pendulum will swing back to sanity and that normal consumer protections will be restored to student loans.

  • Miller and Ed
  • Posted by cts on November 28, 2008 at 3:45pm EST
  • I'm with Miller Mc: I don't see that the article is anything but sympathetic to the situation of student borrowers.

    And Ed ("the borrower, majoring in philosophy at a private school paying $40,000 a year in tuition, borrowing the annual maximum actually believe they’ll make enough money when they graduate to pay them off") could we just get off the liberally educated people cannot find work nonsense? Philosophy, in particular, teaches highly valued and transferable skills.

  • Student Loans
  • Posted by T L Kimball on November 28, 2008 at 3:45pm EST
  • What about the bogus student loan collections? When is this going to be addressed? I had a student loan of less than $3,000 back in 1989, paid it off completely in 1990, received a document of indemnification of said loan because the amount of the loan on the original promissory note was altered w/o my initials yet my wages are being garnished for that same loan. The amount? A cool $18,000. I requested a hearing, said request was totally ignored until after I filed a 3rd complaint with the FTC. Then a hearing was held without my knowledge. I was advised after the fact by some idiot employee of FSA that I'd lost the hearing. My only recourse is to find an attorney who will file suit for me in Federal Court. The entire student loan industry is as corrupt and the U.S. government.

  • “Left Out by the Bailout”
  • Posted by Judy on November 28, 2008 at 3:45pm EST
  • I am not a "deadbeat"; I am a professional social worker with a master's degree. I work for the government (for extremely low pay)with children with disabilities. I have a student loan that I will never be able to pay back. Why? Because I moved back home to care for my dying mother, left a social work position with a "for profit" agency where I could afford my student loan payments to a area where I couldn't find any professional social work positions. Just so my mother wouldn't have to die in a nursing home or alone AND I will never regret that. At this point in our political climate, I consider myself fortunate to have a job, any job for that matter in this era of greed and capitalism; an era that values money and profits over people.

  • Posted by Insane on November 30, 2008 at 8:20pm EST
  • How much would it cost for the US government to pay off every single student loan currently held by its citizens?

    I bet its far less than the Wall Street bailout.

    Imagine the capital that would be funneled into the system if people like Judy (above) had extra cash available to buy a home, buy a car, etc.

    Heck, how about paying off half? A quarter? Forgiving all loans over 20 years old?

  • IT'S NOW CHEAPER TO REMAIN UNEDUCATED?
  • Posted by ELLENOR-WHITTY-in-HoustoinTX on December 2, 2008 at 5:30am EST
  • This just sucks! Only the rich can afford higher education these days. Those that go into debt for college do not win a better life after all, no matter what they have told us. Life in America.... ain't it grand??

  • Only the rich?
  • Posted by David Sweary on December 2, 2008 at 1:55pm EST
  • Ellenor (and others) - "Only the rich can afford higher education these days"?

    You are kidding, right?

    If anything, the multitude of grants and ever-growing financial aid is making higher ed MORE affordable. Many states across the country are now offering tuition wavers and other aid, to the point where college is free for their residents.

    It seems to many of us that this country is heading towards becoming a free higher-ed society. But even then, the cries for more aid (johnny needs a nicer car) will just keep coming.

  • Just a complete rip off
  • Posted by Aressa Jones , No End in Sight on December 18, 2008 at 8:30pm EST
  • My sister and I both went into default not because we were losers or not willing to pay but because things happened in our lives that caused our finances to be much less than they had been in the past. I tried the rehabilitation program. The amount they wanted was way more than I could afford so I got a second job just to pay what they wanted. THey pruposely skipped one of my last two payments then sent me a notice that I had to start the plan all over again. There was no way I could spend another 9 months working 70 hours a week to complete the plan again. I sent several complaints to the Department of Education and the people with the sharks (such a fitting animal for them)and as I reward they started garnishing my paycheck and told me not to contact them any more. My sister has been garnished for more than 7 years and has paid out over $17,000 on an original amount of $9,000 loan so we called to ask for a pay off amount and they told her she still owes $13,000. So basically there is no way she will ever finish paying off this loan. My original balance was $21,000 and it has ballooned to $43,000 in fees and interest. There is no help for us and in the midst of all these bailouts we are still overlooked. We were not ignoring our debt but are treated just as badly as people who do.