Search News


Browse Archives

News

Shying Away From Graduate School

December 8, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

When the economy tanks, graduate school applications go up. That's one of the few bits of good news in which educators could have reasonably taken comfort this year. No more.

The number of students taking the Graduate Record Examination will decline in 2008, the first time ever that the GRE has seen a fall in test-taking during an economic downturn. Because the GRE is required for the vast majority of graduate school programs, its numbers closely correlate with trends in applications.

Educators who learned of the GRE drop Friday in a question-and-answer session at the annual meeting of the Council of Graduate Schools said that they were shocked and some said that they were worried. The GRE drop reflects both those in the United States and international students seeking to enroll in American graduate programs.

Since 2004, the number of people taking the GRE has increased steadily, from 501,000 to 539,000 to 577,000 to 633,000 in 2007. The Educational Testing Service started the year projecting a total of 675,000 for 2008 and now expects the total only to be about 621,000.

Part of the concern arises because M.B.A. programs also typically see increases in applications in tight economic times, and evidence suggests that the pattern will be true to past experience for the business schools. The number of people taking the Graduate Management Admission Test is up this year -- both in the United States and abroad.

On Friday, David G. Payne, associate vice president of ETS for college and graduate programs, said that the "current hypothesis" is that the credit crunch is discouraging some people from considering graduate school, especially if they think they will not receive substantial financial support from the programs they might consider.

Payne noted that the projected decreases this year come both from the United States and the rest of the world. Volume in the United States is expected to fall to 449,000 from 456,000. Volume outside the United States is expected to fall to 172,000 from 177,000. Looking outside the United States, the shifts are not consistent. The two countries with the largest volume of GRE test takers -- and of foreign graduate students in the United States -- are China and India. Both have seen their GRE numbers rising steadily, and China will still go up this year, but India will see a sharp decline.

GRE Volume in China and India

Year China India
2004 22,000 29,000
2005 22,000 40,000
2006 30,000 53,000
2007 41,000 74,000
2008 (current projection) 52,000 55,000

Adding to the concern about the falling GRE volume is that it follows several campaigns by ETS to encourage more people to take the test. In the last year, for example, the testing service has started a new effort to encourage college juniors and seniors to take the test even if they aren't certain that they will apply to graduate school. The rationale -- publicized by ETS to undergraduates -- is that GRE scores are good for five years and that people generally do better on the exam when they take it as college students than after a few years of work outside of college. ETS has also started a campaign to encourage those worried about their economic futures to consider taking the GRE.

Debra W. Stewart, president of the Council of Graduate Schools, said she too was surprised by the data. "We're in the worst financial crisis, so you would think applications would be soaring," she said. The council does annual surveys on application and enrollment trends, but they will come later in the admissions cycle. Stewart said that the organization has done some informal polling of members on the group's listserv and is finding "a mixed picture," with only some institutions reporting declines. But of those not reporting declines, they are reporting "an average year," not the kind of application year one would expect with an economic crisis.

Stewart has several theories about why declines may be taking place this year, despite historic trends. She said it was possible, as ETS officials suggested, that the credit crunch was making it more difficult for students to borrow -- or that hearing about the crunch discouraged some from trying. In that same vein, she said that with many colleges and universities announcing budget cuts, many departments may not have the same levels of funds to offer in fellowship support.

In addition, she said that while economic uncertainty in the past has prompted some people to decide to improve their skills so they can seek better jobs, the turmoil is so great this year that "no one will leave a job if they have a job -- they think the risk is too much to take."

Stewart also stressed that just because the surge in interest in graduate school has not happened this year doesn't mean it won't start. Many people these days are experiencing "freezing behavior" where they are so uncertain about their next move and the state of the economy that they aren't making any changes, she noted. "It could be that this has created a temporary pause where we would have normally seen a flow to graduate school. That the flow hasn't started doesn't mean it won't."

