Search News


Browse Archives

News

Creating a National Voice for Adjuncts

February 20, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Some of the leading activists on behalf of adjuncts are planning Sunday to formally create an organization that would speak solely on behalf of those off the tenure track.

The new group -- currently with the working name of the National Coalition for Adjunct Equity -- would seek to perform a role that its organizers feel existing groups do not. In recent years, all three national faculty unions as well as some disciplinary associations have focused increased attention on those off the tenure track. But these organizations also represent full-time faculty members, and many adjuncts feel that full-time perspectives dominate. And while there is a Coalition of Contingent Academic Labor, known as COCAL, that group has largely focused on periodic national and regional meetings, not day-to-day advocacy on behalf of adjuncts.

At the COCAL meeting last year in San Diego, some adjuncts pushed to turn that group into a more structured organization, but the idea didn't take off.

While the new group is still being defined, those involved with the effort say that they anticipate a group that would create a forum and platform to advocate solely for those who are adjuncts. Organizers see the group as an important addition to existing organizations, but say that they aren't trying to replace the unions or to engage in collective bargaining. Several of those involved in the new effort are involved in the unions; others involved have been critics of unions, while still others are in states where unionizing isn't much of an option.

Those involved with the discussions to create the group note several conditions facing non-tenure-track faculty today. First, many of them are losing jobs, as colleges and universities are dealing with budget cuts in part by eliminating their slots. Even if, as many expect, some of these adjuncts are hired back later, they are receiving non-renewal notices now -- in many cases after years of stable employment. Second, many say that while they appreciate the increased attention of unions and academic organizations, they want an organization that they run. And third, some of those involved say that they do not view their adjunct status as temporary (even if they would like to), but as permanent.

A common theme among those calling for the new group is the idea that adjuncts must take the lead on their own treatment, and not rely on others -- an idea expressed in a recent column in Inside Higher Ed by Gregory Zobel, a California adjunct who is among those organizing the new group.

Deborah Louis, one of those involved in organizing the group, said her career has been as an adjunct and she currently teaches online for Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College, in North Carolina, and Eastern Kentucky University. "My notion of this group is as a national umbrella organization that can be a voice for adjuncts," she said. When she and her colleagues are working on adjunct issues at a particular campus, she said, she would like a group to provide national perspective, public relations help and research.

"We need more support so those of us in the field aren't easily dismissed," she said.

Ross Borden, a lecturer in English at the State University of New York at Cortland, said he hopes that a national group would pave the way for "national employment practices" that might highlight how "really disgraceful" the treatment of some adjuncts has become. "The appalling inequities need attention," he said.

Borden has attended COCAL conferences and found them valuable, but said he wants "a permanent structure." And Borden serves on the part-timers committee of the United University Professions, the State University of New York's faculty union, which is part of the American Federation of Teachers. While Borden praised his union for backing adjunct rights, he said most leaders of the group are tenure-track faculty members with a certain perspective as a result. "I support tenure and the organizations that support tenure," he said. But those without tenure need to be pushing models to protect their rights, he said.

The new organization "is not a substitute" for the unions, he said.

Others involved in the group are more critical of the unions. Keith Hoeller, co-founder of the Washington Part-Time Faculty Association and one of those involved in the new organization, said that when discussions started, he articulated his views on why a national adjunct group is needed in a statement. "Despite the past 12 years of adjunct activism in North America, the two-tiered apartheid system is firmly ensconced in academe. At every turn, it advantages the tenure stream faculty, while leaving adjuncts among the seriously disadvantaged," he wrote.

He went on to say that progress has been too slow, showing the need for an adjunct-led movement. "As I write this, thousands of adjunct faculty have already lost their jobs in this recession, and tens of thousands face dismissal as the recession worsens," he said. "When they lose their jobs, they lose their health care (if they ever had it), and they are hassled at the unemployment office where the colleges seek to deny them aid on the grounds that they have a kind of job security they never had, and certainly do not have now. Contingent faculty do not have the luxury of taking small incremental steps; major change now is a necessity for us if our young movement is to survive."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Creating a National Voice for Adjuncts

  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof , Wary, if not outright Dismissive at No Got One on February 20, 2009 at 9:40am EST
  • Thinking that a union, even with the best intentions cannot serve two masters. Tenured profs are able to pay more dues (certainly a lower percentage of take-home pay), so they will get the Organized attention of the established unions.

    So, do we, as a force of under-employed, low-wage adjunks, with our clever and righteous anger band together? Sure. More power to you.

    However, we are the low-hanging fruit in a bad economy. We have no say, no contract, no obligation extended. We are the last in, first out in the supply chain.

    I would like to attend one of your meetings. I really would, but on an adjunct salary, there is no way I can travel to San Diego...or Chicago...or pretty much anywhere more than an hour's drive.

    But, meet away.

    http://burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com/

  • Adjuncts get Smart
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof on February 20, 2009 at 9:40am EST
  • Here are some suggestions to add to your discussion.
    1. You are dealing with the business end of education. Get your business in order.
    2. Determine your objectives. Are you going to just discuss or do something.
    3.ASK for what you want. If you don't ask, you will get no forum for negotiation.
    Check out the rest of my post:
    http://unaskedadvice.wordpress.com/

  • In agreement
  • Posted by Susan Summers on February 20, 2009 at 11:10am EST
  • I couldn't be in more agreement that the Adjunct professors need a national voice with local state affiliates. For far too long they have been used as the backbone of Universities across America with little pay, long hours, and overloaded classes.

