Quick Takes

March 2, 2009

Survey on Colleges' Staffing Cuts

Salary freezes are the most common strategy being used by colleges to limit compensation expenses in the face of the economic downturn, according to a "pulse survey" conducted by the College and University Association for Human Resources, which was released Friday. The survey -- to which 330 colleges replied -- found that most colleges have not reduced the salary increase pool for the current academic year, but anticipate smaller pools or no pools for increases going forward. On savings in staffing, the survey found that the most common approaches being used are delays in hiring, hiring freezes and limits on overtime. Most colleges reported that they were not using furloughs or layoffs.

Weber State Plans 7% Cut in Adjunct Pay

Adjunct professors, who teach almost one-third of courses at Weber State University, can expect a 7 percent cut in their pay next year, The Ogden Standard reported. University officials announced the plan, and said that adjunct pay would be rolled back to its 2004-5 rates, or about $2,700 per course. Adjuncts at the Utah university do not receive benefits. The state is considering large cuts to higher education budgets, and Weber State officials cited those reductions as requiring the pay cuts. Tenure-track and tenured faculty members will not have their pay cut under the plan, although the reduction would apply to the extra pay those professors receive when they teach extra courses.

Spending the Stimulus Money Wisely

States should spend the federal money they receive for higher education from the economic stimulus package in ways that encourage innovation and greater efficiency rather than reinforcing the patterns that got their college systems into trouble in the past, three groups argue in a report released Friday. The Delta Project on Postsecondary Education Costs, Productivity, and Accountability, the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, and the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems offer recommendations for how state leaders can use the stimulus funds to "leverage change," including reallocating funds to colleges (private as well as public, two-year as well as four, for-profit as well as nonprofit) that "pursue undergraduate teaching as their first priority") and imposing greater requirements on the colleges that take funds, such as tying them to the institutions' enrollment of disadvantaged students.

Could a Fatal Lab Fire Have Been Prevented?

Safety inspectors found more than a dozen deficiencies in a University of California at Los Angeles laboratory in which a lab assistant was engulfed in flames in a December accident that resulted in burns that killed her, the Los Angeles Times reported. The article quotes one expert as saying that the death was "totally preventable." UCLA has ordered a series of lab safety improvements and is cooperating with ongoing investigations, while not commenting on the specific points outlined in the article. The safety inspection that found the deficiencies was conducted two months before the accident, and the Times reported that the requested changes were not made.

Running Out of Time in Santa Fe

The College of Santa Fe, a private college known for its arts programs and close faculty-student interaction, has for months been facing closure and hoping for a a bailout from a state university, most likely New Mexico Highlands University. Legislation to authorize such a takeover by the state is moving, but is not a done deal, leading the college to announce that it would close May 22, barring a new plan to finance its operations. Even as it announced these plans, the college was working with legislators to push the takeover legislation, and supporters of the college continue to float new ideas on how to keep it alive.

Financial Aid for Trustees' Children

Arkansas officials, responding to a report in The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, are demanding that the University of Central Arkansas stop giving discounts of up to 80 percent on tuition to the children of trustees, the Associated Press reported. The practice is apparently not illegal, but also lacks any formal authorization or guidelines. The children of five current or former trustees benefited from the discounts.

Financing Inequities for Pennsylvania's 2-Year Colleges

Politicians and educators in Pennsylvania are frustrated with the system the state uses for financing community colleges -- and charging students to attend them, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported. School districts had a choice in 1967 of whether to support the creation of community colleges and many funding patterns date to the choices localities made at that time -- regardless of whether they fit today's enrollment patterns and education needs, the Inquirer reported.

