Search News


Browse Archives

News

One Too Many

February 24, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At a moment when the University of Florida is slashing its budget and laying off faculty and staff, administrators thought it was reasonable to ask Florence Babb to increase her teaching load to three courses a year. She doesn’t agree.

Babb, an endowed professor and graduate coordinator of UF’s Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research, has entered into arbitration proceedings to challenge the increased teaching load. Babb was given an appointment letter in 2004 that said her teaching load would be limited to one course each semester, and now says the university isn’t upholding its written agreement.

The United Faculty of Florida, a statewide union affiliated with the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, is backing Babb. As more universities contemplate budget cuts, Babb said it’s important to make a stand.

“This could be a kind of a test case,” said Babb, who makes close to $100,000 a year. “I think there is some awareness that this is a big issue for me, but it’s potentially a significant issue for many more people.”

The university does not dispute that Babb’s appointment letter laid out a one-class per semester course load. Even so, university officials argue that changing teaching loads is permissible under Florida’s collective bargaining agreement with the union. “From the university’s point of view, it is black and white in the collective bargaining agreement that a chair can adjust the assignment of a faculty member whenever they need to do so,” said Joe Glover, Florida’s provost.

According to the agreement, the university is authorized to “determine the mix” of duties, which include teaching, research and service. Assignments must be “fair and reasonable,” according to the agreement

An 'Attractive' Arrangement

Babb draws an annual salary of $99,223, according to university officials. The two classes she’s teaching this spring have a total of 43 students. One of the classes she's teaching this spring is a graduate level course.

“I was hired with a very attractive set of conditions, but no more attractive I think than other endowed professors at the University of Florida -- very typical of what I’ve seen in other contracts,” she said.

In addition to her teaching, Babb serves as graduate coordinator in the women’s studies center. Given her duties as coordinator, her new teaching load expanded to three courses over spring and fall semesters -- as opposed to four classes -- because her coordinator responsibility qualifies as a course. Prior to Babb’s tenure in the position, the university had never previously granted the center’s graduate coordinator course relief, because the center is relatively small, Glover said.

Florida took a $69 million budget cut last year, and Babb’s college was already in financial trouble -- even before the state’s economy started to plummet. Glover said the cuts put strains on the university’s teaching mission, and increasing Babb’s load was necessary.

“This is a time when the budget process in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences was so bad that we took the unprecedented step of laying off seven faculty, including several who were tenure track,” Glover said. “Travel budgets were cut to the bone, there was very little hiring and everything was cut back. This is a professor who had a 1:1 course load who has complained about being asked to teach an additional course. I think that’s a disproportionate response given the severity of the situation the college was facing.”

Babb argues, however, that’s she’s been singled out in a way that others have not.

“We’re not aware of faculty who have had an increase of course load for the indefinite time period,” she said. “That’s striking.”

Actually, there was one endowed faculty member in Babb’s college who was asked to increase his teaching load, according to Glover. That faculty member, whom Glover declined to identify, opted to retire instead, he said.

Milagros Peña, director of the Center for Women's Studies and Gender Research, declined an interview request. She did, however, send an e-mail affirming that the center’s “most important” function is teaching. “The central mission of our center is its teaching mission,” she wrote. “With loss of faculty and diminished … resources the center is facing the need for all core faculty to be available to meet the needs of the center's teaching mission.”

Union Sees Strong Case

The sticking point in the debate over Babb’s teaching load may be the presence of a written document that articulates her teaching responsibilities, limiting them to one class each semester. Inside Higher Ed requested the document from both Babb and the university, neither of whom provided it Monday. Both parties confirm, however, that the agreement limits Babb’s teaching load.

John Biro, president of the university’s chapter of the United Faculty of Florida, said the union would not have backed Babb if it didn’t feel there was a strong case to be made that the university had violated its contract.

“It’s not the case that everyone’s teaching load is specified in our collective bargaining agreement; that could not be the case for 2,000 faculty,” he said. “The point is, when it is specified as part of the conditions of the employment then it can’t be arbitrarily changed.”

The union always has an interest in addressing any potential contract violations, but Biro said the need to do so was only heightened in an environment when the university is using budget cuts to justify layoffs and other changes. “I think it’s especially important [now] to be vigilant about the contract,” he said. “That’s not incompatible with saying that we would at any time, under any circumstances, without exception challenge any violation.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on One Too Many

  • OMG! Don't let the AD know!
  • Posted by J.J. on February 24, 2009 at 8:00am EST
  • What a deal! Why .. the football coach has to deal with so many more encounters (e.g., games, meetings, alums, boosters) -- and can be fired on a minute's notice.

    How unfair! Discrimination!

    /thundering of croc-tears heard/

  • Posted by John J. Conley on February 24, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • The case presented here is an example of why the Insitution of Public Higher Education in this country is broken. The system lives at the trough of public funding and has for decades. Instead of being focused on the primary mission of delivering affordable quality education and research they fund atheletic teams, special interest groups, and marginal organizations out of the general fund which have no direct impact on the primary mission. This allow people like the professor here in question to rise up on her high horse of principle and indignation backed by the self serviing interests of a Union who has no stake in changing a model that can no longer burden the public treasury and trust with its ineptitude and Byzintine process. Do more with less is what 100's of millions of Americans are being asked to do and it is time for Higher Education to do the same.

    Over 3,000,000 jobs were lost in the private sector in 2008 and more are taking place every day. There is not a company in the private sector who has not had to reevaluate its organizational foundations and processs and look to behave completely different in order to survive the storm that is still building. All but Higher Education who looks at every proposed change from a status quo business model that has raised tuition on students at rates 2 and 3 times that of inflation on an annual basis for 10 years. The clarion call of change has been blowing in the ear of this model for decades and been ignored. Higher Education is now faced with the very real issue of having created a model that is completely out of the finacial reach of its primary customers. Their solution is, after giving an obsequious acknowledgement of budgetary issues, to stand on a sand hill of principle and declare they will fiddle while Rome burns. If the Professor does not like the solution then maybe she should seek employment elsewhere.

