Search News


Browse Archives

News

Anti-Israel Prof Loses Post at Bard

February 19, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Joel Kovel -- one of the more outspoken professorial critics of Israel on American college campuses -- is out of his job at Bard College. This week Kovel sent a letter to all Bard faculty members denouncing the way he has been treated and charging that his politics cost him the position.

Others suggest, however, that Kovel was treated the way many non-tenured professors are being treated these days as colleges retrench -- and that mixed student reviews of his organizational skills in the classroom may have hurt him more than his politics.

And while the college is generally avoiding comment, some at Bard are angry at Kovel's accusations that appear to link Israel's treatment of Gaza with the college's treatment of him.

His faculty letter concluded this way: "If the world stands outraged at Israeli aggression in Gaza, it should also be outraged at institutions in the United States that grant Israel impunity. In my view, Bard College is one such institution. It has suppressed critical engagement with Israel and Zionism, and therefore has enabled abuses such as have occurred and are occurring in Gaza. This notion is of course, not just descriptive of a place like Bard. It is also the context within which the critic of such a place and the Zionist ideology it enables becomes marginalized, and then removed."

Kovel stands out among academic critics of Israel in that he does not just criticize actions of the government there, or advocate for a Palestinian state, but argues for the replacement of Israel with a secular state for Israelis and Palestinians. In interviews, he has called Israel an "abomination" and said that he understands "the desire to smash Zionism." His book Overcoming Zionism set off a controversy last year when its American distributor -- the University of Michigan Press -- temporarily halted sales, and then ended its relationship with Pluto Press, the publisher.

In his letter, Kovel argues that his position at Bard deteriorated as his opposition to Zionism grew and became more public. He cites his various public statements as well as the links of Bard's president, Leon Botstein, to Israel. Botstein is musical director of the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra, and Kovel's letter cites as problematic a visit by the orchestra to Bard's campus in which the national anthems of the United States and Israel were played. (While Bard does have ties to Israel, it notably has ties to Palestinian higher ed that may be deeper than those of most institutions, just this week announcing a series of joint programs with Al Quds University.)

A Bard spokesman declined to comment on the situation, citing the confidentiality of personnel actions. But an evaluation of Kovel, which he released, suggests that his "long and productive career" at Bard has been problematic of late. The evaluation notes an increasing number of student complaints about Kovel's lack of organization, which he has previously explained by saying that he likes his courses to focus on current material.

The concerns expressed in the evaluation focus on these issues, although the review also notes that Kovel has been teaching a course about his book Overcoming Zionism, despite some qualms from faculty colleagues. "It is possible that the pitch of controversy in regard to Zionism has impeded dialogue in this case. ..." the evaluation says. (Kovel says that the evaluation was biased because one of the three professors involved is a supporter of Israel.)

Kovel has taught at Bard since 1988, first holding the Alger Hiss Chair of Social Studies, and later moving to a part-time professorship. He never had tenure, only renewable contracts, the last one of which will not be renewed. (He will receive emeritus status, however.)

While Bard officials did not respond to inquiries, President Botstein did send Kovel a letter that included in it permission to release it, which Kovel did at this reporter's request. In the letter Botstein notes that Bard is eliminating a number of part-time positions to try to preserve full-time professorships, and that -- had finances remained "flush" -- Kovel's contract probably would have been renewed.

"To take what is self-evidently a result of economic constraint and turn it into a trumped-up case of prejudice and political victimization insults not only your intelligence but the intelligence of your readers," Botstein writes. He goes on to thank Kovel for teaching at Bard and to say that he was never offended by having someone with his views on the faculty. "I am delighted that you hold views that many consider wrong or dangerous. You are not as controversial as you would like to believe."

And Botstein notes that he is proud that Bard is working with help improve Palestinian education through the Al Quds University effort, writing: "I’m sure that over the years ahead Bard will do much good on behalf of education and justice in the Middle East. Parenthetically, may I express my disappointment that you never inquired about this new program, which was announced to the faculty last spring."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Anti-Israel Prof Loses Post at Bard

  • Good riddance to this destructive man
  • Posted by Paul on February 19, 2009 at 6:05am EST
  • Let him earn a constructive living being pro-something instead of just being anti-Israel.