GOP Pressure on Millersville U. to Cancel Bill Ayers Talk

When Bill Ayers visits a local campus these days, it's become common for a local politician or two to denounce the appearance. But Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania are pushing particularly hard at Millersville University, demanding that a lecture later this month be called off. The Intelligencer Journal reported that Republican legislators have issued repeated statements and called for meetings with state higher education officials about the matter. Millersville has defended the appearance by Ayers, noting that he is coming to the campus in his role as a noted education expert at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and that there are no plans to use tax dollars for the visit. But Republicans keep talking about the Weather Underground, of which Ayers was once a leader, and suggesting that there could be economic penalties for the university if it lets Ayers appear. One legislator told the newspaper: "I mean, this guy probably committed treason, and why Millersville would want to give him a forum is really beyond my understanding." Another said: "At the end of the day, the institution does utilize tax dollars. ... So there has to be a measure of accountability."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

Philosophers shoveling snow, in The Duck of Minerva.... Dual authors in anthropology, in Savage Minds....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Dear Lar: on Billy Ayers
  • Posted by L.L. on March 2, 2009 at 7:00am EST
  • Lar .. in case you missed this about Mr. Ayers in the NYTimes --

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/opinion/l10ayers.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=opinion

    " .. As the lead federal prosecutor of the Weathermen in the 1970s .. I do take issue with the statement in your news article that the Weathermen indictment was dismissed because of “prosecutorial misconduct.” It was dismissed because of illegal activities, including wiretaps .. initiated by John N. Mitchell, attorney general at that time .."

    Fact: Mr. Ayers was indicted by the U.S. government, accused of heinous violent felony crimes against the people of the United States of America. Charges dismissed, thanks to the late John Mitchell.

    So .. Mr. Ayers has replaced Mr. Ward what's-his-name as the well-paid critic of the U.S.

    Bet ol' Ward would do the same "why America is always wrong and I'm always right" road show for 50% of what Mr. Ayers does it for. After all -- coffee every morning at McDonald's is so boring ..

  • Bill Ayers
  • Posted by Henry Collier , Research Fellow at University of Wollongong on March 2, 2009 at 8:00am EST
  • Something about innocent until proven guilty? I'm less that inclined to accept the rants of a former lead persecutor who managed to get his case thrown out of court ...

  • Weber cuts adjunct pay
  • Posted by Steve Fox , Director of Writing, English Department at IUPUI on March 2, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • Kudos to Weber State for cutting the pay of the already woefully underpaid: adjunct faculty. Admittedly, there are adjuncts who just teach for the pleasure and prestige,on top of full-time jobs or in retirement--but what about those, as in composition, speech, and math, who do this for a living and help support programs that would otherwise have to hire many additional full-time faculty? I know, times are tough--but have administrators and full professors taken temporary pay cuts first?

  • Uninviting Speakers who probably committed treason
  • Posted by Edwin Duncan , Professor, English Department at Towson University on March 2, 2009 at 8:15am EST
  • >One legislator told the newspaper: ""I mean, this guy probably committed treason, and why Millersville would want to give him a forum is really beyond my understanding."

    If Millersville isn't going to invite speakers who "probably committed treason," then I suppose that also rules out Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby, and George W. Bush, all of whom were most likely involved with the "outing" of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

  • Reiprocity
  • Posted by Historian in PAconvicted on March 2, 2009 at 8:45am EST
  • One wonders how these same Republican legislators would respond if G. Gordon Liddy were invited to speak at Millersville.  After all, Liddy is a convicted felon from the same era and decidedly unrepentant about his acts.  Not too mention he's probably much better paid for his version of the "why America is always wrong and I'm always right" road show than Ayers is ....

  • Our legislators at their (ahem) finest
  • Posted by Professor G on March 2, 2009 at 9:00am EST
  • It's no accident that Millersville is smack in the middle of GOP (read: McCain-Palin-Bush-Santorum) country, which explains in large part why the Ayers visit is raising conservative hackles when visits by other likely traitors and riot inciters are heralded.  The legislator who commented, "I mean, this guy probably committed treason, and why Millersville would want to give him a forum is really beyond my understanding," unwittingly sums it up:  he or she honestly doesn't comprehend the double standard. Sarah Palin is a patriot for smiling along while supporters shout "Kill him" about President Obama, but Bill Ayers (or any other Democrat in the stretch between Philly & Pittsburgh) should be vilified and excluded from any sort of public forum -- particularly if it involves the exchange of ideas at, say, a public university.  My tax dollars go there too, and I say the Ayers invite stands.  In our partisan mess of a state government, who's out there representing me?  Or, more importantly, the basic tenets of higher education and academic freedom? Anyone?  Anyone? 

