Search News


Browse Archives

News

Grade Inflation Seen Rising

March 12, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A professor who has crusaded against grade inflation by gathering and publicizing data has released his largest analysis to date -- and it suggests that grade inflation continues to be a broad problem across much of higher education. The figures may embarrass some colleges and renew a debate over whether students experience enough rigor.

The new analysis found that the average grade-point average at private colleges rose from 3.09 in 1991 to 3.30 in 2006. At public colleges and universities, the increase was from 2.85 to 3.01 over the same time period. The study also examines -- and seeks to refute -- the idea that students are earning better grades simply because they are better prepared. The greatest increases in grades appear to be coming at flagship public universities in the South and at selective liberal arts colleges.

The study was done by Stuart Rojstaczer, a retired Duke University professor who created GradeInflation.com to document these trends. For this study, he significantly expanded the numbers of institutions examined, and the time frame.

In addition, Rojstaczer says that his new study shows that it is possible to tame grade inflation. He finds that Princeton University has largely done so, by making an issue of grades and encouraging professors to give a broader distribution of grades. Further, he finds that there is one sector that has held the line against inflated grades: community colleges.

Rojstaczer's findings will probably resonate with professors, many of whom regularly bemoan grade inflation and say that students are conditioned to expect good grades just for showing up, and that professors who refuse to go along get punished with harsh course evaluations. Many professors who are off the tenure track or who are pre-tenure report great fear of being punished by students (and then not rehired) if they gain a reputation for tough grading, and studies have found correlations between being an easy grader and earning good ratings at RateMyProfessors.com. But other researchers question this study and conventional wisdom and say that reports of grade inflation are themselves inflated.

Various professors start campaigns against grade inflation, but Rojstaczer has stuck with the issue. He gained national attention in 2003 with an op-ed in The Washington Post called "Where All Grades Are Above Average," an article in which he confessed to having let two years pass without awarding a C. The Web site followed, but the new data represent more colleges than ever before and come after several years in which he didn't update the statistics.

In an interview, he said that he releases this information because he believes that not much more is really needed to tackle grade inflation. "People say this issue is complicated and difficult. It really isn't. It's incredibly simple," he said. "You get so fat that it effects your health. You lose weight. I really don't see all the problems in reducing GPAs that everyone else seems to see."

He noted that once Princeton deans said that the issue mattered and encouraged tougher grading, there was a significant change. "How difficult is this?" Rojstaczer asked. Other colleges and universities have seen the opposite trend. At Brown University last year was the first time, for example, a majority of undergraduate grades were A's, up from 42.5 percent a decade earlier.

The issue matters, Rojstaczer said, because "the alternative is a student body that frequently misses class, never prepares in advance, studies about 11 hours a week if they are 'full time' students, and drinks itself into a constant stupor out of boredom. That's not an acceptable alternative anywhere."

Clifford Adelman, a senior analyst at the Institute for Higher Education Policy and a leading education researcher, has conducted extensive studies of grades and degrees, using national data sets, and he believes that grade inflation is marginal -- and that the issue receives far too much attention. (Adelman has criticized the quality of Rojstaczer's past work, and Rojstaczer has in turn been critical of the critique.)

"If grade inflation is so rampant, how come at least a third of kids who start in four-year colleges don't graduate?" Adelman asked.

"My point is not that there is no grade inflation, rather that inflation in the judgment of human performance is something that cannot be proved," he said. In many cases, he said, there is a far more significant shift going on that gets missed in the discussion of grade inflation. "A significant proportion of grades that are not really grades" are being given, Adelman said, as students and professor embrace "alternative signs of student academic behavior" in a way that "devalues grading."

Added Adelman: "I see grade devaluation as a more serious problem for a variety of reasons that Stuart would never consider, but that academic administrators and enrollment managers everywhere instantly understand when the trend is pointed out." Adelman said that he stands by his earlier work, based on national data, that there is not a national surge in grades.

Community College Standards

Rojstaczer's work focuses on four-year institutions, and most of his criticisms relate to traditional college age students. But he notes in his new report that data from community colleges suggest that professors in that sector have been getting tougher in recent years, and have never abandoned the C. Rojstaczer had data from the entire California Community Colleges system (the largest in the United States) and selected other community colleges -- and he found none of the patterns that bothered him in the four-year sector.

Michael R. Chipps, president of Mid-Plains Community College, in Nebraska, said his institution and other community colleges take grades seriously for a number of reasons. One is that community colleges use grades to track how their students do when they transfer to four-year institutions (and he noted that many community college graduates perform better than students who started at four-year institutions). In addition, he noted that because community colleges admit students with a range of academic backgrounds, accurate assessment is seen as important to help students enter the best possible programs and to track their progress.

"Community colleges want the rigor to be sufficient, so that our students can not only prosper in the world of work, but seriously compete with students at the senior level institutions," Chipps said.

Kay McClenney, director of the Community College Survey of Student Engagement, which is based at the University of Texas at Austin, said she hoped the study would lead to more questioning of grades as a measure. "Notoriously, grades are unreliable, and they include measures of just about everything -- attendance, class participation, involvement in group discussions or campus events, and faculty bias -- as well, hopefully, as some aspects of student learning," she said. "I don't know anyone who believes that an A in English 301 means the same thing in my class as in the class down the hall, much less in the class across the country."

As to community colleges, she said that close student-faculty interaction at community colleges encourages frank evaluations. "Teaching and learning is what community college faculty do."

At a reception for college composition instructors Wednesday night in San Francisco, professors from community colleges were not surprised that grade inflation seemed less present at their institutions than at four-year institutions -- and they were proud of their standards, too.

