Search News


Browse Archives

News

A 'Mission-Driven' Core

March 6, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Social justice matters get a fair amount of attention at colleges these days, often in the form of service learning or extracurricular activities. But at one Roman Catholic liberal arts college near Philadelphia, the very core of a new curriculum foregrounds the fact that justice does matter.

Cabrini College's “Justice Matters" core curriculum will feature as a cornerstone a required course sequence termed "Engagements with the Common Good" -- which will include three writing-intensive courses, one each from the freshman through junior years, plus a senior capstone experience in the major.

Now being piloted and to be required of all incoming students starting this fall, ECG 100, 200 and 300 focus, respectively, on awareness of a student’s position and connections relative to groups, communities, and cultural, political and economic contexts; on participation through service learning with a partnering community organization; and on enacting social change through community-based research projects or legislative and advocacy work. EGC sections will vary in content based on faculty interest and expertise, but each level of the sequence has a common set of learning goals associated with it.

“From self to other, the wider community – then how do you take action or put research into use, lobbying or doing legislative change,” Nancy Watterson, an assistant professor of social justice and American studies, said in describing the sequence.

"Not that I want to marginalize this, but not having it just be clocking service hours," said Marie Angelella George, Cabrini's president, in describing the goals for the new "mission-driven" curriculum. "But that it really allows students to think critically about what they’re experiencing outside the classroom and develop a lens that supplements their critical thinking skills -- a lens of seeing, observing, hearing issues and becoming a student. Maybe identifying what are the underlying systemic issues in the situation I’m seeing in front of me, whether that’s global or local hunger, whether it’s poor water filtration at a nearby creek that’s running in my neighborhood.”

The Engagements with the Common Good sequence replaces what had been a long-standing, one-course service learning requirement for juniors. “We were probably one of the very first schools to require service learning and community involvement,” said Jerry Zurek, a professor of communication and department chair. “We would get them interested in social justice and out in the community and then they would become seniors. It was very clear that one course out of the whole college career is not going to have a particularly profound effect for most students.”

Zurek taught a pilot ECG 100 course this fall, “Our Interdependent World,” for freshmen communications majors. Students did their final projects on fair trade and immigration reform. Among the course goals articulated in the syllabus: “You will learn how you, as Communication majors, can give voice to the voiceless around the world.”

“Not all the [ECG] courses are connected to the major, but I wanted this one to be. My feeling is that students need to see how their future profession can affect the common good,” said Zurek.

“My feeling has always been that teaching about justice is not enough and that service learning is not enough, and that we need to move beyond what colleges have grown comfortable doing and actually set our goals almost at an impossible level to change students’ lives long-term after they graduate. So that’s really the assessment that I’m going to be looking at -- 10 years from now, will students be actively involved in making the world better in terms of changing unfair and unjust structures of the world?"

Of course, college officials are also considering other, more immediate ways to assess the new curriculum -- although, says Charlie McCormick, dean of academic affairs, “We haven’t finalized a system at this point.”

"Doing good assessment of this sort of work, if there is a model out there for it, I haven't been able to identify it yet. I don't mean me but I mean all of us here at the college," McCormick said. “We’re testing different things. We’ve looked at the Defining Issues Test, which looks at moral reasoning; we’ve looked at empathy assessments. We’re not completely pleased with any of those."

McCormick added that some faculty are using e-portfolios. “But even if we use those we haven’t exactly figured out what’s the appropriate rubric to evaluate the project and student learning.”

He added, however: “What we found in the pilot group is that all those traditional liberal learning outcomes that are so important to a place like Cabrini College, students are better able to achieve those when we use those in the service of these justice issues. Critical thinking becomes real and important. Writing becomes something that you don’t just do for your professor but something you do for a wider audience and it matters in a way it doesn’t before."

In addition to the new ECG sequence, Cabrini’s Justice Matters core also features more conventional "Literacies in the 21st Century" requirements, including quantitative and scientific literacies.

“It was definitely a nice change of pace. It was kind of refreshing learning something that has relevance now, that can help people now," Ross Salese, a freshman communication major from New Jersey, said about the ECG pilot course he took with Zurek last fall. Salese added that he thinks requiring the course sequence is a good thing, although "some people might not be that into it, some people will be."

