Search News


Browse Archives

News

Big Name, Thin Résumé

March 11, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The president of Roger Williams University is defending the process by which his son was hired for a fund-raising job, weeks after a similar move helped spur a no confidence vote against the president of the University of New Mexico.

Roy Nirschel’s son, Chris Nirschel, 26, was hired several months ago for the position of regional major gifts officer, the university’s student newspaper reported last week. As advertised, the position called for minimum qualifications of “a bachelor’s degree” and “five years of fund-raising experience in a nonprofit or higher education organization.” University officials acknowledged that Chris Nirschel has no formal fund-raising experience, but they would not say whether he ever completed his bachelor’s degree. He did attend Roger Williams for a time, however, and officials say that experience was an important factor in his hiring.

Roy Nirschel said Tuesday that he played no role in the hiring of his son, and that he specifically asked to be left out of the decision.

“I said I can’t be involved in the conversation, much less the hiring,” Nirschel said.

Nirschel said he did not think the hiring of his son fit the widely accepted definition of nepotism.

“If a candidate is given special consideration because he or she is a family member [or] a friend and they displace a candidate who is more qualified, that’s nepotism. That’s inappropriate,” he said. “I’m making the assumption, having not been involved in the search, that Chris did not displace any quote ‘more qualified’ candidates.”

Chris Nirschel declined an interview request, saying “I’m not going to answer any questions. I don’t need distractions from my work. I take pride in what I do, and I love the university.”

When the University of New Mexico offered a position to President David Schmidly’s son in October, it prompted such outcry from faculty that Brian Schmidly decided not to take the $94,000 job as associate director of sustainability. The issue, however, continues to haunt David Schmidly, who received a no confidence vote from the faculty in late February.

Howard Snell, president of New Mexico’s Faculty Senate, said the hiring of Schmidly’s son was one of a number of factors that has stirred faculty criticism of the president. Apart from complaints about high pay for administrators, the Senate’s “no confidence” resolution specifically cited outcries of “cronyism and nepotism” about recent hires.

“There was consternation on campus when that issue occurred, and I think that the main outcome is a desire to have clear policy about familial hires so that rules and policies for that are clear,” said Snell, a biology professor. “I think that’s what caused some of the confusion with President Schmidly’s son. From one interpretation that was within policy, and from another person’s interpretation it might not have been.”

Faculty at Roger Williams have raised no formal objections about Nirschel's son being hired, and the president of the faculty senate said Tuesday that he was not even aware it had happened.

Policy: Relatives Must be "Best Qualified" Candidate

As late as Tuesday afternoon, Roy Nirschel said he'd just spoken with his general counsel's office who "didn't really recall" whether the college had a nepotism policy, adding that it wasn't until a year and a half ago that the college's trustees even adopted a conflict of interest policy. After the publication of this story Wednesday, however, the university's communications office sent an e-mail to Inside Higher Ed clarifying that the university does indeed have a nepotism policy.

"Relatives may be appointed to faculty and staff positions when it has been clearly established that they are the best qualified candidate," according to the policy. [This story has been updated from an earlier version].

The college's Board of Trustees raised no objections to the hiring of Chris Nirschel, according to Peter Wilbur, the former vice president for university advancement who made the hire.

“It was totally transparent,” said Wilbur, who now holds the title of vice president for strategic planning and government relations. “Not only did I announce it at a subcommittee [of the board], but it was also discussed at a [full] board meeting. No one had an issue with it.”

The university’s conflict of interest policy, which was passed by the board under President Nirschel’s advice, does not specifically forbid family members from working with each other. The policy emphasizes, however, that any such relationships must be disclosed.

Andy Brantley, president of the College and University Professional Association for Human Resources [CUPA-HR], said any college should take careful steps to insure familial hires don't raise conflicts of interest.

“In endorsing this [hire], my hope would be that the Board of Trustees has very clearly outlined areas to ensure that no conflict of interest can occur,” Brantley added. “That’s the bottom line.”

Chris Nirschel does not report to his father, but his boss does. Lynn Fawthrop, senior vice president for enrollment and advancement, said she would not be fearful to tell the president that she needed to fire or reprimand his son.

