Search News


Browse Archives

News

Racial Gaps in Faculty Job Satisfaction

December 5, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Surveys by COACHE -- the acronym for the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education -- have played a key role in recent years in drawing attention to the frustrations and hopes of young faculty members. The studies have been influential in campus discussions about the need for more clarity about tenure expectations or the importance of family-friendly policies.

While the studies have in some cases had data for minority and white junior professors, they have not featured breakdowns among racial and ethnic groups. A new analysis -- released Thursday -- features breakdowns by ethnic and racial groups, with some notable findings. Generally, white and Latino faculty members had similar levels of job satisfaction.

But among the 8,500 pre-tenure faculty members interviewed at 96 four-year colleges and universities -- public and private, liberal arts oriented colleges and research universities -- there were gaps among other groups.

Compared to white faculty members, African American, Asian and Native American faculty were less satisfied on a series of questions on climate, culture and collegiality at their institutions. Of the 10 climate measures in the survey, Asians were less satisfied on 6; Native Americans on 5; and African Americans on 4, all by statistically significant margins. These gaps may be particularly important to colleges seeking to diversify their faculties, as a key theme of COACHE reports has been the idea that today's younger generation of professors -- far more than previous generations -- will judge colleges as employers on issues of campus culture and supportive employment policies, not just on prestige or compensation.

At the same time, the new data show that the issues are not identical for all minority groups and that colleges that "lump everyone together" may not be reaching the topics crucial to different populations, said Kiernan Mathews, director of COACHE. "Culture, climate and collegiality remain the key -- and a persistent problem -- not just for minority groups, but for women, too," Matthews said. "And the experiences of individuals in different groups are in fact different."

For black faculty members, for example, job satisfaction levels with regard to work-life balance were similar to those for white faculty members. But they reported lower levels of satisfaction on interactions with tenured and pre-tenure colleagues, with sense of "fit" at their institutions, and with their sense of fair treatment in their departments. African American faculty members are also less likely than their white counterparts to believe that tenure decisions are made primarily on job performance. Cathy Trower, research director of COACHE, said in a statement that these gaps suggest that " African American faculty may be experiencing some lingering aspects of racism -- real or perceived -- as evidenced by their concern with fair treatment and lower satisfaction with the amount of interaction and collaboration with others."

Asian faculty members indicated a different set of issues. Compared to their white counterparts, Asian faculty reported greater clarity about tenure expectations and higher levels of satisfaction on many questions about job satisfaction. But when it comes to questions related to teaching, they were less happy on most questions.

While the number of Native American faculty members in the survey was low, as in the professoriate generally, they were less satisfied than white professors almost across the board. Trower said that these data show a need for sustained attention since "mixing lack of clarity about the tenure process and criteria with dissatisfaction with workplace culture and climate is not a recipe for success.”

Matthews said that based on these results, future research will focus more on the reasons for differing job satisfaction levels by different groups, but that individual campuses may want to consider these findings right now as they consider their own policies and cultures.

Here are some of the key results, in which those surveyed answered on a 5-point scale, with 5 representing either the greatest level of agreement or clarity or satisfaction.

On tenure, professors are more clear on process than standards, women experience less clarity than men on a variety of tenure measures, and minority group responses vary. Men are more confident than women that they know whether or not they will win tenure.

Tenure Standards

  All Men Women White American Indian Asian Black Latino
Clarify of process 3.71 3.75 3.67 3.71 3.42 3.76 3.64 3.69
Clarity of criteria 3.61 3.63 3.59 3.61 3.32 3.64 3.59 3.58
Clarity of standards 3.26 3.29 3.23 3.24 3.08 3.41 3.29 3.33
Clarity on whether or not I will achieve tenure 3.65 3.74 3.54 3.65 3.45 3.68 3.58 3.66
Agreement that tenure decisions are made primarily on performance and not other factors 3.59 3.67 3.50 3.62 3.33 3.68 3.23 3.47

In a series of questions about the nature of their work, faculty members generally said that they were more satisfied with teaching than research, and women were less satisfied than men with how they spend their time and with work hours.