Sandie McGill Barnhouse, who is chair of the Two-Year College English Association and who teaches at Rowan Cabarrus Community College, said that community college professors see it as part of their mission to teach students of a "diversity of entering skills," so there is no assumption that everyone in the class will do well. She said that many community college students haven't had great high school experiences and so aren't the type to demand an A on everything.

Sharon Mitchler, associate professor of English and humanities at Centralia College, a community college in Washington State, said that she thinks grading at community colleges may be more honest because that's the way students want it. Her students, she said, are focused on how improving their writing will help them professionally, and they want to see that the course will give them new skills they can use, not a letter grade.

"If I gave out all A's, my classes would think I'd lost my mind," she said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Grade Inflation Seen Rising

  • EARTH TO IVORY TOWER
  • Posted by finaidfollies on March 12, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • "If grade inflation is so rampant, how come at least a third of kids who start in four-year colleges don't graduate?" [Clifford] Adelman asked.

    Um...could a relentless upward cost spiral have something to do with it?

  • Posted by Assistant Professor on March 12, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • "Um...could a relentless upward cost spiral have something to do with it?"

    I doubt that financial issues alone prevent 1/3 of students from graduating with a 4 year degree.

    Anectdotally, the main thrust of this article is valid: Earlier this semester, I was confronted by a student about her grade from the fall. She not only thought that her merely showing up to class should have given her a better grade than what she earned, but that she should be given the chance to do extra credit (after the semester was over!) to improve her grade. Her sense of entitlement was palatable; finding no satisfaction from my unwillingness to give her an improved grade, she complained to my department head and the Dean - threatening to write a letter to the president.

    All because she "feels" that she's "too good" for the grade she got. Perhaps if she worked as hard studying for the course as she has gone complaining about it, she could have done better.

  • A consequence of this.....
  • Posted by kurt on March 12, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • I don't think institutions fully appreciate how much grade inflation has increased over time, and they compare grade point averages without accounting for the change. A student who graduated college in 1990 and a student who graduated college in 2005 had different experiences due to rising grade inflation, so the 1990 GPA is grade deflated compared to the 2005 GPA. If institutions don't take grade inflation into account when looking at older students, they will falsely assume the higher grade point averages of younger students mean the younger students were better students even though the higher GPA is due to grade inflation alone.

    As colleges hire more adjunct labor, the pressure on those adjuncts to please the consumer is a lot stronger than the pressure on tenure track faculty. Tenure track faculty aren't just fired for any whim or reason. Adjunct faculty are, and they have to ensure they don't get student complaints in order to keep their jobs.

  • Posted by frustrated on March 12, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • Can we spell "retention"; too often retention mandates force the reluctant to give in to grade inflation.

  • Grade Inflation
  • Posted by Ethan S. Burger , Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University Law Center on March 12, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • The piece might better have been titled "Grade Inflation Continues to Rise."

    Today, students are consumers of services. This is not surprising since not only is the cost of higher education costly (with some exceptions) and educational institutions have to compete for students in order to fill their classes, but also most students have been receiving inflated grades their entire lives in part since they were often competing against less capable individuals.

    Today, the lowest grade one typically can give is a "B-". Most professors over the years find themselves "dumbing" down their courses since dealing with student complaints about grades can be time consuming and awkward. In some cases, students will even file complaints with the academic department (or even higher up). One is lucky to be on the faculty that is committed to maintaining standards.

    Grade inflation is less prevalent in courses where there are exams with anonymous grading. Unfortunately, with the exception of certain entry level courses, this form of course provides the student with the least "value" for their [parents' <?>] money. Furthermore, students usually have the opportunity to determine in advance which professors are the least demanding when giving out grades.

    In seminar courses, there is an opportunity for students to develop relationships with there professors. Students produce papers that are of interest to them. Professors have the opportunity to guide them in the process.

    Since few academics would ever think of sending out a draft article to a journal without having peers comments on them, is it not hypocritical to permit students to do the same.

    High schools have increased the number of AP courses they offer since they recognize that college/university admission committees are well aware of the extent of grade inflation. The SATs in theory test "aptitude" for the freshman year of college -- but little else.

  • adjuncts and grading
  • Posted by dean dad on March 12, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • This study suggests that the facile and commonplace equation of grade inflation with adjunct instruction needs to be examined much more critically. Community colleges, as a whole, have higher percentages of adjunct faculty than do, say, liberal arts colleges, yet cc's are conspicuously immune to grade inflation. If the adjunct trend were really the primary driver of grade inflation, this would be inexplicable.

    There are plenty of other valid reasons to object to the adjunct trend -- and I do -- but this isn't one of them.

  • Grade Inflation
  • Posted by Diogenes , Former associate dean on March 12, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • As a former associate dean of a graduate school of education, I was assigned a review of grades awaded to graduate education students and discovered that a number of inistructors had not awarded any grade lower than A- in years (my review went back only 5 years). In a few cases there were no grades lower than A. There were all good reasons for this: the students were very good, they performed at a high level . . . In the end nothing changed save that I ceased being an administrator and good students continued to be cheated because, however unreliable such statistics are or how well students perform, they derived little benefit from distinguished work.

    Diogenes

  • Faculty quality deflation?
  • Posted by smetz on March 12, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  •  

    Author writes:"You get so fat that it effects (sic) your health. You lose weight. I really don't see all the problems in reducing GPAs that everyone else seems to see."

    Perhaps grades were inflated in his English grammar course?

  • Good employers also use objective testing
  • Posted by Frank on March 12, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • " .. In the end nothing changed .. because, however unreliable such statistics are or how well students perform, they derived little benefit from distinguished work .."

    Actually, there is a reason for students from the professional and "quant" areas to "distinguish" their work.
    More employers, seeing higher-ed grading (and course material) that is 99% useless, administer objective 3rd-party tests. Having worked in academia and the real world, I would not hesitate to make an applicant go through The New York Times and explain facts and figures in the paper.