  • The crux of the problem?
  • Posted by Prof. Part Time , Adjunct at U of Akron, Kent State, ITT Technical on February 20, 2009 at 3:05pm EST
  • The problem I see here is that most non-teaching Americans see a university as a place where teachers teach students.... period. Research, tenure, staff meetings, political machinations, publishing, salaries, sabbaticals, college presidents' perqs, etc. are not even remotely related to the classroom with students and the teacher who is imparting knowledge that the students need to LEARN. People send their kids to us (and pay handsomely for it) in order that the kids learn what they need to know in order to graduate and be successful in the world. What does this have to do with researching or inventing theories or publishing in prestigious journals? NOTHING AT ALL. Nothing!!!
    My idea of a pure student/teacher paradigm is Aristotle, Plato, Erasmus, Jesus, Buddha, etc. sitting with a group of students and working with them to understand their teachings. Such a model has nothing to do with university/ faculty politics and the self-interest of those outside the teachers' classrooms.

    As an adjunct, I could care less about research and publishing, or sitting in a meeting of crabby tenured people who regard me as an unworthy migrant worker/WalMart employee. My entire pedagogical aim is to show my students how to write well, which includes spending my personal time in conferences where I can give one-on-one feedback and hint at ideas that can unlock their minds and empower them with the ability to communicate effectively. To me, working with my students is teaching.

    The crux of the problem is that those of us outside of the tenured crowd have an entirely different perception of teaching I am not looking for guaranteed life employment like a pope or queen, nor am I asking for fame and riches. I would, though, like to have health insurance, a place to hang my coat, a decent wage, and eye contact with those who feel they are my betters (the tenured and dept. heads). As I drive frantically between three schools in order to make enough money to subsist, I know that the non-adjuncts are sitting in offices with windows and writing journal papers about the decline of educational quality because of us lowly, undereducated part-timers. I have read the articles; tho they are articulate, they are totally out of touch with the reality of teaching on the front line by us adjunct underlings. Ironically, we are the ones who are doing the teaching to students and bringing in the tuition money for our schools. I don't get it....

  • Adjunct Status
  • Posted by Adjunct George on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • I have been an adjunct for about 10 years. One of the tenured faculty who I respect put it succently during my second year when he said “Well George, how do you like being a plantation slave?” I happen to love the students and think we ought to can tenure since it forces a two level professional system at the universities. Everyone on a 5 year contract if they wish to have a contract. There is a union. With a union goes a contract. No union, allow tenure. Have a union, do not allow tenure.

  • Interesting . . .
  • Posted by Adjunctivitis on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • . . . but, there is much to consider. Having once been on the front line of union organizing (in a right-to-work state, no less), I’m skeptical. Sorry. You see, most of the adjuncts I know are, like me, hoping to land a full time gig. Once and if we ever do, we’re no longer adjuncts. I see an organization with a transient membership. I’m open to learn how this could work, but. . . we’ll see. In the meantime, I’m scrambling between three campuses in some semesters and looking for work in other semesters.

  • How Do I Sign Up
  • Posted by Mitchell Rubinstein , Adjunct Professor at St. Johns Law School on February 23, 2009 at 4:04pm EST
  • Sounds like a great idea. How do we sign up??

  • The one power we have as contingents
  • Posted by Barry Edwards at Oregon COCAL on February 24, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • I'm hopeful but a bit skeptical in a national organization for contingent faculty. Up to now, contingent faculty have needed others with established power to get real movement on our issues. Most of the successes in contingent issues lately have been with the help of full-time tenure track faculty who "get it" or a national union structure (for example, AFT's FACE legislative efforts). So I understand the need for an organization like The National Coalition for Adjunct Equity. 

    The problem is there is only one real power contingents have, and it's given to us by the vary forces that created this mess. The power we have is in our numbers. With something like 70% of faculty nation-wide now being contingent, we have the power to close down colleges if we have the organization and the will. And while there are a very few contingent locals that have had success in organizing their members, most locals (like one of my locals in Oregon, yes I am a 'freeway flyer') won't even talk about the "S-word" (strike). 

    Perhaps this new organization will help us as contingents see our new power and help us find the courage to use it. 

  • Adjunct Abuse
  • Posted by Adjunct Angel , Unemployed on March 9, 2009 at 6:00pm EDT
  • Only after being hired on, I found myself working for a community college that did not have union representation for part-timers. My colleagues and I formed a committee to change all of that. Teachers were not being paid for teaching, others were being black listed if they complained, none of us were making a living wage unless we were willing to "freeway fly" to other part-time positions as much as 100 miles away.

    We did manage to get a union for ourselves, but were constantly having to butt our heads with the insane administrators in charge at that time.

    In my wildest dreams, I think of a wonderful system where we could teach, without having to spin our wheels on this garbage, and have a much better educational system to hand our students.

    When will all the insanity end? When someone gets a clue that all the highly paid PhD.'s need to go through scrutiny to keep their jobs--and a hefty pay cut to boot. The wasteful spending should be made public and those responsible should be fired. That money saved could go to pay Adjuncts what they are worth--their weight in gold.

  • Adjunct organizing
  • Posted by Lance Sparks , Instructor/English at Lane Community College, Eugene, OR on March 20, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • I'm very much in favor of this effort. I've been teaching at the college level for 40 years, at two univeristies and two community colleges. For most of those years, I've been scratching out a living by freeway flying to PT gigs, supplemented by freelance writing. But I love teaching, and my students seem to like my work, in class and in print. So it's been a good (enough) life. I've also been a union organizer a ta university, and a member of a union at a comm coll where PT and FT are members of the same union, a unity which had, until recently, produced at least decent wages for PT, plus health benefits, in part because the FT for years recognized that their security depended in part on making PT nearly as expensive to employers (something approaching equity); that attitude and understanding has diminished lately for various reasons (I suspect the leaky-lifeboat phenomenon).

     

    Still, I think this might be a good time for this effort. If I can help, I will.