Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Final Stimulus Bill

February 13, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As the dust began to settle and details slowly emerged about the composition of the compromise economic stimulus bill crafted by Congress (the bill text is now available, here and here), the picture for higher education was generally positive -- with students and colleges poised to receive somewhere between $50 billion and $75 billion, based on our rough estimate. But exactly how it looked very much depended on where you sat.

Administrators at public colleges and officials in state higher education agencies were probably relieved that the compromise legislation would deliver a total of $53.6 billion in new aid to states over the next two years. That figure is lower than the $79 billion that was in the House of Representatives' original bill, and money that state officials were hoping to get specifically to renovate education facilities will have to come out of that total because lawmakers eliminated a separate pot of money for that purpose. But the compromise figure is far higher than the $39 billion that was in the Senate version of the legislation, and $53.6 billion -- $39.6 billion of which is designed to fill gaps left by state budget cuts, and $8.8 billion of which is set to go to governors to use for education and other purposes -- should go a significant way toward softening the impact of the economic downturn on state colleges and universities.

Universities and academics most interested in research were elated, as the final package allots roughly $16 billion to several federal agencies for research grants and facilities over two years, most of which will eventually flow to academic institutions. That includes $10 billion for the National Institutes of Health ($8.5 billion for research grants and $1.5 billion to renovate university facilities), $3 billion for the National Science Foundation, and $2 billion for science and research programs at the Energy Department. As of just a few days ago, the NSF had looked to get virtually nothing, as it was excluded from a proposal, made by three moderate Republicans, that formed the core of the compromise legislation.

About $30 billion in new funds would flow to students and their families in 2009 and 2010, about $17 billion in the form of increased Pell Grants and $13 billion in expanded higher education tax credits that would, for the first time, be available to some students from lower-income families that do not pay taxes. (Some assistance for students -- an increase in borrowing limits for federal student loans and funds for Perkins Loans -- was dropped from the compromise legislation, though, to the dismay of advocates for private and for-profit colleges.)

If there was bad news in the final stimulus bill, it was probably for officials at private nonprofit institutions. Their students will surely benefit from the increased Pell Grants and tax credits, but they had hoped that Congress would increase the limits on unsubsidized loans (as the House had planned to do), and they lost at the last minute nearly $60 million in new capital contributions to the Perkins Loan Program. They were also hardest hit by the Congressional negotiators' decision to eliminate the separate pot of money ($6 billion in the House bill, $3.5 billion in the Senate) for higher education facilities, which was envisioned to be distributed by the higher education agency in each state.

The compromise stimulus bill wiped out those funds and up to $16 billion for school districts -- reportedly in the face of opposition from Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, one of three Republicans whose votes the White House and Senate Democrats desperately needed in order to pass the legislation, which most GOP members oppose as too heavily tilted toward non-stimulative spending rather than tax cuts. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats fought throughout the day Wednesday (even after a reported "agreement" on the measure was announced at mid-day) to restore funds for school modernization to the legislation. At 10 p.m. that evening, according to Congressional aides, the legislation was altered to incorporate funding for facilities into the state stabilization fund -- but in a way that would primarily benefit public rather than private institutions.

Under the change, according to Democratic Congressional aides, $39.5 billion of the $53.6 billion available through the stabilization fund would be distributed to state leaders to "backfill" cuts that have been made to the 2008 or 2009 budgets for elementary, secondary or postsecondary education. In restoring cuts to public college budgets, states are supposed to use the money for financial aid and operating costs, but under the last-minute change, they can also use the funds for facilities -- but only at public institutions.

Another $8.8 billion of the $53.6 billion stabilization fund under the compromise legislation would go directly to governors to use for what they determine to be "critical services," which can include education. Like the backfill money, those funds could also conceivably be used to modernize (rather than build new) facilities, and a state's governor could, if he or she chose, direct money from that pot to private colleges and universities for facilities or other purposes, the Democratic Congressional aides said.

The rest of the $5 billion would be distributed to states by Education Secretary Arne Duncan through two funds designed to reward innovation and strong performance on a variety of measures; most if not all of this money would flow to K-12 education.

The following is a chart that, based on the best available information last evening (the full legislation was not yet available), compares the compromise version of the stimulus bill with the version passed by the House and the one passed by the Senate after having been revamped to try to satisfy a trio of moderate Republicans, including Collins, her fellow Mainer Olympia Snowe, and Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. Where information was not available, the chart notes that with the word "Unclear."

