Search News


Browse Archives

News

Gordon Gee's Call for 'Reinvention' of Higher Ed

February 9, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- Noting that the United States created land-grant colleges in the middle of the Civil War, E. Gordon Gee told his fellow college presidents Sunday evening that the current economic crisis is no reason not to consider bold and far-reaching reforms of the institutions. "I am calling for intentional upheaval at our colleges and universities just when fiscal chaos already places us on the edge," Gee said here at the annual meeting of the American Council on Education.

The choice for higher education, he said: "reinvention or extinction."

Gee didn't dispute the seriousness of the economic crisis facing colleges, calling it an "ever-worsening fiscal quagmire." But he said that higher education must resist the "first instinct" of such situations, "to hunker down, hide out, take refuge in the fox hole, and wait for the storm to pass." The situation is sufficiently dire, he said, that colleges need to "reconfigure ourselves," rather than simply trying to restore lost funds.

Specifically, Gee suggested that colleges abandon their traditional devotion to disciplines, rethink the way faculty members are hired, and embrace a more central role for community colleges in higher education.

On disciplines, he said that the idea was to "move from thinking vertically to thinking horizontally." Gee cited a retreat the university held with trustees, administrators and selected faculty members and students. "Any guesses who tossed out the notion of blowing up -- completely eradicating -- departments? A trustee? A student? No. The suggestion came from the chair of one of Ohio State's largest and strongest academic departments," he said.

Ohio State isn't about to eliminate all of its departments, Gee said. But the university is placing much more emphasis -- in hiring and supporting research -- on interdisciplinary clusters. In addition, he said that faculty members need to be rewarded for contributions broadly, not just those that advance their own fields.

On hiring generally, Gee said higher education must "look well past the traditional qualifications and expected career paths" that have been used over time. As an example, Gee cited Ohio State's recent hiring of Christine Poon as dean of the business school. Poon has worked for 30 years in the health care industry, running up a long list of accomplishments in the business world. But she doesn't have traditional experience for a dean. "Has she taught a class? No. Does she have a doctorate? No," Gee said. He predicted that she would -- without those traditional requirements but with a wealth of experience -- "enliven an already strong college."

With regard to community colleges, Gee noted that despite his career leading research universities, many of the most important issues are based on the two-year sector. "Truly, the drivers of our future will be this nation's community colleges," he said. That means that research universities need to go beyond traditional ways of supporting community colleges -- such as articulation agreements -- and to think more ambitiously.

As an example, he cited a program Ohio State will be announcing today in conjunction with the College Board and Columbus State Community College in which selected students will be admitted to medical school or other health professions programs at Ohio State while still doing work at Columbus State. While a number of medical schools have programs in which students may be admitted to medical school as undergraduates, these programs generally involve elite undergraduate institutions, not community colleges. Students in the program will receive special academic guidance and a special curriculum to guide them from the two-year college through medical school.

While Gee said he was proud of the program, he said that it was but one effort, when many universities should have much more of a sense of true partnership with community colleges.

Gee was highly critical of higher education for being tradition-bound, but he also said repeatedly that he believes colleges are uniquely suited to help the United States rise out of the country's economic mess. "This will be the century of the American college and university, if we but have the courage to make it so," he said at the end of his speech, which received a standing ovation.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Gordon Gee's Call for 'Reinvention' of Higher Ed

  • Posted by Cassandra on February 9, 2009 at 4:25am EST
  • I smell the death of education approaching.

    Gee cited a retreat the university held with trustees, administrators and selected faculty members and students. “Any guesses who tossed out the notion of blowing up — completely eradicating — departments? A trustee? A student? No. The suggestion came from the chair of one of Ohio State’s largest and strongest academic departments,” he said.

    On hiring generally, Gee said higher education must “look well past the traditional qualifications and expected career paths” that have been used over time. As an example, Gee cited Ohio State’s recent hiring of Christine Poon as dean of the business school. Poon has worked for 30 years in the health care industry, running up a long list of accomplishments in the business world. But she doesn’t have traditional experience for a dean. “Has she taught a class? No. Does she have a doctorate? No,” Gee said. He predicted that she would — without those traditional requirements but with a wealth of experience — “enliven an already strong college.”