Satisfaction With Nature of Academic Work

  All Men Women White American Indian Asian Black Latino
Satisfaction with way time is spent 3.75 3.83 3.66 3.74 3.71 3.82 3.79 3.77
Satisfaction with work hours 3.38 3.54 3.20 3.34 3.50 3.56 3.59 3.45
Satisfaction with teaching (composite) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.02 3.94 3.87 4.06 4.01
Satisfaction with research (composite) 3.42 3.53 3.28 3.43 3.21 3.46 3.31 3.34

On work-life balance, as in previous surveys, the striking gaps are between men and women, with men generally more satisfied than women with various measures. While gender gaps remain, professors are generally more satisfied by the efforts of their colleagues on these issues than those of their institutions.

Work-Life Balance Policies

  Men Women
Institution does what it can to make having children
and the tenure track compatible
3.03 2.81
Institution does what it can to make raising children
and the tenure track compatible
2.91 2.57
Departmental colleagues do what they can to make
having children and the tenure track compatible
3.56 3.44
Departmental colleagues do what they can to make
raising children and the tenure track compatible
3.54 3.37
Colleagues are respectful of my efforts to balance
work and home responsibilities
3.96 3.64

On broad questions related to culture and collegiality, in many categories male and white professors are more satisfied than others are.

Culture and Collegiality

  All Men Women White American Indian Asian Black Latino
Fairness with which supervisor evaluates work 4.02 4.06 3.97 4.04 3.94 3.92 3.96 4.05
Interest tenured faculty take in your professional development 3.53 3.56 3.50 3.54 3.14 3.56 3.45 3.49
Opportunities to collaborate with tenured faculty 3.35 3.45 3.22 3.36 2.85 3.38 3.17 3.30
How well you fit in the department 3.81 3.84 3.76 3.84 3.47 3.73 3.55 3.83
Feeling that department treats pre-tenure faculty fairly compared to one another 3.79 3.90 3.66 3.81 3.33 3.83 3.60 3.75

The above results translate indirectly into broad satisfaction figures from varying groups. Generally, across racial and gender groups, departments are viewed more favorably than are institutions.

Global Satisfaction

  All Men Women White American Indian Asian Black Latino
Satisfaction with department as a place to work 3.89 3.92 3.84 3.91 3.69 3.85 3.76 3.89
Satisfaction with institution as a place to work 3.67 3.68 3.65 3.67 3.47 3.65 3.70 3.69
Agreement that "if I could do it all over, I would work at this institution" 4.06 4.07 4.05 4.10 3.97 3.87 3.98 4.05
Rating of institution as a place for pre-tenure professors to work 3.77 3.81 3.72 3.78 3.45 3.78 3.73 3.74
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Racial Gaps in Faculty Job Satisfaction

  • Statistically Significant is not Enough
  • Posted by Laura on December 5, 2008 at 8:45am EST
  • Although the article states that some of the reported differences are statistically significant, we need to consider whether their magnitude is practically significant.

    Should we alter institutional policies for differences of 3.61 vs. 3.59 on a 5-point scale, even if they're "statistically" significant?

  • Statistically Significant not all this Article Says
  • Posted by Statistically Significant on December 5, 2008 at 12:05pm EST
  • The key findings higlighted by the article focus on the relatively more substantial differences. For example, the "satisfaction with researc" scale generated a mean of 3.43 among White and 3.21 among Asian faculty. That is a .22 difference, and the gap between men and women with regard to clarity about their tenure prospects is .20.

  • Posted by Alice on December 6, 2008 at 12:05pm EST
  • This study deals with perceptions, not realities. It should be no surprise that African American faculty members perceive racism, since every study shows that African Americans continue to perceive racism in many spheres. I found myself thinking about our last dept. meeting. I sat next to two of my African American colleagues. When she sat down, I asked one what she thought about a recent event and she gave me a terse answer then turned to the African American faculty member on her right and never spoke to me again for the rest of the meeting. When minority faculty choose to be less collegial, are their colleagues to blame? When they find themselves feeling isolated in the department, with fewer opportunities to collaborate and an uncertainty about how they are being evaluated for tenure, isn't that a direct outcome of such choices? Our dept. is struggling to increase its representation of African American students. If African American students will not attend campuses where they are too small a minority, despite other advantages, how will any campus be able to provide a welcome environment? How will African American students be successful in a country where they are 12% of the population if they cannot develop a comfort level among those who are not African American, despite outreach? I'm sure there are many things I am not understanding, but the reality is that such understanding shouldn't be a prerequisite for collegiality, since I will never know what it is like to be male either yet I must get along with male colleagues. I am tired of bending over backwards to be welcoming and friendly and inclusive only to be snubbed because I am not myself African American.

