Search News


Browse Archives

News

Plagiarist Punished at Florida

January 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A University of Florida professor who confessed this spring to committing plagiarism was suspended for five years without pay, and opted to retire shortly after the punishment was handed down, university officials confirmed Wednesday.

The professor, James Twitchell, was a longtime faculty member who was highly regarded for his writings about consumerism and popular culture. He was frequently quoted by national media organizations, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. But when confronted with a significant body of evidence, collected by The Gainesville Sun, Twitchell admitted that he had “cheated by using pieces of descriptions written by others.”

The Sun’s article -- which was produced by this reporter, a Sun employee at the time -- was published in late April, but Twitchell’s suspension did not take effect until December 31. He continued teaching throughout the spring and fall, which his dean said was appropriate.

“We weren’t going to jump the gun,” said Paul D’Anieri, dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. “We believe in due process like everybody else does, so we follow it.”

Twitchell was a tenured faculty member, but he waived his right to formally grieve the sanction, according to a letter sent by D’Anieri to Twitchell. In the letter, D’Anieri noted that Twitchell, who is in his mid-60s, would be reinstated after the five-year suspension only if he provided evidence that he had properly attributed sources in future writings. Any past writings that contained plagiarism could also be used to terminate him, the letter stated.

“Plagiarism in the published works of a university faculty member represents a most serious breach of the principles of academic writing and research and, indeed, the ethical principles governing our profession,” D’Anieri wrote.

The Sun’s article documented about 20 incidences of Twitchell closely paraphrasing or lifting passages outright from other authors without attribution. The university did not look for other evidence of plagiarism during the course of its investigation, according to D’Anieri.

“I think certainly the sense was that we had evidence that we needed to act on, and we did,” he said.

One of the authors from whom Twitchell borrowed was Roy Rivenburg, a former Los Angeles Times reporter and freelance writer. In his book Shopping for God, Twitchell lifted a passage from a 1995 piece Rivenburg had written on the marketing of Christian-related products. Rivenburg’s passage noted:

"Indeed, with the exception of furniture and major appliances, it is possible to outfit an entire home in Christian products -- bird feeders to body lotions, luggage to lamps.

Twitchell's passage was very similar:

"Indeed, with the exception of furniture and major appliances, it is possible to outfit your entire self and home in Christian products -- bird feeders to body lotions, luggage to lamps."

When Rivenburg confronted Twitchell about the passage, as well as several others, Twitchell assured him that a future paperback edition of Shopping would properly credit him. Twitchell also told Pamela Gilbert, his department chair, about the incident. Gilbert did not report the matter to research misconduct officers, however, despite a “duty” to do so as described in university regulations. When asked about the failure to report, university officials said Gilbert was unaware of the extent of the allegations.

It’s unclear whether Gilbert was investigated or sanctioned in connection with the Twitchell case, and D’Anieri said such information “would probably be considered a confidential personnel matter.”

What’s clearly not confidential, however, is the university’s report of its own investigation of Twitchell. The “entire file is a public record,” according to Tom Walsh, UF's director of sponsored research and compliance. Inside Higher Ed filed a public records request for the report Wednesday, but university officials have not responded.

Twitchell and Gilbert could not be reached for comment.

Another of the authors from whom Twitchell borrowed was Grant McCracken, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who writes a blog about popular culture and advertising, among other subjects. Asked about the outcome of the Twitchell case, McCracken was gracious.

“It looks like the university did the right thing,” he wrote in an e-mail. “As for Twitchell, it's sad. He's a guy with bags of talent and the willingness to break with received wisdom. I hope he keeps writing.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Plagiarist Punished at Florida

  • plagiarism
  • Posted by Gary Davis on January 15, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • "Plagiarism is the root of all culture," Pete Seeger said.

    It's ironic that English classes are filled with "This passage reminds me of..." comments. Plagiarism is forbidden but its first cousin, referencing, is prized.

    May we always remember how arbitrary is the culturally-defined ethical standard.

  • Faculty Plagiarism vs. Student Plagiarism
  • Posted by Xoris on January 15, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • There are clearly a different standards taken in faculty and student plagiarism cases. Yes, everyone deserves due process, but in many of the reported faculty cases, the institutional administration or departments seem to do everything to duck, what is considered a very offensive act in scholarship and research. Students on the other hand are threatened with all types of sanctions.

  • Research Misconduct?
  • Posted by Puzzled on January 15, 2009 at 10:35am EST
  • The plagiarist's department chair is in trouble for not reporting this copying as research misconduct? Why? The plagiarist wrote about shopping, Las Vegas malls, and the like. Since when has this been "research" (or academic topics, for that matter)?

    To be falsified research findings, there would have to be a correct description of a store or mall which this fellow failed to describe or observe.

  • Posted by bob allen on January 15, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • Let's see, you take form one source, its plagiarism, several sources and its and review article, and a whole bunch, its a book. (wantonly plagiarized from somewhere).

  • Not all that ironic, is it?
  • Posted by Rod Bell , Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage on January 15, 2009 at 10:56am EST
  • One comment suggests an irony in the fact that society values references and condemns the "cousin" practice of plagiarism; another comment wonders why professorial plagiarism is approached more gingerly than student plagiarism.

