Search News


Browse Archives

News

Toward an All E-Textbook Campus

January 14, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Many colleges are experimenting with e-textbooks these days. But at Northwest Missouri State University, President Dean L. Hubbard hopes they’ll be an e-book only campus (or close to it) soon -- as soon as the market will allow it. “We’ll move as fast as the industry moves and they’re moving very rapidly,” Hubbard says.

Northwest Missouri has long bought textbooks on its students’ behalf, renting them in exchange for a $6 per credit hour fee. The university is now piloting a move away from purchasing the paper kind. This spring, the 6,700-student university bought e-books for about 500 students in 10 different courses -- including College Algebra, Intercultural Communications, and the Enjoyment of Music. In addition, McGraw-Hill is making digital access codes available to up to 3,000 more Northwest Missouri students who are using texts available in both formats.

The pilot actually began, on a smaller scale, this fall, when the university experimented with e-books and, specifically, the Sony PRS-505 e-reader model -- ultimately determining that the Sony model "was not necessarily designed for what we want to do,” says Paul Klute, the assistant to the president. So this spring, students will primarily use their laptop computers, already provided to them by the institution, to read the e-books (although a smaller group of students will test out a newer version of the Sony e-reader, Klute explains).

Klute says print will probably always have some place at Northwest Missouri; for example, in the case of an older textbook that is considered definitive in a field. Still, print would be the exception, not the rule. In making this shift, university officials cite a desire to cut costs, and to be "on the cutting edge" of trends in learning and technology.

Citing the e-book's built-in interactivity, "I'm convinced," says Hubbard, "that students will read more and they will learn more, by using this medium."

The proposal to go (almost) e-book only does raise some questions, however -- including what the renters, i.e. students, will think. The university will be surveying students throughout the spring, but data from last fall suggest split opinion. "Our quantitative feedback suggested to us that about 50 percent of our students like the idea of electronic textbooks and 50 percent don't," Klute says.

He adds: "I do think that we'll see that 50 percent that don't like e-textbooks shift as they become exposed to the electronic textbooks."

"That's just a hypothesis of mine and one that we hope to realize as the project moves forward."

"I think there's a lot of interest, and I think a generally supportive attitude certainly among the members of the faculty that I visited with," says Doug Sudhoff, the Faculty Senate president and an assistant professor of mass communication. "There may be some faculty who will have a really hard time letting go of the traditional textbook. That's true anywhere. But I think, in general, as we see the results of the pilot project and if those results are positive, I think you'll see that faculty move pretty quickly to adapt their courses to online textbooks and adopt them for their courses."

President Hubbard also cites a hoped-for cost-savings of at least 50 percent. And that raises some questions given the college's current rental model: While e-books are cheaper, on average available at half the price of the printed version, the university currently replaces rental textbooks on three-year cycles -- getting three years' use out of a single bound book. By contrast, consumers typically buy timed subscriptions for the half-price e-books: 180 days for books to be used in semester courses, or 360 for those used year-long.

"We would have to better understand how our rental model would work with the current system of distributing e-textbooks," Klute says.

"We haven't made a deal yet, we're still piloting it," explains Hubbard. "But we've been very candid with the publishers that we are not going to spend any more than we're currently spending and we would expect over time to spend less."

That's a reasonable expectation, says Frank Lyman, executive vice president at CourseSmart, a digital textbook company started by five major textbook publishers. "It's a reasonable expectation that an institution pursuing digital aggressively should be able to save money for themselves and their students. Having not been involved with Northwest Missouri, I don't know what the dynamic is there," Lyman says.

Lyman says that with 5,029 textbooks now availability digitally, CourseSmart covers about 30 percent of the market. "For institutions that are going to be aggressive about pursuing this goal" -- of being all e-textbook -- "I think the opportunity exists for them to have 50, 60, 75 percent of their titles covered by e-textbooks within the next year."

He adds that a few for-profit colleges have already moved to e-book only in certain curriculum areas. "As with a lot of things, the non-profit colleges and universities are trying to see if there's something they can learn from the way the for-profits operate," Lyman says.