  • Alice
  • Posted by DFS on December 6, 2008 at 2:20pm EST
  • Remember the words of Dr. King, instead of what other people do or say.

    Whenever someone flocks toward another of the same "stripe" to avoid you, you must realize that they are the racists, and not you.

    Be vigilant, and actually call them on it. It may be painful in the short run, but if you keep your professionalism, their behavior will be revealed as the disguised and condoned racism it actually is.

    No one shoud have to put up with that.

  • Racisim
  • Posted by Gordon , Assistant Professor on December 6, 2008 at 4:50pm EST
  • I spent time at a university in a state associated with slavery/racism. The faculty, however, had been recruited from individuals from around the nation. Except for one or two overtly racist i.e., old school conservative, members of the faculty, I found the collegiality exceptionally warm and rewarding. Upon moving to a college in New York State that thinks of itself as liberal and progressive, I have found the faculty, if not racist, then chillingly paternalistic. I have been here for eighteen years and have acquired relationships that are at best fragile. I suspect that the matter is cultural in that the faculty members who were recruited at the Southern university, were extremely interested and respectful of southern and black culture whereas in the North, I found a greater skepticism toward both. I would admit, in addition, to having greater skepticism toward mainstream western culture than my white colleagues and this appears to create a strain in every aspect of our interaction. For blacks who have jettisoned connections with traditional black culture, their relationship with the white faculty appears extremely warm. Ironically, this appears to be true of blacks who are outlandishly critical of western values as well. I suspect that they are embraced for their radical and outlandish behavior. Still, I do not believe that the human beings working in academia are significantly different from other individuals in that a considerable proportion of human decision making is based on both the similarities and perceived social skills of the person being evaluated. How many middle aged white men, for instance, feel similar to and socially connected with young black men? This is the problem in its crudest form. Still, it ought not to be repeatedly dismissed and overlooked.

  • Posted by Thesis on February 4, 2009 at 11:06am EST
  • I agree that some things probably could be done differently and to greater effect

  • Racism
  • Posted by Essay Help on February 12, 2009 at 8:35am EST
  • How will African American students be successful in a country where they are 12% of the population if they cannot develop a comfort level among those who are not African American, despite outreach?

  • Racism or simply discomfort
  • Posted by Quentin Wright , Instructor at Mountain View College on November 21, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • I hope one day we can finally get to the more intricate details of Black and White relations. I am an African American faculty member at a CC and I honestly get along well with my white colleagues. We work on committees, eat lunch and teach classes together. However, I must admit that there are times when I feel uncomfortable when I am the only minority among a significant amount of white colleagues. This puzzled me for quite a while since I know they are not racist and neither am I for that matter. Then I started to realize that my discomfort was only in more private situations that were disconnected from the college. This discomfort was not because I did not trust my colleagues or that we held different perspectives--quite the contrary. It was because when our discussions turned to subjects other than academia, I felt that my world was significantly different than theirs. We did not watch the same television shows, attend the same movies and/or social events, spend our time in the same parts of town or even have the same experiences at our churches. There was always this sort of awkwardness that became much more apparent (at least to me) when I was "the only one."

    I realize this is an oversimplified situation but it causes me to wonder how many times the terms "racism", "skepticism" and other emotive words are used to describe what are simply cases of discomfort. As an African American, I will admit there are some things that can be done to at institutions to create a more open environment such as the expansion of the curriculum to include multicultural content or the creation of new faculty mentoring programs that will enculturate faculty into the overall institution's culture before they start becoming isolated or aligning themselves with those that have chosen to do so. However, I am more interested in my previous point about discomfort. Wade Boykins, or Howard University, once described the black and white cultures as being dialectical. While I would argue that is an extreme view, I do wonder if the differences are significant enough to explain the tension that is present in today's society.