    Time to rethink your model along with every tradition and sacred cow. Public Higher Education is failing its primary mission and now can not sustain itself. The tax payers of this country who are struggling more than any time since the great deprecaion will offer no sympathy to this profesors attitude of entitlement that has developed from centuries of living in an envionment that is completely detached from the economic realities society faces today. The consiquence is the problems before them and the solution will inevitably be so traumatic that this one small and insigmeficant example will be washed away like a grain of sand in a huge tempest.

  • Sharing the Load
  • Posted by Josh M at Midwestern R2 on February 24, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • I live in a midwestern state with an industrial base that is shrinking rapidly. Many workers are willing to cut their own hours in order to let more people stay on and work for their companies. We don't know the whole story here, and I doubt this faculty member was the only one who was asked to take on more responsibilities, either with teaching or other duties.

    If this faculty member doesn't want the position, do like the other one did and resign. No one can seriously doubt the difficulty that Florida and the entire country faces (we'll see it tonight when Pres. Obama addresses Congress and the nation). If she's an endowed professor with tenure, doing a bit less service isn't going to derail her career.

    Now if the Center isn't bringing in grants and publishing quality work, then it needs to be considered for closure -- as with all academic enterprises that aren't producing good scholarship.

  • One Too Many
  • Posted by rosanne soifer , adjunct prof. Music Business and Lifeskills at Touro College, NYC on February 24, 2009 at 8:30am EST
  • Boo-freakin'-hoo. I should have such problems!

  • Stop whining
  • Posted by Salina on February 24, 2009 at 8:45am EST
  • This woman has it so good. $100k/year in the humanities (plus no state tax!) but all she cares about is absolutely minimizing her teaching. She's getting $2500 per student seat. At a state school, that's probably more than they are even paying in tuition.

    How about she just teaches the third course for a couple of years while the university is facing a budget crisis. If she wants to be a star, act like a star who makes the team better.

  • Posted by Larry on February 24, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • Oh, the humanity! I watch my wife struggle as an adjunct with 3 writing classes each semester, often carrying home so many student papers that it's difficult to deal with them all and this woman is so terribly overloaded by a couple of classes and over 40 students. For $100,000 a year!!!!!!!! She should be ashamed to have even mentioned this. But I suspect the greedy and lazy never are really ashamed.

  • More Evidence of Taxpayers money being wasted
  • Posted by Rod Ferrara, Florida resident on February 24, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • As a Florida resident who is experiencing first hand the difficulties of today's dismal job market it makes me angry to hear such incidents where my taxpayer dollars are being wasted. With today's work force being cut and workers being required to work longer it is unacceptable that a so-called academic is unwilling to accept more responsibility. If the professor is unwilling to accept an increase in work load, eliminate the position and lay off the professor. Let the professor go into the workforce, look for a new job and experience what many in today's workforce are experiencing, less jobs, higher work load. This is just another example of how bloated and lazy academics are today. Academics are not, and should not be immune, to market forces, smaller budgets mean higher work loads or layoffs. Save us Florida taxpayers some money and layoff this unappreciative professor.

  • Amen, John
  • Posted by Research Prof on February 24, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • John Conley, my sentiments exactly. I've been associated with higher education my entire life (as a life sciences professor and researcher). Nearing retirement, I am dismayed at the changes in HE over the past 40 years. Instead of pursuing the core mission (teaching, research, service), there has been a proliferation of piffle, while the more rigorous disciplines have languished. Huge sports stadiums are being constructed, politically sensitive, hobby-programs are replicating exponentially and students are being financially raped to support this bilge. I know the thinking: sports and piffle will attract students and lots of money. It does, but it's the wrong kind of both. Savvy students will go elsewhere, ending up with productive careers while the hobbyists will become part of the pampered, piffle-people. What else can they do, after all?

  • She doesn't deserve the job
  • Posted by JR Bjerklie , Institutional Research Coordinator/Adjunct Professor at University of Maine at Fort Kent on February 24, 2009 at 9:15am EST
  • Blessed with an incredibly well-paying job (she makes twice the US median income) and a not too demanding workload, she refuses to provide a small bit of help to the University that gave her the sweet deal, or to share even a small bit of the pain that millions of other Americans are experiencing. Being a teacher involves a commitment to the public good that is absent from Babb's apparent ethic of self-centeredness.

  • Failing Primary Mission - personal mission gravey train?
  • Posted by Gary on February 24, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • Pretty fortunate, five years of living on the gravey train. Two errors present. The University's failure to put a time limit in terms of review of this professor's teaching load. Notwithstanding, the professor's error of failing the Center's primary mission of teaching! Time to WAKE UP and realize, this is no longer 2004! Even the UAW had to get rid of their foolish jobs bank. Hey, maybe unions some unions are beginning to see you can no longer reward and protect minimulization in terms of effort and production. Maybe its time to recognize the value of productivity, merit, and going the extra mile. A novel idea to present to students who shortly will enter the workforce!

    Clearly unions have had a valid purpose, but perhaps it is time to rethink the role and function of unions in the rapidly changing 21st century. Perhaps they are a relic of the past that serve to hamper forward progress but instilling an entitlement mentality. Almost 100K to teach two classes a year, with administrative functions counting as an additional class. According to my 1st grade addition skills: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. Let's see, that is $33,000 per class. Let me throw out a question to the higher education community, particularly the adjunct faculty community: How many Ph.D.'s would line up at the door to receive $25,000 for each class they teach (the University's request)? Better yet, how many would be willing to "sacrifice" and only receive $15,000 to $20,000 to teach an overly challenging four classes a year with no more than 45 students per class? Florida, there's your answer!

  • Contract
  • Posted by not in Kansas on February 24, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • The contract clearly states the agreement between Babb and the University of Florida. If the UF is unable to abide by the contract, Babb should be compensated for a breach of contract.

  • Lawdy lawdy
  • Posted by No sympathy on February 24, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • Crybaby. Absolutely stunning sense of entitlement.