"For most of these issues that we talked about, if I didn’t know about them, I wouldn’t do anything about it," Salese said. "If they make it a mandatory course, at least people are more educated about the subject. They may choose to help or not, but at least they’re educated."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A 'Mission-Driven' Core

  • Mission-Driven Core
  • Posted by Chris Paris , English Department at University of the Incarnate Word on March 6, 2009 at 11:45am EST
  • Friends, I'm deeply gratified to see that Cabrini shares my own institution's convictions. We, the cry in the wilderness, I'm afraid. We, too, are totally motivated by our own mission-driven core curriculum; it always has been for one-hundred-twenty-five years. And, about five years ago, we addressed the core curriculum, once again, to even better incorporate the mission values--that never change, by the way, in a greater integrated fashion not only as incorporating social justice as elements of scrutiny into course objectives, goals, and student outcomes, but also value-added affectives to be acquired by students in their persistence to graduation--and to be measured in our assessment instruments of the core. This ain't no joke. We take it seriously.

    In addition, we've even incorporated Learning Communities of paired courses with the same shared population of students linking courses such as Macro-economics, or Intro to Business with religious studies courses that focus on ethics and spirituality. Lest you purely secular institutions get the wrong impression, these LC's were not required nor coerced, yet maxed out easily.

    Further, Incarnate Word requires forty-five hours of community service for graduation and has proven to be a highly effective vehicle for incorporating service-learning into stand-alone courses and Learning Communities--dynamic combo that even increases collaborative enterprising, collaborative learning, greater student retention and persistence to graduation, meta-cognitive thinking in moral and ethical contexts demonstrated and proven by their own seminar papers. The evidence is there.

    What can I say? All this the advantage of a values-based higher education. Why do you think our faculties are so committed? Why do you think we're one of the largest values-based universities in our region? It ain't some religious dogma, friends. It's dedication to making a difference in the world, and demonstrating to the remarkable students who leave us into the world that they, too, can make a difference with respectful embrace, and equality, and an understanding of equality in a very practical way, and not fall prey to solipsisms, and that the corporate world needs to answer to higher orders rather than self-defining their orders and their self-definitions for their self-interests at the costs of other peoples' lives the world over. I ain't no Bible thumper, friends. Nor are any one of my colleagues. But, equality and compassion and respect for the spirit of all and any others in the world go a hell of a long way. That is the hope they clearly pursue for themselves in the values-based education they have found with us--all delivered in an urbane and respectful and equal manner for any persuasion of our students whose population, by the way, is a true representation of the region it serves. And that word, "serves," is the primary affective of our mission; and all our students know it because they feel it from us in their acculturation, and we become the example for them. I, too, was a product of the sixties, and I, too, was driven to make the world better. That's what our generation was programmed to do. But, we crashed. This generation isn't because it's driven by values it seeks and feels from us, and that Cabrini and Incarnate Word offer with compassion, embrace, and respect. You can look at our numbers--and that also includes our persistent escalating international population of Muslims, Jews, Christians--Western and Eastern Orthodox, Buddhists, you name it. We and Cabrini must be doin' somethin' right. Maybe the world's had it with the others.

    I think I'll forward this to Obama--he who strides out of the darknesses of history. Time for change.

  • Fertile grounds for an ACORN
  • Posted by Mr. Mojo at SUNY on March 6, 2009 at 12:45pm EST
  • How very trendy, what with all the e-portfolios, required community service, and whatnot. I'm reminded of Robert Hutchins' comments that colleges cannot "make its students good ...; if it tries to do it, it will fail; it will weaken the agencies that should be discharging this responsibility; and it will not discharge its own responsibility."
    Of course, his concern with actual intellectual development is sooo old-fashioned.

    I guess Cabrini wants to make sure that future ACORN leaders have actual diplomas to hang on their walls, albeit ones of questionable value.

  • Cabrini
  • Posted by Chris Paris , Fertile Grounds at UIW on March 6, 2009 at 1:45pm EST
  • Too cynical, man. You know what cynicism is--the crash and burn of idealism. Contrary to what you may think or crave, idealism is alive and well in many; and, true freedom is merging the who and the what of it. Otherwise, there's no purpose with conviction and intent for good--you know, doing "good works"--a Judeo-Christian, and Muslim, by the way,tradition all the way from Melchizedek to the Zadoks of the first-century A.D. Do you have the guts? Read Hebrews. There's a reason why Paul mentions Melchizedek six times. It's real easy to be cynical; it extricates you from the responsibility of committing to good, placing you at a distance of submission, throwing your hands up in the air as an expression of disgust as an excuse: "I give up, man." Maybe, possibly, with value-added's, Acorns will decrease with time. But, you, the cynical, want instant coffee, instant gratification extricating yourself from the investment of the dedication and the labor. Trendy? How about, "keep trying--whatever, especially when it's guided by positive evidence that increases hope. I attended SUNY, too, in the late 'sixties, in fact. Great great education; but, it lacked values. Maybe that's part why we crashed and burned.

