Search News


Browse Archives

News

Blackboard, 9.0

January 27, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Blackboard Inc., the giant among course management system (CMS) providers, today unveils Release 9.0 of Blackboard Learn. Blackboard bills the newest iteration as more open and flexible -- allowing colleges to use the platform "as an open foundation for whatever complementary technologies they need to support their approach to teaching and learning."

And the new release will feature expanded Web 2.0 and “social learning” tools, such as blogs and journals, enhanced notification capabilities (i.e., “Your paper is due in four hours” – or four days), and a redesigned, customizable user interface.

“It would definitely be an immediate, apparent change when you log into the system," said Jessica Finnefrock, Blackboard’s senior vice president for product development.

Among the changes that will be most immediately noticeable to students and professors, aside from the redesigned, Web 2.0 interface, are the new notifications. “Probably one of the No. 1 things I heard from students is, 'We need to more clearly manage the things that are due,' ” said Finnefrock. She explained that the notifications for pending assignments will be visible as “dashboards” on the Blackboard site, and students can also elect to receive reminders via e-mail and, yes, Facebook (Blackboard launched a Facebook application last May). “In these focus groups, sometimes students will say, ‘I’ll log onto Blackboard and when I log in I realize my assignment was due that day. Can’t Blackboard send me something?’ ”

Students can choose when (how far in advance) and for what they’d like to receive alerts. Finnefrock said the company plans to continue expanding its notification capabilities in the future to include things like text messages and iPhone applications.

The newest version also features the SafeAssign plagiarism detection software bundled in, as opposed to it being available as an add-on. And it includes integrations to allow open-source course management systems -- such as Sakai and Moodle, to which colleges have increasingly been gravitating -- to be accessed within Blackboard.

While Blackboard prices change from year to year, a spokesman said that the new release has no bearing on the price structure. Colleges holding Blackboard licenses can upgrade to the 9.0 version at no extra cost; Finnefrock said she expects many institutions will pilot the new version this spring and summer and fully launch it come fall.

Blackboard declined to release the full list of universities that have been doing Beta testing for confidentiality reasons, but recommended three institutions that are now in the piloting or co-production phase. Two could be reached; both officials described only minor problems, and general satisfaction with the updated software.

Donna Wicks, senior system administrator for Blackboard at Kettering University, in Michigan, said that, in addition to the notification systems, she’s particularly impressed by the new look and ability to customize the site. “Not that the old Blackboard is terrible, but it looks out of date. This new version, it’s just, it's a cleaner look.… I’ve been able to do more with our log-in page. I’ve really customized it. I don’t feel like I’m at a Blackboard site when I go to the page. I feel like it’s a Kettering page that’s been built.”

Lonnie Harvel, vice president of educational technology at Georgia Gwinnett College, said he was particularly pleased by the "mashup" quality of the new release -- in other words, the ability to import other systems into Blackboard (and export, too). "The interface is more of a robust, portaling environment that is allowing us to bring more services from outside the Blackboard toolset into that environment," he said. For instance, "with the new environment, I can simply connect it to my campus announcement system.... It's all a matter of being able to weave the different information sources together in one place."

Moving forward, Harvel said Blackboard has the daunting task of keeping two very different constituencies happy -- long-time Blackboard users and clients of its old competitor WebCT, which Blackboard bought in 2005. Individuals could be religious in their original preferences, said Harvel (who described himself as an agnostic in that debate). "I think that will probably be one of the biggest challenges that Blackboard has to struggle with, bringing these two platforms together.... They're going to be dealing with two different sets of expectations."

A spokeswoman for a current Blackboard competitor, Desire2Learn, said that the company (which tangled with Blackboard in a much-watched legal battle) has also been focused on social learning and interfacing with other technologies "for quite some time." Valerie Beyer cited, for instance, the company's e-Portfolio, launched last March -- "that really pushed us into the social learning space.” Desire2Learn released an application for BlackBerry in July.

Another player in the e-learning space, Epsilen, has emphasized social learning and e-portfolios. "Blackboard has held market share for a long time, and they’ve built their brand on CMS, and they’re adding some new functionality," said Felice Nudelman, executive director of education for The New York Times Company, which has an investment in Epsilen. "But the sense I get is it is not at its core a Web 2.0 environment.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Blackboard, 9.0

  • Oh, those pesky assignment deadlines...
  • Posted by Mike on January 27, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • While I'm looking forward to the new iteration of Blackboard, even as my institution is exploring alternatives, I would suggest a decidedly low-tech solution to the students who complain they're surprised by an assignment's due date: read the syllabus!

  • Posted by Dr. Pepper , Professor-in-Training on January 27, 2009 at 10:36am EST
  • I gotta say, all these social features are nice, but I get them for free elsewhere. There is no incentive for me to use blackboard since most of the resources (at least at my institution) go buh-bye at the end of the semester. Why put all that work into the social aspect of it if it's going to disappear?

    As far as assignment reminders go - as a grad student I get the syllabus, I put the stuff in my to do list. My iPod, my Phone and my computer squawk at me when stuff is due. I don't need Blackboard to do that too ;-)

  • Students' online expectations
  • Posted by Midwest Prof on January 27, 2009 at 11:05am EST
  • Have used WebCT/Blackboard for many years. Turns out only those students with the highest grades regularly visit the site, even after I point out the advantages of using resources posted there (which include samples of outstanding term papers from previous semesters and PowerPoints shown in class). I've begun adding more reminders when assignments are due, but 1/4 to 1/3 of the students still don't complete them on time. Yet they always seem to know when tests are scheduled. Can Blackboard come up with a program that actually makes student do their out-of-class homework?

  • Posted by Gary Holden , Professor at NYU on January 27, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • Universities have invested a substantial amount of resources in Blackboard. Is there any credible evidence that this product improves education in meaningful ways?