"If he was not living up to the expectations I would certainly say so," she said.

Raymond D. Cotton, a Washington lawyer who specializes in compensation issues in higher education, said it would make sense to change Fawthrop’s reporting requirements on matters related to the president’s son, allowing Fawthrop to discuss the younger Nirschel's performance or other issues with someone other than the president.

“These [private] institutions have an awful lot more flexibility than the publics do, but one way to resolve it is to say this person reports to the president on everything except Chris. That’s what I would do," Cotton said. "That would avoid, to the extent you can, the appearance issue.”

As president at Roger Williams, Roy Nirschel has been an outspoken advocate for the highest ethical standards. In the wake of the 2005 scandal involving American University's then president, he wrote an opinion piece for Inside Higher Ed, chiding university presidents and boards that don’t embrace the “clear, rigorous” guidelines of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB). The AGB doesn’t have guidelines that strictly relate to nepotism, but the association stresses the need to guard against even the appearance of conflicts of interest.

Susan Johnston, executive vice president of the AGB, said it “sounds pretty good” that Roger Williams officials consulted trustees about the hiring of the president’s son. That said, there are obvious potential problems with any such hire, she said.

“When one hires one’s family, the potential for conflicts of interest, including the appearance of a conflict, becomes sharper,” Johnston said.

Other Candidates 'Too Damn Steeped in Tradition'

No one at Roger Williams is suggesting that Chris Nirschel fully met the qualifications that were outlined in the advertisement for the position he now holds. He did sales work at the University of Phoenix, but Fawthrop said “I don’t believe he had any formal fund-raising experience."

As for Nirschel's education, the university won't confirm whether he holds a bachelor's degree, citing the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). Universities routinely confirm such basic information without fear of FERPA violations, but Fawthrop said the university could not release the information when "we have something signed" that explicitly forbids disclosure. The U.S. Department of Education did not respond to an inquiry Tuesday about whether any such limitations exist.

Wilbur, who hired Nirschel, said he saw potential in Chris Nirschel and decided not to strictly abide by the parameters set in the job advertisement.

“I reserve the right as the executive for that position to not paint by the numbers if I see some opportunity," he said.

To apply Roy Nirschel’s definition of nepotism, it would be unfair if Chris Nirschel had been given the job over a more qualified candidate because of his family connections. Roy Nirschel said he felt confident that didn’t happen, in part because the university has had “a devil of a time” filling positions in its development office.

Wilbur echoed the president’s sentiment that filling fund-raising positions has been challenging, even in an environment where nonprofits are struggling and laying off people with fund-raising experience. That’s not to say there wasn’t interest in the position. Wilbur said he had a stack “an inch and a half” thick of resumes from people applying for the job. The number of applicants, however, “doesn’t mean we had a lot of qualified people” vying for the position, he said.

“Some of them were just too damned steep in tradition,” Wilbur said of the more experienced candidates.

Wilbur didn't discuss Nirschel's exact salary, but said the president's son is being paid less than his more experienced counterparts.

"We’re still paying him only 60 percent of what we pay other gift officers. So the next headline will be 'University taking advantage of president's son,' " Wilbur said with a laugh.

Chris Nirschel's salary will likely have to be made public eventually, because new disclosure rules for non-profit organizations require presidents to report compensation of relatives that work within the organization.

University Knew of Arrest Record

Chris Nirschel’s position is new to the university. As a regional gift raiser, he’s stationed in Hoboken, N.J. and only comes to campus about once a month. In creating a new approach to fund raising, which combines development and student recruitment, Wilbur said the university was more concerned with sales potential and personality than fund raising experience per se. Nirschel had the “enthusiasm” and, frankly, a name that might help establish relationships with donors and future students alike, Wilbur said.

“Chris, he had the energy and personality,” Wilbur said. “Yes, he had the name. I’m not going to sit here with teeth in my mouth and say I didn’t know his name.”

In addition to a name, Chris Nirschel has an arrest record. Nirschel was arrested in 2004 for procuring alcohol for a minor and possession of a weapon – not a firearm, according to the Bristol Police Department’s Web site. He was arrested again in 2005 for driving with a suspended license, the Web site notes.