The Stimulus and Higher Education

  House Senate Compromise
Aid for Students      
Pell Grants $15.6 billion to increase maximum grant by $500 and eliminate shortfall $13.9 billion to increase maximum grant and close shortfall $17.1 billion to increase maximum grant and eliminate shortfall
College Work Study $490 million Not included $200 million
Perkins Loans Not included $61 million for capital contributions None
Loan Limits Increase limit on unsubsidized loans by $2,000 Not included Not included
Higher Education Tax Credit Temporarily replace Hope tax credit with $2,500 credit available for four years of college. Credit phases out for individuals with income of $80,000, $160,000 for couples. Credit is 40 percent refundable. Cost: $13.7 billion over 10 years Temporarily replace Hope tax credit with $2,500 credit
available for four years of college. Credit phases out for individuals with
income of $80,000, $160,000 for couples. Credit is 30 percent refundable. Cost: $12.9 billion over 10 years
Temporarily replace Hope tax credit with $2,500 credit available for four years of college. Credit is 40 percent refundable.
529 savings plans Not included Allow computers to count as qualified expenses under 529 savings plans Allow computers to count as qualified expenses under 529 savings plans
Education Aid for States $39 billion for school districts and public colleges, distributed through existing formulas $26.7 billion for school districts and public colleges, distributed through existing formulas $39.5 billion for "backfilling" of state budget cuts; uses include facilities modernization
  $25 billion to states for “high priority” needs, “which may include education” $9.5 billion to states for “high priority” needs, “which may include education” $8.8 billion for governors to award for "high priority" needs, including education
Infrastructure      
College/School Facilities (through Education Department) $6 billion for “higher education modernization, renovation, repair"; $1.5 billion for grants and loans to colleges, schools, and local governments for energy efficiency None None (see Education Aid for States above)
National Institute of Standards and Technology $300 million to construct research buildings at colleges Not included $180 million for competitive grants for research building construction
Computer centers (at public libraries and community colleges) Not included $200 million $200 million
Energy Department Not included $330 million for laboratory infrastructure None
Scientific Research      
National Science Foundation $2 billion for research grants, $900 million for equipment and facilities, and $100 million for science education $1 billion for research grants, $150 million for infrastructure, $50 million for education $3 billion, including $2.5 for research, $400 million for infrastructure, $100 million for education
NASA $600 million for climate change and other research $450 million for science, specifically earth science missions Unclear (probably $1 billion for science; including $400 million for climate change research
National Institutes of Health $1.5 billion for biomedical research, $2 billion for facilities renovation and capacity building $7.85 billion for biomedical research; $300 million for shared equipment $10 billion, including $8.5 billion for research, $1.5 billion for university research facilities
Energy Department $2 billion for energy efficiency research; $2 billion for basic physical science research $100 million for advanced computer R&D $2 billion for research, including $1.6 billion for Office of Science, $400 million for Advanced Research Project Agency-Energy
Homeland Security Not included $14 million for cybersecurity research None
National Institute of Standards and Technology Not included $168 million for external grants Unclear
Job Training $4 billion $3.25 billion, including $1.95 billion for adult and dislocated workers $3.95 billion, including $2 billion for dislocated workers and $500 million for adults
Other      
AmeriCorps Not included $200 million $200 million
Teacher quality partnership grants $100 million $50 million $100 million
Preparing health care workers $600 million for training primary care doctors, dentists and nurses Not included $500 million
Student Aid Administration $50 million to help Education Department administer student aid in changing student loan environment Not included Not included
Support for state data systems $250 million Not included $250 million
Help for Lenders $10 million for larger subsidies for lenders Not included Not included
Arts $50 million for National Endowment for the Arts Not included $50 million
Rural distance learning and telemedicine (Agriculture Department) Not included $100 million None

(Note: This table has been updated to correct information from an earlier version.)

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Final Stimulus Bill

  • Posted by hsr0601 , Bipartisanship on February 13, 2009 at 6:50am EST
  • Basically, Democracy respects the result following heated argument to seek fresh,productive, and progressive ideas, then now will be the time for bipartisanship to ensure success of the project for job generation and the 21st century infrastructure based on advanced science. If united, the world is certain to hail the democracy-driven, country-first decision thereafter, I believe.