  • Values
  • Posted by Mr. Mojo at SUNY on March 6, 2009 at 2:30pm EST
  • Cynical? Naaaah. Instant coffee? Haven't had it in years.

    Remember that Hutchins said it's probably too late to teach values to the college-aged. He thought the values should have been instilled by family, the church, and the community well before the college years.
    The lack of values isn't the fault of, or remedied by, a college. Instead, we have families w/o a moral center , media dominated by sex and consumerism, Godless publik skoolz, etc.... Can a college change that? Probably not. I'll concentrate teaching my students about my discipline, and spend my time, idealism (and Catholic school tuition dollars) on my own kid.

  • Posted by Patty S on March 6, 2009 at 2:45pm EST
  • I have a daughter that attends Cabrini College. While some may call this program "trendy" and I am sure this comment offends many educators, students and parents, I believe this college is worth every penny our family has fought so hard to obtain in order to pay for a wonderful college education for our daughter. I have watched my daughter become an incredibly strong, passionate, dedicated and educated young woman and I couldn't be more proud. Truly, this institution has made all the little seedlings that we planted as parents come to fruition. While my daughter is a senior and this new program is really just coming to actualization, she was lucky enough to come under the tutelage of an incredibly strong Communications Department at Cabrini, led by wonderful, caring faculty members who truly invest everything they have, 24 hours a day, in producing the finest students and giving them every opportunity to learn about true community. I couldn't be more thankful for this caring environment. Not only have they provided a caring and challenging environment, they have provided a community which fosters outstanding academic work and has become nationally recognized in so many arenas. Cabrini is challenging their staff and their students. In spite of the difficult job market, I truly believe my daughter will be hired in no time, because she is different from other students. She is full of self worth and has an amazing e-portolio that has come about from this fine college community. Any prospective employer will recognize her as outstanding. So much for being trendy!

  • Justice
  • Posted by DFS on March 6, 2009 at 3:45pm EST
  • Justice matters, but not at the college.
    It matters in the real world; justice is framed at the college by examining it critically, not by espousing one side of it.
    Else, "justice" as taught by one side becomes that -- one-sided justice.
    No wonder now about the "ethics" of journalism.

  • A Changed Woman
  • Posted by Kasey , Senior student at Cabrini College on March 6, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • Hey Mr. Mojo,
    I would love for you to call me and talk. I can give you my number, as well as about 13 other seniors that will agree that they have been changed these last two years in college. I don't understand how you can be a teacher at heart and only want to teach to your own child. You should want to TEACH to all those you come in contact with. So obviously, I have the answer to my question. Students will NOT learn about social justice because you are NOT teaching them. I did not come in contact with these subjects before I enrolled in Dr. Zurek's SEM 300 class, "Working for Global Justice," so I thank him and the college for allowing a class like this to be offered. Maybe you need to learn a thing or two from DESIRED teachers because I know my professors have children and they instill these values in them as well. They are teachers inside and outside of the classroom; they are teachers with PASSION.

  • Former Cabrini student
  • Posted by A. Finnegan at Cabrini College on March 6, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • I’m a direct product of this curriculum at Cabrini. My education has changed my outlook on the world and how I view others, regardless of their social status, race or religion. The college has opened my eyes to the role I play in our world, one I may not have seen anywhere else.
    I’ve spent time with Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel and former child solider Ishmael Beah, dined with Philadelphia’s homeless, tutored inner city youth and spent two weeks in the Middle East with Iraqi refugees and aid workers. The opportunities may have been given, but my opinions were always my own.
    I’ve learned how to use my own profession as a journalist to initiate change and to “give a voice to the voiceless.” How else will people learn about the injustices in our world if there is no one to tell the story?
    Cabrini has been teaching this philosophy before the term “social justice” was even coined. It’s been at the core of the college since its opening. It’s hardly a trend. In fact, I wish it were. If peace and fairness were the latest trend, I think we’d all be in a better place.