  • Gordon Gee identifies problems in Higher Education
  • Posted by Sol Gittleman , University Professor at Tufts University on February 9, 2009 at 7:00am EST
  • President Gee's comments might have some gravitas, if he weren't part of the problem. His salaries as he moves from school to school have changed the image of our professional leaders. This is no Robert Hutchins. President Gee also lives in the rarified atmosphere of Division I institutions that spend millions on athletic programs that have nothing to do with higher education: nothing. Whatever problems we have and will eventually have to face as a profession, Gordon Gee is not the kind of leader to take us to any Promised Land.

  • Let's get rid of insolance...
  • Posted by Diogenes on February 9, 2009 at 7:15am EST
  • says the man who sucked 1.8 million a year from Vanderbilt to support his Wall Street opulence! I have an idea...lets get rid of administrative arrogance! Maybe Brandeis can hire him. After all, he has a reputation for hating art and music! Think we forgot about his murder of the Charleston String Quartet to help pay for his cool million a year and his super President's house on campus? No. We haven't. He's just another Wall Street type that's part of the problem of higher education, not the solution!

  • Huh?
  • Posted by Hegelvon on February 9, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • Of all the college presidents in the U.S. that other college leaders could have chosen to address them on the serious subject of the future of American higher education, they selected a man whose compensation demands, self-congratulatory predilections, and careless disloyalty to Brown and Vanderbilt universities have set records in both the 20th and 21st centuries. One can only imagine that the selection committee of fellow presidents were in fact wreaking their own revenge on poor Gee when they sent him up to argue for revolution on the basis of the reported statements of a "selected" department chair who did his Stepin Fetchit routine on demand for the Ohio State trustees before they all went out to watch the Michigan game from the president's well-furnished private box. "Great idea, Gordon. Go get 'em!" One hopes, in any case, that the selection committee had that much wit.

  • Innovation
  • Posted by Daniel Bennett , Administrative Director at The Center for College Affordability & Productivity on February 9, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • Mr. Gee appears to have some fresh and innovative ideas to help advance (not to mention preserve) the role of higher education this country. That's why he gets paid the big bucks.

  • Gee, are these comments really true?
  • Posted by feudi pandola on February 9, 2009 at 10:50am EST
  • Don't know much about Gordon Gee. Based on the posters comments though, it sounds like taking advice on higher ed from Mr. Gee is sort of like basing investment decisions on what John Thain tells us! As for imputing wisdom to Mr. Gee because "he's making the Big Bucks", well, we've seen just how much credibility huge salaries and perks mean in the real world.

  • It's Ground Hog Day...
  • Posted by Bob S. on February 9, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Goeden Gee has a record of periodically making provocative proposals within the safety net of established organizations. His style is amusing and alarming just enough to titilate any unknowing faculty who are so easily handled by a good reformer performer.

    Gee has a record of antidisestablishmentarianism which goes over well within the naieve corridors of academe. Boards are infatuated with such charm and reformers are quick to listen but not hear.

    It's all smoke and mirrors for thinkers who are short of substance. He's certainly in the right business to have fun with such stuff AND get paid the kind of money that is thrown his way by people who have not yet learned to read between the lines.

    Highly entertaining to say the least. Robert Hutchins need not fear any competition here.

  • Marketing Hyperbole
  • Posted by sv on February 9, 2009 at 11:20am EST
  • I think the level of fear and hyperbole in the current discourse about the economy and education is officially out-of-control. Gee and others smell opportunity and are positioning themselves for personal growth. Nothing wrong with that, except for the fact they are filling our heads with do or die language that will lead to more problems down the road if we search for solutions in such a precipitate climate. Look, times are bad and reassessment is sorely needed – we’ll get through this storm and universities will probably be the stronger for it if we can assess wisely. What we don't need are professional fear mongers and other opportunists who claim that it’s “reinvention or extinction.” It’s not.

  • Posted by Publius on February 9, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • This is simply destructive language from a person whose understanding of academe is not even paper-thin. This is just a variation on the "re-engineering" nonsense that started nearly twenty years ago. If you like this approach to higher education, then you probably liked the past administration's program to turn over our retirement funds to Wall Street. Perhaps Mr. Gee has an office to remodel.

  • Posted by Planning Guy , Planning and Budgeting on February 9, 2009 at 12:26pm EST
  • Feel free to nash your teeth and insult the bearers of bad news for their personal failings all that you want.

    The long-term trend of net tuition increases outpacing the growth in personal income was unsustainable even before the recent economic difficulties. A crash is coming that is going to wash away quite a number of mid-tier institutions. Those institution that emerge (stronger?) will have to change.