    And to those who show off their "distinguished" portfolio-work during the interviews -- I expect a clear, precise, and timely explanation of how their arrived at the facts and figures presented. I've seen too many "Mom & Dad" fingerprints on "work portfolios."

    Employers are much smarter than academics. A lot smarter.

  • Posted by LM on March 12, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Ethan Burger got it right. Not only are students "clients," most faculty receive any raises available based on student evaluations. Now faculty have to not only dumb down the courses but also give students the tests in advance and go over the answers in class for them to be able to pass in spite of regularly covering the material in class. When 1/3 of classes are "special need" students, who receive extra exam time, note-takers, and free tutoring, no wonder prices go up. (Without even mentioning the student sport-team members who travel [$$] and miss a large percentage of classes, thus not hearing the material the first few times.) Faculty spend more time re-doing and over-doing the necessary teaching job. Many students really need someone to force them to sit down and study regularly, and to teach them to use a book- or even to read in some cases.

  • Posted by Jim on March 12, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • "If grade inflation is so rampant, how come at least a third of kids who start in four-year colleges don't graduate?" Adelman asked. . . . Uhh, easy answer. Because most students don't leave college because of grades. They leave for other reasons. I am not familiar with this literature, but from my personal experience at four unviersities I would contend that grade inflation is rampant. I would also contend that most of us as faculty know it, sometimes admit it behind closed doors, but for most part have other things to worry about that are more important.

  • More F's, please
  • Posted by Dale , English department at Roanoke-Benson High School on March 12, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I urge us all--from primary school teachers to grad school professors--to revisit the classic Carl Singleton essay, "What Our Education System Needs Is More F's." Google it.

  • grade inflation
  • Posted by Patricia Moran , Director, Disability Services at Blinn college on March 12, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Working with students with documented disabilities at a community college gives me firsthand experience with the sense of "entitlement" so many first year freshman students have. But, the awarding of higher-than-earned-grades, although commonplace even at the community college, never fails to generate dismay and offense. Recently, the president of the student government association at my college failed to meet the required 2.0 GPA to hold office (hardly an unreasonable GPA requirement). He was removed from office by the faculty advisor and the members of the SGA. He protested his removal...his father got involved, ect. Turned into a circus. This kid went to two of his instructors and had the "Fs" he actually earned changed to "Cs"! None of us could believe these instructors would actually commit this outrageous act! This young man decided the institution was not a good fit for him and I couldn't agree more. Kid needed to go home; spending a year as a roofer in Houston, TX in the summer would do him a world of good.

    Good grief - either a student does the work or not and makes the grade or not....everyone has the opportunity to perform.....or not. This is not a hard concept...

    community college counselor and instructor

  • Book about grades
  • Posted by Andrew , Professor, SOC, ANT & SWK at Eastern Connecticut State University on March 12, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • 1. Grades are basically destructive to learning. They serve primarily to give teachers power over students.

    2. Nobody attaches credence to grades except educators. Few employers look at them knowing that they are a poor measure of performance in the real world.

    3. This isn't a new issue See Wad-Ja-Get? The Grading Game in American Education (1971) by Kirschenbaum, Simon, and Napier

     

     

  • Posted by another adjunct on March 12, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • If I gave low grades, I would get low student evaluations. There were a few (count 'em, FEW) unfriendly student remarks on my evaluation forms a couple of years ago--this after having taught here ten years--and I got a most UNsupportive performance review in my Official Personnel File.

    Student feedback started as a way for faculty to improve teaching. I did learn, at first--write larger on the board, and speak louder, and (not getting too technical about it) enhance visual learning. So I wrote much larger, got a microphone, and used some videos.

    But now? I am like an entertainer, a charmer, and who needs personality-plus. (Happily for me, my father was an Irish story teller, so I can spin Blarney as needed.) In my department, the regular TT faculty relish how tough they are, or think they are, but at my adjunct level, oops! One needs to come up with mostly 4s and 5s, or there are plenty more where you came from, fella, bye bye.

  • All things considered
  • Posted by Garcia on March 12, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • "My point is not that there is no grade inflation, rather that inflation in the judgement of human performance is something that cannot be proved." I believe proof of inflation grades can be measured. Survey the employers who hire your graduates.

     

    "Many professors who are off the tenure track or who are pre-tenure report great fear of being punished by students (and then not rehired) if they gain a reputation for tough grading." In addition, Rojstaczer finds "that there is one sector that has held the line against inflated grades: community colleges." Although this may be true for the community colleges surveyed by Rojstaczer, this does not hold true for all community colleges. As one community college tenure-track instructor stated, "Can I fail my entire class!" Our community college enrolls a large number of academically unprepared students and I believe grade inflation occurs in community colleges, for the same fear of rehire.

     

    When an instructor fails to give a student the grade they deserve, the instructor simply places the burden on the next instructor; and so on and so on. Confucius says, "Do not impose on others what you yourself do not desire."

  • Tired of the wrong focus
  • Posted by Higher Ed Administrator on March 12, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Is anyone else tired of focusing on the wrong issue? Grade inflation - give me a break. What are students learning??? What should every college graduate know? How can you assess if they've achieved the learning outcomes that society/employers/parents expect them to achieve?

  • Grade Inflation at Community Colleges
  • Posted by Kay McClenney , Director at Center for Community College Student Engagement on March 12, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • The story and dialogue about grade inflation raise interesting issues. However, I would like to clarify my response. What I said was that even given the fact that community college faculty are focused on teaching and learning, typically working in smaller classes and at closer range to student work, campus users of our surveys -- CCSSE and SENSE -- are concerned about some indications that expectations of students may not be high enough. In fact, students in focus groups actually tell us that." I did NOT intend to suggest, as stated in the Inside Higher Ed story, that "students and professors at two-year institutions are on the same page on standards: both groups worry about and would oppose anything that suggests that "expectations of students may not be high enough." In fact, the concern on both sides is the opposite -- that expectations may sometimes not be high enough.