  • New Cabrini Curriculum
  • Posted by Brittany M. , Cabrini Student at Cabrini College on March 6, 2009 at 8:30pm EST
  • As a student at Cabrini, I can truthfully say that I’m so very honored to have experienced the pilot class of this curriculum and to know that our new educational outlook is finally receiving the attention it deserves.

    By reading the comments, I now understand that there will be skeptics. But based on personal experience I would just like to make clear that this academic system isn’t about transforming us as individuals. It’s all about exposure to the real world and unsung problems; we’re the ones that change ourselves.

    This curriculum wasn’t created to be “trendy.” It was created for opportunity and so that we can graduate with more than a piece of paper to hang upon our wall.

    As I walk down the isle in May it’s going to be quite clear that I not only received an education, I received an opportunity to love what I previously didn’t know about.

  • Posted by Walt , Communication Student at Cabrini on March 7, 2009 at 10:45am EST
  • I have to say that I was insulted when I read Mojo's "trendy" comment.

    I dont think he understands the scope of what we are doing at Cabrini. I am a English communication student at the college. I am graduating in May and only became a com major last spring. It has completely changed my life. I feel so empowered when I gain video experience by reporting on the college presidents recent trip to Guatemala. I feel even more empowered when I push the idea of social justice on my friends.

    However, if Mojo wants to talk about the trend, it seems to me that the trend for most college students is to care less about the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa, to not know what Human Trafficking is and to read Prez Hilton rather than The New York Times.

    Cabrini is teaching social justice classes that are literally transforming students from the trendy "who cares" persona and throwing us into the realities of poverty.

    One more comment before I go. Mojo also mention a weakening in the institutions already working to end global poverty. Cabrini is partnered with CRS and we work with other organizations to fight and report on poverty. If anything, we advocate these institutions and make them stronger.

  • Dear Mojo, DFS, and Hutchins
  • Posted by Chris Paris , English Department at UIW on March 9, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Justice is essential anywhere, everywhere; and, the definition of Justice, as well, along with all its attending commonplaces. Your guru, Hutchins, is dead--I'll qualify: his hypothesis is dead; the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence of the countervailing hypothesis killed him. That's why I'm glad I cranked this exchange in the national arena of discourse IHE has afforded us. I'm glad what I did. And, I profoundly admire the participating commentaries by parents, students, and alumni of Cabrini. As for UIW, friends, feel free to jump in any time you want; or, anybody else in this equal arena of discourse I find invaluable for our industry. Kudoes to IHE.

    I'm glad because I've always been suspect of what your cynically poisoned comments, Mojo and DFS, have further demonstrated as underscoring mis-perceptions of private values-based institutions of American Higher Education. We're participants, too, and you ain't gonna close us down. Here are the reasons, and I'll enumerate them for the sake of clarity:

    1) You don't have to fear us; we do not pose a threat to your "sense" of freedom, or liberty; nor, to freedom of expression. Just remember that what you telegraph to this national arena of discourse afforded to us is open to scrutiny and debate. As for freedom and liberty, it's very possible, in fact, probable that the values-based institutions defend your freedom and liberty possibly more than you do on your own campuses because freedom and liberty, and equality, and respect for others--no matter who they be, are essential to our values that are living, breathing, actualizing a cosmology, not just elements of scrutiny as artifical intelligence. Example: The Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, founders of UIW, and members of UIW's faculty and administration have frequently participated in persuading governments of Central America to raid and shut down houses of prostitution that have held pre-adolescents, adolescents, and adults--primarily women, as tortuously captive; and the Sisterhood has then given these liberated individuals sanctuary. Have your institutions done that as an actualization of their values and cosmology?
    2) Contrary to paltry mis-guided pictures, we don't walk around in habits or monks' robes all day carrying Bibles. Nor, are we coercive, or prejudicial to some singular doctrine as you would like to think so as to give credibility to your own--what has to be "solipsistic" perceptions because you prefer to remain uninformed; otherwise, the mis-perceptions would not persist as I have even witnessed when a Dean as part of my career, and attended national and international Deans Conferences. So, time has come for this response I offer to our nation of participants in higher education.
    3) Gee. All our permanent faculty are tenured, too, and according to any national standard provided by any public institution of higher learning nationally. We, too, must be regularly published in national refereed journals, and presses for book-length publications; and, we, too, must serve the institution--probably more than you do; and, we too, are scrutinized for our teaching, and our participation in sharing our scholarship of pedagogy--probably more than you do, because teaching our students is essential to our cosmologies and their values mentioned, earlier. So, be careful with your swipes at Diplomas Cabrini and UIW offer.
    4) Gee. We, too, must be regularly scrutinized and approved by a national accrediting body--in our case, The Southern Association; and, you know what? We sail through it because the Southern Association repeatedly with its standards of scrutiny constantly find that our Mission, and our Values, and our values-based education, and our values-based community are persistently translated and assessed in our education's goals, objectives, and student outcomes--from classroom experience, to community participations, to majors, to degrees, and to persistence of alumni's life pursuits. Gee. You don't believe it? Maybe you should do what Hutchins should have done before he shot his mouth off. Examine the extrinsic evidence. Aristotle's proofs require extrinsic evidence, too; that's because he was really an organic thinker, and the inside and the outside needed to be true to each other--which we apparently are.
    5) Because of the strength and power of our cosmology's convictions and values, we are typically longitudinal in our governance--i.e., we are consummately committed to shared governance and transformational leadership in spite of required bureacratic constructions typical of industrial America. We have found our way of organically synthesizing the two genealogies into a working model of equality, and liberty in initiatives, and creativity, and crossing boundaries between our schools and our disciplines to afford our students the demonstrations of organic thinking where one's entire world's body of knowledge is essential and is actively incorporated in anything this individual is confronted with, troubled by, challenged by, desires to initiate, accomplish as goals--immediate, or life goals; and, underscored by that value-system that pleads for doing not only for oneself, but to include the well-being of all in the process. Our governance and our commitment to its vision finds its way into all our classrooms as equal and free and respectful communities of discourse where every student comment is invaluable in its participation. Our students learn by example, and practice as well as through the same strictures of your artificial intelligence probably using the same textbooks you do. Gee.
    6) I am confident in Cabrini, and I love Cabrini as I love my own institution as all my colleagues do, and I am confident that what I share for our national community of discourse is just as accurate for Cabrini as it is for UIW. Is this a defense for Cabrini? You bet, because Cabrini has become my own personal allegory for values-based higher education's world's and cosmic view. Cosmic: think of the implications for equality, and liberty, and social justice, and values for our national and world communities. Quite a dream. But, we're doin' somethin' about it. All of that litany of social and cultural ills you, Mojo and DFS, lament, we act upon as natural to the ontological synthesis of the what and the who of our beings, actualized. Now THAT's real liberty.

    So, to everyone, nationally, who may be interested--although if you're not, it doesn't deter us any, Social Justice, Equality, Liberty, Pursuit of existential truths as well as those of artificial intelligence, globalization inspired by all of the above, and cosmic evolutions initiated by diversities are alive and well in America's values-based institutions of Higher Learning. Make no mistake. We're driven by equality and diversity, and social justice that ain't just some artificial act of hypothetical scrutiny. We live it; and, because we live it, we keep it all alive--for everybody.

    My apologies if all this rings like a diatribe; it's not. The tone only reflects the commitment. If all of you, nationally, possess the kind of commitment that Cabrini and UIW share in your own institutions' Missions and their attending Values; and, if those Values are not stigmatic solely to intrinsic examinations of artificial intelligence, then our cultures may have a chance.

    Hope to see y'all soon some day. After all, we're all participants in perpetuating our culture with what we engage with our progeny. That's a very sobering thought.

    Chris Paris

  • What's the Matter with IHE?
  • Posted by DFS on March 11, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • Consider this.

    "So, to everyone, nationally, who may be interested--although if you're not, it doesn't deter us any, Social Justice, Equality, Liberty, Pursuit of existential truths as well as those of artificial intelligence, globalization inspired by all of the above, and cosmic evolutions initiated by diversities are alive and well in America's values-based institutions of Higher Learning. Make no mistake. We're driven by equality and diversity, and social justice that ain't just some artificial act of hypothetical scrutiny. We live it; and, because we live it, we keep it all alive--for everybody."

    What's the matter with IHE? Should I be afraid of what this Chris said about meeting me and others?

    I am not afraid. Let IHE et. al. know this. In fact, I do hope I'll meet this Chris, in person.

  • to the last,
  • Posted by Chris Paris , English Department at UIW on March 14, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • DFS, sorry I didn't answer sooner; was workin on some stuff.

