Search News


Browse Archives

News

A Vision for History at Community Colleges

January 27, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

SEATTLE -- History as a discipline is most popular as an undergraduate field of study at liberal arts colleges or research universities -- institutions that attract well-prepared students. Professors at community colleges in the Seattle area are trying to find ways to attract more students, in part by accepting that many of those they want to educate view the field as boring, thinking of it as “just memorizing names and dates.”

To reach the students, these professors are working on a two-pronged strategy. First, they are preparing exercises that link students’ lives to the study of history. Second, they are focusing on basic information literacy and research skills, which their students tend to lack. The combination appears to be working, even as these professors teach not to the idealized seminar room of the stereotypical history scholar, but in classes of 35 students or more -- many of whom have full-time jobs.

The professors described their approaches here at the annual meeting of the Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Brian Casserly of North Seattle Community College uses assignments in a U.S. survey history course to teach the basics of conducting research and writing a research paper -- something most students don’t know how to do.

“We have this image of students as being savvy about finding information,” he said. “But I find a very shallow understanding of how to evaluate information,” with students aware of little except Google and Wikipedia. To get beyond that, he uses as a central assignment a paper in which students must link an important event in American history to the life of one of their family members.

An example he offers in the assignment shows how a student's grandparent might link to topics appropriate for a history paper in several ways. This grandparent might have attended college on the GI Bill (which could then be the key event) or settled in the suburbs (suggesting a report on the rise of Levittowns).

As they are working on the larger paper, students receive lessons and homework designed to teach research skills. For example, to wean them off Google as a sole research source, they have a library tour and orientation, and then the assignment of finding an article on civil rights in a scholarly journal in the library and producing short pieces of writing that demonstrate the ability to appropriately paraphrase an argument and cite sources. Similarly, students are given a topic on which they must prepare an annotated bibliography.

Because many students will interview a parent or grandparent for the larger assignment, they have class sessions on how to do an oral history interview, including the process of obtaining permission from the subject.

The various small assignments are all designed to teach skills that are foreign to the students and that would normally discourage them from studying history or viewing it as anything by memorizing, Casserly said. But his experience is that, if guided, the students do in fact learn these skills. “It’s about using a systematic process,” he said. When the students turn in the final papers, “the research skills have improved dramatically” and they are actually finding the process interesting, he said. (This session stood out among others at the AAC&U meeting in that the professors brought students along, and they vouched for the techniques being talked about, indicating that they never previously found history relevant, but how these assignments helped them understand how the Vietnam War might have affected their parents, or exactly why President Obama’s election was so historically significant and meaningful to African Americans who were alive in the civil rights era.)

The fact that some new community college students don't have a sense of the Vietnam War or the civil rights movement reflects a reality -- poor knowledge of history -- that the professor here said must be addressed head-on, in part with diagnostic tests. While new community college students are routinely given placement tests in mathematics and writing, these professors argued for their use in history, to help identify early on what students know and where their gaps are.

There are many gaps, but Maureen Nutting, a professor of history at North Seattle, said that professors can adjust if they know what they need to cover. For a course on American history, for example, she asks students at the beginning of the course to define and provide context for terms such as "Reconstruction" and "Jacksonian democracy." One of her colleagues, Scott Rausch, asks students in a world history course similar questions and produced this analysis of correct and incorrect answers, along with the teaching implications. He knows going in that he'll have a majority of students who know what a caste system is, but that the odds aren't in favor of any student understanding polis or Pax Romana.

"Our courses aren't easy," said Nutting, but they start without being over student's heads.

Amy Kinsel, professor of history at Shoreline Community College, said she has had success teaching immigration history. About a quarter of students are immigrants, and many others have close family members who immigrated to the United States. Students are wondering, "Where do I fit in?" and immigration history -- which she teaches from colonial times to the present -- provides answers. The major research paper for the course is on the immigrant group of the student's choice and Kinsel noted that students do not necessarily pick their own.

The paper must cover issues of race, ethnicity, class, religion, and national identity -- as well as assimilation, acculturation, group identity, political power or lack thereof, work or economic roles, gender roles, educational experiences, and interactions with other groups.

