Search News


Browse Archives

News

Transparent Boycott Target

February 19, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Habits die hard.

“A concern for some people is they can’t imagine what they would do without bottled water,” said Alexandra D’Urso, a Ph.D. student in curriculum and instruction at Pennsylvania State University who’s involved with a new campaign to ban bottled water on campus. “It’s hard to believe that we’ve gone from a point 15 years ago when no one carried a plastic water bottle, that now no one can imagine how we would live without them.”

To borrow from John Lennon, imagine. That’s what student and faculty activists are asking on a number of college campuses where efforts to cut down on the use of bottled water, or restrict its sale -- all for sustainability’s sake -- are gaining momentum.

Many in the “Ban the Bottle” camp are taking inspiration from Washington University in St. Louis, where university money is not supposed to be spent on bottled water -- the sale of which is banned on campus as of January 1 (although it’s still being sold in one market through March 15 due to a contractual obligation).

Washington University officials have been flooded with dozens of requests for information -- how’d they do it? -- and on Friday they hosted a conference call explaining how. “I hope it can be one of those things that we can be the first domino that falls,” said Deborah Howard, special assistant to the executive vice chancellor of administration.

“It wouldn’t have been successful without the student campaign. We wouldn’t have done it. There’s too much resistance,” Howard said – resistance tied to revenues. While Washington saves money in not having to buy bottled water for catered events, “campuses make a lot of money in dining services and vending machines selling bottled water.”

“I really feel like the vast, vast majority of people just never thought about it before,” said Kady McFadden, a junior environmental studies and political science major at Washington University who led the successful "Tap It" campaign. “Just making it an issue, so if someone does have a bottle of water at least they think about it before making that purchase – hopefully that will continue, not just through college.”

Proponents of banning or limiting bottled water cite the fossil fuels injected into the processing, packaging and transporting of a product that students can get for free from the tap, as well as waste and low recycling rates.(The vast majority of bottles end up in landfills. Estimated recycling rates range from about 15 percent to -- according to the trade association for bottled water -- 25).

Industry executives, by contrast, say, first of all, that bottled water and tap aren't the same, and that bottled water shouldn’t be singled out for protest -- especially given obesity rates and the possibility that a student will reach for a Coca-Cola instead. “I’m a little confused by Washington University because all of the beverages that they sell on campus are in plastic bottles and contain mostly water, whether it’s a soda or even a beer. It seems unreasonable and short-sighted to single out bottled water, the healthiest beverage a student can buy,” said Tom Lauria, vice president of communications for the International Bottled Water Association.

“Ban the bottle” has a certain ring to it. But at a number of campuses, activists aren’t focused on restricting the sale of bottled water – citing student choice – but instead have mounted educational campaigns and are distributing reusable bottles, fixing broken water fountains, making filters available, and otherwise acting to make tap water a more convenient and palatable option.

At Brandeis University, the institution’s catering service has replaced individual bottles with reusable coolers, said Janna Cohen-Rosenthal, the sustainability coordinator. “That’s the university’s own money,” she said. But other than that, “We decided not to quote-unquote ban it. We didn’t think that was the right way to respect student choices and decision-making. Instead, we provided really good options to limit bottled water use” – including distributing reusable bottles to all students and installing fillers on water fountains to make it easier to keep them full.

"One of the biggest hurdles in convincing people not to drink bottled water is they were really concerned about tap water," said Cohen-Rosenthal. "There are so many societies where there's not access to fresh, clean drinking water, and Waltham, Massachusetts is not one of them."

At Evergreen State College, in Washington, the “Ban the Bottle” campaign restarted last week (per the rhythms of campus activism, two students who first got it going last spring had graduated). “I’m the director of sustainability for the college, I work in the president’s office, and I think if I were to push from a senior management or institution-wide [position], we could get victory. But to me that’s not a victory at all,” said John Pumilio. “A victory is seeing the students and community members on campus really say that it does not make sense to do this and just flat-out quit purchasing bottled water. That to me is victory; it’s not a mandate.”

Ultimately, Pumilio explained, he’d like to see an institutional policy restricting the sale of bottled water, but first he’d like to see a distaste for it develop as a campus norm. “I think we will eventually have an institutional policy where we’re just not selling bottled water on campus, but we haven’t reached that organic threshold yet where people aren’t purchasing bottled water anymore.”