Further, Stewart said that it should start, and that graduate programs and the government should encourage that through financial support. "The only way out of this is with development of intellectual infrastructure," she said. American society needs more people with higher skill levels, and so should be concerned about any drop in graduate applications or enrollments. Right now, she said she worries that the economic stresses on American universities are hurting graduate education. "I'm very worried about the financial stresses that are currently on our member institutions across the board. Graduate education can only be healthy when institutions within which it is offered are healthy,” she said.

Measuring Personal Potential

One of the largest changes in the GRE is the introduction of the Personal Potential Index, which ETS is adding to the GRE next year and that will allow students to have people who know them rank their creativity, communication skills, teamwork, resilience, organizational skills and ethics. This index -- which does not produce the same gaps among racial and ethnic groups found in most standardized tests like the GRE -- has been years in the works, and the event where ETS announced the volume decline was actually planned to promote the PPI, as the index is called.

As ETS has moved closer to going live with the new index, it has been conducting testing of it. And ETS officials used Friday's meeting to invite graduate programs to help in planning "validity studies" that would measure how people with different PPI scores actually perform in graduate school.

In an interview, the director of the research center at ETS, Patrick Kyllonen, said that some early studies are encouraging in that they address key concerns some had about the PPI. One key finding based on pilot use of the PPI is that evaluators -- generally professors or employers -- offer a range of scores. "A lot of people thought everyone would get perfect scores and that hasn't happened," he said. "The raters make full use of the scale."

In addition, Kyllonen said that there is no evidence so far of a "halo effect" in which people receive the same scores on all of the attributes being evaluated. Rather, the people doing evaluations do appear to be making distinctions and not applying some overall standard to all of the categories. "I think the PPI is going to give a more complete picture," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Shying Away From Graduate School

  • decline in GRE registrations
  • Posted by Pamela on December 8, 2008 at 8:45am EST
  • Has the number of student visa applications also declined?

  • Another collapsing bubble?
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountabilty Project on December 8, 2008 at 9:35am EST
  • If this drop continues, and if it proves to be coupled to decreasing enrollments, it will provide a wealth of information about the limits to the education expansion, and how its global collapse tracks the vicissitudes of the financial sector (see link).

    Especially interesting is the rapid decrease in India, and whether China will follow suit. Perhaps credential markets are more tightly coupled to economic conditions than previously thought.

    During the Great Depression in the US, colleges that survived saw increases in attendance. State funded public colleges, alumni association support, and the lower cost of feeding and housing students attending all contributed to the greater numbers attending college. With the advent of radio, and the invention of football rivalries, institutions were being marketed on a larger scale, resulting in a new kind of legitimacy and status for attendees.

    But much has changed since then. Colleges now play a far greater role in mediating job opportunity, graduate school has become the rule for those that can afford it, and the federal government funds most of college education, if not with student grants and loans, then through subsequent bureaucratic sector employment.

    Skyrocketing tuition costs have also changed, including punitive lending costs and dire consequences for default.

    It has been argued that enrollment levels are now decoupled from actual market demand for graduates, and seem to be based more on the decisions that other families are making (social comparison effects) - making education highly vulnerable to contagion effects, just as seen in financial sector (see link). Will India's pull-back also extend to China?

  • My opinion
  • Posted by Jody on December 8, 2008 at 2:00pm EST
  • I have been thinking about going back to school for either another MA/MS or a PhD...but I still owe on my original student loan (no buy-out for me or a drop in interest rate!) and just got a fulltime teaching position. One, I cannot afford to take the GRE let alone pay $500 an hour tuition. Two, I really do not see a great improvement in my future if I do take the challenge on.

  • Aptitude tests are useless
  • Posted by Grad Student on December 8, 2008 at 4:45pm EST
  • I took the GMAT. I think I was an average test taker. My score was just high enough to get into the school of my choice. Once I got into grad school I excelled and came to the top of my class, and the courses were not easy!