  • Midwest Prof: be devious
  • Posted by Mojo Bison on January 27, 2009 at 1:25pm EST
  • MP: in my sections, I arrange it so that students literally cannot access course materials (read: exams) unless they have completed certain benchmarks (read: homework). Play around with the Select Release Criteria commands for your assignments. For instance, no one can access ANY of my quizzes until they've passed a quiz on ...the course syllabus and FAQ.

    I'm glad they're making 9.0 free to everyone with a current license, that might be enough of an inducement for my place to upgrade sooner rather than later. Nothing can wholly take the place of in-class dynamics, but I sure do like not having to waste time on giving in-class assessments.

  • Devious suggestion
  • Posted by Midwest Prof on January 27, 2009 at 2:40pm EST
  • That could work if I gave on-line tests, but mine are done in class. My confusion is why students know the dates for in-class tests yet not for on-line assignments. Nor do they feel particularly upset about getting a 0 on those assignments. What's more, the assignments collectively are worth as much as the tests. Just seems odd to me.

  • BB V9
  • Posted by Larry Lambert , System Administrator on January 27, 2009 at 4:50pm EST
  • Like most other CMS, this new iteration of BB will go a long way to spruce up the media black hole that has existed in previous versions. The new system addresses many issues that previous versions have been completely ignoring. It seems BB has been listening to customers more and now understands it is okay to be able to integrate features from other Open Source LMS' too. I think this will be a good change if for nothing else other than student and faculty interest. The paradigm has changed and will continue to do so. Learning is different now and definitely NOT your granddaddy's classroom.

  • Serious Consumer Reviews Needed
  • Posted by BDL on January 27, 2009 at 4:50pm EST
  • After reading this article I am reminded again how badly people in higher ed need serious reviews of the systems we use for our courses. It seems that for quite some time now the systems that institutions get locked into have been the proverbial tail-wagging-the-dog of online learning. Not only do we need clear and objective reviews about their reliability and technical performance, but also about their impact on the very definition of teaching and learning.

  • online crap
  • Posted by DFS on January 27, 2009 at 9:45pm EST
  • I don't know if this helps, but I can diagram something on the board and explain it on my feet better than anything I have seen demonstrated on the internet.

    I'm still looking at all of the clutter, however, admittedly looking forward with excitement to acquiring something I haven't seen which would explain my material better. I would use this, if I would find it.

    I understand the "need" for Blackboard, but I also realize its admission of failure compared to the way I learned.

  • Online does not equal crap
  • Posted by Dr. Pepper , Professor-in-training on January 27, 2009 at 10:55pm EST
  • I disagree with you DFS.

    Teaching online is different from teaching face to face. Trying to get a 1-to-1 correspondence between online and face-to-face won't get you anywhere productive.

    No, online learning is not the way you learned. That doesn't mean that it's not on par with face to face learning if you plan it correctly. Yes in a face to face environment you can think on your feet and draw a diagram. You can do the same thing online, if you know how to.

  • Not Either/Or
  • Posted by cts on January 28, 2009 at 1:35pm EST
  • I don't see that using a tool like BB is equivalent to online teaching. I teach in a traditional classroom and also use BB for various purposes. It is nice as a place to locate resources for students, escpecially those who would never drag themselves to the library's reserve room. Using the tracking tools, I can see who has done the reading. It saves $$ and paper, as I no longer pass out all those clever aids to every student in every course. And, it is very handy for quick announcments, such as today's "I'm snowed in; no class."

    I DO hope the new version makes adding, copying, and managing materials easier. And, I wish I did not have to pretend that every assignment has a point value. Did they change any of that?

  • I hear you, Dr. Pepper
  • Posted by DFS on February 4, 2009 at 12:10pm EST
  • I'm not absolutely opposed to Blackboard. I just know that I am (and must be) prepared to answer almost every question on my feet. (If I don't recall, or know, the answer, I will tell them that I'll get back to them, and the class waits for it with the due anticipation.) There is still some benefit, though, to the immediate response in the actual presence of the class in the same physical space. People still interact when intermingled, and this dynamic is entirely natural. This dynamic is altered, for good or for ill, and for differing reasons and for differing results, when the venue is altered.

    It is for that reason -- the intermingling -- that I am not oppossed to technological back-up. There must be some use for it -- for me. I still have an open mind, even though I am a "traditionalist."

  • The world has changed folks, get used to it
  • Posted by Frank on February 10, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • It is sad to read some of these comments. Instructors who do not see a value in online education and use of various tech tools within their classes, should not be teaching. Their time in the classroom has passed them by.

    The world has changed folks. Education has changed. The way students learn has changed. The way you work in the world, outside of the 4 walls of your classroom, has changed.

    One commenter above asks to see research about the value of Blackboard and its use. Why do you need to see research? I've seen tenured college instructors who could not teach, could not communicate with students, and who had a shaky grasp of the content. Where's the value in keeping them in the classroom? Where's the research that proves that they should continue to teach?

    Blackboard, Moodle, Sakai, and all the rest of the technology tools used in education benefit both teacher and student when used correctly. Another commenter above stated that he needed to stay on his feet and try to answer every question immediately in class time...and because of that, online education does not work. According to whom? I've found a number of the classes I've taken completely online were much better learning experiences than many of the ones I had in the traditional classroom. The same instructor needs to be able to diagram on the board, on the fly, during face-2-face class. You can do that in Bb and in a number of online tools (Bubbl.us, Many Eyes, Text2MindMap, etc...).

    Instructors may continue to hold on the traditionalist way of teaching. In the long run, doing so hurts the students since they will only be further ill-prepared for life post-college.

  • Why get used to it?
  • Posted by THMH on July 17, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • It will only change again.