  • Avoiding an Ephemeral Stimulus Package
  • Posted by Jerry Pattengale , Assistant Provost at Indiana Wesleyan University on February 13, 2009 at 7:45am EST
  • Doug, Thanks for this clear look at the basics of the stimulus package. (Perhaps this article might become the most-read to date.) My hope is that those of us throughout higher education will help to forge an accountability process for the spending of this money. While the shape of the package is beyond our purview, and now in the aorist tense, its use is not, and there is still plenty of wrapping left. We’re a community given to outcomes and benchmarks, and it appears that each state could establish a scorecard and basic assessment measures, with some common across states. We should be able to look at this scorecard on February 13, 2010, as well as 2012, and know how we did with these funds. Against the backdrop of the managing debacle among key corporations and financial institutions, we should especially be cognizant of the need to be prudent and above reproach. Perhaps the governors could call an immediate meeting to establish such an accountability scheme—a template for states—and have a state-by-state accounting. Regardless of one’s politics, there are those governors like Indiana’s Mitch Daniel’s known for sound fiscal policies, and foundations like Lumina and Lilly with respected accountability practices. An ephemeral stimulus would be more than a financial loss. I’ve met scores of people on both sides of the political aisle that work well together—especially when students and children are involved. Last year in our roundtables at the White House (Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives) I was amazed at bipartisan support for remarkable practices, whether from Gov. Richardson’s interest in the backpack program in New Mexico or an idea from a Hudson Institute fellow. I hope that on Feb. 13th next year you run another article on the accountability of these funds, and on the targeted outcomes. JP

  • Final Stimulus Bill and Higher ED accountability
  • Posted by feudi pandola on February 13, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • I agree that Higher ED needs to be accountable to the taxpayers for how we spend our portion of the stimulus package. If the net effect of the Pell Grant increase is for colleges to simply increase tuition and fees, then the Stimulus Bill will be all for naught. Higher ED must prove it has turned over a new leaf in terms of cost containment. If we don't show a sense of responsibility, then President Obama's Adminstration, through the Department of ED should, I hope, force us to do so.

    I wholeheartedly applaud the allocation for alternative energy research. Not sure why we needed the massive increase for NIH, but that line item was the cost incurred for Arlen Spector's endorsement...sort of an earmark without the ears.

  • Unclear???
  • Posted by Robert , PhD Student on February 13, 2009 at 10:40am EST
  • The thought of the provisions of the stimulus package being 'unclear' is worrisome. Shouldn't members of Congress know what they're voting on?

  • Worrisome?
  • Posted by Engineering Grad Student on February 13, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • Robert, President Obama himself has reassured us that spending and stimulus are synonymous, by definition. Why worry about particulars? The clarity of any particular section has no bearing on the effectiveness of this package, nor should it have any bearing on the votes for or against it -- after all, it's not as though Congress has read the 1,071 pages of the bill since midnight.

  • New boss, same as old boss
  • Posted by J.J. on February 13, 2009 at 1:25pm EST
  • "Basically, Democracy respects the result following heated argument to seek fresh, productive, and progressive ideas .."

    "The thought of the provisions of the stimulus package being ‘unclear’ is worrisome. Shouldn’t members of Congress know what they’re voting on?"

    Yesterday, Congressional Republicans vowed to repeal the permanent spending aspects of whatever was voted on this week, when they re-assume control sometime within the next 10 years.

    Grab all the money you can. Because, as noted before, it "will be fleeting."

    Change! Truth!

  • Posted by Theresa Branum on February 13, 2009 at 3:25pm EST
  • Why would we give $50 million to arts and
    nothing to agriculture?

  • Stimuli bills
  • Posted by feudi pandola on February 13, 2009 at 3:25pm EST
  • It's as Newsweek opined: "We are all scoialsist now". But it's unfair to lay that on Mr. Obama alone. No, Mr. Bush started the process with the Wall Street Bailout of the CEO class, while Mr. Obama completed the loop with yesterday's legislation. If I had my druthers, I'd take bailing out folks who actually earn an honest living rather than those who feed off the labor of others, and that includes the men in suits as well as welfare deadbeats.

  • Grab all the money you can?
  • Posted by daniel.marler , Community College Employee on February 13, 2009 at 3:25pm EST
  • Where do you think all this money is coming from? Debt. To foreign investors! We've just sold our souls because we're too big of babies to weather the storm and let the economy take care of itself. Instead, we argue about when, where, and how to spend money we don't have. "Grab all the money you can"? How about we trim some fat and give it all back!