  • A Twofer
  • Posted by Mark , Another one of those Zionist professors on February 19, 2009 at 7:10am EST
  • So this schlub also held at one time "the Alger Hiss Chair of Social Studies"? That is delicious irony.

  • Posted by John on February 19, 2009 at 8:50am EST
  • Maybe he is just upset about having to come down from the 'ivory tower' and that he might actually have to work for a living. Doubtless, there are many Palistinians in need of a Liberal Arts Education, that might be a starting point, but wait, that would be too close to the real world.

  • Posted by Cary Nelson , President at AAUP on February 19, 2009 at 9:20am EST
  • As president of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), I am concerned about the recent termination of Professor Joel Kovel from an appointment at Bard College. His length of service under yearly contracts would appear to grant him an expectation of continued employment under AAUP rules. If pedagogical issues are at stake, opportunity for remediation would be appropriate. While further investigation may be necessary, there is also reason to be concerned that politics--namely his outspoken positions and publications about the Arab-Israeli conflict--may have played a role in this decision. Given that an allegation of a violation of academic freedom has been made against Bard, Professor Kovel is entitled to a full and impartial hearing on that specific charge.

    Cary Nelson

  • Kovel doesn't confuse the issue with facts
  • Posted by Donna on February 19, 2009 at 9:20am EST
  • I am amazed that a university kept him as long as Bard did. An educator should never present material with monovision. Didn't he understand that Israeli civilian populations were being attacked for several years? Interesting that he felt free to attack but resented when he was attacked.

    Is there a psychologist reading this comment that could help him?

  • Middle East Studies
  • Posted by Elizabeth Barlow on February 19, 2009 at 9:50am EST
  • It seems to me that that neither Scott (writing for IHE) nor any of the commenters has actually read Joel Kovel's book, Overcoming Zionism, which I found very thoughtful and compelling. He gives sound reasons for believing that the Jewish people would be better off if they could detach themselves from the militarism and exclusivism of Zionist practice, and embrace the universal justice tradition of Judaism.
    May I urge interested readers to actually get the book and read it?

  • McCarthyism!
  • Posted by Nick on February 19, 2009 at 9:50am EST
  • First Finklestein then Kovel.
    The double sin of being a jewish critic of Israel.
    Academic freedom in the US is dead!

  • political firings
  • Posted by Anonymous on February 19, 2009 at 9:50am EST
  • Reminds me of another case...

    At the University of Mississippi in the 1960's, historian James Silver wrote a book, "Mississippi: The Closed Society" that criticized that state's system of power.

    Silver was tenured at Ole Miss, but they fired him anyway. It was a good job market back then, so Silver found another academic job. But not in Mississippi.

    The official explanation for his firing had nothing to do with the book. Do you believe that? Me neither.

  • Try watching the BBC instead of Fox News...
  • Posted by queenofthejungle on February 19, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • I continue to be amazed at the extent of brainwashing in this country. Whenever anyone tries to speak to objective facts about the Middle East(which, by the way, the rest of the world outside the US agrees with), they are treated like they are out of their minds. Witness the recent case of Jimmy Carter, who thankfully continues to speak truth to power despite the backlash against him. Yes, Israeli civilians have been attacked -- with weapons looking like my brother's high school science project. How people can continue to equate this with the well-financed high-tech wholesale slaughter of Palestinians is beyond me. Thank you, Mr. Nelson & the AAUP, for being another voice crying in the wilderness on behalf of academic freedom and free speech.

  • Kovel is so passe
  • Posted by Chuck on February 19, 2009 at 10:56am EST
  • It's amazing to see the hysteria and bombast that arises whenever one or two darlings of the left gets fired or terminated from a university position.

    The defenders of Kovel cannot possibly imagine that he was a poor classroom teacher, either because of, or despite his rabid views on Israel.

    I would far more likely trust and believe in the professional judgment of department peers at Bard who, after all, probably hired him in the first place.

    Maybe he can now be free to peddle his views on-line, or at YouTube, or in a street corner.