    I don't get your last comment. It doesn't quite attain--until, maybe, one begins to consider the sub-texts. I thought my conclusion was pretty good. It kinda wraps everything up and puts it all back together, again. I don't know what it has to do with your own fears from somebody, anybody, although they're unfounded, and that's what you really have to look at now. I don't see anything threatening to you in the concluding paragraph. Is THAT why you quoted it? The only thing you may possibly have to fear, maybe, is the possibility of your own prejudices that you may have to confront and deal with which you and the other MOJO guy made clearly evident in your early commentaries about what Cabrini and UIW do and why. I'm sorry, I won't tolerate anybody taking a whack at the quality of these two institutions (remember the diploma part by MOJO, and your own heavy-handed suggestion that Cabrini and UIW may examine justice from a prejudicial--I guess that's what you meant by "one-sided," perspective). Unjustified, prejudicial, uninformed, cynical and hegemonous comments get my hackles up--especially when directed at the universal liberties--you, yourself, and MOJO violate, by the way--that I love, and hold dear for everybody, and with the people I may love. You didn't get it. My commentaries are defending the rights of everybody--including Cabrini and UIW and anyone else like us who you and MOJO have assaulted with prejudice--which is exactly the point I'm making. You didn't read the Cabrini commentaries; or, you didn't take heed to them. You got their hackles up, too; and rightfully so. There is clearly a prejudice out there against private values-based insitutions that if not defended against with the realities of the extrinsic evidence the multiplicity of Cabrini veterans demonstrated, and what I shared about my own institution, then they continue to be hegemonous in reinforcing these exclusive prejudicial views, attitudes, possibly even communities you may represent. It's fascinating to me that your prejudices arose out of nowhere, virtually nowhere; my response to the original article was praise, and the demonstration that Cabrini and its vision are shared, why, and how. I guess I smoked y'all out; I'm glad I did. I pray that you and MOJO are just anomalies; but, I don't think so; not from my own experiences that are also extrinsic. But, that's okay, we all have fears. The best way to get over them is look at the facts--even about ourselves, and the truths the facts demonstrate, and then finish it all by examining ourselves. I'm holding a mirror in front of your face, DFS. Do you have the guts to look at yourself in the face? If my throwing the gauntlet of examining yourself (which is what an arena of discourse is supposed to do, and why it's so vital, and why IHE is doing such a great job) at your feet, then don't bother meeting anybody--either here, or anywhere. Why would you think it's okay for you and MOJO to mouth off un-informed prejudicial comments in an open arena of discourse and not expect a response? Telegraphing rhetoric implies response; response should be expected and valued for the opportunities of examining yourself for credibility. This is higher education--yes; and, higher education, whether in public or private institutions, espouses free expression--yes; and, this is America--yes, and because we're Americans we have the right to say whatever we want--No. Categorical NO. We don't have the right to just say whatever we want--especially when prejudicial, misleading, unfounded, or abusive, or assaulting. It's not just your cynicism; it's what your cynicism did--which is what you wanted it to do: prejudicially assault. But, don't worry; none of us are going to take legal action although our rights have been violated. We're perfectly capable of defending ourselves. Truth and evidence can always defend themselves against cynical prejudices. It's all in the content of the evidence.

    I don't know why you summon IHE. They're doin' a great job; they hear everybody out, which is exercising the liberties our type of institutions defend for you. Didn't you get that?

    I need to comment for anyone, nationally, watching this. It has NOT taken a scurrilous turn. All of the principles underscoring all of this are profoundly important, not only to Higher Education, but to our culture. I see the same MOJO's and DFS's on C-SPAN watching our representatives and senators presenting their rhetoric on Capital Hill. And, I respond the same way to them, too, when I disagree, or I think Americns are being assaulted or hegemonized by people of authority with not quite accurate, or prejudicial, or assaulting commentaries. You want an example? The whole Obama and socialism thing. I had just about enough when some Senator got up and tied it all together with the bailout, and tied them all together with accusations of COMMUNISM, of all things. I had just about enough, and responded the same way as I have to these prejudices. It's our right. Rhetoric is our right. Rhetoric as civic discourse is our right. The exercise of rhetoric as civic discourse NEEDS to be exercised as our right--which is why I actively participate in what IHE has afforded us. This whole thing has become an allegory of itself. There's great value in that. And, this whole thing has been a long time comin.

    I'm going to make a national appeal to all our institutions of Higher Learning: those of us active participants in teaching rhetoric: please consider an upper-division course that explores and instructs "Rhetoric As Civic Discourse." Maybe we've been too lax in thinking that the implications of our rights and the value of civic response have been clearly evident. I'm beginning to think that they aren't. If so, it's time for us to act. A silent nation is a threatened nation.

    Chris