  • Posted by Cincinnatus on February 24, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • As with the mortgage discussions of late and the questions surrounding the octo-mom, I notice that hard times are causing people to turn on each other, i.e., the previous comments. I like the response that every-day folks are willing to take less to share the pain and prevent another person's job loss. Little of that is offered from the hallowed highs of the 'private sector' that was the source of this crisis of faith in the financial shell game. Two suggestions; first, blame up unless you have a good reason to do otherwise, because 'up'will blame down, and set regular folks against each other; second, watch for signs of the 'shock doctrine' brought to a local environment, where 'tightening budgets' are taken out of areas that challenge the political status quo (i.e., they might actually and accurately note who is really responsible for this dismal cinrcumstance.) How many courses (even at Babb's pay grade) could be taught by a footaball coach's salary? (And don't give me the 'they bring in so much money' distortion; i've never seen a convincing accounting of how much these programs cost in total vs what $ is brought in).

    What does Calhoun's recent outburst tell you about the relationship between athletics and teh 'teaching mission'?

  • Abolish the position altogether
  • Posted by Libertarian on February 24, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • Even tenured faculty positions can be eliminated for budgetary reasons. Let this effete dweller of the Ivory Tower experience the real world! Her opinion on this is obscene in these times of crisis.

  • Sweetheart Deals are Everywhere
  • Posted by Bob S. on February 24, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • Sweetheart deals like this abound at all universities. At least she is teaching and shows up for work. Many have deals that do not reqire WORK!.Her arrangement is one of many that may be exposed not unlike the Wall Street bonuses. These deals are very common in higher education for "selected" people. They have done this for so long they do not have a clue why we are disturbed. Their $60 million bonuses has been discovered and is being challenged.

    We would just love to hear he rest of the story. How many other deals are there at Florida...and everywhere else in higher ed? Who could be so stupid to offer such a contract ?

  • Please be Quiet
  • Posted by Lawrence G. Dotolo , President at Virginia Tidewater Consortium for Higher Education on February 24, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • Professor Babb's crusade to avoid teaching three classes in one academic year hurts the image of higher education and the teaching profession. The general public is already questioning the cost of higher education and legislators across American are asking their colleges and universities to be more efficient. Then, along comes Professor Babb who underscores what many people believe about college professors: overpaid and under worked. We know that is not true, but sometimes perceptions people have are hard to overcome. In a time of economic stress, colleges and universities have the right to find ways to respond to the crisis. Adding one class to Professor Babb's teaching load is one way the University of Florida chose to respond. My advice to her is enjoy the Florida weather and be thankful that you have a job in this economic climate. I am sure there are many academics who would be pleased to replace her if she feels three classes is just too much for her to undertake.

  • Posted by Adjunct George on February 24, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Boo Hoo. Poor baby. I teach two classes with 160 students for a third of the money. This person is the reason we should put everyone on five year contracts and do away with tenure.

  • Not hired primarily as a teacher
  • Posted by T-bone on February 24, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Based on the description of the contract, Prof. Babb was not hired primarily as a teacher. Now the University wants to redefine her job as a more teaching-intensive job. Had she known this change would be forth-coming, perhaps Prof. Babb would have taken a position at a different institution or negotiated other allowances in her contract. If this change needs to be made for economic reasons, then the University should say so and give the faculty members a chance to respond. Otherwise it comes across as nothing more than "bait and switch" tactics.

  • Meanwhile, back at the ranch. . . .
  • Posted by John Hare , Professor, American Studies and English at Montgomery College on February 24, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • In community colleges, my colleagues and are I responsible for the equivalent of 15 semester hours each semester. For an English teacher, that generally works out to four sections of composition and one literature--or three developmental sections. The number of students in those sections has risen from 22 to 24 to 25. And, because of the economic crisis, our AAUP chapter had to renegotiate our contract, sacrificing the generous raise negotiated in better times to maintain jobs and a quality opportunity for students. Why? Because, as our mission statement points out, "students are the center of our universe."
    Dr. Babb, come out of that bubble. You're an embarrassment to our profession.

  • Meanwhile, back at the ranch...
  • Posted by Excant on February 24, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • ...some poor adjunct who is already carrying 3-4 courses will contemplate taking on another for the extra money and because s/he has been asked to "help out."

    Oh, @ not in Kansas: see 14.1 (d), 14.2 (b) (especially this one), 14.2 (e), (f), (g), 14.3 (b) (again, important), and 14.5 (b), with particular attention paid to 14.5 (e)(2). This gives the institution the absolute right to change her assignment if there is a need, because the needs of the institution--as stated very clearly in the contract that she signed--outweigh her personal preference. She doesn't have a leg to stand on. The department can consult with her, make its final decision, and then assign her a second prep or an additional section if it wants to.

    If the standard load is 3-3, she wants her Center appointment to count for a 2-course reduction. If the department or the School thinks that this is unfair (and I am inclined to agree) then they have the right to change that. Her assignment isn't ironclad. And if she doesn't like it after they supersede her ridiculous justifications and her over-inflated sense of absolute entitlement, she can always go back on the market.

  • OH poor is ME..
  • Posted by MartinT on February 24, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • I am sorry, but any professor who refuses to teach more than one class per semester is simply nothing more than a spoiled academic brat. I have been in Higher Ed for over a quarter of a century, and I have seen countless experienced professors who think that because they have been teaching for a while they somehow deserve to cut back on the sharing of knowledge with our students. It amazes me that Deans continue to push huge teaching loads on new instructors, those who haven't proven themselves as good teachers, yet; and allow those with the greatest knowledge to somehow hoard said knowledge. Of course it is the fault of Higher Education as a general rule to allow this to go on for so long. I think that the whole system of tenure has to be addressed and soon as Higher Education continues to struggle with soaring tuition and declining enrollments and endowments. Everyone is to blame, now everyone needs to come together to save the day; otherwise, that nice 100K salary will be mute when the University is forced to close some programs and phase out some positions.

  • real world
  • Posted by CC VP on February 24, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • I've tried to look at both sides of this argument, and honestly can't see the power in "the Uni should stick to the contract" side. Anyone with half a idea about economics understands that we are facing dire times which is going to require sacrifice....something the last two generations of Americans have yet to experience. Refusal to teach one more class simply comes across as Ivory Tower Idiocy.