  • much ado about nothing
  • Posted by Steve M. on February 13, 2009 at 4:50pm EST
  • Where were all those fiscally responsible Republicans when Bush pushed through $3 trillion of unfunded tax cuts? or spent $2.4 trillion on the unnecessary Iraq war? When $13.5 billion of cash on a platform disappeared in Iraq? When Halliburton misappropriated billions in military contract money, then moved to Dubai to avoid paying taxes? When Bush's banking cronies all got $350 billion of dole-outs with no strings attached? When the Clinton budget surplus morphed into a $450 billion deficit and the national debt doubled to $10.66 trillion under Bush? I don't believe them when they talk about "generational theft." They're the ones who stole from their own grandchildren!

  • Grab all you can?
  • Posted by daniel.marler , Community College Employee on February 13, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • "Responsible Republicans"? Are you kidding me? The problems with republicans are as you stated, but it's more severe than just republicanism. The irresponsibility is bi-partisan. Everyone has the same "Grab all you can" attitude. Don't think for a second that Obama will solve all our problems and that somehow throwing good money after bad will somehow save a cyclical economy. WHEN the economy corrects, it will happen despite the republicans and democrats best efforts to defeat it. To bring this back to education, what's wrong with a few lean years, instead of grabbing all we can. Recessions inspire innovation and make us appreciate the good years.

  • Point of order
  • Posted by J.J. on February 13, 2009 at 11:45pm EST
  • " .. When the Clinton budget surplus .."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_U.S._public_debt

    U.S. public debt in FY1992: $4,064,620,655,521.66

    U.S. public debt in FY2000: $5,674,178,209,886.86

    The Clintonian increase in U.S. public debt: 41.5%.

    Facts -- painful but necessary.

    CHANGE! TRUTH! GRAB MONEY NOW!

  • Take What We Can
  • Posted by Fin Aid Guy on February 16, 2009 at 12:35pm EST
  • It is a huge amount of money, and although we can argue that there should be more set aside for financial aid, I think we should all be happy with getting something. To be honest, I'm not sure how to get college costs under control.

    The most important part of the bill, in my opinion, is the increase in Pell Grant money and work-study. I like the idea of giving more to those who will serve the country in some way or another as well. Never been much for handouts, but hopefully these small increases in financial aid will go a long way to help those who need it most. More highlights can be seen here:
    http://www.financialaidpost.com/What-the-Stimulus-Means-for-Financial-Aid

  • Socialism & Fat Trimming
  • Posted by Jay Gillispie , History Instructor at Community College on February 16, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • As for "socialism" I doubt those who sream about it actually offered to pay tuition for their public school education, wish to see all colleges become privatized, or end financial aid programs. These are just some of the "socialist" things we all take for granted in the country.

    As for "trimming fat and giving it back" I work at a community college and we're about as lean as you're going to get. If you can find any "fat" here, go for it!

    One thing I would suggest is virtually eliminating Pell Grants. I see that program of free money with no accountability abused regularly. Either make students perform at a certain level for the free cash or make them get loans and invest in their futures as many of us did. I fully support making money available for students to improve their lives but I also see no problem with having them finance their own success through liberal loan policies and low interest rates that do not have to be paid until after graduation.

  • Stimulus Package
  • Posted by Terri , disability teacher on February 16, 2009 at 2:20pm EST
  • Setting all divisions aside, the stimulus package from my perspective, has not and will not solve the original problem that got the U.S. to this point in the first place. The mortgage debt (and other loan debt, including student loans) occurred because people in our great country have totally succumbed to the long encouraged "spend now (i.e. grab what you can), pay later" attitude fueled by our credit card mentality (pay only the minimum required). The U.S. (government - Democrat or Republican, corporations, people, etc.) are in a spending frenzy with no sound financial basis, other than let's borrow or print more money and worry about payment later....thus to me, this debacle is a sad tragedy that will only continue in a downward spiral until WE ALL change our attitudes and our ethics.

  • another oxymoron
  • Posted by DFS on February 16, 2009 at 4:35pm EST
  • "Final Stimulus Package"

    Don't worry, all of you (inherently greedy) academics; more will follow.