Tim McMannon, professor of history at Highline Community College, said that he tries to combine critical thinking and research skills with "an emphasis on the content" in his courses.

One of the assignments he typically gives is a book review, in which students must critique a monograph about history. "So many of my students don't read books," he said. As a result, he said that students start of complaining about the assignment, especially when he rejects books that aren't real monographs. But he shares examples of book reviews, and that helps the students gain confidence.

At the same time, he said it was important not to only assign books. He typically assigns students to review a museum exhibit. "For many of them, they are unexposed, or they were in third grade when they last went and didn't learn anything." The review must include both description and judgments on such matters as the scholarly value of the presentation. (To frame the assignment, he usually specifies that it be an exhibit that pertains in some way to the history of the Pacific Northwest.)

Students need "literacy with material culture," he said.

One thing all the professors stressed was the importance of using every possible tool to teach. McMannon said that on the multiple choice tests he gives, he doesn't want students to end the process after receiving their grades. So he offers "second choice points" for students who can identify the page in the various books where they should have learned the answer to whatever question they missed.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Vision for History at Community Colleges

  • Bring History Home Teach Public Higher Ed 101
  • Posted by Chitra KarunaKaran at CUNY on January 27, 2009 at 7:05am EST
  • This article about the importance of teaching history at community colleges offers me the opportunity to reiterate the importance of teaching the History of Public Higher Ed at these and the senior colleges.

    I teach at a community college in the CUNY City University of New York system and I have long argued without any success that every entering freshman, during what CUNY calls the FYI Freshman Year Initiative, be offered the opportunity (not mandated) to take Public Higher Ed 101.

    My students know nothing of the entrenched two-tier system of educational inequality, one private and elite, the other public and inadequately financed, that thrives in the US. Yet, our students are victims of this structural inequity.
    Our faculties, especially tenured faculty who are mainly compliant, neoliberal and non-progressive, and our post-plantation admins. accept and even promote this inequity.

    Q. How better to garner and generate support for Public Higher Ed than to teach and encourage critical thinking so that beneficiaries of public higher ed can engage in strategic action on issues confronting Public Higher Ed?

    Public Higher Education institutions and critical, evidentiary knowledge of their history and contemporary political location, are essential for fostering civil society and ethical democracy in the U.S.

    Dr. Chithra KarunaKaran
    City University of New York
    Ethical Democracy as Lived Practice
    http://www.EthicalDemocracy.blogspot.com

  • Teaching research skills by participation
  • Posted by Iris Devadason , Professor of English Retd, but active at The United Theological college on January 27, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • hi,
    In addition to teaching English I taught Study Methods too, while working, for about 20 yrs which sts declared was most useful.But this could have turned a passive exercise too.So,I introduced a Simulated Academic Research Project which I learnt from another English teacher,Roger Budd,(ELTJ 1988)
    This involves five step for which I awarded grades.20% each.
    1.Writing abstracts of books that they must read on their chosen topic.(Bk.reviews and precis writing skills)
    2.Creating a questionnaire
    3.Administering the Qnn during the break, even using the mother -tongue, if need be.
    Tabulating and Interpreting the Qnn,(all with my guidance )
    4. writing a draft ouline for the final essay.Writing the final essay.
    5.making a 10 minute oral presentation of their findings.
    As this was so useful, I am now introducing this idea in another Institution where I work as Director:Resources and have to train the teachers first. Hard work all around but high returns I assure you.
    Iris

  • Surveys
  • Posted by CT on January 27, 2009 at 8:37am EST
  • I'm sure Iris Devadason means well, but does Professor Devadason have any training in constructing questionnaires? Survey work is both a science and an art, entire courses and programs exist to teach people how to do this task well. While I appreciate instructors' desire to make their courses universally relevant, there is something to be said for sticking to one's areas of expertise.