    As a small business owner once told me: "God Love 'em, but preachers and teachers don't have a clue what makes the world go 'round."

  • John Conley says it all
  • Posted by Lili Macklin , Lead Writer at Franklin University on February 24, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • The reactions of those who have posted replies range from eloquent dismay to seething outrage. I find the very first post by John Conley succinctly and eloquently positions why this professor seems incredibly out of touch with reality, and agree with others that, if she dosn't want to pull a little more (reasonable) weight, then she should try to look elsewhere for an equally high-paying, low-demand position. I, too, know well qualified adjuncts who work full-time in positions of high authority and responsibility, and still manage to effectively teach part-time college courses. They might just love to wear Babb's elitist, dainty shoesies!

  • The comments on this article are garbage
  • Posted by sba99 , Random Assistant Professor on February 24, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • I am absolutely disgusted by the comments on this article. It's true what the one shining light says - economic problems are causing people to turn on each other.

    The person described here accepted a job at the university in part because of this article of the contract. The university is trying to renege on the deal. You don't know if she could have taken another opportunity at a different university - maybe one that would have guaranteed just 2 classes (and by the way, if you read the article you'll see that she's already at 2 classes) but would have kept that promise. Since I assume by their tenor the people here pretend to be capitalists, they should understand that. But, even if you think you are, you aren't really. You aren't any better than the hordes after the Soviet Revolution who looted the houses of the aristocrats. And, if you aren't pretend capitalists, then really you're just petty, jealous people who can't succeed on your own.

    I hope the person in this article wins, and I hope those of you who describe yourselves as Florida taxpayers are happy when you become the victims of violent crime resulting inevitably by reduced social and education spending, and for those of you who are adjuncts or low-paid academics - your wonderful attitudes are why you're stuck in those jobs in the first place.

  • Sympathy for the Devil
  • Posted by Gary L. Herstein on February 24, 2009 at 11:00am EST
  • Babb is a difficult person to feel any sympathy for, which makes her a perfect target to begin the destruction of the entire contractual system in Florida. Observe, first of all, that if her contract can be breached, then anyone's can be as well. If her course load can be increased, so can everyone else's.

    This means FEWER jobs. One can simply break contracts at will, increase course loads across the board, and not even bother to hire those pesky adjuncts. Later on, once you've annoyed your tenured people into retiring, then you can herd the cattle back in to their underpaid, uninsured adjunct positions and exploit them at will.

    This looks very much like a strategic move on the part of Florida's higher ed people to attack everyone. But by cleverly choosing the target that they have, they have masked the fact that the real victims of this action will be the people at the bottom of the food-chain. Were they to move directly to gut the system from the bottom, everyone would be outraged at them. By striking at the top, they still achieve their goal of gutting the system at the bottom as well, but do so while playing the role of "Hero of the Working Class."

  • Interesting
  • Posted by Larry Jordan , Government Instructor/Arts and Science at Vernon College on February 24, 2009 at 11:15am EST
  • No comment from a Community College Instructor.

  • Appointment letter a permanent contract?
  • Posted by Virginia University Prof on February 24, 2009 at 12:30pm EST
  • I haven't seen Babb's terms of offer letter (of course). However, I'm willing to bet that it specifies her initial compensation along with the initially assigned duties.

    If she wishes to stick to the initially assigned duties in her appointment, I suggest that the university return her to her 2004 salary. The difference should be enough to fund a hire-behind instructor.

    Of course, I doubt that Babb would be willing to go along with that reduction in salary.

    The key, of course, is that as her work assignment changes, her annual evaluation should also change to reflect it. (It would be reasonable to expect a reduction in publication rates, for example.) As long as that occurs, I don't see what the issue is.

    Personally, I'd be thrilled to teach one more class if I could trade it for a few required meetings over the year.

  • Another consideration, perhaps?
  • Posted by KDavis on February 24, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • How many of you adjuncts and community college professors have to also produce academic research? I didn't think so. That is one aspect of this article that seems to be missing. Does the Florida professor have a research duty? Probably, as Florida is a teaching and research institution. Generally, when a professor's teaching load is light, it's because there is an expectation that they produce academic research. Endowed professors also have other duties to the actual endowment. As a journalist and journalism researcher, I think the story is incomplete.

  • Posted by remediatedteacher at A Rust Belt Community College on February 24, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • Wow, there is a lot of vitriol here. It's worth keeping in mind that Babb is a professor who makes a good wage, but not a CEO who makes a wage equal to the GNP of a small country. She has some renown; is active in her field; has similar training in time and work to that of an M.D.; and she was hired mostly because of accomplishment, not potential labor. Florida gets cache off her presence and benefits from her exposure in her field. On top of this, the school benefits from her expertise in committees, in her guidance of students, and, yes, in her work in the two classes she was hired to teach. Why should this person suffer personal attacks for meeting her contract and for expecting the other party to meet it as well?

    Sure, the economy is bad, institutions are shaky, and many, many people are working harder than they expected to when hired. The nature of institutions (and corporations) though is to look out for the greater interest of the larger beast, often at the expense of the real life individuals who make institutions possible. This is why unions are so important and why the contracts unions have won must be protected. Unions grow into somewhat larger beasts that ideally look out for the individuals. Unions make it possible for the harried adjunct and the relatively privileged professor to be protected both against the larger institution and, hopefully, against a public that might be easily swayed by the rhetoric of economic hardship and the ill-defined greater good.

  • Academic Citizenship
  • Posted by Edward F. Palm on February 24, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • Call me an aging idealist, but I have always thought that a professor has a responsibility to be a good citizen of his or her academic community. Agreeing to teach one more course a year, in this case, impresses me as the least this professor could do to help her program and her university stay afloat. I have to wonder if she considers herself immune from the economic pain so many of the rest of us are feeling and which of the lower orders she feels should endure an even greater share.

  • How 'bout some middle ground here?
  • Posted by Professor G on February 24, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • Sounds like there are plenty of issues to disentangle here, and plenty of blame to go around.  Babb sounds bratty, UF is (apparently) trying to remake a previously existing contract, and in the midst of this students and taxpayers may well be getting the shaft.  