  • Higher Education
  • Posted by Frustrated Foolishness on February 18, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • There is no fat to trim in higher ed at my institution. Ever since 9/11 we have remained at flat or decreased state support and have had to offer early retirement and other options to survive. We are now understaffed and cannot attract the numbers of faculty we need to properly instruct our students. We are not even close to market salaries in regards to faculty or staff. We will, in effect, get a pay decrease this year because there will be no raises for inflation or merit AND there is an increase in benefit costs. I am unsure whether or not this stimulus bill will do anything to help our economy OR higher ed. I almost feel that we need to let the whole economy go bust and start from the ground up but I am willing to have a little hope. One thing I am not willing to do, J.J., is trust ANYTHING that is sourced from Wikipedia. Do you work in education? No one from K-16 allows that to be a reliable source.

  • don't cut grants please.
  • Posted by Kristen , college is expensive on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  •  

    “""One thing I would suggest is virtually eliminating Pell Grants. I see that program of free money with no accountability abused regularly. Either make students perform at a certain level for the free cash or make them get loans and invest in their futures as many of us did. I fully support making money available for students to improve their lives but I also see no problem with having them finance their own success through liberal loan policies and low interest rates that do not have to be paid until after graduation.”

     

    Do you have any idea how much it costs to go to a 4 year school without your parents contributing anything?? I would be more sunk than I am with my TWO jobs FULL TIME schedule, rent to pay, transportation, food and utilities not to mention books. How can you say that Pell grants are unnecessary? I have a 3.8GPA right now and if I I had to pay an extra $1000 each year I think I would explode. I even had community college transfer credits from AP courses and high school and I’m just barely going to graduate on time and WHY? because “higher education institutions” even though mine is “public” it is for PROFIT!!!

  • Your all Nuts
  • Posted by Tony at Self-Employed on February 25, 2009 at 8:15pm EST
  • This is in no way a "Stimulus Bill".

    All that's in this is pure spending. The only part that has ANY stimulus in it wont take effect till 2010 and by that time, if this bill hadn't been passed, we would have been on the upswing from this recession.

    With the passage of this "Spending Bill", we will be lucky if we EVER get above ground again. If we don't go into a Depression because of this, we will be VERY lucky.

    I don't see ANY way that President Obama's promise of cutting the deficit in half by the end of his first, and hopefully only, term in office. Granted, he did inherit a $1.2 trillion deficit from President Bush, but now he's gone and tripled that with this Bill, the Bill for the banks, and the Bill that they are working on now. Is he a Moron to think he knows anything about managing a country. I don't think he can manage his own household let alone the United States.

    I only hope he sees the light before it's too late.

    God save us all...

  • Posted by Physicist on February 26, 2009 at 3:30pm EST
  • Yet another windfall for NIH, yet another down for the many many physical sciences neglected by ignorant leaders. The IHT regularly chronicles the massive research spending in Asia for what heh US has been ignoring for so very long. And the decision to neglect ITER is another blow for energy independence.

  • Thank God for some injection of cash into Education and Research
  • Posted by ellie on February 26, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • Grow up Tony, the man has been in office 5 weeks, he's our best hope and we must support him and his team to do the best he can in the time given. You think you can do better? Why don't you start your campaign today to run for president in 4 years time and see how you compare?

    Thank God there's finally some injection of cash into education and research. Why should a student who spends 4 years in business school, earn twice as much in an entry level position as a student who spends 11 years getting a PhD in the hope of earning $30k as a post-doc?? It's a total JOKE. Someone with a high school diploma can earn that much starting at 17. Let's get real here. Is Science really that unimportant to society?

  • Same Old Boss...or Same Old Beauracracy?
  • Posted by undergrad , Undergraduate Student at BU on March 14, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • I won't claim to be an enthusiast or a studied politician, but doesn't it seem just wrong that there is such a stale process for deciding these kinds of things? When Congressman who don't seem to do anything but throw a 9-digit amount on this stack and just rip out a 9- digits on this pile, and then vote on a 1,000 + page Bill before morning breaks are the ones deciding where the money goes, I just don't know what side to believe in. We need something more 21st Century before somebody somewhere pulls the final Jenga Block.

  • A Reflection of Deep-Seated Stupidity
  • Posted by Tara , writer on March 18, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • No money was spent on homeland security. No money was spent on agriculture. However, 200 million dollars was spent on computers in public libraries and 50 million dollars on art. Really? Can it be that our leadership is that foolish?

  • Private College
  • Posted by Brian. W , Private College Employee on March 27, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Hi all.

    Just reading some of the comments... very interesting indeed.

    How can Private Colleges take advantage of these monies? I see most of the money is allocated to K-12 and state institutions…

    Thanks

    BW