    After all, college and university faculties, especially in the humanities and social sciences remain heavily dominated by so-called "progressives," many of whom hold remarkably illiberal and decidedly backward views on racial group behavior and gender claims......

  • Posted by Alan Leventen , Anti Israel Professor_ on February 19, 2009 at 10:56am EST
  • Kovel has recourse.He can apply and no-doubt be accepted to Al-Quds University as Professor of Anti-Zionism,Anti-Semitism With The Former Giving Plausible Deniability For The Latter.He'll fit in nicely over there. b

  • Kovel's garbage and "academic freedom"
  • Posted by Sam Kollins on February 19, 2009 at 11:35am EST
  • I note that Cary Nelson speaks for the AAUT and its apologists for Arab oil money propaganda. AAUT also defended SAmi al Arian who was responsible for the murders of over 100 people in the Middle East including US citizens as the head of Islamic Jihad in the USA. Due to irresponsibility of people like Nelson, any hack or pseudo-scholar needs to be retained no matter what according to AAUT.
    Kovel is a pseudo-scholar with psychological problems who didn't teach, he propagandized and for once the students were respected enough to be ssured a real education by Bard.
    ENough of these fakes making money and getting attention from the Saudi lobby in our universities.

  • Pseudo-Scholar
  • Posted by ari on February 19, 2009 at 11:35am EST
  • I liked the part of the statement about his getting fired in which Kovel brags about his long track record of scholarly writing, consisting largely of articles in TIKKUN magazine, a pro-LSD anti-Israel hippy magazine run by "Politics of Meaning" pseudo-rabbi Michael Lerner

  • Tell Me The Party Line ... I’ll Parrot It
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 19, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • “It is my thesis that the agent of this clinch is administration and the administrative mentality among teachers and even the students. It is the genius of administration to enforce a false harmony in situations that should be rife with conflict.

    Historically, the communities of scholars have perennially been invaded by administration from the outside, by Visitors of king, bishop, despotic majority, or whatever is the power in society that wants to quarantine the virulence of youth, the dialog of persons, the push of inquiry, the accusing testimony of scholarship.

    But today Administration and the administrative mentality are entrenched in the community of scholars itself; they fragment it and paralyze it. Therefore we see the paradox that, with so many centers of possible intellectual criticism and intellectual initiative, there is so much inane conformity, and the universities are little models of the Organized System itself.”

    Paul Goodman in "The Community of Scholars"

  • Give him a break.
  • Posted by S. C. on February 19, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • I had Kovel as a professor a few years ago at Bard. He taught a number of environmental courses. While his political analysis influenced the topics, his views on Israel never did. He helped diversify my views on environmental issues and was an asset for doing so. For the record, the students in the class guided most of the discussions and if Israel did come up, it was their doing, not his.

  • silver
  • Posted by Rsy on February 19, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • The late James Silver wasn't fired by Ole Miss. He left for Notre Dame in 1965, within a year of the book's publication, before an attempt by the then-powerful White Citizens Council to oust him found any success.

  • Bard
  • Posted by fred lapides , I have none on February 19, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • A few things.
    The AAUP needs to get seriously involved in collective bargaining and then do something about the growing body of non-tenured part time people who replace full-time tenure slots. Not just pipe up to defend someone losing a job under questionable circumstances.
    Note that this guy's vision is a one state solution (Edward Said also) so that demographics would quickly do in the state of Israel. Why should a sovereign state resign itself to amalgamating with surrounding enemies that have sought to destroy it?

    This case gives us a chance to take another look at tenure. Imagine if this guy had tenure! He would stay on till retirement. And so, like it or not, schools will increasingly like the freedom that non-tenure gives them to call the shots.

  • Posted by Ellen Schrecker on February 19, 2009 at 3:00pm EST
  • One aspect of the Joel Kovel case that seems particularly disturbing is the financial rationale that accompanied Kovel's nonreappointment. As institutions tighten their belts in today's hard times, are we going to see them eliminating their most embarrassing faculty members in the name of financial exigency?