Breck Speed, chief executive officer of Mountain Valley Spring Water, in Arkansas, said people misunderstand the realities of the bottled water business. “The misinformation is that we’re competing with tap water, whereas in the bottled water world you’ll never see any ads about bottled water being better than tap water. … Bottled water has been adopted by consumers not against tap water but against carbonated soft drinks; that’s where our growth has been,” said Speed, who publicly took offense when the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville's Sustainability Council announced its first project last fall: replacing bottled water on campus. “They thought it was the low-hanging fruit,” said Speed, who has proposed entering into a recycling partnership with the university.

Recycling alone, however, doesn’t solve the issue of energy use associated with manufacturing and shipment, said Robert Cross, an emeritus professor of chemical engineering who represents the College of Engineering on Arkansas’ Sustainability Council. "There are actually some discussions of general cooperation in recycling with him on campus. We’re trying to leave the door open,” but, said Cross, “we’re committed to the bottled water program and we’re going ahead with that regardless of what else might transpire on the side.”

Arkansas' campaign is educational and voluntary in nature, and organizers stressed that they are not aiming to get campus vendors to remove bottled water from their shelves. Instead, the Sustainability Council just asked student groups to consider giving up bottled water at their meetings and events, and members are primed to similarly reach out to academic units.

It's not a shocker to anyone that many academic units are facing the prospect of smaller budgets these days. And while colleges may make money on the sale of bottled water, it also costs money when they’re the consumers -- a fact not lost on the president of one Florida college, who opted last month not to renew a contract for the coolers of bottled water dotting the campus. Arthur F. Kirk, Jr., president of Saint Leo University, called them “a symbolic sign of better times.”

In a meeting, administrators asked, “ 'What are ways that we can be more responsible stewards of our resources?' and somebody pointed to the water cooler and said, ‘That’s really not necessary and it’s not good for the environment either,' ” Kirk recalled.

“It’s both symbolic and real in that it raises the consciousness of everybody when it’s that kind of visible thing [you cut], and not some department’s Xerox budget or something that no one sees.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Transparent Boycott Target

  • Posted by Tanya on February 19, 2009 at 8:50am EST
  • I'm a grad student at WashU, and while I applaud the ideas and ideals behind the bottled water ban, it has been increasingly frustrating to be on a campus where no bottled water is available. Even the Coca-Cola machines no longer have bottled water: instead, they have VitaminWater, which isn't exactly low on the calories.

    The cafes on campus tend to have a container filled with ice water from which you can refill a reusable container, but graduate students and faculty probably spend less time in those facilities than undergrads.

    Still, I echo the point in your article about how it's strange to single out bottled water when there are so many other bottled beverages still being sold.

  • Shooting small bunnies
  • Posted by T-bone on February 19, 2009 at 9:50am EST
  • Drinking bottled water is certainly not the most environmentally damaging activity at Washington U. Consider just the carbon emissions from the vehicles for all of the students and faculty members traveling to campus each day! Banning bottled water seems silly as you are just shooting at the small bunnies while ignoring the fattened cows.
    Instead, why not spend efforts on developing educational campaigns, or a series of workshops or speakers on environmental issues, or including a course on environmental studies as part of the curriculum?

  • Vitamin water
  • Posted by Betty , Adjunct Faculty on February 19, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • As a Registered Dietitian I CANNOT believe that vitamin water is sold. IT is such a "rip off", almost as bad as Gatorade unless one is a marathon runner. I would rather they had kept the water and got rid of those other "drinks". Why pop and not water?
    An RD

  • Posted by David on February 19, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • Perhaps another issue to consider about the distaste (pun intended) of bottled water is the cost. Why does something from the tap, treated with whatever they do to it, cost more than soft drinks and juices sold from the same machine or vendors? This irks me more than the problem of plastic bottles. Of course water companies will object. Perhaps it takes hard times like these for people to realize that maybe, just maybe, the price they are paying for what they can get much cheaper (like Starbucks for coffee) or even free (from the fountain) and savings can be used for more important things in life, like actually making a living. Charge a quarter a bottle, and maybe it would be worth it, if nothing else, just for the bottle!

  • Plastics are killing our planet
  • Posted by Prof Ed on February 19, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Packaging products is necessary, but plastic bags and disposable plastic containers are some of the most environmentally destructive products of our modern throw-away culture. We need to get rid of all of them--not just bottled water containers. Alternatives exist, such as aluminum, which is more likely to be recycled, glass, which is inert, doesn't float to be consumed and damage marine life the way plastic does.