    I've been contemplating going back to school a few years later but the thought of paying to take the GRE (or another type of worthless test) is not sitting well with me.

    As far as college enrollments, working at an institution of higher education I can tell you that higher and higher tution costs are really detering students. I have friends who graduated with a BA/BS with a lot of money in loan debts, and they won't be seeing bail-outs. They are intellectually curious, but can't afford to go back to school and add to that debt.

  • Shying Away From Graduate School
  • Posted by Nicole Engelbert at Datamonitor.com on December 8, 2008 at 5:00pm EST
  • Perhaps people are thinking that the recession will last longer than a typical graduate program, thereby greatly reducing the potential return on investment.

  • Posted by Lawyer on December 8, 2008 at 5:35pm EST
  • Out of college, I took the LSAT and went to law school. Even today, I wonder if I made the right choice -- practicing law at a big firm is grueling and thankless. But the trade-offs of going into a PhD program make me generally not regret my choice. First, the program lasts 5-7 years. This delays adulthood and financial independence. Second, professors' salaries are *very* low compared to the business sector, especially as we've seen law and finance salaries skyrocket. But most important, job security for professors has steadily declined. More universities are making wider use of visiting, adjunct, and part-time faculty and offering fewer and fewer tenured positions. The only advantage of becoming a professor was the quality of life. Take that away by offering fewer tenure-track positions, and there is no incentive to go the PhD route.

    I hope schools soon realize that failing to invest in their faculty, while continuing to build fancy gyms and dorms and student centers, will ultimately bring down the house of cards.

  • Posted by Been Around the Block , This Is Good News on December 9, 2008 at 8:25am EST
  • Gosh, now who's going to teach those sections of freshman comp? No wonder the graduate directors are worried. No more meat for the grinder means no more sausage for breakfast.

  • Remain Calm - Everything Is Well
  • Posted by Scrawed on December 9, 2008 at 10:15pm EST
  • Concerns are articulated within the article and by the posters about the decline in graduate student enrollment at a time when enrollments "should" be increasing. Is it possible that tuition and room and board expense increases have outpaced inflation for each of the last 15 years - and has that historically been the case prior to and during the last few economic downturns? Is it possible that the nature of this particular downturn (collapses of creditor institutions) might have had an adverse impact on enrollments and plans to enroll given this increased reliance on debt funding? Is it also possible that economic uncertainty - thanks at least in part to increased globalization and changes in customary employment practices - might also play a role not only in terms of an absolute decline in financial stability but also in a decline in perceived educational investment benefit?

    Not much is expected of graduate institutions. The prospective student is often required to pony up vast sums and go into debt, for the dubious privilege of studying in and working in what are often highly politically-charged arenas for several years, in the process of which some very bright, hardworking, and ethical people are turfed out. Those that do get degrees are usually not guaranteed as much as a job interview. Perhaps this imbalance of investment and commitment versus returns has finally begun to be appreciated for the hard-luck casino that it truly is.

    Finally I'm surprised at the lack of concern about the GRE PPI score reports - not only with respect to issues concerning lack of individual privacy but also with respect to its apparent social aim to "equalize" performance between testing groups.
    "For the past two years, ETS PPI has been piloted through Project 1000, an initiative based at Arizona State University that is designed to increase the number of underrepresented students in graduate school," claims the ETS website. One might suspect this will only hasten the decline of white male representation in graduate programs in a fit of "turnabout is fair play" political correctness - and seems likely to reduce representation among mature students who might be hard-pressed to locate people who can evaluate them adequately. There might even be some appropriate concerns about measures which are apparently designed to increase and facilitate access of American education by international students - espeically as it is far from clear what impacts large international student cohorts (without precedent for the majority of the world's nations) are actually having on American higher education.

    At root, objective performance is objective performance. Recommendations and subjective impressions are what they are. Both are valuable, so let's not throw one away by conflating it with the other.