CourseSmart reports that 72 percent of their customers say they would buy some or all of their textbooks in electronic format in the future. Likewise, "Our research shows that a very high percentage of students who actually use these digital textbooks have a positive experience. Most recommend it to their friends," says Jeff Ho, a product manager at McGraw-Hill, one of five publishers that Northwest Missouri is working with.

However, an August report by the Student Public Interest Research Groups found that 75 percent of students surveyed said they'd prefer a printed textbook to a digital one. Thirty-three percent said they felt comfortable reading on a computer screen, 22 percent were uncomfortable and 45 percent were in the middle.

"It's a sentiment shared among a lot of educators that it's the 21st century; we should be using computers for all of education. As we wrote in the report, to some extent it's true," says Nicole Allen, the report author and the textbook advocate for Student PIRGs. "We've just got to remember that reading a Facebook profile is not the same thing as reading a textbook."

"Textbooks are necessarily disconnected from students' needs as consumers, because textbook sales are not driven by students; they're driven by faculty," she says. "It's important to remember that the consumer actually does have needs and desires and the students do have preferences as to whether they want to switch to a digital book or a print book, and they're different. The best thing is to give students options, and a lot of them can make that determination themselves. I'm not saying that switching to e-books is wrong. I'm not an educator; I don't know. But I represent students' needs as consumers and you can't rely on the market to address those needs."

In an e-mail, Abby Freeman, Northwest Missouri's Student Senate president, expressed support for the university's ongoing pilot.

"I think it demonstrates that NW is continually searching for methods to improve our university and the educational setting for the students. Though the original use intended for the [Sony] e-readers may not be the best option for the students of Northwest, the continued piloting and research into the programs and their benefit is great. I think students enjoy exploring new opportunities in their classrooms and discovering if those options are a benefit to the university."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Toward an All E-Textbook Campus

  • Posted by Dr. Pepper , professor-in-training on January 14, 2009 at 9:55am EST
  • I am still not convinced.

    As a grad student I experimented with ebooks one semester. It was a protected PDF and it cost me $20 less than the physical book (it still cost me $55 though). It was a pain, I had to lug around my laptop, and the ebook had attached itself to my hard drive's serial number so I could not take it with me.

    I ended up printing the book and putting the pages in a binder. My hard drive eventually died and I lost the book. I consider that purchase to have been a total waste of money since I could not resell the book (if I wanted to).

    Yes this particula university leases the texts to its students so it may work for them, but in most universities where students buy their books (and often sell or trade them at the end of the semester) this work work. Not to sound old school, but I personally have a hard time reading for extended periods to time when I am not reading on paper.

  • Posted by quasarpulse on January 14, 2009 at 9:55am EST
  • From a student:

    I understand that many students simply fulfilling requirements prefer the rental systems and e-book delivery. However, for those of us majoring in STEM fields (ironically, the fields which made e-books possible) there is no substitute for a real paper textbook which can be kept after the end of the course and used as a reference for later study.

    Case in point: the standard text for a large number of introductory calculus-based physics sequences nationwide is Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. This also "just happens" to be the book most recommended for use three years later to study for the Physics GRE. A prospective physics major who rents it or "buys" a 360-day subscription to it for a course will have to buy the paper text again three years later.

    Meanwhile, there's just no substitute for solid texts in calculus and differential equations for use as references for techniques which students may not remember but are later required in upper-level physical science and engineering courses. The texts for those upper-level courses, in turn, are invaluable resources for graduate study.

    There are also issues with the "usability" of an e-book. For a humanities or social sciences class where the book primarily exists to be read, this may not be a problem except for the visual fatigue issue. But for courses like calculus, the book is used entirely differently; one has it open to problems on one page, flips back through the chapter for information on how to solve it, flips to the front cover for integration formulas, and so on. E-book readers (and even computer screens) are extremely difficult to use in this way. And computer screens are not especially user-friendly for doing homework, as they're brightly lit, vertical, require the student to look up and re-focus each time he/she wishes to look at a problem, and when not in the form of laptops are frequently placed on desks not designed to be ergonomic for writing.