Wilbur, who has been at the university for nine years, said he knew of Nirschel’s arrests and chalked them up to “growing pains.”

Nirschel’s past behavior, however, is not as important as his future behavior, according to Cotton, a partner in Mintz Levin law firm. If Nirschel were to run into trouble with the law again, it could create a professionally awkward situation for his father, Cotton said.

“The fact of the matter is that the president, if he got involved in it, would have a much easier time giving another employee a second chance than he would his son,” Cotton said. “Chris is walking on eggshells as I see it. Everything he does reflects on his father.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Big Name, Thin Résumé

  • Nepotism? Absolutely
  • Posted by Wossamotta U. on March 11, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • A good president would have insisted that this person NOT be hired, regardless of familial ties. Recusing himself from the search only implies the president's desire to avoid culpability. Presidents are supposed to TAKE responsibility. A good father would ensure that his son knows the correct path to a succesful career, which in this case includes a bachelor's degree. Again, the silence on this qualification strongly insinuates his son does not have one. Finally, if "steeped in tradition" is taken to mean years of experience and some demonstrated success with six-figure gift solicitation, then that is a tradition worth continuing. I don't care what kind of discount they say they got on this guy, he'll be on campus once a month, and he'll be wining and dining in NYC, on the university's tab, all 30 of the other days. I'm sure he'll occasionally meet with donors, but not having worked his way up (sales for a for-profit corporation does not count), he'll have no respect for the position. If he had been hired as an Assistant Director for Annual Giving, I would have been more amenable to the idea, but Major Gifts Officer? You better believe that's nepotism.

  • whoa!
  • Posted by Idealist on March 11, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Four little words…. Impropriety & ethics violation

  • nepotism, cronyism, call it what you want
  • Posted by worker bee in higher ed on March 11, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • While I cannot find the specific disclaimer in any definition of nepotism that neopitism is nepotism only if the relative is hired over a more qualified applicant, it might very well be true. And if the president had no direct influence (emphasis on direct, since there is bound to be an indirect one) on the hiring decision, this whole situation, while "well explained" and "desperately justified", still reeks; maybe it is not nepotism, but it is for sure cronyism! But then higher ed, just like the board rooms of our companies, is full of cronies - meritocracy is the rule only for the rest of us with no name. Cronyism only appears to become an issue when it is rather blatent as in this case, but no worries (and the bigwigs know they don't have to worry, they are rather thick-skinned anyways - see the attitude of upper mannegament in our current economic crisis!), nothing will change. The only thing that truly annoys me is the accompanying hipocrisy of "we are upholding the highest standards of ethical behavior" - my foot!

  • Leadership
  • Posted by Dr. Katie on March 11, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Not long ago someone wrote that no one person is bigger than the institution they serve. Guess not at RWU. You bet there's a problem here and it starts at the very top.Sure there are excuses to be made, but the fact is, when anyone reads this article, they know it's wrong. Dollars bet that those administrators and faculty at the insitution know it's ethically wrong also, but, until the President fails, all will step into line and not say a word.

    Except of course, if the President were a woman, or an ethnic minority, alas, she or he would be out the door already.

  • Posted by bystander on March 11, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • My son lost his job last week--the little company failed entirely. Sure wish his dad were president of a college b/c he could maybe become a major gifts officer. He does know how to shake the money tree, after all (Mom & Dad) so maybe could do the same elsewhere. Like this young man, he too has no actual fund raising experience or bachelor's degree, so would be as well qualified, and he's charming too, and would definitely be willing to come to the office one day per month--and probably at less than 25% of what would ordinarily be paid someone who knows how to do this kind of work already.

  • something rotten?
  • Posted by bradley bleck , English Instructor at Spokane Falls CC on March 11, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • I could get behind the hire if this person was the best available, but in these tough times, I can't imagine that they didn't get a single application, or interview a single person, who didn't meet the qualifications. That doesn't mean they would necessarily do the better job because they are better on paper, but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, well, doesn't seem particularly transparent. And what job applicant doesn't sign a waiver allowing for sharing info such as the place one earned (or didn't earn) their degree?

