Search News


Browse Archives

News

Do Econ Grad Students Need a Teaching Bailout?

January 5, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At most research universities, considerable teaching of undergraduates is done by graduate students -- either leading discussion sections or full courses, or grading papers for faculty members. While graduate students presumably know more than the undergraduates they instruct, there remains the question: Do those in the front of the classroom know what they are doing?

Research presented this weekend at the American Economic Association’s annual meeting, in San Francisco, suggests that relatively few doctoral programs require graduate students to take for-credit courses that are intended to teach them how to teach. While this finding concerns the authors of the study, other research presented at the economists' meeting suggests that many new Ph.D.’s still feel well prepared to lead courses.

The study on requirements was based on a survey of departments that grant Ph.D.’s in economics. Among the findings:

  • 91 percent of departments employ graduate students as instructors.
  • 29 percent of departments require graduate students to take a course for academic credit on how to teach undergraduates.
  • Just over half of departments require graduate students to attend a non-credit program about teaching undergraduates.
  • 80 percent of departments require a formal test of English proficiency before foreign students can start teaching duties.
  • 89 percent of departments have programs for formal assessment of teaching by graduate students, with student evaluations being the most commonly used tool (many times in combination with other methods).

The authors of the study -- William B. Walstad of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln and William E. Becker of Indiana University at Bloomington -- write that they are “perplexed as to why more economics departments do not require that their graduate student instructors take a credit course on teaching.”

Noting that teaching “can be difficult to master on your own,” the authors write that without “effective” training, “the goal of becoming a teacher for most graduate students is likely to focus on the simple mastery of lecturing to the exclusion of other teaching methods or strategies.” And Walstad and Becker note that the quality of undergraduate teaching can affect enrollment patterns and have a key impact on whether new students are inspired by a field.

While no research presented at the meeting featured the views of undergraduates in those courses, another study -- based on a survey of new economics Ph.D.’s -- found that they do feel prepared to teach at the end of their doctoral programs.

Further, this study found no statistically significant difference in the percentage reporting themselves well prepared who had taken a credit course on teaching and those who hadn’t. The second study was conducted by two scholars at Murray State University: James P. McCoy, associate provost and professor of economics, and Martin Milkman, professor of economics.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Do Econ Grad Students Need a Teaching Bailout?

  • Posted by Robert , PhD Student on January 5, 2009 at 7:55am EST
  • In my top-20 PhD program, incoming students get one day of TA training and half a day of university-required diversity training. We can't take teaching courses for credit due to taking the maximum allowed courseload during the first two years of the program.

  • Great idea, but. . .
  • Posted by Bryce on January 5, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • . . .does taking one or two courses in "how to teach" really make a difference? Furthermore, who would teach these courses? Chances are it would be an "experienced" faculty member from the department (in this case Econ) who probably hasn't received any formal training in teaching herself.

    This article and the article about peer instruction earlier in this issue underscore the problem identified by John Tagg in The Learning Paradigm College--the problem with higher education is that most of us view it as an efficient machine designed to pump out scholarly work and paper degrees. Student learning is usually left out of the equation.

  • Do faculty have training?
  • Posted by Dr. Pepper , professor-in-training on January 5, 2009 at 10:35am EST
  • I've been a student for quite sometime now.
    Out of my 100 classes (yes that many) only two were co-taught. Everyone else had a PhD.

    Now these individuals were brilliant! They really were! Published, world renouned in their field, but only a handful knew how to teach! Most of them were horrible as teachers. very few inspired me (those that did though made up for the rest of the bunch that didn't!).

    PhDs are subject matter experts. This is OK if you are going into strictly research, but ALL PhDs that are going into teaching tracks (IMHO) NEED to take classes and prove that they can teach before they are given a PhD!

  • Posted by Patricia Downey , Assistant Professor on January 5, 2009 at 12:46pm EST
  • I am a Ph.D candidate from a major research intensive university in the Midwest. I was required to attend a one-day training session on teaching when I accepted a graduate teaching assistantship. The experience, while well-intended, was woefully inadequate in preparing me to meet the needs of my students. It did, however, introduce me to topics, issues, literature, and additional resources in teaching and learning available on my campus that later proved to be critical in my development as a teacher. I also had the great good fortune to be on a campus that offered graduate students a minor in college teaching. I took this minor and learned about research in learning as well as how to navigate through the intricacies of the professoriate. Later, I transferred my assistantship out of my disciplinary department and accepted a position with the teaching and learning center on my campus. I believe all of these experience combined to help make me a better educator. Vital to my ability to participate in all these experiences was the support and mentoring from from disciplinary faculty. Graduate students may not have time in their schedules to enroll in credit course work in teaching and learning, but other less formal avenues are often available. I think the essential ingredient needed to help graduate students discover opportunities to improve and diversity their teaching skills is the departmental culture towards teaching. The words and actions of disciplinary faculties set the standard, in teaching as well as research, and direct graduate students attention to what is valued. I am grateful to a faculty who pointed out resources and encouraged me to use them.

  • who will teach?
  • Posted by Higher Education Faculty , Assistant Professor on January 5, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • College teaching is an actual area of study. In fact, many universities that have a higher education program have faculty who teach a college teaching course. I teach such a course at my university and I get PhD students from a variety of disciplines. While it may not be a "cure-all," it is a theoretical, philosophical, and practical course where students actually get to learn about pedagogy, learning theories, and due to the interdisciplinary nature of the course, a variety of approaches to instruction. Often, it is the first time (beyond that day and a half TA training) that aspiring faculty actually have conversations about teaching.

  • student point of view
  • Posted by Jean on January 6, 2009 at 5:05am EST
  • Maybe the new PhD's feel that they are prepared, but has anyone checked with their students to find out what they are learning? It is not about teaching; it is about learning. My son is currently considering changing his major in Economics at a large research university because his professors are such poor teachers, unlike his high school teacher, who made it a topic that he really enjoyed.
    When I developed an award winning program for teaching faculty to teach online, I was amazed at the number of new professors on campus that took the five-week course and said that it was the first time that anyone had addressed the topic of teaching as part of their faculty development; their own departments only emphasized publication and not how to teach the subject to their students. The reading and recitation of lectures is NOT the best learning style for most students, consequently, not an effective means of teaching. However, because they know their subject, new PhD's do think that they are ready to teach because they did learn after all. :)