  • You reap what you sow!
  • Posted by Idealist on March 12, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Grades are one on the few motivating tools a teacher has in their arsenal. Grades are about speaking to the competitive side of human nature. Another writer rightfully said … “Nobody attaches credence to grades except educators. Few employers look at them knowing that they are a poor measure of performance in the real world.”

    Add students! They are thirsty for the all important grade as a measure of self-worth, or more importantly how they stack up against their peers. Being average is a failure in itself! My favorite conversation with a student is one where a student wishes to argue an answer on an exam, not because he/she is correct, but because they don’t want to be wrong!

    Grading has always been about ranking and somewhat subjective, however pandering to the students need to be above average whether they are or aren’t, is in your own hands. Inflated grades may make students feel good temporarily, but what have they learned? Award grades for the right reasons, anything else is unprofessional. Beware; sometimes doing the right thing comes at a cost to your-self.

    I’ll take an honest “C” student anytime, rather than a whole group of self absorbed, full of false expectations “A-“ Prima-Dona’s.

  • Adjuncts in Community Colleges
  • Posted by Adjunct English Teacher , English Instructor at Grossmont Community College on March 12, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • This information about community colleges in California sounds bogus. We are funded the same as K-12, and this means unless we get a minimum of 15 enrolled, we don't get a class, and we don't get paid. In these days of "Ratemyprofessor.com," enrollments shrink unless these students get high grades from an instructor. Since we adjuncts have no contract to guarantee that we can "bump" any adjunct if our class doesn't make the minimum 15, the pressure is on to become "popular". Guess how a lot of adjuncts do this? That's right. They hand out the "As" like candy.

  • LM is right!
  • Posted by Frustrated Faculty , Asst. Professor at APSU on March 12, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • LM wrote:

    "Many students really need someone to force them to sit down and study regularly, and to teach them to use a book- or even to read in some cases."

      The above sentence gets to the heart of the matter, in my opinion. Students spend less time studying and reading these days. I have had students complain that my exams were too hard, but admit that they did not study. My grad assistant and I offer tutoring to assist students with study skills, but get few takers.

       Part of the problem with poor study habits lies in the fact that most students take full-time course loads while working outside jobs. They have little time left in their schedules for quiet study. In many cases, low levels of rigor at the high school level gave students unrealistically high assessments of their own abilities. I have tried to offer tutoring assistance to students scoring low on my exams, only to have the students explain to me that they were honor students in high school, and therefore, CANNOT have a study problem. These students don't feel the need to spend much time studying because of their self-professed superior abilities.

    Of course, I did question whether I have grown more difficult over the years, and that exams that produced  one class averages of  80%, but now approach 60% were somehow at fault. I placed some items from a practice exam which were available to students before the test on the actual exam. Students were made aware of the practice test and that items would be placed on the real test. Scores on these items averaged 60%. This scenario lend evidence for LM's assertion that students don't or can't read/study. Perhaps all of our big retention programs need an old-fashioned "study hall".

  • I’m Glad You Asked
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 12, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • finaidfollies, Assistant Professor, and frustrated seem to think retention and grade inflation are causally (and strongly) related ... and lament the fact that one-third of entering freshmen don’t make it to graduation (I admit I thought it was much worse than that ... less than 50% graduate within six years).

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/education/15graduate.html

    Fortunately Jim hit the nail on the head ... whatever causes those students to “drop out” along the way it is little affected by grade inflation (take that smetz).

    Of course I am well positioned to answer on behalf of the hundreds of thousands who move on without a degree ... and usually get terrible grades before they slam the door on their way out.

    “First, the college experience is just soooo boring, so inconsistent with what I’m looking for in life, I was not motivated by any of that shit. I hardly ever went to class, and I could hardly wait to get out of there.”

    “Second, despite the fact that it was excruciatingly boring, I would have stuck it out if doing so were likely to help me get a decent job upon graduation. But Circuit City has closed up shop, Enterprise Rent-A-Car has cut way back ... as has Best Buy ... and forget about all of the technology companies ... and the manufacturing companies moved to Mexico and from there to China ... and you don’t have to have a college degree to take customer service calls for Comcast. Hell, I could have stuck around BigTime U to get a Ph.D. ... and then what? Right, become a adjunct professor and make McDonald’s wages. No thanks!”

    “You guys have got your heads up your asses. You can’t help anybody get a job. It was a waste of my time and my parents’ money, so I partied for a few semesters, then bummed around from job to job for awhile, applied for nurses’ training at my local community college (but the waiting list was two years), and now I’m learning the produce business at Costco ...health care ... dental ... pharmacy program ... vision program ... 401k ... lots more benefits. When you jokers can help me do better than that, give me a call. In the meantime, I’ll take a few courses at the University of Phoenix ... no classes ... straight A’s. Life is good.”

    http://www.costco.com/Service/FeaturePageLeftNav.aspx?ProductNo=10045087

  • Posted by David Azerrad , Program Officer at American Council of Trustees and Alumni on March 12, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • One thing that is absent from the discussion so far is the all-important question of how to curb grade inflation and allow students, parents and employers to once again trust transcripts. In this regard, interested parties should consult the American Council of Trustees and Alumni’s recently published Measuring Up: The Problem of Grade Inflation and What Trustees Can Do. It reviews the different strategies adopted by universities across the country to address the problem.