    Foods and drinks stored in glass are probably safer over long term than foods and drinks laced with plasticizers. Bottled water addicts who think they are being "healthy" sucking in plasticizers daily would be wise to dump their habit.

    If university vendors insist on pushing their plastic products, then, professors, staff, and students, bring your own beverages sold in environmentally responsible containers to school, fill and bring your own permanently reusable water bottles and shun the vendors--starve these irresponsible vendors out of existence. Try to purchase nothing in a food store that comes in plastic containers--go for brands that use glass, metal or paper.

  • Well
  • Posted by Cicero on February 19, 2009 at 10:20am EST
  • "Instead, why not spend efforts on developing educational campaigns, or a series of workshops or speakers on environmental issues, or including a course on environmental studies as part of the curriculum?"

    I'm pretty sure WashU does all those things, T-bone.

  • bottled water
  • Posted by Deborah on February 19, 2009 at 11:40am EST
  • I had stopped buying bottled water about a year ago because of my concern for the environment, every day bringing a couple of bottles from home with ice in them. The Student Government at our small technical college, on suggestion from some students, installed an ice/water machine in the student lounge and gave away reusable bottles to all students who wanted them. No ban on bottled water, but I and many others take advantage of the free, cool water. I do think it's better not to force people into it, but hopefully to educate them about the small part we can each have in the larger attempt to save the environment.

  • The choices are yours, for now...
  • Posted by Idealist on February 19, 2009 at 12:05pm EST
  • Sorry folks, we are America – Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. Again we have products that seemingly everyone uses and are now being approached as taboo for environmental reasons. Wake up; we shouldn’t be in the business of giving away our freedom to choose a particular product over another. The responsible users of plastics are to pay for the abuses of the irresponsible. Plastic is as recyclable as any other container. It can also be formulated to breakdown in nature, but not in landfills! Apparently the energy that goes into the making of glass, paper and aluminum are free and have no effect on our world. If we are to be good stewards of the environment, we must realize that our quality of life is in our own hands. The reality here is that if we use these products responsibly, including consumption, then we have minimized the detrimental effects of manufacture. It is not only un-fair, but is ignorant to single out a product only for its “so called” detriment, without considering the economic, social, or health, consequences. Education is the key to responsible actions. Irresponsibility is the real culprit here and always has been. If consumers wish to pay the price for bottled water, then we have an industry that pays taxes, employs people, and makes profits for most of your retirement accounts… “Recycle the damn plastics” That’s the campaign that will truly make a difference

  • bottled water
  • Posted by Rupret on February 19, 2009 at 12:35pm EST
  • What!? They have water in bottles now?

  • Bottled Water
  • Posted by the michigan guy on February 19, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • I'm glad we're now on to banning bottled water and have left the smoking alone for a while -- and to answer RD's question as to why water and not soda? Ah, there really is no such thing as a soda fountain -- only water fountains.

  • Soda Fountains
  • Posted by Carol on February 19, 2009 at 6:20pm EST
  • Of course there are such things as soda fountains. If you are going to ban water in plastic bottles, you should ban soda in plastic bottles. It makes no sense to select only one product to ban.

  • How To Make It Easier
  • Posted by Ashley on February 19, 2009 at 6:20pm EST
  • One of the tricks to using reusable bottles is that they have to be cleaned every so often. This is very easy in an apartment or home, and is often more difficult in a college dorm. Not every dorm has a kitchenette, and some that do have concerning theft problems.

  • Water
  • Posted by Amanda on February 19, 2009 at 6:20pm EST
  • I hope they do not bring this to my campus unless the offer an alternative, like filtered water. The city I live in has terrible water. It's so chlorinated that I feel like I'm drinking a swimming pool when I drink the tap water.

  • Tap It - What a joke
  • Posted by Erik on February 19, 2009 at 6:50pm EST
  • This is the worst thing ever, telling students to drink tap water. Have they not done studies to find out what is in the tap water? This is ridiculous and someone just wanted to have their name in an article. According to the National Tapwater Quality Database, over 140 different Unregulated chemicals have been identified in tap water: http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/findings.php. (click on local or state findings to see how many chemicals are in your tap water) While St. Louis may not be affected by as many chemicals (only 6) as most places, it is still irresponsible for anyone to ban bottled water over Pop and Gatorade.