  • Why is this a concern?
  • Posted by J. Rob on December 10, 2008 at 6:10pm EST
  • Frankly, I don't see what the fuss is about. In my experience, most graduate departments receive more applications than they have space available. What does it matter if the number of applicants decreases slightly? I doubt there will be very many programs that will have empty seats as a result.

    Are the "shocked" and "worried" educators described in this article afraid they will have to admit 30% of their applicants instead of only 20%? I can just imagine these "educators" wringing their hands and pulling their hair out because the applications-to-seats ratio is only 3:1 instead of 5:1.

    If anything, this may be good news because it will create opportunities for others to go to graduate school instead.

  • J. Rob & Dir McGhee are right
  • Posted by DFS on December 10, 2008 at 6:35pm EST
  • Since the higher educational establishment is to "blame" for the unwieldingly high number of graduate degrees extant, there is only a natural market adjustment toward the number gainfully employed.

    The truth hurts, and so it should.

  • GRE Applications down
  • Posted by Linda Schweitzer , Associate Professor on December 11, 2008 at 3:20pm EST
  • The reason for the decline in GRE applications is, in fact, economic uncertainty. In a word, "peak oil", is a major fear factor in the blog world. If you are unaware of this term and its potential implications, look it up on the internet.

  • education in China
  • Posted by kaz on December 16, 2008 at 5:25am EST
  • The Chinese government has been using a strategy of rapid and extensive expansion of the higher education sector as a way of mopping up a demographic bulge. Grad unemployment is now at an alltime high and many ordinary people are starting to question the wisdom of spending so much money on what is becoming a risky propostion - grad employment.Expectations have been raised to unsustainable levels about the value that higher education degrees add to a starting salary. And the rapid expansion has lead to some very dubious programs being available to Chinese students. Rip-offs abound. Overseas study seems to still be a popular way to ensure a certain standard and quality and also help students stand out from the rest of the peers at those massive job seeker fairs in China.

  • Posted by Linda on January 9, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • I have a MSN and teach in a diploma program. I earn in the 70's with 28 years in nursing and 4 years in teaching nursing. A PhD would cost me 4-7 years, around 50K (more or less)and I could anticipate earning approximately 50K in a collegiate setting. I'd be lucky to find a tenure position and would probably have to move to do so; not to mention the increase in workload. I'd considered a PhD for personal satisfaction, but then I realized I could get that by spending more time with family and friends which would cost me nothing yet provide multiple deposits into the "emotional bank account". So, I guess my point is "what's the point"?

  • Waste of a test
  • Posted by jackie , rn on January 23, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • What a poor way to determine one's performance while in grad. school. I was denied access into a masters program based on my GRE score of 950. If my undergrad college had based my performance on my SAT score, You would have thought I'd last a month, maybe. I graduated top of my class in nursing and have attained certifications from then on. My concern is that the standard for grad school performance cannot be based on verbal and math analysis questions. Peoples' dreams are ruined because of a test one developed as criteria to base future performance, however the test has never been re-evaluated by institutions as a bias criteria set for those who could be successful in an area or career they love. What a shame. What a waste.

  • GRE
  • Posted by Ken Orsholm , Library Director on May 3, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • I agree the GRE is taken far too seriously by universities. Here is the problem, The GRE is considered merely as 'playing the game' and yet much rides on the outcome. I did quite poorly in the GRE, had to take pre-graduate courses to 'prove myself' and then had a graduate ranking of 1 with an obviouis 4.0

    I wanted to go on for my Doctorate but was told I had to re-take the GRE. My wife had similiar issues with the GRE and was equally as successful in college both as a student and college instructor despite her GRE scores. I would tend to believe that two people from the same household with the same GRE problems and subsequent successful academic ratings is not merely another Ripley's Believe it or Not!; story; considering this is not the only time GRE failed itself and others.

    I am quite sure GRE stands for the Greatest Ripoff in Education.