Search News


Browse Archives

News

'The Latino Education Crisis'

December 22, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Generalities about "minority students" can easily hide specific issues related to various ethnic and racial groups -- and the ways they do and do not advance in the American educational systems. The Latino Education Crisis: The Consequences of Failed Social Policies, just published by Harvard University Press, is a scholarly attempt to focus on one fast-growing ethnic group. The authors are Patricia Gándara, professor of education at the University of California at Los Angeles, and Frances Contreras, professor of education at the University of Washington. The book primarily deals with elementary and secondary education, but a major chapter focuses on higher education. They responded to questions via e-mail about their findings on Latino students and college-going rates and success.

Q: In what ways are the issues facing Latino students with regard to college-going similar or different to those facing other minority groups?

A: Latinos have the worst record of completing college degrees of any group; between 9 and 11 percent for the last three decades; African Americans, for example, have been making slow but steady progress over the past three decades, from 11 percent in 1975 to 18 percent in 2006.

Q: You cite research on the role of maternal expectations and how they are voiced as correlating with going to college. Why is this so important, and what are the implications of this finding?

A: Mothers have been identified in many studies as being key to motivating their children educationally. This is no different for Latinos, in spite of the fact that these mothers have much less formal education, on average, than mothers of all other major ethnic groups. Over 40 percent of Latina mothers have less than a high school education. This compares to approximately 12 percent of African American mothers.

Q: How does growing up in a primarily Spanish speaking environment affect college-going rates?

A: Growing up in a primarily Spanish-speaking environment does NOT in itself affect college-going. Many Spanish speaking students from solid middle class homes go to college and succeed. Their families are able to prepare them well for school and as result they do well. However, if the family does not have sufficient resources and the schools that their children attend are impoverished, as is the case with the great majority of Latino students in the United States, and if the instruction they receive is generally in a language they cannot understand, then the data speaks for itself -- the consequences are negative.

Q: Do standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT hinder enrollments of minority students?

A: Yes. Some colleges that practice affirmative action tend to not count these scores very heavily, but schools that use them generally include them in a formula that puts both Latinos and African Americans at a disadvantage for admission. In states without affirmative action they are especially problematic because there is little means for counterbalancing the weight placed on them in admissions decisions. Of course, it is important to remember that there is an extremely strong correlation between SAT, ACT, and family income and parent education levels. So, poverty and poor schooling are the real culprits that simply get expressed in these scores.

Q: In several states over the last year, politicians have attacked policies that allow undocumented students to enroll in or pay in-state tuition at public colleges. Most Latino students in American higher education are of course legally in the United States. What do you make of all the attention on these other students? Does that attention have a negative impact on other Latino students?

A: The problem of undocumented students in higher education is a serious, and terribly large, one. Many of these students have been here almost all of their lives and as expressed in the Plyler v. Doe decision of 1982, it is not their fault that they find themselves here without documentation. Hence it is especially unfortunate -- for both them and the broader community -- that they are impeded from educating themselves well. They are our children -- the Supreme Court has ruled on this -- it makes no sense at all to refuse to educate them.

Q: What are three things a college should do to promote enrollment by Latino students?

A: Recruit in schools and community colleges where these students attend, such as Hispanic-serving community colleges; reach out the middle schools where these students are forming their postsecondary plans, work with high schools to create a seamless program that reaches across high school AND college to support these students not only as they transition to higher education but also while they are progressing through college.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on 'The Latino Education Crisis'

  • Rule of law?
  • Posted by Ernest on December 22, 2008 at 9:35am EST
  • " .. it makes no sense at all to refuse to educate them .."

    The U.S. is theoretically a nation of laws -- e.g., self-submitting taxation, immigration.

    If members of one group decides that it is above one set of laws -- isn't anarchy the obvious outcome?

    That is: why should other groups follow laws that it does not want to? If one particular group does not?

  • Student Success Matters as Much as Access
  • Posted by Barbara J. Millis , Director, Teaching and Learning Center at University of Texas at San Antonio on December 22, 2008 at 9:50am EST
  • Access is well and good. However, what happens to Latinos and other underserved students after their admission is equally important. Few institutions make systematic efforts to provide faculty members—-whether tenure-track, non-tenure track, or adjunct—-with specific teaching skills to address the needs of underprepared students, particularly those at-risk in large classes. Countless studies, including the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), emphasize the need for student engagement, particularly at a Hispanic serving institution where cultural norms emphasize cooperation, rather than competition, and group-based decision-making rather than individualistic problem-solving. In fact, recent research from NSSE “found that student engagement had a ‘compensatory effect’ on grades and students’ likelihood of returning for a second year of college, particularly among underserved minority populations and students entering college with lower levels of achievement” (Wasley, 2006, P. A39.) Further, a newer study, The Role of Active Learning in College Student Persistence, finds: “Faculty use of active learning practices plays a significant role in the retention of first-year college students.” Here’s the explanation of why: “The pattern of findings of this study tends to indicate that active learning practices that faculty use shape in students the perception that their college or university is committed to their welfare in general and their growth and development in particular, a perception that leads to their sense of social integration. The greater a student’s degree of social integration, the greater is his or her level of subsequent commitment to the college or university. The greater the student’s level of subsequent commitment to the college or university, the greater is his or her likelihood of persistence in the college of initial choice.” (p. 81). AAC&U’s recent report, College Learning for the New Global Century indicates in a figure depicting “Bachelor’s Degree Attainment by Race and Income” that in 2005 only 11% of those between the ages of 25-29 years-old attaining BAs were Hispanic. They conclude that “the commitment to expanded college access needs to be anchored in an equally strong commitment to educational excellence” (p. 10).
    Professors do make a difference in their students’ intellectual development.