  • Try some thoughtful background reading. . .
  • Posted by Cliff Adelman , Senior Associate at Institute for Higher Education Policy on March 12, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • . . .before we hear any more anecdotes. Lester H. Hunt (ed.) "Grade Inflation: Academic Standards in Higher Education," 2008 (August),

    State University of New York Press: 10 essays, including real research with statistical metrics and a lot of background theory

    (e.g. economic) and literature review. They are by people who don't always agree with each other about the nature or scope of the

    problem or problems, let alone what to do about them, but they are thoughtful and do not play at Jeremiah or any other zealot. If

    you sit down and read the material with an open mind, you may never think about the issue the same way again. It's worth a try.

  • grade inflation
  • Posted by Michael Jernigan , Educational Technology Specialist at Crowder College on March 12, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • Grade inflation is not only a problem in the collegiate world, it's also prevalent in the K-12 environment. While I work now in a community college, I taught elementary school for 24 years prior to this position. Each year I had students that were way below grade level in many areas. If I had failed all students who did not meet the set of competencies for the grade level I was teaching I believe I would have lost my job. There were "unspoken" expectancies for most if not all of your students to be passed on to the next grade. That bothered me greatly and is part of the reason I no longer teach elementary school. At the community college level we see many students taking developmental classes. I believe this is directly related to the "unspoken" expectancies still prevalent in the K-12 environment. How does it benefit a student to be passed on to another grade without mastering the competencies at that grade level? It only sets him/her up for failure later on.

  • Wisdom from Princeton
  • Posted by David Ogden on March 12, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • I enjoyed re-reading the original Report to Faculty on Grading Proposals

    http://www.princeton.edu/odoc/faculty/grading/grading_proposals/index.html

    The question and answer section specifically addresses the following questions from Princeton's point of view:

    (*) Why do we grade our students?
    (*) What do we grade when we grade our students?
    (*) Why is it important to address our institutional grading practices? Why do grade inflation and grade compression matter?

    http://www.princeton.edu/odoc/faculty/grading/grading_proposals/04.html

    If you have made it this far down the comment list, I hope you enjoy it too.

  • Isn't Most Attrition Personal or Social - Not Academic?
  • Posted by Jim Greenberg , Director Teaching, Learning and Technology Center at SUNY Oneonta on March 12, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • "If grade inflation is so rampant, how come at least a third of kids who start in four-year colleges don't graduate?" Adelman asked.

    I've been in HE for 30 years and year after year I'm told that the VAST majority of students that don't persist are for social and personal reasons and NOT academic ones. I believe grade inflation is real and that Adelman is mistaken to use this as evidence that it is not.

  • Posted by PS on March 12, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • I have only two responses to this article. First, I do not think grades are a valid measure of what students actually learn. They do measure how well a student can take a test, how well they feel on the day they were assessed, family income/wealth, or how well they were prepared in K-12 schools, but I doubt that grades are too meaningful and are a better measure of other factors, many unrelated to what professors actually do in the classroom. 

    Second, how do the professor respondents to this article feel about a publication with the words "grades and what trustees can do about it"? It is bad enough that Boards are full of vindictive and vengeful politicians more interested in getting revenge (as in the case of a former instructor or administrator) or rewarding crony incompetents than in actual education policy. If there is one shining, blatant factor that holds progress and change back (instead of promoting it), it is Boards. But now, they want to get involved in how you award grades. Get ready...this is only the beginning.

  • GPAs of 4-year college drop-outs: national data
  • Posted by Cliff Adelman , Senior Associate at Institute for Higher Education Policy on March 12, 2009 at 6:45pm EDT
  • Greenberg is right that the primary reason students leave higher ed without degrees is "personal and family." The second reason they more frequently offer is "mood and lifestyle," as in "this ain't my thing." Finances rank third, and their position differs by year in which the student dropped out. Academic reasons only come to the fore in students' explanations among those who dropped out after 5 or 6 years. These data come from the most recently completed national grade cohort longitudinal study from the National Center for Education Statistics. I don't make them up.

    Nor---because the data are transcript-based, hence don't lie--do I make up the cumulative GPAs of those who dropped out. For those who started in 4-year colleges and left for personal and family reasons, it was 1.996; for those who left for mood and life style it was 1.973; for those who left for financial reasons it was 2.013. Now tell me, are these indicators of wonderful performance? These folks may give you other reasons for leaving, but the GPA evidence is telling. When I asked how high grades could be if a third of those starting at 4-year colleges don't earn degrees (and that comes from the NCES data, too) these are the folks I am talking about. Go figure!

  • Posted by Chris on March 12, 2009 at 10:00pm EDT
  • I had a student say on an evaluation "I know research methods is supposed to be hard, but I don't think I should have to question my intelligence." This was a senior in college who had clearly never struggled with material before. Needless to say I got flamed on my evals since I had a C+ average for the course.

    I don't have tenure so gues what? All B's and A's this semester.

  • Grade Inflation Seen Rising
  • Posted by George Patsourakos , Retired at Harvard University on March 12, 2009 at 10:00pm EDT
  • Whatever happened to the bell-shaped curve that instructors used when I went to college some 50 years ago? Using this curve would mean that about 40 percent of the students would get a C; about 30 percent would get a B; about 15 percent would get an A; and about 15 percent would get a D or an F. Instructors determined these grades by using the mean, the median, and the mode to analyze student rankings, based on student performance on their tests. Unfortunately, today too many students lack motivation to study, because they know instructors will give them an A just for attending all the classes of a course!

  • George
  • Posted by Kevin on March 13, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • You probably wouldn't agree George, but the Bell Curve really operates as a cop-out. By providing a ready made distribution, what you really achieve is the ability to absolve yourself from truly doing the careful evaluation of student work to determine what grade they deserve.

    The quality of students in any given class is different, and if I have a class full of students who are all remarkably astute, do the work, and strive to improve their thought processes around the topic material, then those engaged students are going to fall primarily in the A to B+ range. A different class filled with apathetic students who would rather do anything but learn are probably going to fall largely between F and C+. All classes contain a broad range of students, from engaged to apathetic, but it is not right -- in fact it is intellectually lazy - to presume that we should curb students to present a pleasing shape on a distribution curb, regardless of the quality of their work.