  • Posted by Adjunct George on March 2, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • The relativism trap again. The innocence or guilt no longer depends upon the act but upon a court of law. You are innocent or guilty when you perform the act, not when you get taken to court. If you go 60 in a 45 mile an hour speed zone, you are guilty of speeding even if the policeman doesn't show up and the judge dismisses the charge. Terrorist Bill admitted to setting explosive devices in his book. Thus he is guilty but not convicted. He should be shunned but instead he is held up as a hero. Keep up the good work GOP. I never understood how he could have tried to kill people and was rewarded with tenure and paid by the government he tried to bring down. If you believe that he never meant to hurt anyone, I have 100 shares in the Brooklyn Bridge company I would like to sell you.

  • Posted by Adjunct George on March 2, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Talk about limited information sources by the leftist professors. This series of posts takes the cake. First, Valarie Plame worked at CIA headquarters. Richard Armatage was the one who released Valarie Plame's place of employment, not Scooter Libby, George Bush or Dick Chaney. Get your facts correct. How you can claim anyone who works at CIA headquarters is a "secret agent" is beyond me. Next, why would anyone invite G. Gordon Liddy? He isn't a leftist so would not get an invitation. This is a red herring comment. As for Sara Palin, there was no one at her rally that called out "kill him." Investigation by the secret service found that no-one other than a leftist reported heard this remark. Great scholarship shown by the above propaganda that continues to be distributed by "academics." The reds of the 1960's are being very well represented on the public university. You don't need to invite terrorist Bill to represent them.

  • Posted by Dr. Mike at Shippensburg University of PA on March 2, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • Regardless of what the man did or didn't do in the past, and regardless of one's attitude about what he does or doesn't presently stand for, he's obviously of some immediate importance - if not, his visit wouldn't be this controversial. Universities should be in the business of inviting such people to speak on campus; that's what a liberal (in an educational not political sense) education is all about.
    The minute he's through speaking, the world will (maybe unfortunately) remain largely the same. College students are not empty vessels to be filled with the ideology of the moment. They do (although they often hide it cleverly) think for themselves, and are not likely to be converted to anarchists (or anything else) based on any one speech. Besides, he's not coming to talk on his past political views or activities. No mater what he talks on, it won't make that much difference. Denying him the opportunity to speak, on the other hand, is a very significant act indeed. One that would have much more lasting and far-reaching repercussions than anything Ayers - or any other speaker - might say.
    Freedom of speech matters - no matter what is being said, or the context within which the speech is given. We stifle free speech at our peril. If we begin the process of denying this freedom based on the prejudices of the moment, we won't have to worry about extremists bringing down our system of government, we will have begun the job for them. 

  • Dr. Mike
  • Posted by DFS on March 2, 2009 at 1:15pm EST
  • "Obviously of immediate importance."
    Let's roll back the clock. Obviously, we should invite Adolf Hitler due to his immediate importance.
    Or, how about Fidel Castro? Mao? Pol Pot? Ho Chi Minh? Kim Il Sung? Attila? Herod? Caligula?
    Jane Fonda? Oh, wait -- that's already been done.
    Gotcha.

  • Decouple tenure and compensation at Weber State
  • Posted by Reader on March 2, 2009 at 5:00pm EST
  • The Utah legislature should take advantage of the Weber State situation to decouple tenure and compensation at their public universities. Tenure is an important protection for controversial views (although hardly any faculty use it for that purpose), but there is no reason senior faculty should be permitted to lock up all the institutional resources in their own pockets during times of economic hardship, at the expense of the educational peasantry. By decoupling tenure and compensation, across the board salary cuts can be made to senior positions when finances require it (not singling out any individual).