    I sincerely hope that colleges do not get too caught up in the rush for new technology and neglect the needs of their students. Providing e-books as an option is perhaps OK (although it has all the makings of a scam: how long will it be before 360-day subscriptions to e-books cost as much as paper textbooks do now?) but requiring all students to buy them or all professors to use them ill-serves students and the educational process.

  • Going textbook-free
  • Posted by H. E. Baber on January 14, 2009 at 10:55am EST
  • It depends on what you mean by an "e-book" and depends on the field.

    I've gone textbook-free in one of my courses, a survey of Analytic Phil, where the textbooks one standardly uses are just collections of the important articles. All these articles are readily available online. The old ones are in the public domain; the more recent ones are in journals available online through the databases to which our library subscribes.

    It's easy enough to put up the reading list for the course at the class website with links to the articles to make getting them hassle-free for students. Students can read them online, for free, or print them off--still much cheaper than buying a book.

    The reason I did this is not only because of the price of textbooks but because it's impossible to get exactly the selection of articles one wants. As these courses are traditionally taught you make students buy textbooks, use about 1/3 or the articles (some just because you feel you have to justify having students buy the book!) and then supplement them with xeroxes, library reserve or, more recently, stuff online. It's a mess, and it's not conducive to good teaching since the availability of material in the textbooks that are out drives the selection of articles rather than vice versa.

    This is just one kind of course though and in classes where you need different kinds of stuff you can't do this. But, for the kind of class where you just use a collection of readings, why not?

  • philosophy textx
  • Posted by Elizabeth Hodge , professor at Gavilan College on January 14, 2009 at 12:25pm EST
  • The idea of electronic books and/or renting texts is a fantastic idea, particularly for low-income students. It is very often the case that community college students have very little money to spend on textbooks, as they are often working and paying for tuition on their own or are learners who depend on programs to assist in their college experience, financially and otherwise.
    Textbooks, in general, tend to be over priced and frequently up-dated so that used books become obsolete. In philosophy, primary sources could easily be utilized in this manner, as they are often supplements or used in conjunction with other readers, at least at the undergraduate level.

    Additionally, renting books would allow for students who lack financing at the beginning of the semester to keep up with the class.

    While renting, etc., may prohibit underlining and so forth, it would not hinder the student from outlining material for the purposes of study.

  • Textbooks should be saved as reference guides
  • Posted by Amanda on January 14, 2009 at 12:25pm EST
  • I can understand using e-books in general education courses because typically students do not keep these books as reference materials. Where I am concerned is when a student is taking a course within their area of study. Often times it would be wise for a student to keep these textbooks and use them as references to help them in future courses and help them in the career. The problem with e-books or with renting books for that matter is that a student does not have this option. I would have never gotten through college as well as I did without those old textbooks to refer to when I forgot something.

    Plus I have to agree that reading on a computer screen really puts strain on the eyes.

  • digital publishers
  • Posted by Brady on January 14, 2009 at 2:10pm EST
  • There are some really quality all-digital curriculum publishers popping up, as online learning continues to be one of the hotter spaces in Silicon Valley. A company called Shmoop (http://www.shmoop.com), for example, provides free online supplementary curriculum for students and materials for teachers. They make money through advertising, it appears. It will be interesting to see whether the folks who pay for textbooks - college students and high school administrators - are willing to take free or low-cost materials in an ad-supported model.

  • E-Textbooks
  • Posted by pgb on January 14, 2009 at 2:10pm EST
  • Every time I hear about a move toward e-books and (worse) e-textbooks, I think of this short story.

    http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html

    Dr. Pepper's experience with e-books suggests that we are on course for a future like that one.

    I'm a technology geek, but I will always prefer real books (just like I prefer CDs to MP3 downloads) because the real thing doesn't have DRM.

  • The Persistence of e-Memory
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois on January 14, 2009 at 3:20pm EST
  • I still have my physics and math textbooks from college and graduate school. Some, long out of print, contain approaches to certain topics that are not to be found elsewhere, and retain their pedagogical (and intellectual) value. How likely is it that anyone will be able to access the content of a particular e-textbook thirty years after its publisher stops supporting it?