  • “Correlation” And Causation
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 13, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • Cliff Adelman just won’t quit, will he?

    He keeps pushing GPA as an “explanation” of why students leave college within six years of their matriculation as freshmen … and I don’t care how complete his (National Center for Education Statistics) data may be. It would be bad enough if he were only witnessing correlation and suggesting causation, but he’s also committing the ecological fallacy -- i.e., drawing conclusions about the behavior of individuals based on his summary statistics – and, truth be known, he doesn’t even know what the correlations are.

    Not to worry, I’ll join the party myself and suggest a generalization based upon anecdotal information about one of my sons.

    1. He entered the University of Michigan (mathematics) in 1997 with lots of AP credits that he decided to ignore. He worked part time at the tech bench and in the install bay at Best Buy.

    2. He was put on academic probation after two semesters.

    3. He was warned again after his third semester, and dropped out (of his own volition and with five Ws) in the middle of his fourth semester. His cumulative GPA when he left was 1.73.

    You may think a student with such a low GPA had not enjoyed the fruits of grade inflation, but he told me, “Dad, I have no idea how I got a 1.73. I haven’t studied at all, and, except for taking a few tests, I haven’t gone to class in more than two semesters.”

    4. For the next four years, he worked full-time at Best Buy, eventually achieving an annual income of $51,000 plus reasonably decent benefits.

    5. He was readmitted to U of M as a provisional student in 2002.

    6. As a full-time student over the next nine semester, with a major that changed from mathematics to physics to computer science, and working part-time at Best Buy, he made straight As and was either on the Dean’s List or was a University Scholar every semester.

    7. His final GPA was 3.1 … those first two years – no matter what you think is “fair” -- were averaged in.

    My point? Of course there’s grade inflation … lots of it. Of course courses are dumbed down … a great many of them. Of course some students can’t hack it, have low GPAs, and leave the university (either voluntarily or because of university requirements) … but not that many. Of course some students choose behavior pattern that result in low GPAs and, quite independent of their GPAs, leave the university … a huge number of them. They were only marking time anyway. Sure they committed academic suicide, but they practically begged the university to wield the weapon.

    So you see, I’m not prepared to argue that strict grading standards lead to low GPAs which in turn lead to students leaving school. I am, however, prepared to argue that, just like my son, the vast majority of those students who leave in the first year or two choose behavior patterns that assure that outcome, and low GPAs are just another consequence of their actions.

    Grade inflation – and probably even dumbing down – are red herrings being drug across the trail of retention.

    And, by the way, Adelman’s figures about one-third of those who enter as freshmen dropping out without graduating in six years is both an underestimate of the actual percentage and is very misleading. It’s a good example to use in your intro statistics course to demonstrate that looking at the mean in the absence of information about the variance is a very bad idea. For a good discussion of the matter, read …

    http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/11B4283F-104E-4511-B0CA-1D3023231157/0/highered.pdf

    and be sure to check out the histogram in Chart 6 (page 6).

  • Posted by old prof on March 13, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Use of the bell curve implies that education is a random process.  If that's the case, why do we bother?  Surely a little assessment and judgement isn't too much to ask.

  • A Long Story
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 13, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • I have been teaching for almost fifty years – at both outstanding and mediocre universities, including one or two mediocre universities with outstanding reputations – and, until about ten years ago the extent to which I inflated grades – and I grade students vis-a-vis their mastery of course objectives – has been minuscule. But ten years ago, I took a job at a business school (1) at a small private university (call it P.U.) in the Lower Shenandoah Valley and (2) named in honor of one of Americas most pronounced and influential opponents of integrated public schools.

    My colleagues led me to believe our students – at least those in the b-school – were capable, and I designed my management science courses under that assumption. I soon discovered my colleagues’ assessments were incorrect, and despite making several adjustments on the fly during my first semester at the university, I ended up with grades fitting an inverted J-distribution and with upwards of 80% of my students making Cs, Ds, and Fs (and not that many C’s).

    I knew this would not work, especially since ...

    1. the university had an acceptance rate of 96% (a fact generally hidden from faculty and definitely hidden from the public).

    2. the university was tuition dependent ... and, therefore, relied on retention just to make a go of it financially.

    3. in my opinion, it was grossly unfair to admit students who had a very low probably of success without providing them with special resources designed to increase the likelihood they could succeed.

    4. in my opinion, the university (overall) had an extremely unfortunate culture for learning.

    5. I was not inclined to give grades away.

    Starting at the beginning of my second semester at P.U., I gave 20-question pre-tests in very basic mathematics and statistics (at the level of high school Algebra I)... the purpose of which was to get a sense of what I would have to cover remedially. I don’t have the data on hand any more, but fewer than 25% of the students could “Graph the equation defined by -6x + 2y = 10” ... and I even gave them the labeled axes. Other parts of that question asked them what the slope of the line was and asked them to show on the graph what the “predicted” value of y was when x = 3.

    The most difficult question on my pre-test was one in which I gave them two linear equations that intersected at (2, 5) and asked them to graph both lines on the same graph and algebraically determine the common solution. I think over four years, less than five students (waaay less than 5%) got that one right. Oh yes, I should mention that (1) two of my courses were required courses for undergraduates (and almost all of my students were juniors and seniors), (2) one was required of MBA students, and (3) the MBA students were not much better prepared than the undergraduates (except for the international students).

    Not being inclined to give grades away, I decided to build remediation into my courses. In addition, in order to avoid being demeaning and to keep my students’ focus on business applications, I decided to integrate remediation throughout the course (when it was needed) rather than introduce almost all of it up front. This “worked” and gradually the distribution of my students’ grades (mastery) changed from inverted J’s to U’s to almost, but not quite, J’s.

