Search News


Browse Archives

News

Standards for Short-Term Study Abroad

January 30, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Short-term study abroad has grown rapidly in recent years, with 55.4 percent of Americans studying in other countries now doing so on programs of two to eight weeks in length, according to the latest figures from the Institute of International Education. Such programs have their own specific challenges in terms of administration and education, and a new set of standards from the Forum on Education Abroad aims to address them.

“While some short-term programs are well-established and repeated regularly, others are ad hoc ventures that are designed and led by faculty members, campus internship and volunteer offices, or others who may have little or no experience with the standards for designing and managing education aboard programs,” states the introduction to the standards, released today and freely available on the Forum's Web site. “Because of the brevity of short-term programs, it is all the more important for program organizers to learn from experienced study abroad administrators so that the programs they develop maximize student learning opportunities and make every moment count.”

"As with the Standards of Good Practice for Education Abroad, these short-term program standards are balanced in that they provide guidelines on the one hand, and respect the unique education abroad missions and goals that particular institutions have," explained Brian Whalen, president and CEO of the Forum. "The short-term program standards are intended to be used as a means to assess and improve short-term programs. The standards provide guidance without dictating specific ways that organizations or institutions should meet the standards."

The standards are meant to be considered in concert with more general standards promulgated by the forum (which is recognized by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission as a standards development organization). They're subdivided into nine categories -- an example from each is included below.

  • Mission, Objectives and Purpose. Example -- "Appropriateness: The focus of the program is appropriate to the site chosen."
  • Student Learning and Development. Example -- "Learning Outcomes: The program fosters discipline-specific and/or interdisciplinary learning outcomes appropriate to the curriculum, site, and program goals."
  • Academic Framework. Example -- "Length: The length of the program is appropriate to the amount of credit granted." (Institutions vary a great deal in how much credit they award for short-term programs.)
  • Extra-Academic Framework. Example -- “For programs involving extensive travel … faculty and program sponsors should consider carefully the number of sites proposed to visit, their geographical proximity to each other and the time spent traveling between them. More emphasis should be given to having full, in-depth experiences at each site rather than on ‘seeing everything' by visiting multiple sites and spending only short amounts of time on each site.”
  • Preparation for the Learning Environment Abroad. Example -- "Returning Student Support: The home institution and/or the program provide support for students returning from abroad."
  • Student Selection and Code of Conduct. Example -- "Affordability: The program seeks to keep the program affordable for the greatest number of students."
  • Organizational and Program Resources. Example -- “Training: Academic and Administrative personnel have appropriate training in the areas of health, safety, and security; student affairs; disciplinary procedures; academic advising; and operating in the host environment." ("Many organizations and institutions have excellent training programs in place for faculty and administrators involved in short-term programs," said Whalen. "However, it can be an area that is overlooked, especially at institutions where programs are not overseen centrally.")
  • Health, Safety, and Security. Example -- "Health: The program leadership is aware of student health issues prior to departure and is well prepared to handle student, faculty, and staff health issues that may arise."
  • Ethics and Integrity. Example -- "Cultural Sensitivity: The program acts with sensitivity to and respect for differences between local cultural norms and those of the home culture."
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Standards for Short-Term Study Abroad

  • Study Abroad Standards
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Assistant Provost at Indiana Wesleyan University on January 30, 2009 at 7:20am EST
  • Elizabeth, Thank you for this list of standards. During my previous work with a foundation I was amazed during my time overseas at the number of students participating in such programs. While in England and Egypt I ran into programs sponsored by the CCCU, and its 11 programs might serve as a good case study for those interested: http://www.bestsemester.com/about.asp. The programs are divided into those that are "culture-shaping" and others that are "culture-crossing." Many of our IWU students have participated in these and all reports are positive. Ironically, my first email this morning was from a colleague in Zambia with our new program there. Thanks again for this short but timely piece. JP

  • another accrediting agency in the making?
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at FHEAP on January 30, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • Just what we need now -- another accrediting agency, with another set of standards.

    If this organizational development follows historical precedent, it will eventually morph itself into an independent accreditor for "study abroad" programs.

    The overlap with existing so-called standards is almost total. But apparently the standards that are now in place no longer apply.

    It is interesting to note, in passing, that the regional accreditors have not headed off this intrusion onto their turf by simply pre-empting the upstarts by including their own standards for study abroad.

    But the big battle will come when these folks vie for federal recognition.

  • Where's the culture in study abroad?
  • Posted by Nepal Wallah , Director, Graduate Admissions at The College of Saint Rose on January 30, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • As someone who directed a study abroad program for three years, and who currently teaches intercultural communication, it surprises me that the subject of intercultural competence is so poorly represented in these standards. I don't disagree about the other issues raised here -- they are relevant and need to be addressed -- but isn't the reason to take students abroad to challenge them not just to see stuff? Because there is little time for processing knowledge/learning, emotions, and experience in the field, a short-term program really needs strong pre-departure and post-return work.

    When I first started out in directing study abroad, my pre-service trainig included a lot of worst-case scenarios, which I thought was overkill. Then I had a student get injured on the trail who had to be carried by porter to a roadhead, a student experience a medical reaction to malaria meds that caused her to see visions and hear voices, students have relapses of eating disorders because of the natural/expected stress of new environments. Believe me, responses to these kinds of issues do need to be in standards for short-term programs too. Experienced administrators can provide a lot of guidance and support to faculty, allowing faculty to concentrate on instruction. I've heard faculty colleagues pooh-pooh this, but I encourage everyone to have a checklist like these standards handy when planning.

    The politics of the accreditation I'll leave for others to analzye. (I find it fascinating, but not my "burning issue.")

  • program affordability
  • Posted by alice gail bier , Director at University of Minnesota Duluth on January 30, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • Most institutions with a strong international focus have a wide range of programs that address the academic needs and desired personal experiences of participants and financial structures of the international office and the institution. At the same time, the student body of a given institution generally have represent a wide range of income levels and financial resources. Program "affordability" would be best addressed within the range of programs offered rather than on an individual program basis.

  • Nepal Wallah
  • Posted by DFS on February 4, 2009 at 12:50pm EST
  • Thanks again for keeping us grounded in Reality. What a Concept!