    Rock-n-roll will never die, but data formats do. When was the last time you were able to play one of your old 8-track tapes? I expect the same will be true of e-textbooks.

  • Posted by Cold-hearted Truth on January 14, 2009 at 7:10pm EST
  • If you can't afford to buy the books, you don't belong in college.

    Either choose a cheaper school, or stop chain-smoking and drinking all weekend.

    The vast majority of profs select texts within an affordable range. If $50-100 is too much per course, you need to drop out and save up $2000-2500 to buy books for the 4 years when you re-enroll.

  • Posted by Laura on January 14, 2009 at 9:50pm EST
  • How wonderful it would have been to have electronic bookmarks available in my chemistry, biology, and math texts; or the ability to make electronic margin notes, as one can with Word or Adobe standard; or especially, ESPECIALLY, a ctrl-F to find a word or phrase I needed. That alone would have been seriously cool.

    I wonder if some people who dislike e-texts aren't making use of the technology, or the useful technology isn't available on their hardware or software.

    And I wonder how many people turned up their noses at Gutenberg's invention b/c they loved the feel and smell of rolls of parchment.

  • Posted by Dr. Pepper , Professor-in-traiining on January 14, 2009 at 9:50pm EST
  • @ cold hearted truth:
    I've never had a class that cost $50-100 for books. Each book costs $80-200 and you generally get 2-3 of those per class.

    I used to work at a textbook store as an undergrad. Each student easily dropped $500-700 per semester for 3 -4 classes

  • Posted by Jim#2 on January 14, 2009 at 10:40pm EST
  • I've gone the next step on the articles I read professionally and for my graduate program: if I can find them electronically, I run them through a text to speech program and then listen to them during my commute. I take notes on a digital recorder, and if I need to review parts of the readings when I get to the office or home, I do that then. Multiple modalities and multiple learning avenues.

    As to the need to make notes on the e-copies: use Zotero or Diigo.

    Use the tools available.

  • What about your eyes?
  • Posted by Ryan on January 14, 2009 at 10:40pm EST
  • Isn't it bad for your eyes to continually read from a computer monitor?

  • Posted by Cold-hearted Truth on January 15, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • Dr. Pepper, allow me to match you anecdote one of my own.

    I have taught several courses over the years for which students needed to purchase a ~$28 textbook for the course and a ~$14 reference work [a style guide] for their profession [or at least the entire time they spent in the major]. I routinely had students claim they couldn't afford them.

    Recently, I used a textbook for which there were several places to find cheap previous editions [for under $20] to use for the course if students couldn't afford the over-priced monstrosity ordered by the bookstore [without my authorization...I had selected the much more economical abbreviated text]. If the book was bought, few read it.

    In *my* experience, too many students like to make the very reasonable claim that the books are too expensive, yet they are always anointed with technology that makes underpaid adjuncts and grad students weep with envy.

    Circa 1990, I paid ~$300 a semester at the highly selective SLAC I attended for undergrad. Barring those super-expensive anatomy texts for wannabe med students, I have rarely encountered a prof who compiled a mandatory reading list of over $100. And many of us did our best to keep it under $75.

    College is neither cheap nor free. Kind professors who find reasonable alternatives are a treasure, but a lot of us simply lack the institutional resources to keep compiling bookless readings that many students ignore any way.

  • Posted by Miriam Pia , MS. on January 17, 2009 at 11:05pm EST
  • I want contracts to write some of these babies!

    Miriam Pia
    CC MA/PD BS

    An Adventure in Indianapolis
    *2 very different occultists, a priest who's holy water heals on contact and a big hearted soldier hunt down urban villains the cops can't touch*

    *Kindle Amazon* *YouPublish*

  • Electronic readers
  • Posted by Jana Hill , Freelance editor, writer at Scribbleproof on January 22, 2009 at 7:35am EST
  • The article mentions Sony readers - I wonder why the Kindle and other readers were not mentioned?