    But this “success” came at a cost. My Operations Management course, for example, instead of being a legitimate Operations Management course, was approximately 60%-70% of what I considered to be appropriate for such a course. I simply had no time to cover everything I would normally cover in Operations Management plus do the remediation, so I strategically chose what to include and what to leave out.

    I don’t care how you look at that, I was dumbing down my courses ... and, in my opinion, one would have to bend the truth rather substantially to argue that what I was doing was not also grade inflation. So, in my opinion, I was practicing both dumbing down and grade inflation (in a strange sort of way) ... and I even surprised myself by becoming remarkably comfortable doing what I was doing.

    Post Script. P.U. was not a tenure-granting institution ... we had three-year rolling contracts. So they fired me for “being insensitive to the needs of students.” My replacement has essentially the same course schedule I had, and practically overnight (1) the university is on the U.S. News and World Report “Best Colleges” list, (2) the business school has been accredited by AACSB, and (3) virtually all of my replacement’s students are making A’s and B’s. They must be doing something right.

  • I love giving A's to screw the system
  • Posted by adjunct terrorist on March 13, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I'm an adjunct who has to teach 8 classes at four colleges to make ends meet -- and I don't live that well. I just adore giving A's to students who don't deserve it to screw the system, and the students don't complain. The students don't complain that I don't work them that hard (so I don't work hard) or let them out early, either!

    Academia is a joke. I tell students that if they show up and do the work, they get an A.
    If they don't show up and don't do the work, they get a B.

    My supervisors love me and keep asking me to keep teaching. I have more jobs than I can handle, even with my "light touch."

    What, me worry?

  • So grade inflation is inflating?
  • Posted by Mike Miller , Associate Professor of Mathematics at Corban College on March 13, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • According to the title, grade inflation is rising. Does the author mean to say that grades are going up, or that the change in grades is going up. One may be a problem, the other may be a more serious problem. If grade inflation were declining, they would still inflate, just at a decreased rate.

    You've got to love Calculus teachers.

  • The Trouble With Math Teachers
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 13, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • As much as it pains me to do so, I’m going to take issue with Mike Miller’s post.

    Let’s start with the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of GI; to wit ...

    “grade inflation: a rise in the average grade assigned to students ... especially the assigning of grades higher than previously assigned for given levels of achievement.”

    So just to start the discussion, we imagine there is a fixed level of achievement, but grades -- and, in particular, the average grade -- may change over time. When the average grade is increasing, we call that grade inflation, and when the average grade is decreasing, we call that grade deflation.

    Now look at the first graph in the following URL, but ignore the numbers except as placeholders. Think of the horizontal axis as time and the vertical axis as average grade ... so if this were a really good graph the numbers on the vertical axis would be sandwiched between 0 (all F’s) and 4 (all A’s).

    http://www.teacherschoice.com.au/Maths_Library/Functions/about_polynomials.htm

    As you can see, between -5 and -3 the average grades are going down (grade deflation), and that is also the case for the average grades between -1 and 2. Since we’re not discussing grade deflation, we get to ignore those parts of the curve.

    That means all of the action for us is on the curve between -3 and -1 (grade inflation) and between 2 and 4 (more grade inflation). But is there any difference between the grade inflation between -3 and -1 as compared to the grade inflation between 2 and 4? The answer is damned straight there is!

    As you can see, even though there is grade inflation between -3 and -1, the grades are inflating at a much slower rate ... so, by the time you reach -1 the grades inflate a really small amount over a fixed amount of time. We describe that by saying grade inflation is decreasing. Allow me to say that another way ... “the grades are inflating, but the grade inflation is decreasing” ... and that is clearly not what Stuart Rojstaczer was suggesting. So we get to ignore that part of the graph too.

    On the other hand, if you look at grade inflation between 2 and 4 ... wow! ... it starts out increasing fairly slowly and then it practically jumps off the map in a relatively short period of time. In this case we say grade inflation is increasing ... and that is precisely what Professor Rojstaczer is claiming. You’ve got grade inflation ... and, not only that, the grade inflation is increasing. So there it is ... it is not ambiguous to say, as Professor Rojstaczer did, that “Grade inflation is increasing.”

    Okay, now I’ve got two test questions for Mike Miller.

    1. I take it my explanation was excellent ... clear as crystal. But, the trick I played on everyone was pretending that average grades can keep on trucking (they have no lid). But we all know that average grades are sandwiched between 0 and 4 (there is a lid). So what does that mean? Is Professor Rojstaczer’s claim a physical impossibility?

    2. Maybe you’ll explain the circumstance I skipped; i.e., grade inflation is neither increasing nor decreasing ... it’s constant.

    P.S. And for everyone besides Professor Miller ... the famous economist Joan Violet Robinson said, “I never learned mathematics, so I had to think.” I just can’t tell you how simple and straightforward this discussion would have been if you all had learned just a little mathematics along the way. I could have done the whole damned thing in just three or four lines.

  • The Real Problem with Math Teachers
  • Posted by DFS on March 14, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • Remember. The institution of higher education must encompass all previous knowledge and wisdom in mathematics. As soon as it does less than this, our knowledge and wisdom must wane.

    If a student shows promise in extending this knowledge, and therefore our wisdom, then the student passes, with the appropriate grade. If not, then he Fails. I have learned to be a great believer in letting someone earn their F.

    To the "terrorist," your proteges will eventually be found out by US, and your precious place in our world will be lost. Get over it, since you have obviously not gotten over something unimportant to us math teachers. Perhaps you can dredge up something among sociologists, and author a column on IHE, for example.

    Knowledge is stil knowledge, and we cannot let this perish.