  • Hmmm ... The University of Edinburgh?
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 9, 2009 at 2:20pm EST
  • If the next generation of “molders of higher education” in these United States includes any more of the likes of William Friday, Theodore Hessburg, Lamar Alexander, and E. Gordon Gee, we’ll be sending our best and brightest grandchildren to Europe for their university experiences.

  • GEE'S HUBRIS CONTINUES
  • Posted by VandyHigherEd , Gee's Hubris Continues at Vanderbilt University on February 9, 2009 at 3:35pm EST
  • It is astounding how often this man seeks to "reinvent" higher education in his own name. Meanwhile, the hypocrisy of his policies and their lack of continuity with his ongoing declarations filters up in plain view.

    "Divide and conquer", Mr. Gee, is not a viable governance plan for collegiate cohesion. Outspending your rivals on fancy events is no way to build enduring human networks. Ignoring the fiduciary responsibility of the Board of Trust is hardly a path to ensuring greater institutional trust and accountability. And scaring the good folks at the ACE with your urgent pleas of viewing the world of higher education through your lens is no prescription for lasting or constructive change.

    Mr. Gee, your many well-spoken words fall far short of the problematic realties you practice.

  • Examine the ideas.
  • Posted by Charles Muscatine , Professor emeritus on February 9, 2009 at 4:10pm EST
  • What a pity that Gordon Gee's biography, and the enmities is has generated, can be used to denigrate the great ideas he just expressed. Examine the ideas, not the speaker.

  • ovation?
  • Posted by Goerge T. Karnezis on February 9, 2009 at 5:50pm EST
  • Given the reception of the speech, it would be useful to have access to it so that its vision may receive scrutiny. This report does suggest that, yet again, business leadership is held up as the model for a University President, and that somehow "academic experience" is a liability rather than an asset when it comes to running a university. Any evidence that this judgment is correct?

  • Don't shoot the messenger!
  • Posted by Don Philabaum on February 9, 2009 at 5:50pm EST
  • President Gee's message might not please everyone but it's a message that we need to be thinking about.

    1) The cost of education is no longer affordable in this new economy. Families will no longer be able to "mortage the farm/home" to send their kids to college of their choice. Gee recognizes parents will drive their kids to community colleges first.....

    2) That is... if online colleges don't get to them first. Low cost online colleges will emerge out of this mess and take away students, that would have become alumni that would have donated to the college.

    There is something happening, and it's clear that it will be easier to shoot the messenger rather than look at the crisis facing higher education and begin to change cost structures, organization and staffing.

  • Gee whiz
  • Posted by Chris on February 10, 2009 at 5:05am EST
  • Note that none of these educational "innovators" ever have anything new to say. As a pp said, this is standard boilerplate corporate newspeak for the last 20 years.

  • Gee's comments are welcom
  • Posted by John Fallon , Professor of English at Rhodes State College on February 11, 2009 at 12:57pm EST
  • The message that higher ed needs to remake itself to be more competitive is a message worth repeating. His hiring of a dean of Business, whose competitive advantage is real-world experience is a step down from the Ivory Tower and into the world. I'm glad to hear his comments and look forward to hearing more of them. Gee can be a big time change agent in Ohio, and I am glad to see him stepping up.

  • Posted by Dave Schwalm on February 12, 2009 at 1:50pm EST
  • The big established universities are usually the last to discover what other colleges and universities have known for for a long time. Then folks like Gee make a big whoop about discovering "new directions" that others have been more or less quietly pursuing because they have had to do so. Being from one of these other places myself, I'm always glad to see that the big dogs are actually breathing, but I wish they would look around a bit before they start barking as if they were first to see the very large noisy and obvious intruder whom we have been fending off successfully for some time. Never hurts to have more allies, of course, but it might not hurt to do a little talking with the first responders before suggesting corrective measures that were chic that last time they looked up from their slumbers but which others have moved beyond. Really? Bring in someone "business" to "help" us? Interdisciplinarity is good, but look at what others have already done along those lines and follow their lead. It is hard to imagine how far The Ohio State is behind other institutions in its relationships with community colleges. This reminds me of an incident a couple of years ago when the lumbering Modern Language Association discovered the importance of teaching writing and announced it with great fanfare. A large listserv long devoted to the importance of teaching writing celebrated Mongo's discovery under the subject line "The MLA Finds its Butt with Both Hands." Hands on hips, President Gee. You're warm.