  • Scott Jaschik's article about my case at Bard College
  • Posted by Joel Kovel on February 19, 2009 at 3:45pm EST
  • There is a serious omission in Jaschik's treatment of my being terminated at Bard College. He correctly states that the findings of the College Evaluation Committee were instrumental in Bard's decision to let me go. However, he fails to mention that a central aspect of my complaint is that this committee was improperly constituted, in that at least one of its members was heavily involved in Zionist politics, and indeed worked on matters about which I had taken a very public, anti-Zionist stand. The Faculty Handbook of Bard states clearly that such an evaluator should recuse himself, which was not done. Therefore the findings on the basis of which I am to be let go, are to be considered bogus. The reader is urged to follow the evolution of this matter.

    Joel Kovel

  • Al-Quds
  • Posted by Louis Proyect on February 19, 2009 at 3:45pm EST
  • While Bard does have ties to Israel, it notably has ties to Palestinian higher ed that may be deeper than those of most institutions, just this week announcing a series of joint programs with Al Quds University.

    ---

    That is part and parcel of George Soros's bid to establish paternalistic relationships with satellite colleges first in Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union and now in Palestine. It is symptomatic of the rather superficial reporting of this article that it fails to discuss the rather problematic character of the Palestinian partner of Soros and Botstein. To put it succinctly, the head of Al Quds university is viewed by many in the Palestinian struggle as a complete sell-out in light of his partnership with the former head of Israeli intelligence and his disavowal of the Palestinian right of return. Check this for more information:

    http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/bard-college-terminates-joel-kovel/

  • Rsy: was James Silver fired from Ole Miss?
  • Posted by Anonymous on February 19, 2009 at 9:50pm EST
  • Silver wasn't fired, "merely" forced out.

    Historian James Silver published his book Mississippi, the Closed Society in 1964 and gave a public speech to the Southern Historical Society in 1963 in which he declared that Mississippi was a "totalitarian society." This made front-page news in the national media.

    He was a hero to the New York Times and Newsweek. Predictably, reaction in Mississippi was extremely hostile. The (Jackson, MS) Clarion-Ledger declared that Silver "had abused the state of Mississippi, its people, officials and newspapers". A bill was introduced in the state house of representatives to fire Silver. The state's segregationist governor, Ross Barnett, was very hostile to Silver. The university board of regents attacked Silver for "contumacious conduct".

    Silver found himself isolated on the Ole Miss campus: old friends crossed the street to avoid him. Silver himself related a conversation with an Old Miss provost, an old friend, who "suggested that the university administration would find it easier to deal with the legislature if I were not on campus."

    You are entitled to your quibble: Silver wasn't actually fired. He was "merely" forced out of the university where he had taught for nearly three decades, because of his public opposition to segregation. There's not a helluva lot of difference between being fired and being forced out: the outcome is the same.

  • Posted by SJB, Bard '97 on February 19, 2009 at 9:55pm EST
  • I am very impressed by the way in which many posters cite their "Zionism" along with their academic credentials. It gives me great faith in their impartiality.

    As Botstein quite rightly pointed out, Kovel's views are not terribly radical, but they surely must rankle the passionately pro-Zionist president and chair of the religion department at Bard. This is as clear-cut a case of Bard's grotesquely pro-Israel stance as anything I have seen (and this is not the first instance). Bard claims to be "a place to think." Perhaps more apropos would be to describe it as "a place not to think bad things about Israel."

    I'm disgusted. You won't be getting any alumni dollars from us. Sorry, I learned way too much about critical thinking at Bard to ever let this kind of intellectual bullying stand. Bravo, Mr. Kovel, and to those who live comfortable academic lives in the USA and claim to be "Zionist," I suggest you go see what's really happened in Gaza before you let your smug assurance that you're in the right strangle your sense of decency.

  • Overcoming Kovel:
  • Posted by jack , Dr. on February 20, 2009 at 5:25am EST
  • See interesting coverage on http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/02/19/the-dismissal-of-joel-kovel-sanity-in-academia/ and http://thejewishpress.blogspot.com/2009/02/cleaning-out-gutter-joel-kovel-gets.html

  • He can still get a job!
  • Posted by steve on February 20, 2009 at 5:25am EST
  • I understand the Norman Finkelstein lemonade stand is now hiring! Maybe Kovel can send his resume there!