    I have to wonder, though, whether the vitriol would be quite as fierce if Babb weren't a professor of Gender and Women's Studies.  Even as I compare my 4-4 teaching load and think how good Babb has it, many of the comments on this story smack of the "let's go back to REAL teaching of REAL knowledge." They suggest a return to an Ivory Tower model of academe that serves no one.

  • Shocking Opinions from Presumed Smart People
  • Posted by Stoptheblame on February 24, 2009 at 1:30pm EST
  • As I read the opinions on Professor Babb's case here, like a few others I am deeply shocked by the general air of know-nothingism and dog-in-the-manger sentiments displayed.

    To ALL the people who commented negatively here, GET YOUR FACTS before you express opinions which are not worthy of presumably well-educated, thoughtful people. Do you not have PhDs, for God's sake?

    Several points to those of you who seem willing to side with the very institutions which overwork and underpay you (at least, by your own self-descriptions).

    1) Don't forget--the University was not *compelled* to pay her this salary; it solicited and *offered* her this job, this teaching load, and this salary.

    2) Know this: Because of Florida's Sunshine Laws, anyone who wants to can get on the Web and look up anyone's salary at UF. If you do, you'll find that Professor Babb makes less than many endowed professors at UF--sometimes by far (especiall male endowed professors), and she is one of the only endowed professors at UF to be targeted in this particular way.

    3) As another commentator pointed out, Babb's could be a test case--in a bad way. If the terms of her contract can be changed at will, anyone's can. If her teaching load can be changed, anyone's can. Wake up, people.

    4) As anyone who teaches at a four-year college or university knows, endowed professors come with many more duties than just the most visible--teaching. In fact, anyone who teaches knows that the workload of a professor is more than just teaching. Endowed professors make the salaries they do because they are expected to maintain a national and in her case international academic profile, *one which the University gladly pays for,* because this enhances its academic standing. She is required to publish more, do more research, maintain more contacts both in the U.S. and abroad, and be more visible than most professors, at the same time serving both the Center and the University as a whole by teaching, chairing graduate committees, mentoring, serving on administrative committees, and holding administrative positions (in this case, Graduate Coordinator).

  • Give me a break!
  • Posted by V. E. McLure , English on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • Let's see, my load this semester is 3 freshman comp classes and three sophomore classes and that is considered normal. I have over 100 students. Needless to say, I also make significantly less money. Pardon me if I have absolutely no sympathy for this situation. She needs to learn what it means to actually work for a living.

  • RIDICULOUS
  • Posted by Anonymous Faculty on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • This type of professor is exactly why higher education is being held under the accountability microscope. Plus, this is just another example of why tenure is so unproductive. If this woman can't do research, program coordination, advising duties, AND teach a little bit then she needs to get out of the profession. She seems overwhelmingly lazy and, given the details of the article, she is not even coming close to earning her pay. I have been in higher education for 20+ years. This woman needs to wake up....move on.....or, better yet, get out of the profession. Higher education doesn't need dead weight like this any longer. People would line up for a schedule like hers!!

  • Don't blame unions
  • Posted by Fred Flener , Retired on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • Personally, with respect to the Babb's situation, I think she is over the top. I even believe most, even almost all union members would feel she has a sweetheart deal. However, the administration, not the union, gave her that contract. I know not why they agreed to it (and I doubt if anyone would reject it if offered), but once they did the union has an obligation to enforce it. Otherwise, the administration can start changing things carte-blanche. So, don't blame the union for the administration's stupidity, but if they don't put up a defense their stupidity can expand to other aspects of the contract (which was, of course, negotiated.)

  • Posted by fred lapides on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • I have been involved in a number of strikes over the years in my job as a faculty member at a university, and find, for the first time ever, that I side with the administration rather than the union. While the letter of the law may indeed be on her side, and this ultimately will be determined by a court or an arbitrator, a more reasonable person would pitch in for the benefit of taxpayers, fellow faculty, and the institution and its students. Let her as a head of a department show leadership by helping out instead of believing she is standing up for some principle, a principle that in good times might be worthwhile but in economic tough times ought to be put aside.

  • Your job is to be a professor, not a teacher!
  • Posted by wake up on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • Reading these comments, I am disgusted. The job is to be a college/university professor - NOT a teacher. A teacher teaches K-12. They teach our children basic skills they'll need for the real world or for when they end up in our classes. Depending on the type of institution, part of our job is to teach them. But we teach them more than just basic skills and concepts. The rest of our job is research, writing, advising, committees and the ever popular service to the department, college/university, and our disciplines. So adding one more class on may not seem like a big deal to those of you at community colleges, but how would you like it if your administration added 3 more credit hours onto your existing 15? That's what we're talking about here - adding more work onto already full-time duties. I don't think you'd be spouting these hateful words if you were being asked to take on way more responsibilities. I think you'd contact the union too. So, to sit there and hurl vitriol at this woman for merely sticking to the contract she signed is pathetic. Wake up and use the critical thinking skills you gained as part of your doctoral training.

  • To "Stoptheblame" - Words of Wisdom
  • Posted by Equally Outraged on February 24, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • I too am amazed by the caustic tone of this blog, and was about to post a response similar to the comment by "Stoptheblame". This blog is littered with anti-intellectual sentiment, and stereotypical comments regarding college professors and the practice of teaching. It seems few people actually engaged in any thoughtful reflection concerning the content of this article, and "Stoptheblame" found the same information I did. In addition, Dr. Babb's CV is also available online, and a review of her contributions to the literature in her respective fields documents her continuing role in the research committee. Anyone who believes research is a minor undertaking is simply misinformed and inexperienced. Who among you have actually authored a book? A book chapter? Original research? Does anyone have a real, first-hand understanding of the work publication requires? Research in anthropology is especially time consuming and tedious. And, by the way, teaching is hardly a job for "slackers": Anyone who thinks course development is "easy" has never put together a course or at least not a course worth attending. Two advanced classes, combined with research duties linked to endowment, and a slew of administrative and committtee work is a heavy work load. I imagine Dr. Babb's work hours days run about 14 hours a day (or more), and her duties and research activities keep her busy well into the weekends and throughout the summer. Seems there is a great deal of misery to go around, and this blog demonstrates how much misery loves company!

