Search News


Browse Archives

News

College for All

February 25, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

President Obama issued a powerful challenge to his own administration and to individual citizens Tuesday night, calling on every American to "commit" to attending at least one year of college so that the country can reclaim its mantle as the best educated nation in the world.

"[W]e will provide the support necessary for you to complete college and meet a new goal: by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world," the president said in his first speech to a joint session of Congress.

In the "State of the Union-like" address, as some commentators called it, the president identified education as one of three priorities (along with energy and health care) that demand significant attention and investment even at a time in which the government needs to get spending under control to ensure its long-term economic vitality.

But in a speech filled as much with talk of sacrifice as of hopefulness and opportunity, resonant of President Kennedy's famous "ask not what your country can do for you" speech, Obama spoke not just about the government's responsibility to ensure that its citizens can get a higher education, but also about Americans' obligation to take advantage of the opportunities provided to them to get one.

His premise built on many recent assertions (from groups such as the College Board and the Gates and Lumina foundations) that with more occupations than ever requiring more than a high school diploma, the shrinking proportion of Americans with a college education and the growing high school and college dropout rates are a "prescription for economic decline, because we know the countries that out-teach us today will out-compete us tomorrow," Obama said.

The government must do its part, the president said, and his administration is off to a fast start there, building significant new funds for student aid into the economic stimulus plan enacted last week and, through a "stabilization" fund for for states, providing "the resources necessary to prevent painful cuts and teacher layoffs" for colleges and schools.

More is to come, too, Obama said, starting in the 2010 budget he plans to submit to Congress tomorrow. Even as he warned in the speech that his administration would get federal spending under control generally -- in part, he vowed, by ending "education programs that don’t work" -- the president said that the country must continue to "invest in the three areas that are absolutely critical to our economic future: energy, health care, and education."

As part of that investment, the president renewed his campaign pledge to "make sure that you can afford a higher education" in exchange for community or national service. (Although he did not detail it in the speech, Obama's proposal was for a fully refundable tax credit to cover $4,000 a year in college costs for four years, in exchange for 100 hours a year of public service. Tuesday night, he urged that legislation to create such a program be named for two lions of the Senate, Orrin Hatch and Edward M. Kennedy).

But just as it is the responsibility of politicians and educators to provide opportunity and to make the education system work, Obama said, "it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it. And so tonight, I ask every American to commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training. This can be community college or a four-year school; vocational training or an apprenticeship.

"But whatever the training may be, every American will need to get more than a high school diploma," he continued. "And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country -- and this country needs and values the talents of every American."

The centrality of higher education in the president's speech heartened college leaders. "That's the strongest statement we've ever heard about the importance of postsecondary education" in a State of the Union address or the equivalent, said Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president for public and government affairs at the American Council on Education.

He described the president's call to restore the country to the top spot in international rankings on college going as "certainly an aspirational objective" and "very ambitious," given that the United States has been dropping rather than rising on those lists.

The administration, Hartle said, "already showed in the stimulus that it's willing to provide the resources to help make it happen," but "money alone won't make it happen." The other part of the equation is impressing on individual citizens the importance of getting an education and making clear that going to college is not only possible, but necessary.

And on that score, Hartle said, "it's hard to imagine a more forceful argument" than Obama made Tuesday.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on College for All

  • Fatally flawed
  • Posted by Frank on February 25, 2009 at 6:00am EST
  • " .. President Obama issued a powerful challenge to his own administration and to individual citizens Tuesday night, calling on every American to "commit" to attending at least one year of college so that the country can reclaim its mantle as the best educated nation in the world .."

    Comparing the U.S. to England, Japan, France, Germany, et. al, has one major flaw:

    The U.S. is nothing like those other countries. In those other countries, your father is a city employee -- you're going to be a city employee. The U.S. has more "diversity" than those other countries (twice as much as France) -- does that mean, the U.S. should be less diverse?

    Absurd, obtuse and silly. Like complaining that the U.S. has less broadband than Singapore -- SNG being the size of Rhode Island. A fool's argument.

    And given that only 56.4% of incoming freshmen graduate in six years, and research shows that every student with SATs capable of admission either is or has gone to college -- where's the problem? Is it on campus?

    America's young people are better than the bureaucrats and politicians pontificating about a problem that conveniently gives the latter an above-average paycheck. They deserve better than what they are getting today -- a lot better.

  • college for everyone?
  • Posted by Jo , retired on February 25, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • This was the part of President Obama's speech last night that got my goat. The proportion or US citizens who aim their kids toward a college education, and have kids prepared for getting one, is much lower than in the EU, for ex.. But even there, alternative trade and craft training with apprenticeships is available for people unable to deal with higher education of the liberals arts sort found here. What we need are more high quality vocational schools with guaranteed apprenticeships that will train for jobs rather than making license plates.