  • Posted by Peter Shield on February 20, 2009 at 7:05am EST
  • Joel Kovel is much more than the one dimensional character being lambasted here by the anti-freedom of speech brigade. His ‘The Enemy of Nature” book is perhaps the finest laying out of the basics of integrating ecological thinking into the bed rock of Marxism. Indeed, while many of the arguments of his work on Zionism have been voiced before, some of the work on eco-socialism is really breaking new ground and will, I hope, have a much wider and longer lasting impact. To remove such an innovative thinker under a ‘cost cutting’ measure what ever the real reason has robbed Bard of a real innovator, just at a time when more radical and wide ranging measures to deal with the environmental crisis alongside world social justice issues. Luckily people don’t go silent just because they get canned, but it does helps pay the bills.

  • When will the majority of Jews
  • Posted by When , Attorney at Law at private practice of law on February 20, 2009 at 11:35am EST
  • genuinely support peace in the ME rather than attack every Jew, Muslim, and any other person who criticizes Israel for its heinous crimes against Palestinians.
    Bard's president Botstein gave himself away when he denied that Kovel was fired because of his "wrong and dangerous views." He adds that Kovel is "not as controversial as [he] would like to think." In other words, Kovel's views are wrong and dangerous, but not controversial? That's how I feel about Botstein's views and those of many who have posted comments applauding the firing and jeering Kovel.
    As for the students who commented negatively on Kovel's performance, why wasn't there an investigation of this before firing him? Were the students biased because they, like many of these writing these posts, are hardline Zionists? people who don't much care about truth or justice or they would have joined in a hearing on Kovel's performance.
    Regarding Professor Sami Al-Arian, the jury in the government's multi-million dollar trial acquitted him of all serious charges and voted 10-2 in favor of acquittal of the remaining charges, none of which was anywhere as serious as one of the posters states. All monies having been exhausted, Al-Arian could not continue with his defense and pleaded guilty, upon which he was to be released within a few months.
    Regarding Gaza, it was Israel who completely breached the June 19th truce between Hamas when it entered Gaza on November 4, killing 6 Palestinians on the pretense they were digging tunnels to capture an Israeli soldier. Note that the complaint was not about rockets, because Hamas had effectively stopped the rockets and had not itself launched a rocket for 18 months. Check Israel's Intelligence Reports.
    Israel immediately breached the truce by refusing to relax its blockade over Gaza's airspace, coastal waters, and land borders preventing food, medicine,construction, development, exports, and everything necessary for the economy and the Palestinians to survive.
    On November 5, Hamas responded with rockets.
    Try reading Israeli intelligence reports and Israeli papers as well as other US non-mainstream media, if you really want to know the truth. As for Israel's campaign of terror, as much as tried to deny witnesses to its atrocities when it denied entry to reporters and dignitaries, the cameras were there. We saw the videos of white phosphorus, the burned bodies, unarmed Palestinians running from Israeli gunfire.
    It's obvious most of you commenting here don't give a damn.

  • Posted by Silver on February 20, 2009 at 2:10pm EST
  • I've read all that about Silver, have read the book (which unfortunately is long since out of print). It's practically ancient history. I was going by the NY Times Obit from 1988, not a White Citizens Council Rehabilitation League or something. Sheesh. And Notre Dame was a big step up, regardless! I doubt the same sort of outcome will be the case here, and this guy actually was outright fired before he could find anything else.

  • Posted by Martin on February 20, 2009 at 2:10pm EST
  • As I haven't read anything he's written or attended any of his classes, I have no idea whether he was fired for the right reasons. I do think, however, the idea that Bard College is a hotbed of right-wing thinking is laughable.

    I also see from Kovel's screed that he isn't exactly temperate or balanced; indeed, he seems to fan anti-Israel hysteria. He may, in fact, lack the qualities that Bard values in its professors, wholly apart from any political considerations.