  • Banning sales of bottled water
  • Posted by Bridger on February 19, 2009 at 9:50pm EST
  • I am not a fan of bottled water; I resent, in fact, buying something that nature provides for free and I wonder about those who have to "buy" water. That said, it's their choice. I am always flabbergasted at the number of folks out there whose lives are in such perfect order that they feel it is incumbent upon them to impose their beliefs on others and to "legislate" the lives of others. I shudder to think of the day when these folks target fat people, or skinny people, or ugly people...
    Bridger

  • This Cracks Me Up
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 20, 2009 at 5:25am EST
  • This is so silly I’m having difficulty keeping a straight face. There are at least three reasons not to pay for and drink bottled water: (1) it is outrageously expensive, (2) a great deal of what you’re drinking is not better than tap water … it is, on the average, not nearly as pure as filtered tap water … and it doesn’t contain fluoride (so discourage your kids from drinking it as opposed to drinking tap water), and (3) it is environmentally outrageous, even if you recycle all of that plastic.

    Try this on for size. During the past two years I have purchased four four-packs of SoBe Green Tea. That stuff, although both delicious and refreshing, is outrageously expensive. I bought it, however, only for the wonderful, practically indestructible, 20 fluid ounce glass bottles with sturdy metal screw-on tops … and I can tell you it is difficult to find high quality glass drinking bottles these days. After drinking the tea and removing the labels, I have been using the bottles as water bottles, filling them with tap water … and admitting I have a PUR filter on my tap. At the moment, I have one bottle sitting on my desk, I have six bottles in my fridge, and I leave the house every morning with three bottles in my back pack. I wash them and refill them daily, and I have not broken a bottle in two years (although my sister steals one of my bottles every chance she gets).

    Now for the stupid Americans issue. On the average, in my neighborhood …

    Regular gasoline = $1.82 per gallon.

    Aquafina (Pepsi Cola) or Dasani (Coca-Cola) = $8.90 per gallon.

    Filtered tap water = $0.19 per gallon

    Oh, by the way, both Aquafina and Dasani, which cost almost 50 times as much as filtered tap water, are … you guessed it … filtered tap water. Indeed, more than 25% of all bottled water comes from someone’s tap. If I average five 20-ounce bottles per day – which I do – my annual savings by drinking MY filtered tap water instead of THEIR filtered tap water is approximately $1,400.

    Finally, a Natural Resources Defense Council study “… included testing of more than 1,000 bottles of 103 brands of bottled water. While most of the tested waters were found to be of high quality, some brands were contaminated: about one-third of the waters tested contained levels of contamination -- including synthetic organic chemicals, bacteria, and arsenic -- in at least one sample that exceeded allowable limits under either state or bottled water industry standards or guidelines.”

    http://www.nrdc.org/water/drinking/nbw.asp

    P.S. If you really want to be bent out of shape – as well as be ripped off -- try this …

    Hewlett-Packard printer ink = $8,000. per gallon.

  • In Response To Rupret
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 20, 2009 at 9:20am EST
  • I must respond to Rupret who asked “What! They have water in bottles now?”

    Some years ago I taught courses in Market Research (I know, I know, you have my apology). Anyway, two examples I employed to demonstrate my business stupidity were ...

    A small businessman from Ypsilanti, Michigan approaches you and says, “I have this idea. We’ll make a pizza that more or less tastes like Styrofoam, but we’ll promise to deliver it to your home in twenty minutes. I need a partner. Interested?”

    A businesswoman from Atlanta drops by your office and says, “I’ve been thinking. What would you think of taking water right out of the tap, putting it in plastic bottles, putting a nice label on it – I’m thinking of a waterfall or an ice berg – and selling it for about fifty times it’s original cost. Do you think that will work?”

    As Yogi Berra said when he learned that Dublin, Ireland had elected a Jewish mayor, “Only in America can a thing like that happen.”

  • A campus movement
  • Posted by Wash U Grad on February 20, 2009 at 10:10am EST
  • When I was at Wash U the great campaign was styrofoam. Now it's bottled water. Hmmm...

    St. Louis has areas mired in poverty. There is likely now, as in my day there, great consumption among the student body. At the end of the school year, many rich kids would just leave televisions and appliances behind as trash, and the local cleaning staff would scavenge.