  • Real Hope for Course Integrated Info Lit
  • Posted by stevenb on January 27, 2009 at 9:26am EST
  • It is encouraging to read that enlightened faculty are integrating the development of student research skills into their courses. The campus librarians have sought, for many years, opportunities to collaborate with faculty as part of their information literacy initiatives. Some faculty are open to it, others are resistant. But when faculty take the responsibility to help students learn these skills, with or without a librarian partner (hopefully with) it will be a much more powerful learning experience for the student.

    Think about it. You can have a librarian come and talk about research for one class session (common) or a faculty member can integrate research skill development into the course and spend some time on it throughout the semester. The latter approach is far more likely to result in students internalizing an appreciation of high quality research. And let's face it, students see faculty as the authority. When they hear about this from a librarian they might hardly pay attention. But if the faculty member tells them to use a particular database - the students listen. We know this because of OCLC's College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information study. When asked who they learn about new e-resources from and who they trust to guide them for their research, students overwhelmingly identify faculty as their top source. Librarians? Way down on the list. I hope this is a model that will catch on in a big way. And if faculty need help to get started with this model - you librarians are ready and waiting to help you. Thanks for promoting what these history faculty are doing to help their students become savvy consumers of information.

  • Posted by Larry Steele on January 27, 2009 at 11:20am EST
  • While teaching a unit on immigration, I have asked students in my online history course to relate some of their family's experiences moving to this country or our state. The assignment has led to some interesting family discussions and led some students to explore their heritage. Many had never spoken to their parents or grandparents about the past and they often come away with an understanding that their families are a part of "history" in ways that they had never imagined.

  • sometimes...
  • Posted by Melissa at CC Adjunct on January 27, 2009 at 11:25am EST
  • I, too, tried the research paper project, albeit in a world history class. For a variety of reasons -- because it was a night class, because it was only once a week, heck, even because despite my best efforts, I wasn't communicating it well -- but it bombed. Horribly. Now I do all the 'parts' (a bibliography, an annotated bibliography, note taking, etc) without a final product.

    Hopefully, a different schedule, or perhaps a different class, will allow me to try it again. But I'm a little gunshy of a research paper in the CC classroom.

  • info LIt in History
  • Posted by Karen , Assist Prof/Librarian at Lamar University on January 27, 2009 at 12:02pm EST
  • Sounds good and I hope they are including a librarian in the process. Melissa, you might want to talk with the librarians on your campus to help with your research project. Most of us are more than willing to get involved! It also takes some of the load off an instructor.

  • Mistakes are Appreciated
  • Posted by Melinda Grube on January 27, 2009 at 1:50pm EST
  • For the past five years, I've been an adjunct history lecturer at a community college in Upstate NY. I choose to emphasize the use of primary sources and research methodology with my students. Their biggest project, assigned on the first day and due the last day of class, is what I call the Adopt a Dead Person Project. Their job is to visit a cemetery, choose a gravestone then do research online, in archives, through interviews with public historians, in libraries, etc. to find as much as they can about that person's life and historical context. I encourage them to write not only about their successes but their failures as well. By having them focus on the (intentionally)frustrating process I assign them, I get them to abandon the idea that history is something that leaps fully formed from the heads of people with doctorates. History involves love, labor, and error and it is not just something they can learn but is also something that they can do.

  • Genealogy
  • Posted by Engineering prof on January 27, 2009 at 2:01pm EST
  • I hated history through high school. Now, with genealogy as my hobby, I love it. If history had been taught by tying it to my family history, maybe I would have liked it, and maybe I would have asked more questions of my grandparents when they were alive, sigh.

    I also find that I love history books even about topics not tied to my family, if the history is tied to individuals. I think the adopt a dead person idea is great.

    I think this is a brilliant way to teach history.

  • Chitra KarunaKara
  • Posted by DFS on January 27, 2009 at 6:30pm EST
  • I am not conversant in this. Please explain what is meant by "History of Public Higher Ed."

    Thanks.

  • No research skills before college?
  • Posted by Lloyd Daub on January 27, 2009 at 9:45pm EST
  • "basics of conducting research and writing a research paper — something most students don’t know how to do"

    That's an indictment against any K-12 school system anywhere in the country, no matter what socio-economic element makes up the student body. Or the professors are allowing themselves to be misled by their students.

