Search News


Browse Archives

News

Style: MLA, Updated.

March 11, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Even in citations, print is the default no more. The seventh edition of the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, released Tuesday, states that the Modern Language Association no longer recognizes print as the default medium, and suggests that the medium of publication should be included in each works cited entry.

Moreover, the MLA has ceased to recommend inclusion of URLs in citing Web-based works – unless the instructor requires it or a reader would likely be unable to locate the source otherwise. “Inclusion of URLs has proved to have limited value… for they often change, can be specific to a subscriber or a session of use, and can be so long and complex that typing them into a browser is cumbersome and prone to transcription errors. Readers are now more likely to find resources on the Web by searching for titles and authors' names than by typing URLs,” states the handbook.

The latest edition of the standard style guide for language and literary study is thinner than the last (and considerably less shiny) – thinner because it is the first to be complemented by a Web component. The password-protected Web site includes the full (and searchable) text of the handbook, plus 200 online-only examples, and a series of 30-plus-step narratives taking undergraduates through the process of writing a paper, complete with model papers available in PDF form and professors' sample comments.

A narrative describing the process of writing a paper on Jane Austen's Mansfield Park, for instance, includes 32 separate how-to entries. They discuss such steps as choosing among three topics, evaluating sources, starting the thesis, discussing fictional characters, quoting dialogue, preparing the list of works cited and formatting endnotes (plus writing the outline and first and final drafts, of course).

The narratives are intended to be used not only by students seeking guidance but also as teaching tools. “It’s a model and it shows you what an advanced undergraduate in eight or 10 pages could ideally do,” said Rosemary G. Feal, executive director of the MLA. “The point that comes out immediately is it’s not a mechanical process.”

“It’s a shift from form to process, which is more and more how instructors are thinking about teaching writing,” said Sidonie Smith, chair of English at the University of Michigan.

Feal stressed that the new handbook is also more explicit about the flexible and modular nature of MLA guidelines for citations. As one example, in describing how to cite graphic narratives, the handbook notes, “Many graphic narratives are created through collaboration. Begin the entry for such a work with the name of the person whose contribution is most relevant to your research, following it with a label identifying the person’s role” (i.e. writer or illus., for illustrator). Examples, of course, follow.

The new MLA handbook costs $22; students must buy the book to access the content online, and Web-only passes aren’t available (“We still think instructors will want their students to have a physical book,” said Feal). Access to the online content will be available during the life of the seventh edition. The sixth edition was released in 2003.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Style: MLA, Updated.

  • MLA IS OLDSCHOOL
  • Posted by Brokeharvardgrad , Blank at Blank on March 11, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • True, there is no school like the old school, but that doesn't mean it's the best school. Where does this stuff come from that teachers get to decide whether or not a student gets web access by a book purchase? This is now definitive proof that the MLA group is behind the times and certainly not competitive anymore in the field of publishing. Great job, MLA, you have now given yourselves the titles: old, out of date, and irrelevant. http://unaskedadvice.wordpress.com/

  • MLA, the archive of irrelevence
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof at www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com on March 11, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I have to agree with the above post. Be REQUIRING purchase of a printed book, the MLA has once again written a handbook for the wrong audience. I have written before about how digital natives compose a new discourse community [www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com], and the old-fogeys at the MLA have missed their target audience (writing 101).

    True, as the article points out, there is now an online component. Yay. How 1995 of them. They are also giving weight to the process approach to writing. Yay. How 1988 of them. They also have working models of various citation examples. Again, yay.

    But the 33 working "learning points" [my phrase] of Mansfield Park...are they serious? Is the expectation that a Freshman will weave her way through such an essay to find the one point of citation know-how she needs? Are they writing to English Profs? Certainly they no longer teach actual students at the MLA. Certainly they no longer interact in the real world.

  • What about library copies?
  • Posted by BethAnn Zambella , Library Director at Elizabethtown College on March 11, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Most students don't purchase a style guide, at least until they declare a major, since they are often required to use several styles. Instead, they use library copies. Is there a way for multiple users to access the Web site when the library purchases copies of the guide?