  • Violation of ethics and accepted recruitment procedures
  • Posted by DrBob , Lecturer in Psychology at Indiana University Kokomo on March 11, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • If I were one of the candidates who did meet the requirements as stated in the advertisement, I would sue Roger Williams University for violation of accepted standards of recruitment and hiring. I have worked in 4 different states and participated in recruitment and hiring. In each of these states I have always been advised by our affirmative action representative and by the state Attorney General that what you advertise for you have to hire. If you want to change the parameters of the search, you must shut the search down and re-advertise. The EEOC might be interested in knowing more about the conditions of search and hiring.

  • I Feel A Couple of Haikus Coming On
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 11, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • Hey Pops ... Got a job? / I’m between gigs now-a-days / I think “You da man!”

    Hey Son, how ‘bout this? / Problems? ... I’ll cover your ass. / Dad Comes through, eh Chris!!!

  • Big Name, Thin Resume
  • Posted by George Patsourakos , Retired at Roger Williams University on March 11, 2009 at 6:30pm EDT
  • The fact that the son of the president of Roger Williams University was selected for a fund-raising position requiring five years of fund-raising experience -- and the fact that he has no fund-raising experience -- indicates that he was selected because his father is president of Roger Williams University. The University's Board of Trustees needs to remove this new hiree and reprimand his father, in order for Roger Williams to be exonerated from this stigmatized scenario!
  • Bad Fundraising Policy
  • Posted by Nick Foust on March 11, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • Ethics aside, administrative staff should have pondered more deliberately the implications his son's hire would have on the overall fundraising efforts of the University. Times are tough--its difficult as it is to meet revenue goals and convince current and new donors to support non-profits. People are careful with their money. There's more to winning over prospective donors than flashing a notable last name their direction. People must be inspired. They must be approached by enthusiastic individuals who will deliver an inspiring yet HONEST presentation of the school's goals and projects. I wonder what his son's response is when asked what degree he has from Roger Williams University or what year he graduated. Does he lie or tell them he never completed his degree? How is sending a non-graduate out into the community reflecting on the overall mission of any higher education organization? Donors have to be convinced of the importance of the cause, which in this case would be education. The decision to hire someone without an education to advocate on behalf of an educational institution is contrary to common sense and is likely to directly affect the fundraising success of the organization; which in these times, no school can afford.

  • Reverse Discrimination
  • Posted by comment12 , Student at Loyola University on March 11, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  •  

    While I do not agree with the attention that this matter is receiving, if it must get notoriety, I think it would be more appropriate to focus on the notion of reverse discrimination.  Many of the above comments are based upon two unfounded assumptions: 1. Chris Nirschel is not qualified to fulfill such a position, and 2. other candidates applied for the position and were turned down because of Chris's connection to the president. I do not understand why it so controversial for Chris to have been hired at the university if he is indeed qualified for the position; to me this is reverse discrimination.  Essentially, this means that an individual should not be hired for a position that they are clearly qualified for if they have ties to an individual who works at or in close proximity with the establishment. If this is so, I would approximate that many people would be out of a job. Additionally, lets take this idea further and question the credibility of all the students who attend a university that their parents work for. Are these students qualified to attend such universities, or did they get accepted because their parents are employees? Furthermore, is it fair that these "unqualified" students essentially took the place of more qualified individuals simply because their parents work at the university. The purpose of such an example is to say that such a mentality, which is displayed by the above article and readers, is an extremely slippery slope? 

    It is extremely common for individuals to utilize various connections for purposes of obtaining possible employment opportunities; this is not to say that such connections guarantee employment.  It might be true that Chris would not have known about the fundraising job opening at RWU if his dad did not work at the university; however, it is a complete assumption to say that Chris got hired because of his dad’s position. Furthermore, in my opinion, being the presidents son and knowing the ins and outs of the university, would most likely make Chris more than qualified for the position of essentially "selling" the university to prospective donors and students. 

     

     In sum, I do not believe that it is fair for Chris and the president of RWU to receive such scrutiny based upon pure assumptions.  The know facts, which are that Chris is a charismatic, qualified individual who is being paid equal to or below other individuals in a similar position, do not warrant such attention, and disproval. 