    Unprepared students can achieve an increased level of performance with the encouragement and support of their professors. Kathleen Gabriele (Nov 25, 2008) emphasizes:
    If we are sincere about giving at-risk students who are enrolled in our classes a real chance of success, then professors must also be engaged and not just refer these students to academic support or tutoring centers. If we, the professors, are not reaching out to at-risk or unprepared students who are enrolled in our classes, then we are simply setting these students up for failure and, at the same time, only pretending our colleges have somehow fulfilled a moral obligation of providing opportunities to our diverse population in today’s society. (p. 1)

    The classroom-based approaches that lead to increased learning and persistence are well-documented. Cooperative learning works particularly well with Latino populations where cooperative and social cohesion--a sense of community--are extremely important. Community can also occur through a variety of technology-based approaches, such as threaded discussions on Web-CT, clickers, technology-enabled academic games, distance learning, etc. Team-based activities can be facilitated face-to-face and through technology.

    The problem lies in educating faculty members in these cooprative approaches and convincing them to redesign their courses to embed them. Teaching and learning centers and the skilled professionals who run them can play a crucial role. Despite rising costs that often result in more and more students sitting, isolated, in larger and larger classes, the United States can no longer fail to educate a large number of students who could thrive under effective teaching and learning conditions. We cannot afford "throw-away" students.

    References

    Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2007). College learning for the new global century: A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education & America’s Promise. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Braxton, J. M., Jones, W. A., Hirschy, A. S., and Hartley, H. V., III (2008). The role of active learning in college persistence. In, J. M. Braxton, ed. The Role of the Classroom in College Student Persistence: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 115. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Gabriele, K. (Nov 25, 2008), cited in Jaschik, S. Review of teaching underprepared students: Strategies for promoting success and retention in higher education. Inside Higher Education.

    Wasley, P. (Nov 17, 2006). Underprepared students benefit most from ‘engagement.’ Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A39-A40.

  • Posted by Perry on December 22, 2008 at 10:40am EST
  • A difference apparently not addressed in this study is that Latino students are less willing to rely on student loans to attend college. I teach in a predominantly Latino-serving public university and I see the problems arising from trying to work one's way through college. Preparation isn't the only problem when students do not have time to read and attend classes because they are working full-time jobs while carrying a full course load. After much hair-pulling, studies finally showed that the number one factor affecting grad school completion was financial resources. Why should it be any different at the undergrad level? The LA Times last year published an article showing that Latino students will not seek or accept loans because of a cultural attitude about debt. This has long limited the ability of Latino students to pursue grad school. Now, with rising tuition costs, it is similarly limiting their ability to self-finance their educations. When a student cannot afford textbooks, it doesn't matter what his or her reading skills are like.

  • Posted by E. Moran on December 22, 2008 at 8:30pm EST
  • B. Millis quotes:

    “If we are sincere about giving at-risk students who are enrolled in our classes a real chance of success, then professors must also be engaged and not just refer these students to academic support or tutoring centers. If we, the professors, are not reaching out to at-risk or unprepared students who are enrolled in our classes, then we are simply setting these students up for failure and, at the same time, only pretending our colleges have somehow fulfilled a moral obligation of providing opportunities to our diverse population in today’s society.”

    Buried in this paragraph are so many assumptions. “At-risk students” (also more accurately spoken of here as “unprepared”) should not be in the university until they ARE prepared. They can fail; it’s a free human’s right to fail at some things, and some people do not get a degree. The professors are “reaching out” to all their students, trying to deliver a high-quality experience to people who might actually benefit from it. We don’t want the process diluted to meaninglessness.

    I’m not “pretending our colleges have somehow fulfilled a moral obligation of providing opportunities to our diverse population in today’s society.” I believe no such silly thing. If the degree is to mean anything then it can not be for everyone; it is for those able to meet the requirements and do the work.

    Very female idea, this nurturing thing, toxic to real achievement. And condescending. Time to Man-up, yes?

  • what percentage are legal?
  • Posted by Doug F. , HS Math Teacher of ESL students. on January 2, 2009 at 3:50pm EST
  • "Most Latino students in American higher education are of course legally in the United States."

    Of course, I'm sure you're right, but for the record what would your source be for this statement?

    What percentage are legal?

  • Doug F's comment
  • Posted by oxylate on February 10, 2009 at 5:05am EST
  • For Doug F.: There are 35 million Latinos in the U.S. (U.S. Census) and 8.52 million of these are undocumented (Pew Hispanic Center). For the other comments, these children's parents came illegally and they should not be punished for their parents' illegal crossing of the border. Instead, these children should be given the opportunity to attend college and give back to society...