  • Hard to Believe
  • Posted by Tracy Leinbaugh , Associate Professor, Dept. of Counseling and Higher Education at Ohio University on February 24, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • I am an associate professor and program coordinator of both our doctoral and master's counselor education programs. I teach 6 courses over the course of the three quarters of our academic year. I make two thirds of her salary after eleven years. I teach two additional courses at a regional campus program winter and spring quarters. This is real life. It's not perfect, but there you have it.

  • PC Run Amok!
  • Posted by David in San Diego on February 24, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • Hey! All of you layoff Ms. Babb!

    Dodn't you know who she is? She is the endowed professor and graduate coordinator of UF’s Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research. She is a protected class of citizenry. Increasing her class load to three courses a year is a Paternal Construct, and as such must be opposed because it oppresses all womyn.

    How can you expect her to oversee graduate students who will, without pay, teach that additional course for her? She's too busy expanding the minds of womyn so they'll be able to sell their viginity on eBay and take the courses Ms. Babb, err her graduate assistants, will be teaching.

    Please leave Ms. Babb alone [sob]!

  • Posted by Phil Smith on February 24, 2009 at 3:15pm EST
  • "How many of you adjuncts and community college professors have to also produce academic research? "

    All of them that hope to obtain a tenure-track position, or are currently writing a dissertation. It would appear that a lack of awareness surrounding the realities of various academic positions isn't limited to the posters who are criticizing Ms. Babb.

  • Maybe she should try walking in my shoes
  • Posted by Overworked Adjunct , Adjunct Professor/English at Metro Community College on February 24, 2009 at 3:30pm EST
  • As someone who teaches fourteen sections of writing each year, five per semester and four each summer, all for less than $45,000. with no health insurance, I have no sympathy for this person.

  • Posted by Michael on February 24, 2009 at 4:00pm EST
  • A teaching load of 1 and 1 would be okay if (a) the faculty member was bring in enough external funding to buy her or his self out, and (2) the research being generated or the service to the university was sufficient to warrant such an arrangement. I am deeply involved in the accreditation and accountability process and this case illustrates why we have lost the confidence of the public. I am a full time administrator and I teach one course per semester for a $5000 stipend per course. I expect I will volunteer to teach next semester pro bono.

  • Stunned and Appalled
  • Posted by University Professor on February 24, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • Did anyone go look at the syllabus for the "ONE" class she teaches? It had no assessments listed except "participation" and one paper. I would LOVE to see the rubric she uses to assess participation since this counts 50% of the grade. But, of course, the syllabus made no mention of how participation was assessed. So, for the one class she does "teach" it appears very lacking in substance and learning assessment. I found the syllabus embarassing for any university promoting quality assessment and accountability for student learning. This woman needs to wake up to the real world of higher education. The question has nothing to do with whether one is at a community college or university-level. The issue is doing quality work that promotes student learning and doing a sufficient amount to justify both one's pay AND their position.

  • The faculty member should be ashamed
  • Posted by Fed Up Staff on February 24, 2009 at 5:15pm EST
  • This is insane. This faculty member should be embarrassed! She makes academics look lazy and as though universities waste money. Unfortunately, I see some really good faculty to who go the extra mile all the time and then a few such a this one that make all of us look bad and is the reason our public perception is so negative.

  • teaching load
  • Posted by Fred , Professor, Biochemistry at R1 State U on February 24, 2009 at 7:30pm EST
  • As usual, hard cases make bad law. On the one hand, she did have a contract. On the other hand, I doubt that the contract has a clause giving her a Center Directorship and reduced load in perpetuity.

    My colleagues here, virtually unanimously, suggested to the Administration that any cuts in compensation would be structured to protect lower-paid faculty and staff. I picked up another couple credits this semester because the department needed it, and as a senior faculty member, I could afford the time more than our nontenured faculty (and yes, I have a funded research program, too). So it's hard to feel an excess of sympathy for Prof. Babb.

    But I have to ask: How many administrators, compliance officers and other non-faculty personnel are being asked to take on extra loads at UF? Is the Dean of Arts and Sciences teaching three classes a year? Or any new ones? At my institution, administrative salaries have risen much faster than faculty and staff compensation over the last decade. Do we wonder why she's dragging her feet?

  • God Bless You, Eternal Adjunct,
  • Posted by DFS on February 24, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • for carrying the water of all who are outraged at any negative comments toward this person. You are one of those who makes her job possible.

    And, when they ask more from her, she throws the proverbial hissy fit.

    I always thought that there was some clause in any good contract which allowed for reasonable adjustments for the good of the employer.

  • THINK
  • Posted by cts on February 24, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • Let's think this through, shall we?

    1) The Professor is party to a contract which, presumably, the University found agreeable.

    2) For may of us, it looks like a lovely deal - based on what we know from the outside.

    3) Her university - and all her colleagues - are in trouble.

    4) We do not know how many other holders of endowed positions in the same system have been asked to 'do more.'

    So, in the interests of her university and her colleagues, she might well be expected - morally - to acccept the request to do a bit more. Of course, if she has reason to think she has been singled out - or nearly so - to do more, she might be rightfully angered. Legally, the university has little basis for requiring a change in her duties, unless it imposes the same changes on others in her situation.

    The fact is that none of us, based on this report, know anywhere near enough to berate the professor. If we object to the original contract, we should be berating the university administrator[s] responsible.

    Of course, one could ask that a colleague be willing to step up and share the pain. But, we do not know whom else has been asked to share the pain, and so we are really not in a position to scold one person for being unwilling to do so.

     

  • Contracts cut two ways
  • Posted by J.J. on February 24, 2009 at 9:15pm EST
  • To those bleating about "a contract is a contract" --

    Then you don't have a problem if the employer declares that position "financially-exigent" and orders a layoff?

    Of course you not. You and the unions always want it for the employee -- only. That's the union's job.

    Well -- that dog won't hunt. Other people have rights, too. Get used to it.

