Search News


Browse Archives

News

AP Participation Up, but Not for All

February 5, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

More students than ever are achieving high scores on Advanced Placement examinations, according to data released by the College Board Wednesday. But the report also noted continuing gaps among racial and ethnic groups -- with minimal progress for black students.

For the high school class of 2008, 15.2 percent of students scored a 3 or higher on at least one AP course while in high school. A score of 3 generally suggests a good understanding of the material and tends to be the minimum level at which some colleges will award credit for the work. That percentage is up from 14.4 percent for the previous class, and from 12.2 for the class five years prior.

AP courses have grown in popularity over the last decade, with many students seeing them as a way to impress college admissions officers. While there is much debate over whether the courses really represent college-level work, even many educators who are skeptical of AP meeting that standard praise the programs for adding rigor and keeping students engaged in the senior year of high school.

As AP has become a key way for top high school students to demonstrate their academic abilities to colleges, concern has grown over the participation gaps among different demographic groups. Wealthier high schools tend to offer many more AP courses, while high schools in low-income areas with many minority students tend to offer far fewer AP options. The College Board has made a major push to expand both participation and success rates on the exams, providing grants and support to high schools that serve low-income students and are working to expand AP.

The data released by the College Board on Wednesday show some progress -- for some groups that have not historically achieved high levels of participation. For example, 17.0 percent of AP test-takers in from the class of 2008 were from low-income families, up from 16.2 percent the previous year. And these low-income students made up 13.4 of students achieving at least one score of 3, up from 13.1 percent the year before.

The College Board has set a goal of closing the "equity and excellence gap" for all states -- a goal that is achieved when the percentage of students from various groups achieving at least one score of 3 equals their share of the state population. As of this year, 18 states have closed the gap for Latino students and 16 states have done so for Native American students. No state has closed the gap for black students.

Nationally, the percentage of public high school students who took at least one AP exam (regardless of score) shows the extent of the gaps. For white and Latino students, the proportions of those in the total population and the AP population are similar. Asian students are much more likely to take an AP exam and black students are much less likely to do so.

High School and AP Test-Taking Populations by Race and Ethnicity, Class of 2008

Group % of AP Population % of High School Population
Black 7.8% 14.4%
Asian 10.2% 5.3%
Latino 14.8% 15.4%
Native American 0.6% 1.1%
White 61.0% 62.8%
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on AP Participation Up, but Not for All

  • Inputs, Inputs, Inputs
  • Posted by An Old Goat on February 5, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • 'Advanced Placement' used to mean a young high school graduate could earn credit for college-level learning -- not just another way to try to impress admissions officers. Has College Board research ever quantified the numbers of such credit recipients and the volume of credit awards? Aren't 'outputs' important, or shall we go back to the days of counting books in the library, never mind the statistics on actual borrowers and circulation rates?

  • More about AP's
  • Posted by peter herzberg , educational consultant on April 28, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • The article may want to mention that affluent kids can pay test prep organizations to help them crack the test code; poor kids don't; and the College Board does or can do little about this. And the other large question is whether the content of AP's--largely chug and plug--adds pseudo rigor to schools that need to look good and have a vacuum in better curriculum that could much better prepare larger numbers of kids across the spectrum for a world which requires non AP thinking.
    And how about skimming the best teachers from kids that really need those teachers? I have little hope that the AP juggernaut will be challenged in the absence of perceived rigor elsewhere, but it's time we subject this curriculum to much more rigorous analysis.