Search News


Browse Archives

News

Southern Accreditor Places 2 on Probation, Backs VCU in Degree Scandal

December 10, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools placed two colleges on probation and continued four others on that status at its meeting this week, its president said. The regional accreditor also lifted its probation against Texas Tech University, saying it had made progress in assessing student learning outcomes.

And the regional accrediting agency's Commission on Colleges also contemplated action but decided not to impose any punishment on Virginia Commonwealth University, concluding that the university had taken adequate steps to respond to a degree-granting scandal last spring.

Belle S. Wheelan, president of the accrediting group, said Tuesday that its Commission on Colleges had cited Alabama A&M University, a public, historically black four-year college, and Webber International University, a private nonprofit business college in Florida, for failing to comply with the accreditor's criteria related to finances. Alabama A&M has been in turmoil, with its governing board firing its president last spring amid a series of allegations of financial impropriety. Both institutions will be on probation for 12 months.

Wheelan said that SACS had kept four other colleges on probation for another year: Texas Southern University (for a series of financial issues), Virginia Intermont College (for concerns about finances and institutional effectiveness), Louisburg College (for finances) and Fundacion Universidad de las Americas Puebla (for a wide variety of problems).

The association also issued warnings to Eastfield College for problems related to the adequacy of its faculty; South Carolina State University, for five separate violations tied in part to the university's governing board and athletics; and Warner University and Miami International University of Art and Design, both for failures tied to faculty qualifications.

Texas Tech said Tuesday that the accreditor had lifted its 12-month probation imposed a year ago against the university. “I am pleased that the probation has been lifted,” Guy Bailey, Texas Tech's president, said in a statement. “During the past year, a number of people have worked extremely hard to put in place an assessment process that will provide meaningful data on our general education courses. We were able to develop the assessment and meet the SACS evidence requirement in a timely fashion."

Wheelan said that the Southern association had also reviewed the situation at Virginia Commonwealth University, where the chief of police in Richmond was improperly awarded a degree. The commission found that Virginia Commonwealth had taken adequate steps in the wake of the scandal to put safeguards in place to ensure that the problem did not recur, and chose not to punish the university.

The accreditor also did not weigh in on whether the university should rescind the degree. "We did not ask for the degree back, because that's not our purview," Wheelan said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Southern Accreditor Places 2 on Probation, Backs VCU in Degree Scandal

  • Posted by kgotthardt on December 10, 2008 at 9:25am EST
  • Good for SAC! Now get NCA and ACICS to do their jobs and we might be heading in the right direction.

    Unfortunately, I'm not optimistic.

  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee at FHEAP on December 15, 2008 at 10:40am EST
  • SACS "heading in the right direction"? You gotta be kinding!

    When institutional assessment amounts to a self-study once every ten years, and an on-site visit to briefly peer under the hood ?
    Come on!

    The Southern Association's annual ritual and ceremony no longer suffices to assure us of the educational quality at the institutions it reviews. One can only guess what QC\QA would look like when conducted by those other than hand-picked insiders and guild members ( http://home.earthlink.net/~fheapblog/id27.html ).

    What is needed is a study -- one study, one outside study -- that rates the effectiveness of this form of institutional evaluation. Their own internal compliance review earlier last year was indicative of the reliability problems with the current process.
    http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/COC%20Research%20Project.pdf

    Clearly, this form of self-review is far more likely to serve the interests of the institutions themselves, the members that then set the standards they assess each other for. No wonder this has been called the "country club" model of institutional evaluation by those in the field.

    Missing are reports on improprieties at South Carolina State University, and the phantom-branch of North Carolina Central University in Atlanta, GA.

    Lastly, and it bears repeating, the problems with faculty credentials are ongoing here in the South, despite the best efforts (or due to them) of SACS to provide college administrators with maximum flexibility in staffing their programs (i.e., as they see fit). Without minimum standards, uniformly applied to faculty appointments, problems like this will go on. Taxpayers and students deserve better.