  • Not Enough Information
  • Posted by EB on February 24, 2009 at 9:30pm EST
  • I agree with those who have stated that we don't know enough about this case. to pass judgment. In particular, she is an endowed professor, so it is possible that the state does not pay all or even part of her salary.

    Furthermore, the anger against her is ridiculous. So she makes $100,000 a year. Big deal. Just a few years ago there were plenty of mortgage brokers in California and Florida making more than that. They were supposedly working hard and being productive. I'm sure the people complaining about this woman were not complaining about that. That was capitalism at its best. Look where that landed us.

    Someone actually compared her to a CEO. I don't see how that weak analogy could withstand serious scrutiny.

    If people want a more equitable distribution of pay, then vote for politicians who plan to raise the marginal tax rates for top earners. That tends to produce a more egalitarian society.

  • Posted by prof_x , wage slave on February 25, 2009 at 4:45am EST
  • I teach a 4/4 for less than a first-year schoolteacher makes. Some 600 credit-hours / year. Sympathy? Ha.

  • Posted by Kevin on February 25, 2009 at 4:45am EST
  • To those of you criticizing Babbs -- do any of you have any idea what Babbs' other duties consist of beyond teaching these courses? As the coordinator of a department, and a scholar who presumably has research responsibilities, the chances are good that she is actually working quite hard.

    Those of you who go on and on about "Ivory Tower" blah blah blah -- you don't get it. Most professors who are tenure-track teach courses in addition to committee responsibilities, supervising graduate students, and often intensive research requirements. A great many academics easily work 50-80 hours per week. The fact that these hours are often not 9-5 in a cubicle somewhere seems to give a lot of bloviating private sector posters the impression that academics don't work hard... well -- get a clue!

  • No Win Situation
  • Posted by Bernie Gleason on February 25, 2009 at 8:00am EST
  • Prof. Baab and the faculty union are putting themselves in a "no-win" situation regardless of the legitimacy of her contractual claim. As this case gets gathers more publicity and national attention, it will become the poster child for those who believe that faculty are living in an ivy tower.

    Prof Babb and the union will get about as much public sentiment and support as the air traffic controllers did in their confrontation with President Reagan.

    For the Babb and the union to push this issue at this time is a case of smart people acting dumb.

  • Get Over It - We Choose Our Situations
  • Posted by Amy , Prof. at CC on February 25, 2009 at 10:30am EST
  • I'm a CC Prof. I make 1/3 of what Babb does. I'm okay with it. I only teach 15 credit hours a semester and choose to teach only one class each summer. I have no publication expectations, no research expectations, low stress conference expectations, and minimal committee work. And that's what I wanted. I knew going into this that I wouldn't make the "big bucks".

    I did my Ph.D. at an ivy league school where my advisor only taught ONE class a YEAR (back in 2005). The thing is between committees, advising 15 grad. students, publishing many research articles a year, multiple national AND international conferences a year, and lab group budgeting/personel issues he worked 65+ hours a week. He was at the school EVERY Saturday and most Sundays (in addition to Monday through Friday). I remember having meetings with him on Dec. 24th and then again on Dec. 26th because he had new information to discuss. That meant he worked on Dec. 25th. And the guy had tenure. He made just over $100,000 a year and, as far as I am concerned, he earned every penny.

    We don't know the whole story on this woman. I chose to take a job at a CC where the pay is shabby but the classroom is our priority with minimal expectations outside of that. My contract says that I must teach 15 credit hours (which translates into 18 contact hours + 10 office hours a week). Babb chose to take a job at a Uni where the pay was pretty good (not outstanding as far as endowed prof.s at major R1s go) and the classroom was only one small part of the larger whole.

    Don't doubt that I would fight the CC if they asked me to teach 20 credit hours with no increase in pay. That's not what I agreed to when I accepted my terms of employment. Her employment agreement was one class a semester. The school should honor it's agreement or not have made such an agreement.

    If you are jealous, suck it up. There is always going to be someone who is getting paid more for doing less. And, frankly, she is probably not only getting paid more but doing more.

  • Perspective
  • Posted by Ted , Literature at Univ. of Florida on February 25, 2009 at 3:00pm EST
  • We're in trouble in HE, because of how so many educators respond to a case like this. You hear the details, and the first reaction is to trash the faculty member because her workload appears lighter and her pay is better. There is also a bizarre, knee-jerk, and naive acceptance of the administrative rationale: times are tough, and we all need to pitch in... Only about one in ten or twenty responses shows any skepticism about administrative motivations, about uneven application of this "urgent" demand for more teaching, or about what contract violation means for the rest of us.

    At the University of Florida, we are facing a serious crisis, but administration, instead of instituting a hiring freeze, is pursuing dozens of new hires, including hires of outside administrators with huge salaries. Administrators are not picking up additional teaching, and the targeting of faculty contracts is neither consistent nor transparent. Despite news of the stimulus money "rescuing" the state budget, and despite our governor's wish that education funds not be cut, the university appears to be proceeding with plans for budget cuts, with the outcome still up in the air.

    Ultimately, as long as the response to situations like Babb's is one of resentment and hostility, as long as the response is immediately to trash the educators and trust the administrators, we (educators) are in serious trouble, and administrators will get what they wish.

    BTW, shame on InsideHigherEd for not providing the broader context about (a) on-going hiring at UF; (b) addressing upper-level administrators' teaching loads; (c) providing context about Glover, who applied for the deanship in the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences and was overwhelmingly rejected by the faculty; or (d) addressing other cases of contract violation and lay-offs at Florida.

  • Turning on each other
  • Posted by Michael Stiber , Associate Professor/Computing at Univ. of Washington Bothell on February 25, 2009 at 10:30pm EST
  • I'm dismayed by the display of willful ignorance among most of the comments to this article. As others have said, it seems that this economic crisis has us turning on each other, as if the ill fortune of others will somehow make our lot more bearable. Is everyone who makes more money than you overpaid and under worked? Shall those in the humanities curse the engineers, who in turn will undermine their colleagues in the medical school (who I guess are out of luck)?