    A 'Ban the Bottle' campaign among the privileged is a diversion and a romp. Wash U students would do better by aiming that youthful energy towards ameliorating the harms structural poverty and racism have inflicted on the St. Louis metropolitan area for decades.

  • There's No Such Thing...
  • Posted by Tapped Out on February 20, 2009 at 10:50am EST
  • ...as "free" tap water. Someone, somewhere is paying to receive that water. It might be hidden in tuition or room and board charges, but I've never experienced genuinely free water. Granted, tap water is much less expensive than bottled water, and may even be healthier in some municipalities, but free? Hardly.

  • other "low-hanging fruit"
  • Posted by Sarah Schneewind on February 20, 2009 at 12:50pm EST
  • How about banning leaf-blowers, which use fossil fuel to move leaves from place a to place b without actually getting them into the compost pile, while adding noise and stink to the environment and taking a toll on the health of workers? Let's go back to rakes and brooms; even if the universities did have to hire an few extra workers (which is not clear), that would be a good thing.

  • Tap Water Connection
  • Posted by Lydia on February 20, 2009 at 3:20pm EST
  • I agree that bottled water may not be the gravest problem in our midst and banning it may not be the best approach, but getting people back to drinking tap water is an important positive step toward sustainable living.

    It is essential for our survival on this planet to start questioning and changing our wasteful habits - drinking bottled water is just one small example of where we have gone wrong. It is an important but easy step people can take on the path to reducing their eco-footprints, but hardly the last. Once a person reduces their consumption of bottled water, they are likely to re-consider many of the other disposable convenience items they consume daily.

    Most importantly, when we drink tap water, we are connnected with our environment. Suddenly, we are concerned about where our tap water comes from and what's in it. We realize that we have to take care of our watershed because we are dependant on it. We tend to think we can live disconnected from nature or by conquering nature, but ultimately we can't. Let's get Back2Tap so that we consume fewer resources, reduce our waste and protect our watersheds.

  • ‘Transparent Boycott Target’
  • Posted by Bob Pantano on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • I am new to the bottled water controversy that is brewing in America. I have watched "Flow" and I am appalled by what is transpiring in Michigan and other states at the hands of Arrowhead. Being a native to the desert southwest, I grew up in Tucson, Arizona, enjoying some of the best tasting tap water in the U.S. But thanks to a policy of unbridled growth backed fully, completely and politically, by our local water company, our area became the poster-boy of sprawl and desert overrun. On one hand, publically Tucson Water Company urges conservation and warns of the imminent water shortages we face. At the same time, the company has never spent one dime of revenue discouraging growth in our valley and/or the surrounding area. And on the other hand, this same water company championed the delivery of C.A.P. water (Central Arizona Project i.e., Colorado River water) to our taps which not only resulted in a corresponding increase of corrosive factor to our water pipes and fixtures of about 1,000%, but also succeeded in making the water that comes out of our taps almost undrinkable due to the river's hard mineral level and the now-added chlorine factor. It all makes us natives so frustrated and upset (that's putting it mildly), with this new terrible tasting water which has been forced upon us by our local water company, that some of us wonder if the water company is actually in cahoots somehow with the bottled water industry. The water company spent millions and millions of dollars defeating a citizens initiative that would have forced the city to curtail growth and stop the delivery of C.A.P. water to our taps and only allow it's use for other things. The initiative was defeated thanks to our water company. The corresponding boom in purified and unpurified bottled water consumption in this city is off the charts. It sure makes us all go hhmmmm....??

  • Bottled Water Quality Questionable
  • Posted by Dr. R , Professor/Environmental Engineering at Utah State University on March 3, 2009 at 4:15pm EST
  • In response to Erik's posting of Feb 19, Tap it - What a Joke, he directed us to the National Tapwater Quality Database from the Environmental Working Group, EWG: http://www.ewg.org/tapwater/findings.php.

    While this has lots of troubling information about detectable levels of contaminants in our drinking water, what Erik didn't direct us to was a news release by EWG suggesting that the FDA impose the same standards that EPA uses for tap water on the bottle water industry.  Our tap water may not be as pristine as we would like, but the bottled water some people pay lots for was found by EWG to be even worse and not as well regulated as our drinking water.  Before you stop drinking tap water and start drinking bottled water you may want to check out the EWG link below.

    http://www.ewg.org/newsrelease/FDA-Should-Adopt-EPA-Tap-Water-Health-Goals-for-Bottled-Water