  • In Defense of Bard
  • Posted by Dan , Associate professor at University of Utah on February 20, 2009 at 3:50pm EST
  • Two quick points:

    Bard claims that they're not renewing a number of part-time faculty b/c of the budget cuts that all schools are facing. My school is also doing so for the same reasons, in large part to preserve full-time positions. And we're having to let go some long term non-tenure track folks. If Bard's only non-renewal is Kovel, then he has a point. But if there's a larger pattern of non-renewals, there's a very good chance that this has little to do with any of his political activism. Indeed, he largely seems to owe his position to such activism. Since his de facto mode is political outrage, that's how he's decided to portray his non-renewal, rather than admitting that maybe, just maybe, the budget cuts are legit and he ain't that special.

    Just as importantly, the student evaluations which Kovel himself released show a pattern of increasing student frustration with his lack of organization, etc. My department has had to make some similar decisions b/c of budget cut and, all non-tenure track people were primarily evaluated on the basis of teaching - which effectively means student evaluations. Why wouldn't he be one of those let go?

  • Replying to "In Defense of Bard"
  • Posted by Louis Proyect on February 20, 2009 at 4:30pm EST
  • I guess this is what happens when Scott Jaschik writes an article based *exclusively* on quotes from Botstein and other sources hostile to Kovel. You will conclude that Bard had a case against him. I might have hoped that Inside Higher Ed would have had been interested in both sides of the story--apparently not.

  • Posted by student on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • I am a student at Bard College. I’m a dance major, and really, I don’t think he’s being treated any differently than MANY of the non-tenured professors at Bard right now.

     

    The exact same weekend, the dance department let go two of its part time professors who had been working there for 20 years. That’s two professors out of a total of six in the department. And the two let go were some of the favored in the department overall. Same goes for the theater department, who let go one of their favored professors.

     

    Now, I’m not saying that Joel Kovel’s nonrenewal has nothing to do with politics. It just think it’s important to know that many other professors with no political issues with President Botstein were fired at the same time.

  • An addendum
  • Posted by Louis Proyect on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • Although I am obviously critical of this article, I should state that I consider Scott Jaschik to be a consistently excellent reporter. This is why I feel so let down. Along with Scott McLemee he makes Inside Higher Education a must read on a daily basis. I have checked it daily since it was launched some years back. I guess my hope is that Scott will make amends and do a follow-up interview with Joel so that we can get both sides of the story. I am sure that would be of huge interest to Inside Higher Ed’s readers, no matter where they stand on the issue.

  • Joel Kovel and Alger Hiss
  • Posted by jw on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • Joel Kovel, with poetic justice, occupied the Alger Hiss Chair of Social Studies at Bard. Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy, loyal to one of the most monstrous regimes that has ever existed, the Soviet Union. Joel Kovel also supports tyranny, lying in typical Communist fashion. He wants to destroy Israel, a democracy, to replace it with a secular state with (non-Jewish) Arabs and Israelis. Have such states existed? The Arab states that had Jews who had lived in these places for thousands of years? Egypt? Jordan? Iraq? Lebanon? All persecuted and expelled.
    In any case, the Arabs (miscalled “Palestinian,” since “Palestinian” was always synonymous with “Jew” from the time the Roman Emperor Hadrian changed the name of Judea to Palestina, in 135 A.D., after suppressing the last of the Jewish rebellions under Bar Kochba. It was the Soviet Union that got the name of the (non-Jewish) Arabs changed to “Palestinian” with all the history rewrite following), the Arabs have had only one motive in destroying Israel — religious. So Kovel’s fantasized “secular” state would be another Islamist Hamas, with all the Jews killed.
    Is there any other state that Kovel wants to destroy? There are many tyrannies in the world, but Kovel wants only to destroy a democracy.

  • Shame!
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  •  

    I do not have the documentation to decide whether or not Dr. Kovel should remain in his position. Whether or not to condemn Bar College. I do see, however, a disgusting pattern: The treatment of highly qualified, well-published critics of Israel (Norman Finkelstein, Joel Kovel) as if they were insane, incompetent buffoons. This joy in degrading one’s adversary has no place in civilized academic discourse. Shame! Shame!

  • Posted by Kevin on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • As a resident of South Bend, I would welcome Mr. Kovel to our community. Perhaps there’s a position at the Kroc Institute for him. We would have a diversification of opinion denied N.D. by Bushco’s denial of entry to Tariq Ramadan in ‘04... Mr. Finklestein is most welcome also...