  • Library use of MLA Handbook
  • Posted by Rosemary G. Feal , Executive Director at Modern Language Association on March 11, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Each copy of the Handbook purchased by a library enables a librarian to set up an account on the MLA Handbook site and to display the site for instructional purposes and to provide reference assistance to students. I hope this feature will be helpful. Rosemary G.Feal, MLA Executive Director

  • Posted by Donald E. Hall on March 11, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • I disagree with the previous posts. As someone who has taught many sections of classes with strong research methods components, I need students to have the book in class as we work on various research issues, so we can all turn to page 35 and look at citation of personal interviews (let's say). If we ever reach the point where all classrooms are fully tech-equipped, then the hard copy might be dispensible. But not yet.

    I haven't seen the new edition yet, but am looking forward to it. The changes as detailed in the article here seem sensible and timely.

  • library access to handbook website
  • Posted by librarian on March 11, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • From the MLA handbook website:

    If you are an institutional owner of a copy of the MLA Handbook, such as a library, you are not authorized to make available a user name and password for general use, such as by library patrons. The user name and password are not intended to be used as a “site license.”

    It seems that these are the only "permitted uses" for libraries:

    • Display the Site or portions of it on a screen or monitor for the purpose of face-to-face classroom instruction.
    • Display the Site or portions of it on a monitor in a library for the use of an institution’s librarians as they provide face-to-face reference assistance

    http://www.mlahandbook.org/fragment/terms_of_use

  • Library Use of MLA Handbook
  • Posted by Judith C. Avery , British and American Studies Librarian at University of Michigan Library on March 11, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • Ms Feal's response to the question about library use is rather vague.  Does this mean that each library can set up an account for all faculty, staff, and students at that institution to use, with that account connected to one purchased copy of the Handbook?   If that is the case, I'm sure we're all going to be very happy with this as an alternative to the access we usually purchase for web resources.    Or does that mean that only Librarian X, who has negotiated the purchase of the one library copy, is able to use it for answering reference questions but cannot give the access number either to the student or to colleagues?   Or is there some middle ground?   If each faculty, staff, and student user has to purchase his/her own paper copy, we have just taken an enormous step backwards.

  • library access, part duex
  • Posted by Rudy Leon , Learning Commons Librarian, Undergraduate Library at UIUC on March 11, 2009 at 4:00pm EDT
  • Rosemary, is that "account for instructional purposes" the same as "access to the web site for all the same people who have access to the physical book sitting in the reference section of the library"?

    Generally libraries buy physical books through different processes than resources that need to be proxied or set up in special ways online. Can you explain how the online access for library copies is set up, or point us to a website where all of this is clarified?

  • MLA ... so cute
  • Posted by RhetProf , Associate Professor of English on March 18, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • One wonders, sometimes, what MLA would do if it ever actually became useful or relevant. Each edition of the handbook makes even sillier rules than the former and none of them are about the value of citing work, not for professors/researchers who use them or the students who learn various citation systems. One also wonders what would happen if MLA actually involved writing teachers and those knowledgeable about online writing and research in their discussions of how to cite non-print-based texts. But why would these folks ever talk to anyone but themselves, right? Who could know more than they?

  • Posted by Jessica , Teaching Fellow on April 16, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • I find that students rarely use the web or CD components of English textbooks and handbooks, though they are all too likely to use technology to Google terms from a paper prompt and then plagiarize the resulting websites. In other words, I consider the CD/web components of most textbooks to be unnecessary, and I expect that MLA's Web component will be no different.

    However, I think it ironic that MLA is accused of being irrelevant and out-of-touch just when it has taken steps toward greater incorporation of technology. Brokeharvardgrad, you might consider that students have been obliged to buy and use books since the advent of the printing press, so that's hardly an imposition. Piss Poor Prof, professors need not cater slavishly to the preferences of "digital natives," as you term our freshmen, since students will consider citation handbooks to be out of style no matter in what format they are presented.

  • Secondhand copies -- zero value?
  • Posted by Robin Shapiro , Reference Librarian at Portland Community College on April 16, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Since the online access code is consumed by the first purchaser, the secondhand value of the MLA handbook will be virtually nil. What a waste of paper and of students' money -- so many will use it only for required freshman comp courses, then go on to APA, CSE, or some other style for their majors.