  • Finally a kind word for postsecondary vocational training
  • Posted by Libertarian on February 25, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • I am so glad he mentionned career education as well. Not everyone is ready for college at 18, for many young people, a good career education gives them the dignity of work and a career, sometimes very well paid. This dichotomy, its either college or the street, harms society.

  • College for all doesn't mean Harvard for all
  • Posted by Charlotte Pressler on February 25, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • Frank, your objection to President Obama's proposal has its own flaw. "College for all" doesn't mean "traditional liberal arts education" for all. It can mean, among other things, an additional year of technical training qualifying the student for a skilled trade. It could mean that students graduate from high school with a year of this technical training and a vocational certificate in hand, courtesy of their local community college. In the British system, this would be called "further education." Anywhere around the world, it is a must for decent blue-collar jobs these days. 

    Yes, there are students who will not complete their year of training, but non-completers should not be considered the norm. At present, on the other hand, our society expects that members of a number of lower-SES groups will drop out of high school as functional illiterates with no job skills. Further social expectations for these demographics include incarceration and homelessness. These disastrous life outcomes should never be treated by the wider society as the norm, not for any group. Some members of all groups may end up that way, but no group should be encouraged to regard it as a normal or expected outcome. 

  • My father's footsteps?
  • Posted by Maartje on February 25, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • I'm a bit surprised reading Frank's post. I'm from Western Europe but I don't recognize myself in having to tread my father's footsteps and I'm wondering if this statement is anything else than a gross generalization. Kids everywhere in the world claim they want the same profession as their parents, few end up in exactly the same line of work. How would that be different from the USA?

    As an almost complete outsider, I would say that at least the intention of this president is laudable. If intention itself is enough? Probably not, but change only occurs when people have clear intentions and start sharing them!

  • College for everyone?
  • Posted by Wes Ramsay on February 25, 2009 at 9:30am EST
  • The laudable part is his call that everyone take up the personal responsibility to pursue further education. After decade upon decade of 'victim-speak' from the Democrats, he has a hard task ahead of him undoing the damage.

    Even with current economic difficulties, the opportunities abound. America has taxed itself into the ground to build an educational system. What's lacking are families and kids who will actually take advantage of what already exists.

    It's not so much a matter of money, as the moral decision that must occur in hearts and minds.

    Again, after decade upon decade of the NEA and the Democrats poisoning the cultural well, with the solution always being more spending and bureaucracy, BHO's message (if he really means it, that's another subject) will have to be repeated for decades to come.

    Do we dare believe the NEA and Dems, who have a stake in continued failure (thus more taxation) will cooperate?

  • Posted by Lloyd on February 25, 2009 at 9:45am EST
  • The subject comment posted under, "College for All" states that, "In speech to congress, Obama calls for at least one postsecondary year for every American and says U.S. should reclaim mantle of most educated country." In the actual story account about Obama's comments it states that Obama said the America should reclaim it mantle as the BEST educated nation in the world. There is a world of difference between the two statements. Inside Higher Education should be accurate with the report.

  • Controlling Higher Education Greed
  • Posted by Senior Professor on February 25, 2009 at 10:30am EST
  • It will help to examine the economics underlying this goal.

    Our nation's colleges and universities have a longstanding practice of shamefully grabbing federal incentives to attend college via increased tuition and fees. (Recall that healthcare and we are the only major industries that can't contain our growth within the GDP. Healthcare, at least, can claim that they are always implementing new technologies and medicines, while we still teach the same way our great grand-professors taught and complain that we are overworked.)

    President Obama's plan will fail unless he finds a way to keep the grubby hands of higher education's self-interests away from the incentives.

    Few sights are as pathetic as when greed masquerades as public service.

  • Parents -- not education-unions
  • Posted by Frank on February 25, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • Madam, I've worked directly with the poor, not as some theoretical, abstract concept. When you see the number of lower-SES kids from broken homes -- thank you, "Great Society" and LBJ -- you understand "bi-partisan" agreement that strong families create strong kids.

    Not edu-crats -- there is just not enough money. Strong parents. Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Any outfit with authentic discipline.

    Without discipline -- "education" is just a paycheck for adults who pay union dues.

    As for non-USA class-structure -- thank the shop owner's daughter, Margaret Thatcher, for less European economic-class rigidity. And Tony Blair, who copied her technique. That didn't happen via Labor or the Greens.

  • OBAMA'S PLAN FOR EDUCATION IS A BIG MISTAKE
  • Posted by R. G. Lacsamana, M.D. on February 25, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • I find specious the idea that taking one year of college training would make this country the most educated in the world. How is that possible? To begin with, that premise is based on quantity rather than quality. What can students possibly imbibe in a year when most courses now demand full immersion in a particular discipline of at least four years?