    UF offered a position to Babb, with a certain set of responsibilities and at a certain salary (which appears to be paid, partially or wholly, from the income from an endowment, not UF operating funds). Now they want to change those responsibilities. These things happen. But there is a process for such things, which I suspect may involve faculty governance. Apparently, to most respondants here, due process and faculty governance don't apply to people who make more than they do.

  • C'Mon Ted You are Killing Me!
  • Posted by Brian McNary on February 26, 2009 at 5:15am EST
  • Our country has turned into a cradle to grave entitlement case. One clown posted a comment about profs...working 50 to 80 hours a week- puleeaasee. Does that count summers, spring breaks, holidays?

    Go get a job in the military, or land a job on the deck of a fishing boat or oil rig-then tell me how hard you work. You are little school kids, whining about soft labor, teaching stuff at an unconsciously competent level. Getting paid to sleepwalk and worrying about what everyone else is doing and getting paid.

    We all grade on a curve don't we? Go find some fresh perspective, get real grateful, and call me in a week. That's your homework assignment.

  • Ignorance and Its Discontents
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on February 26, 2009 at 9:30pm EST
  • So much of the vitriol tossed at Dr. Babb comes from people who, I am afraid, are ignorant of the American university. The University of Florida is a national public research university. This means that, although teaching and even service are important, research plays often the determining role in tenure and promotion cases. The American university is a hierarchical entity. At the highest level stands the endowed chair. Chaired professors are, at best, brought in from the outside specifically for their distinguished record in research. The university attracts a chaired professor with more than a title: the enticements often include a high salary ($99,000 is, in today's market conditions, relatively modest), research assistants, a travel budget, and a reduced course load. It may well be a unfortunate aspect of the profession that we are honored by being offered to teach less. Nevertheless, this is how the profession awards distinguished research. The article made it relatively clear that only two chaired professors are made to teach more, one in English (the gentleman who retired), and Dr. Babb in Women's Studies. Only these two, both in the Humanities. No endowed chairs touched in the social and natural sciences, and, obviously, none touched in the Colleges of Accounting, Business, Law, and Medicine. Will an extra course or two assigned to Dr. Babb have any impact at all on the University of Florida budget? Our administrators are decent, sincere, hard-working men and women, doing their best in an all but impossible situation. I admire them and I salute them. I also am willing to consider that a mistake may have been made in this case, and I also salute Dr. Babb for her courage. So many academics roll over and submit. She does not.

  • Just got this Piece
  • Posted by roger , Planning at UC on February 27, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • The chief of staff of the budget subcommittee of our state's committee on higher education just emailed the article to me.

    She commented: "Glad to know all is well over there. It's looks really really bad out here, when you get a chance to look."

    Thanks, Babb. Please don't keep it up. The rest of us can't afford you.

  • Dr. Babb & Dr. Anonymous
  • Posted by Mark on March 2, 2009 at 4:30am EST
  • I have to agree with Dr. Anonymous. Dr. Babb is not just some professor, she is an endowed chair at the top of her career. As a fairly new professor at a state university, I taught seven courses this semester, including one online graduate class. This load put a big stress on my efforts to do research, which seems to be the missing part of the equation being discussed. Few people outside the profession realize the incredible demands on time the work of being a professor takes. She has earned her spot, let her keep it.

  • Maybe she just doesn't have anything more to offer....
  • Posted by How Sad , Dean at ITT Tech on March 7, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • A professor in the liberal arts making $100K teaching two courses A YEAR?????? Please! First of all, the university making that deal should be ASHAMED of themselves for agreeing to this. Secondly, perhaps she just doesn't have enough material in her "field" to offer an additional class.

    WAKE UP ACADEMICS, the world is changing. If you can't provide education that is going to help our economy move ahead or support those areas that do, then you are rapidly growing obsolete. Heck, I'm a woman, and I don't need a course on women's studies.......I already get it.....I've lived as a woman for 47 years! For heaven's sake, maybe I should apply for her position! I would be receiving an almost 100% pay increase by accepting a demotion! And I'd definitely be willing to teach 3 classes a year for that, as well as, provide administrative duties. I mean really, how time consuming can it be to mentor 43 students? I imagine I could take care of all that and still have time to study for a real degree AND get my nails done.

    Professor Babb, shame on you!

  • Information We Don't Have
  • Posted by James L. Morrison , Professor Emeritus of Educational Leadership at UNC-Chapel Hill on March 7, 2009 at 7:45pm EST
  • As several people have noted, readers are lacking some pertinent information. In addition to what has been mentioned previously, why did the director of the center, who stated that the teaching mission of the center was primary, search for an endowed research professor? In addition, we may not know how Professor Babb was approached about increasing her work load, although the reporter used the word "asked." How did the "asking" occur; gingerly, after first acknowledging the agreement but citing the economic conditions? Why hasn't the provost "asked" other endowed chairs to increase their workloads.

    Best.

    Jim

  • Too easy for commenters to judge
  • Posted by A Midwestern Profesor , Associatie Prof./Chair of Women's Studies at Midwestern U on March 22, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • I'm astounded at how easily 62 commenters think they can assess this situation. A senior female and feminist scholar is offered a contract and a desireable situation to recruit her away from a very good job. The candidate accepts because the SPECIFIC TERMS are attractive. The hiring institution then decides to break their contract. NO OTHER senior scholars are treated similarly at this institution. Hm. Who's at fault there? Certainly it is not this scholar's fault that the economy has tanked and jobs are hard to come by. And certainly this scholar shouild not be faulted for seeking what all scholars seek: an attractive position that allows for more research and scholarship. You think not? Look at the teaching loads of senairo MALE faculty at any public institution and get back to me.

  • The whole picture
  • Posted by UF Professor , Assoc. Prof. at University of Florida on March 26, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • As a University of Florida faculty member I feel obliged to set the record straight.  Only half the story of Florence Babb's case has been told.  There are several distinguished professors in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, many of whom earn more than Babb, and none of whom were asked to teach an extra course.  It might surprise you to know that Babb is also the only female distinguished professor in the college.  She never refused to teach another course. She just wants an answer as to why she was singled out for this change in her contract while her male colleagues were not.  She has received no explanation from the administration.  I think this information casts things in a very different light.