    Can it really be that I am of the last generation of pupils in America to have begun research assignments in Elementary school and kept doing them all through High School?

    No. I am assured by public school teachers and parents of K-12 children that research techniques are taught in schools from grade school on. College students should not be ignorant of research techniques.

    And yes, I teach Information Literacy myself. We know the students have done research; we want them to learn college level research and citation and learn to use advanced tools. And even then many of our students are aware of databases and OPACs.

  • being inter-disciplinary
  • Posted by Iris , Prof.retd at UTC.Bangalore on January 28, 2009 at 6:45am EST
  • hello CT,
    Sure I had to train myself , not on a large scale, but just enough to train sts.That is why I read Theology to teach English and did a good job too.I have done pioneering work in ESP:Theology and pubd.If one does not venture out of one's field one cannot achieve much when there is a demand for such inter-disciplinary approaches.
    I belong to Ce-Tesol (USA)and they will endorse what I say.Christian educators in TESOL.

  • Vission for Histroy at Community Colleges
  • Posted by mike beehler , VP- Ext Learninbg on January 28, 2009 at 11:25am EST
  • This is called "Teaching", too bad there isn't more of this from the inception of a child's education. MB

  • Research Methods
  • Posted by Iris , Prof.of English Retd on January 29, 2009 at 6:55am EST
  • May I clarify a bit more.I did tell the sts that the subject specialists wiould lead them further afield when they went into the 2nd year of study and that I was just showing the way as I am after all, an English teacher. But the study of English improves while doing such Simulated Academic Research and removes the monotony of grammar and vocabulary repeated at higher levels.
    As for librarians, I have always relied on their help when I prepared a "literature sources hunt" for the class=Step I.
    I loved the idea of "Adopt a dead person"!
    Might use it in another context.Thanks.
    Iris

  • Replying to DFS' request for clarification (above)
  • Posted by Chithra at CUNY on January 29, 2009 at 8:20am EST
  • Hi DFS,
    Scott Jaschnik's article details *methods* for the teaching of history at cc's.

    I am raising the core curriculum question of CONTENT. Why not teach the trajectory and political location of Public Higher Ed insitituions? I know that at my uni. the historic development of CUNY would be an absorbing topic of study for cc and senior college students because it is tied up with civil rights activism and legislation, women's studies, Black Studies, Puerto Rican Studies, Asian American Studies, etc. Our students are attending these institutions, yet they know very little about the history and socio-political location of instit. that they benefit from and most important, have the oppty to improve upon. Why does the US have a 2-tier education system in the first place? Perhaps the premise of educational inequality has its roots in the assignment of unequal humanness, most fully elaborated in the system of slavery and racism, not to mention genocide of indigenous peoples,all part of US history.

    That type of critical engagement in history would be authentic preparation for lifelong citizenship in a democracy, for community college students. In fact our students are ready to study critical history, but the faculty are not quite as ready to engage in teaching it.
    I am asserting that the inclusive public progressive system of higher ed is the cornerstone of a civilisational ethical democracy. The US needs practice in this area.
    History does not exist in a geopolitical vacuum and does not consist merely of an assortment of teaching tools.

    Note:I am not saying that ANYONE engaged in this discussion or mentioned in the article is implying that!

    Chithra KarunaKaran
    Ethical Democracy As Lived Practice
    http://www.EthicalDemocracy.blogspot.com

  • Brian Casserly's research assignment
  • Posted by Andrea Finkelstein , Professor at Bronx Community College CUNY on January 29, 2009 at 3:05pm EST
  • The question is how to draw students into history beyond skimming the last three generations? Do you also risk privileging current history to the point that students are taught to undervalue anything too far back for a living person to explain? After all, part and parcel of a history course is to expose students to the deep (temporally speaking) roots of current conditions. So, once you've have them do this 20th century paper, what next? Also, if the course is taught chronologically, won't most of it be long gone before students are introduced to topics they could research this way?