    Then there is the false assumption that most high school students have the credentials to enter college. That is a myth, since a number of colleges require proofs of viable academic performance before students get admitted. To admit everybody regardless of whether one is prepared or not to tackle college will not make this country the "most educated." "educated."

    I submit that the more important problem facing this country concerning education, apart from declining academic standards, is the large number of drop-outs in schools, something that's increasing every year. Students who are not qualified ought not to go to college and should seek other means to become useful members of society. High academic standards ought to be imposed instead, and maintained, which can only be diluted by the president's plan. I just get the feeling the president wants the government to dictate its own agenda to all of us, which is dead wrong. The choice to enter college belongs to us, not the government's.

  • Posted by Laura on February 25, 2009 at 11:30am EST
  • Agree with the commenter about the dropout rate. Some inner-city highschools have dropout rates of >50%, and we're asking those students to complete at least a year of college or trade school? How about we fix that problem first? And "fixing" might mean a pared-down goal of basic literacy and numeracy, graduating by age 15 or 16 ready to go to work. I think some original thinking is needed, some realistic goals, a workable path to get there, before we start piling frosting on a cake we don't even have.

  • Vocation Ed isn't a dumping ground for Academia
  • Posted by Idealist on February 25, 2009 at 12:15pm EST
  • The idea of having a highly educated population isn’t a bad one, it just the mechanics aren’t possible. Today work force demographics (these are approx. numbers) are about 20% professional, 60% technical, and 20 % labor. The two later numbers have flip-flopped in the last two generations. Today we have a dropout rate in Middle America that is around 25 % and much higher in urban, poorer neighborhoods. Close to half of our workforce holding the technical jobs are within 10 years of retirement. If America doesn’t get it together, we are going to have a very real workforce dilemma. Higher Ed, Vocational Ed, Work force training and K-12 are all part of the solution. Pointing fingers isn't getting it done.

    One year of college is fine, but technical training would be a better bet. One thing that most of you folks are missing, is that old age old myth that people who are not “college material” should be pushed to the trades because they are not ready (intelligent) enough for the rigors of academia. Pull your heads out! Trades people need to be well educated too. They are not Pavlov’s dogs taught routines like robots. People in the technical fields actually use math skills for real applied work issues that most college grads learn and never use again.

    The day that Higher Ed in general,can stop looking down their noses and actually learn that technical education, workforce training, and vocation ed are not a dumping ground for those that can't, is the day that we will actually have an educational system that has a chance at being the best in the world.

  • Forgive (Some Percentage of) Student Loans
  • Posted by FormerProf , Learning Solutions at na on February 25, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • To stimulate the economy and reward those who have been graduated from college, the administration might forgive a percentage of student loans. Almost every young graduate I know struggles with loans that keep them from buying a house, or new clothes, or fare much beyond the quality of student menus. These are the young people who work to clean up the environment, shop local, serve in undeclared wars, and generally give the US a better future than the one we Boomers did. They are making an effort to pay their educational debt--why not extend to them the same stimulus to do well as we are to unethical insurance companies and business-as-usual automakers.

  • Posted by Jo on February 25, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • Senior Professor is right. This morning on NPR the author of the new book, The Student Loan Scam, was discussing how the student loan industry has directly led to the ever escalating way-beyond-inflation of college and university fees. Please take a look at his website: www.studentloanjustice.org. One woman primary care doctor who called the talk show ("On Point") said that under laws passed just two years ago, her student loan contract is not re-negotiable. She expects to be paying off the loan until she retires. Congress really screwed students on loans to satisfy the greed typical of the lender industries, in collaboration with outrageously expanding higher ed fees. Sallie May loans are one of the offenders, and they are getting a tax-payer bailout.

  • Dropping out is not acceptable
  • Posted by Faculty Person on February 25, 2009 at 1:00pm EST
  • One thing I appreciated was Obama's statement that dropping out is not acceptable. It will take a cultural change for Obama's vision to become a reality and this is a (small) step in the right direction.

  • Faculty Person
  • Posted by DFS on February 25, 2009 at 5:30pm EST
  • While I agree with your point, I am suspicious about what happens when the establishment will "implement" this.

    When it's put in the hands of educrats, this idea spoken by the President will result in "passing them through," even when they fail -- yet another example of the high school phenomenon of not earning it.

  • WSJ op-ed on student loan book
  • Posted by Frank on February 25, 2009 at 8:00pm EST
  • We've gone off-course here .. and, as usual, far to one side ..
    A WSJ book review of aforementioned book on student loans .. which notes the book's author questionable reactions --

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123544367541855983.html
    For the zillionth time -- don't understand the loan papers -- DO NOT SIGN. Even if means living at home.

  • Good news for Adjuncts
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof on February 25, 2009 at 10:30pm EST
  • If Obama is only really pushing for one year post High School, then the massive new Freshman enrollment should be a boon for contingent faculty.

    Yay us.

    Piss Poor Prof