    It will be interesting to see how the issue of e-texts shakes out. Electronic texts make a lot of sense from a student's point-of-view: portability, cost, links to additional information.

    Electronic books are all stored on a single device, be it a reader or a laptop. Both are lighter than a bag full of books. Add that to the lower cost - students are more likely to work part-time or not at all, and therefore have less to spend - and the generational norm of electronic communication, and e-texts seem to be a natural fit.

  • e-text books
  • Posted by Mary Khosh , Ph.D. on January 22, 2009 at 7:40am EST
  • Another huge advantage of e-textbooks for students that has not been mentioned is the benefit to their joints and backs. The weight of text books in backpacks can be up to 50 lbs, and students walk long distances on campus carrying these overweighted bags on their backs. The damage may not been seen for years....but the full bags of heavy textbooks takes its toll. I'm definitely for the adoption of e-textbooks and the sooner the better.

  • at Cold-Hearted Truth
  • Posted by Nessa on January 22, 2009 at 6:30pm EST
  • I don't know what profs you know, or where you buy your books, but please enlighten me so that I may transfer schools! During my undergrad years, I considered it an amazing feat if I spent under $600 per semester on my books. And then to sell those same books back to the bookstore? I was lucky if I cleared $100, and that was keeping my books in excellent condition! However, none of that compared to my first year of law school. My books for my first semester cost over $900. One semester. Now that I'm in my second year, it hasn't gotten any cheaper. It has gotten to the point where the professors themselves complain about the prices of books and the ridiculous buy-back value. So for you to say that professors don't assign books over $100? That's ridiculous. Granted, they often-times don't have a choice in this; the texts that work the best for their class are available only from publishers and bookstores who feel no real need to accomodate college students and their pocketbooks. My point is, please enlighten me as to where these books exist that do not cost over $100. I think it may just be a fantasy land made up inside your head, but I would still like to investigate.

  • E-textbooks
  • Posted by Mary on February 2, 2009 at 8:50pm EST
  • I am the library director at a very small college. Many students come to the library and print their texts using our duplex printer. Their reasons vary from discomfort with reading a lighted screen to wanting to write/highlight to laptop power issues while reading their texts. Computer science majors want to have the text beside them while working on programming, instead of flipping back and forth from their work to electronic texts. Perhaps if all e-textbooks could fit on any e-reader (and Kindles and Sony readers are different, I understand)and the readers weren't expensive, the e-textbooks would be more popular with students--who, btw, like ebooks because they are searchable--it's the textbooks they seem to want in a paper format. Oh--another thing: here every time you take a book with an e-textbook, you buy the book--even if the book was used in an earlier course and you have already downloaded it. That, students feel, is a rip off.

  • Objections, industry seem misguided
  • Posted by Micah , Student at Washington University in St. Louis on February 11, 2009 at 5:05am EST
  • I think e-textbooks are a wonderful idea for campuses as long as they are coupled with e-book readers like Amazon's Kindle 2 and I think the main objections by students and professors above are misguided. I reply to the following objections as an undergraduate student who hopes to see a strong future for e-textbooks. My responses are trying to show that the objections are not necessary, not that they can't exist in certain uses of e-books (a distinction that will be made clear below). I will follow up my responses with some e-book pros that make them better than normal textbooks and some hopes for the future.

    I use the Kindle 2 as an example that I am most familiar with, but I'm sure most competitive E-book devices would fit my descriptions.

    Objections:

    "It was a pain, I had to lug around my laptop...My hard drive eventually died and I lost the book"
    --A device like the Kindle weighs less than a paperback book and can hold every textbook you need - much easier to carry around than a textbook...The kindle backs up all purchases online so any hardware failure won't affect purchase.

    "for those of us majoring in STEM fields... there is no substitute for a real paper textbook which can be kept after the end of the course and used as a reference for later study...there’s just no substitute for solid texts in calculus..."
    --This is a fallacious argument. E-books which are purchased can be kept for reference after the end of a course. Therefore making the either/or between paper/software and permanent use/rental just isn't true. The rental model is only one way of use e-books. As an engineering student myself, I would think an e-book reader would be much more handy to have in the field where I can pull out a small, light device that has every formula, graph, proof, etc that I need instead of going to a library of heavy textbooks to find that information.

    quasarpulse, above, had a long paragraph that came to three basic objections, I'll debunk these piece by piece:

    1) e-books inherently cause eye-strain for long reading periods.