  • Inflated grades are the least of our problems
  • Posted by SusanJ on March 14, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Let's be frank:

    1) the majority of students should'nt be in college at all,
    2) their parents are spending upwards of $30K and expect nothing more from us (despite lipservice to the importance of a liberal arts education to create well-rounded, thinking, compassionate citizens of the world) than that their children will get "good jobs,"
    3) why penalize students for their lack of interest, lack of study skills, lack of intellectual curiosity ... they just don't have what it takes, and most of what we teach, in the humanities, math, or sciences, is entirely irrelevant to what their future employers will be asking of them.

    My problems are that I can't teach to the three or four students in class who ARE competent, that the As these students earn do not reflect their patently superior performance, that they cannot get as rigorous or challenging a course as they deserve.

    Not long ago corporate America picked up the cost of training high school graduates to do the work they needed done. Now they've passed those costs along to parents, who will probably never see a return on their investment.

    Who was it who decided that the purpose of a college education was to serve as a pre-requisite for an entry-level corporate job? Many of my college-educated neighbors are affluent tradesfolk--electricians, mechanics, builders. Their education is obvious in their speech, their critical thinking, their awareness of the world; not in their jobs. And that's the point: in previous generations those of us who had some academic academic capabilities went to college for an education, not as a stepping-stone to (or delay tactic for) entering the adult world of business.

  • Right on Susanj
  • Posted by djk , englastprof at ECU on March 14, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • I couldn't agree with you more. It might cost me my job if the multitudes of students who should not be attending my university left, but the truth is that many students are in higher ed for all the wrong reasons.

    No one mentioned the numbers of students for whom B or higher averages are essential for the continuation of financial aid. That is one factor I hear when C students come to me begging for a grade change.

  • I have been adjuncting since 1976 & haven't been found out yet
  • Posted by adjunct terrorist on March 15, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • To the math professor who says my rampant grade inflation will be found out.

    I've been adjuncting since 1976. I don't teach math. I teach English. And when I teach junior- and senior-level classes I get students even worse than mine who've gotten higher grades than even I could ever justify.

    As for my "precious place" in academia, it's as someone who is exploited. My job is destroy the system, and people like yourself with your pompous "standards."

    Go add that up. There are more of me than there are of you. We adjuncts are the vast majority now, and we'll keep giving A's just to annoy you and everyone but our students and their parents and the administrators who have told me that they don't care about what we do so long as we "show up and hand [our] grades in on time."

  • Standardized Grades As A Solution
  • Posted by FacultyCommitteeOnGradeInflation , Professor at GWU on March 16, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • There is an easy solution that takes the pressure off faculty to inflate grades. Simply report the standardized grade for each class. The standardized grade = (individual grade)/(class mean grade). This eliminates the returns to students from taking courses with inflated grades.

    As someone who teaches one large (270 student) lecture of an introductory freshman class where the material and examination techniques have been constant for 30 years, I have found that student performance has not changed over time and neither have the grades in my classes. However, over that time my grades, compared to the grades that students earn in other freshman courses have gone down by approximately half a grade point! I'm still at 2.7 and the freshman class is now at 3.2! Please don't tell me that there is no grade inflation!

  • "Terrorist" is absolutely right
  • Posted by LBB , Another Adjunct on March 18, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • I was actually let go from one private institution because my evals were too low. Anything less than a 4.5 out of 5 was in fact considered too low.

    I was rehired when other faculty members quit, and I had learned my lesson. I stopped following the official standards on grades. My GPA went up from 2.9 to 3.3. I give lots of extra credit chances. My evals are now in the "acceptable" range.

    Rather than being found out and losing one's precious position for giving out As, a non-tenure track instructor is far more likely to lose one's position for NOT giving out As.

  • LBB
  • Posted by DFS on March 27, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • As a former adjunct, and now not such, I can say that it was only because I defended successfully every grade I posted that I am no longer an adjunct, but full-time. (We have no actual tenure here.)

    Therefore, actually doing the right thing was the right thing to do. Obviously, it was only through the filter of my chair that I was able to survive. It's too bad that there are too many gutless cowards as chairs out there.

    However, it's usually the peer faculty which enable this. Such is the milieu of any "terrorists."

  • Okay, I'll Try It Again,
  • Posted by DFS on March 27, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • Let's see: 2009 minus 1976 equals 33 years of bull. Aren't you proud, Terrorist?

    When I tried to post this comment before, I extended my first choice of the word "bull" by four letters to something else more on point.

    Although not everyone here is a math professor, we can add four plus three and arrive at the correct response. Further, we can do the subtraction of the years, as well, I hope.

    And we should be proud of your post?

  • a statement from a doctor
  • Posted by Dr.Eega , Medicine- Ane at Columbia P&S 03', Mayo 07' on January 2, 2010 at 4:45pm EST
  • alright... i went to Yale university 99'.

    you know what if it wasnt for grade inflation no one would be in graduate school. When i entered Columbia P&S Med the average gpa for getting into medical school was 3.55 and a average mcat of 28. Now its 3.7 and 31.5?, and you know.. its only getting higher and higher, and i ask you.. why? Is there a reason why people need to meet unrealistic requirements for grad school.

    Grade inflation was born because teachers aren't blind, they aren't stupid. They realize if someone is dreaming to be a doctor in a competitive field which requires graduate level education. They need a high gpa, i mean if graduate schools cared less about a grade point average and more about extra- curriculars/internships and competitency in tests like the mcat. If they actually cared about students learning something and not just having a bunch of A's.

    The day that happens, grade inflation will be gone.

    but until that day.. grade inflation will be necessary as more people purse graduate schools with unrealistic requirements.

    But till this day.. i owe a lot to grade inflation, if it wasn't for it. I'd never have attended one of the most prestigious medical schools in the world, and i would never have become the head resident at the best Ane program in the country at the Mayo clinic.