     

  • You're Kidding, Right?
  • Posted by Shane Pressley on March 11, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • A college drop-out advocating the support of higher education? You're kidding, right?

  • Please Get Real About This
  • Posted by Franco A. Lentini , Student at University of Southern California on March 12, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Have any of the people behind these self-righteous, pompous and phony missives ever worked in fundraising for a university? Having held such a position in the "major gifts" department of a UK university (incredibly without a degree of any kind unless one counts High School), I found the job both dismal and Quixotic. Why anyone would apply for such a job, even in such a dour economy is well beyond me? The part of the story that I find incredulous is that there would be more than one applicant for this position. It would seem to me that the senior Nirschel may have cajoled the younger into taking the rather thankless job. In searching the website of Roger Williams is appears that President Nirschel has a preternatural gift for fundraising. Perhaps there is some genetic disposition towards fundraising? Congratulations to Roger Williams for finding someone to fill this most difficult of positions in the midst of an epic economic meltdown. Better him than me.....

  • Missed the Point
  • Posted by Dr. Katie on March 12, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • Sadly, the point of the unethical behavior of RWU in this case, appears to be lost in some of the comments. I still guarentee, if the President were a woman, she'd be out.

  • Posted by Catherine on March 15, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Clearly the kid isn't qualified; his hire blatent pandering. To VP Wilbur: seriously? You are going to tell the president that the kid has to go? I highly doubt it. Fundraisers will do anything to avoid conflict - it is built into the job. I get the whole nepostism angle, it isn't the first or last time this will happen. What tripped me up was the word alcohol and weapon in the same sentence. Growing pains? How about complete and utter lack of judgement. And the kid is tucked away in a regional office? Nice. And as for the person who made the comment about it being okay if it the kid was hired for an annual fund job, give me a break. Annual fund work is keeping colleges and universities afloat in this economy.

  • Posted by CR on March 17, 2009 at 12:00am EDT
  • Missing academic credentials of the son aside, you'd think that, considering the significant effort Roger Williams University has been taking to promote itself on a national scale since President Nirschel's hiring, he might have been prudent enough to avoid risking even the appearance of impropriety, considering the damaging effect it could have on the University's reputation, which he is ostensibly at least in part the safeguard of, and thus advised his son not to apply for this particular fundraising job...

  • just plain wrong....
  • Posted by Stewart Home , attorney at private practice on March 20, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • This has been a very clear issue in colleges and universities...this was WRONG! President Nirschel knows better and the fact that he even allowed his son to apply means that he wields way to much power in that institution. Otherwise, knowing the consequences, he would have insisted that his son not apply for such a position in the institution. He got the job just on his application, whether qualified or not, because his dad was president. Nirschel knows better than to put his staff in that comprimising position, but did it anyway. Most likely no BA degree, earning a high salary, living in yuppee Hoboken for a institution on RI. Power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  • It's simple
  • Posted by A neighbor , none at none on March 23, 2009 at 7:30pm EDT
  • OK. How many educators does it take to learn the educational level of a school representative? Answer: one. Check his business card. But do it quickly, he may get an honorary degree before you know it.

  • Ineffective Ranting of the Diseffected
  • Posted by Henry Porter , None at BA from RWU on March 25, 2009 at 5:45am EDT
  • When I graduated from Roger Williams, more years ago than I care to recall, the acronym RWU stood for ' Rich White Underacheiver'. The school was

    universally regarded as a joke. If memory serves, Dr. Nirschel took over in 2001, just as the horrific events of 9/11 took place. He took hold of the place

    with a steady hand and has guided it to unimaginable heights. The idea that Roger Williams University, once the epitome of mediocrity, is now one of the

    top universites of its' size in the northeast is an astonishing achievement. I know nothing of his son and his abilites, and as an alumni with a vested

    interest (two teenage daughers headed to the school), I am thrilled by the incredible progress. It is after all, private university and the absurd,

    pecksniffian grousing sounds a bit like the disgruntled squawking of old line middling RWU instructors who Nirschel may have replaced while reinventing

    the place. Good heavens the griping of these inane people, with their pithy rants...... as the young people say, "get a life"