  • AAUP Grievance Procedure
  • Posted by David Kettler , Research Professor, Division of Social Studies at Bard College on February 25, 2009 at 12:30pm EST
  • As a colleague of Joel Kovel, who has at times agreed and at other times disagreed with his politics, who has often learned from him in both kinds of cases, and who regrets his involuntary departure, I welcome Cary Nelson's suggestion that Joel Kovel's allegations be subjected to an AAUP grievance procedure.  As I understand those procedures, however, the inquiries are not conducted on blogs, but under conditions where charges of complicity and duplicity against colleagues are confidentially and prayerfully considered, and inferences from protest NOT made and related constructions are not taken very seriously.  Does anyone seriously think that they have learned anything at all from the fact that no one objected when the conductor of an Israeli orchestra, who is also the President of the College, played two national anthems on a cultural-commercial occasion on campus?  Let's first do some serious editing, an academic habit that should be harder to break than Joel finds it, and then put the remaining firm questions into the appropriate process.  The terms and conditions of Bard faculty are under a collective agreement with the local AAUP.  As a former head of a faculty union in Canada, I wish that the contract were more solidly grounded, but there are academic freedom guarantees and grievance procedures.  The local chapter would be the logical starting point.  If it appeared that the chapter was insufficiently experienced or otherwise unable to function independently, it would be in order for the President of the AAUP to send some wise heads to Bard to talk with the local officials and if necessary set up a special outside hearing commission on behalf of the locals.  Isn't that the point of organizations?  The people denounced by Joel's attack include members in good standing of the AAUP, and the evidence pertinent to the charges should not be bandied around in public.  I regret not only Joel's broadside but also the action of my longtime friend and patron, Leon Botstein, in making his CEC evaluation public.  But the main thing is that Cary Nelson should get going on his real job, which is to make our organization credible in these matters by acting in accordance with the procedures that legitimate it, instead of writing op eds to blogs.  Do I need to legitimate myself by saying that I (mostly) agree with Kovel's analysis of the Palestinian situation and that I was myself once--long ago--an academic freedom case?  I suppose so, since that seems to be the norm in this medium.

    David Kettler

  • Posted by 09bardie , Prelaw kid at Bard College on February 26, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • Having served as a student representative in Bard's facutly evaluation process, I can corroborate that the faculty member mentioned by Prof. Kovel should have recused himself under the provisions of the Faculty Handbook.

    I think Prof. Kettler's insistence that the AAUP take this case makes some sense for the overall preservation of faculty and administrative rights.  But I don't really really follow his argument that it was unethical for Prof. Kovel to make these allegations public.  From the perspective of faculty solidarity, it makes sense.  But his argument is leaving out one of the biggest stakeholders in this decision: Bard students.  As pro-union as many of us are, the AAUP isn't really a union, and in any case we aren't AAUP members and don't really enjoy the rights of academics.  So it's not clear to me why we might share in the obligation to keep this debate out of the public sphere.  Whether or not Prof. Kovel remains at Bard is an issue for the student body; it has a significant effect on the image of the school as well as the content of other classes taught by instructors who aren't in line with President Botstein politically.  The publicty surrounding this case, and the student response to President Botstein's decision, will also affect the sorts of prospective college students who will eventually come to Bard.  

    Also, I have it on good information that members of the Bard faculty have been warned not to involve themselves in this case in defense of Prof. Kovel.  So we can hardly assume that Prof. Kettler's reaction, reasoned as it is, is representative of Bard faculty opinion.  

  • Academic freedom vs. 'Official Truth'
  • Posted by reindeer on March 11, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Some people here seem to think that the academic freedom only applies to those who pertain to certain political ideas and who don't criticize hot political topics. They also seem to think that it is natural and even moral(!) NOT to give people permanent tenures (ie. secure existence and livelihood) in case they became too difficult - that the Universities should self-evidently be able to fire people if they become too difficult.

    What can I say. This sure looks like censorship to me. Whether your left, right or center; zionist or anti-zionist - or something else, you should still be able to publish books, teach and do scientific research, and have your livelihood protected from outside political pressure groups. Unless you want to turn into a Big Brother state where there is only one official Truth.