    --With E-Ink technology (which most e-readers have), e-readers work like high resolution etch-a-sketches in that they read just like words on a page. There is no eye-strain involved any more than normal reading. While some have a backlight, it is optional and would not be used in situations where a normal book could be read.

    2) E-book readers are "extremely difficult" to use when needing to flip back and forth between pages (problem set/answers/formulas/chapter description/etc).

    --I know that Kindle has a feature called "Dog-earing" pages, in which you can easily flip between multiple pages, just like a normal book (except you don't have to flop 350 pages back and forth every 10 seconds).

    3) Computer screens require a student to look up and refocus every time they want to read the book
    --Again, this is completely solved by e-book readers with E-Ink technology.

    Now onto pgb's objections:

    1). (from the story) If your computer breaks, you're forced to frantically ask other people for help.

    --Again, if all your purchases are backed up, you can redownload the material to your laptop or friendly library computer. While it's true that e-book readers cannot be found readily everywhere (and therefore if yours breaks you can't immediately read your book without eye-strain, etc), e-book readers are pretty durable and since they are so one-purpose machines, they shouldn't have problems with crashing.

    2) E-textbooks (and other downloaded media) have DRM-like software.

    --In a future where every student has an e-book reader, there would hopefully be a way to share books with friends - like how movie rentals work with iTunes - where the book can be moved but it will only be in one place at a time. Arguing that there shouldn't be protections on e-books is just silly - you can't burn your textbook for your friend and then keep the original for yourself.

    Now on to Professor Golllin's objections:

    1) Useful out-of-print books can't be found online. Data formats, like 8-tracks die and therefore e-books have short life-spans.

    --These types of objections just stem from a misunderstanding of computers and technology. First off, with e-textbooks there will never be a reason for any book to go "out-of-print," as it won't cost the publisher any additional money to keep the electronic version of the book online. In fact, Google has been scanning out-of-print books for the past few years to create digital copies and will eventually be selling them. With respect to the analogy between data formats and physical media, that analogy doesn't work. Software on computers will always be upgradeable. If you buy an e-book from a popular seller (like Amazon or Google) you will never have to deal with the equivalent of owning an 8-track without an 8-track player - future e-book readers will be backward compatible or they will have ways to redownload old copies (the wonders of the Internet).

    --E-book pros--

    * 1500+ books fit in a 10 ounce frame. In the future this would include audio books, multi-media presentations, etc.
    * Searchable text
    * Underling/highlighting/notes that can be removed
    * Adjustable text-size
    * Cheaper

    --Further thoughts--

    The two most important agents in the change to digital textbooks will be the book industry and e-book makers.

    The book industry needs to understand the digital economy and make substantial discounts for books, such as the $9.99 scheme that Kindle has for "normal" books. While an old-school approach might freak at this price, iTunes has shown that this model will inevitably make much more money for the producers of the content, than high-priced items - it might also help foster life-long learning in adults by getting them to purchase textbooks instead of the latest John Grisham novel.

    E-book makers should work with students to make form factors that make sense for textbooks. This means larger, color screens, durable products, ability to share books (like iTunes rental - single copy that gets moved around), included stylus (or working with other medium - it would be interesting to see a screen that could take input from a mechanical pencil - without lead - and not get scratched up), etc.

    Finally, when people object to the future of e-textbooks it is important to make the decision between the *idea* of e-textbooks and the *current implementations*. If your only objection is the implementation - like the screen size on current devices - instead of fighting the move to digital, you should reframe your arguments to be productive. For example, change "e-textbooks shouldn't be the future because the screens are too small" to "e-book readers would be much more useful for textbooks if their screens were bigger."

    I look forward to hearty debate in the years to come on how to make digital textbooks work for students. Meet you in the future!