    There is neither irony nor inconstency evidenced in these facts: Both attest to the establishment of customs, norms, rules, and laws that protect and promote the accumulation of knowledge as "social capital," i.e., a resource that enriches (literally) the society that institutionalizes that knowledge. More or less, these rules protect property rights and the transactions that can occur under such rules (copyrights, publishing contracts, competitive research centers and great jobs, etc.). Hence the difference between citing references and not is, among the professoriat, the difference between paying for gas and stealing it. Likewise, when the professors discover and sanction students for cheating, the profs are doing what they're expected (and paid) to do; even students, as a class, expect their profs to police a line between legitimate grade and cheating (otherwise the students' degrees lose value). But when profs finger one of their own, they are playing with fire; it's like the problem of police misconduct--by identifying and prosecuting it, the police risk their own authority vis-a-vis their "customers."

  • The Comments Tell
  • Posted by Common Sense on January 15, 2009 at 11:20am EST
  • The comments seem to indicate there are a lot of stupid people who don't understand referencing styles.

    There's these little things called quotation marks. Use them. That's step one to avoiding charges of plagiarism.

    Once you master that, we'll teach you how to do a proper lit review. If you paraphrase properly, you get to avoid the quotation marks!

    In either case, you are duty-bound to tell the readers who and what you are reviewing. If you don't, it's not a review...it's just you vomiting unspecified information about something you know nothing about. Or, at least, you cannot PROVE you know something about it. Imagine if a movie-reviewer never told you what movie was being reviewed in a newspaper article. 'Nuff said, dufus.

  • Stealing vs. Research
  • Posted by Hana , Assoc. Prof. on January 15, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • Wasn't it Wilson Mizner who stated, "To steal from one author is plagiarism; to steal from many is research." ??

    Maybe it's Steven Wright who said it, or Gallagher, or maybe David Brenner. At any rate, someone said it. Apparently it's plagiarized from some other source.

  • Relativism Rampant
  • Posted by cts on January 15, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • Plagiarism and referencing are 'first cousins'? Is this intended in the same sense that one might say slapping someone's face and stroking someone's face are first cousins? How about, borrowing with permission and stealing?
    And why would the acceptability of students' recognizing similarities among works in a class be relevant to the propriety of an author's publishing someone else's words as his/her own?
    There is nothing 'arbitrary' - in any meaningful sense of that much misused word - about standards of referencing and plagiarism. Some cases may be hard to determine; that does not make the standards arbitrary.
    And, as for differential resposnes to student plagiarism and that of a professional colleague: well, gee, what factors might account for that? That the consequences of outing student cheating are typically less life-blasting than those of outing professional cheating? That we stand in professional roles in relation to our students which differ from our roles in relation to our colleagues? That the visible shame of an adult professional is more painful to observe than the temporary, typically private, shame of a young person? None of these fully justify reticence to out a colleague, but they might be considerations a normal human would recognize.

    Nah. it's all just some silly, 'arbitrary' system.

  • Produce or write?
  • Posted by Mark Scott on January 15, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • Did Jack Stripling *write* the article about JT's unacknowledged borrowings, or did he "produce" it, as he says he did? Since when do writers "produce" articles? And how? As movie producers "produce" movies?

  • Good riddance...
  • Posted by schencka , English instructor on January 15, 2009 at 3:05pm EST
  • to the credibility of Twitchell, Stephen Ambrose, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Stephen Glass, Jayson Blair, and the rest.

  • Keeping Track
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on January 15, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • Hmmm, faculty plagiarism ... now that they’ve nailed Twitchell, Ambrose, Goodwin, Glass, and Blair – and not to mention Ward Churchill -- it’s 6 down and 47,682 to go.

    Listen to this ...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNC-aj76zI4

    And while you’re listening, read what Frizbane Manley had to say at ...

    http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2008/08/26/field

    Just to get you started, “It’s not that ‘the public’ considers plagiarism to be no big deal; it is perfectly obvious that, despite paying a little lip service here and there, it’s we academics who consider it to be no big deal. Indeed, we – including students, faculty, research scholars, and administrators – practice it, dare I say embrace it, as if it’s an academic right of passage.”

  • Posted by Jeremiah on January 15, 2009 at 4:40pm EST
  • Remember the words of the Sri Mahasta: "Poor philosophers copy the works of others; great philosophers steal them."

  • Posted by Perry on January 15, 2009 at 9:15pm EST
  • Are people trying to be humorous or do you all really not understand what plagiarism is and why it is serious in academic work? If the latter, perhaps Inside Higher Ed needs to run a few articles about that.

  • Plagarism far more dangerous to PhDs than students
  • Posted by Scooby on January 16, 2009 at 4:30pm EST
  • Students get away with plagarism far more often than everyone thinks. Even when caught red-handed, legal counsel steps in to avoid costly lawsuits.

    The only defense is to give the student a zero for the course.

  • Posted by Professor on February 3, 2009 at 10:05am EST
  • It's crazy to call everything plagiarism. When an editor requires the use of no citations when public documents are used and space is at a premium, why is the faculty member guilty and editor is not?

  • plagiarism
  • Posted by j ranelli on February 25, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • at best plagiarism is lazy...and, in places where the advancement of knowlege is the task, it wastes time

    and energy that could be better directed if the thief would just provide a bibliography save us time spent on denatured

    duplication...of course they never do because the thievery is driven by a self-serving imperative and the potential

    rewards therefrom...nail their thimblerigging (to paraphrase joyce) names to your classroom door.