Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Academic Performance Tournament

March 16, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

When it comes to the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Division I men’s basketball tournament, everyone is an expert.

Nearly every observer, from average fan to seasoned sports commentator, has his or her own tried-and-true method of filling out the 65-team bracket and predicting the national champion. Still, most televised predictions and entries to the average office pool are not even close. After all, it would not be March Madness without an upset or two.

Back by popular demand, Inside Higher Ed proudly presents its 4th Annual Academic Performance Tournament. As in years past, we have broken down the entire men’s tournament bracket and advanced those teams with the better performance in the classroom.

To select the winners, we used the NCAA’s Academic Progress Rate -- a nationally comparable score that gives points to teams whose athletes stay in good standing academically and stay enrolled from semester to semester. (Last year, the NCAA began using the scores to impose penalties on teams that underperform academically.) In instances where matched-up teams had the same Academic Progress Rate, we broke ties using the NCAA’s Graduation Success Rate -- which, unlike the federal graduation rate, considers transfers and subtracts athletes who leave college prior to graduation “as long as they would have been academically eligible to compete had they remained.”

Often, this method selects some unlikely teams as national champions. For example, the first two years we played out such a tournament, the winners were both from the Patriot League -- Bucknell University and the College of Holy Cross. In the actual tournament, Bucknell lost in the second round in 2006, and Holy Cross lost in the first round in 2007. Last year, Davidson College won our Academic Performance Tournament. Though the Wildcats did not win the actual tournament last year, they fared better than any of our past champions. Davidson lost in the Elite Eight, after an unlikely run.

This year, our Academic Performance Tournament has its fair share of upsets. No. 16 East Tennessee St. beats No. 1 Pittsburgh, and No. 15 Morgan St. beats No. 2 Oklahoma in the first round. Both of these Cinderella teams advance to our Sweet 16. At the end of the day, however, only one team can be champion. This year, our winner is actually quite plausible.

Click the image below to reveal the entire bracket.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Academic Performance Tournament

  • NCAA Men's Tournament
  • Posted by feudi on March 16, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • What a fun idea! And the results are not terribly different from what they'll be in the basketball version...of course, I never win the pool.

  • Link $Payout to academic performance
  • Posted by Richard A Hesel , Principal at Art & Science Group on March 16, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • I love what this bracket reveals.

    One sure way to ensure that the academic performance of teams competing at this level improves would be to include academic performance as a major factor in the payout of tournament cash. Teams would be rewarded or penalized based on an comparative index of the academic performance of their players.  Since the whole game is motivated by money anyway, cash is the only "rule" with any value.

  • Great Idea!
  • Posted by Herman Beavers , Associate Professor/ English at University of Pennsylvania on March 16, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I like the idea of thinking about March Madness in terms of academic performance. There are schools and coaches who have absolutely abysmal graduation rates. I agree that the NCAA ought to consider graduation rates and academic performance as guidelines for the payout, but I'd go even further. Schools that have graduation rates for athletes below 50% for more than two years would have to direct any money they receive toward improving academic performance. Schools below 30% would be excluded from the tournament altogether. In the era of "one and done," the basketball factories that produce NBA players but not college graduates would be free to continue doing that, but not at the expense of the idea of scholar/athlete.

  • Posted by EWR on March 16, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • I predict that this year the winner of the hoops tournament and the academic performance tournament will be the same.

  • Really
  • Posted by BYU fan on March 17, 2009 at 12:15am EDT
  • Dude... BYU 2nt???

    Really?

    I'm a huge BYU fan.

    They wont make it to the 2nt round.

  • If only...
  • Posted by Seasider on March 17, 2009 at 4:30am EDT
  • I wish my Cougs could play ball like they perform in the classroom. I'm glad to see we top Cornell, though. Here's hoping for a first round W baby!

  • Still some flaws
  • Posted by college sportsfan on March 17, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • This is a great bracket - and a fun way to shed light on graduation - but don't get confused about NBA "factories".

    As I understand the APR there is no penalty -or loss of points- for going pro...but there is if the partial scholarship student's mom/dad loose their job and can't pay for classes. What it can do is keep schools from recruiting students who have no hope of graduating - or going pro.

  • Sorry
  • Posted by Alestro , Student at BYU on March 18, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • Unfortunately, in the real world, academic performance has little to do with athletics. If you think im wrong, please watch as most the bracket picks here are proven wrong in the first round, and most others by the third. It is unfortunate that in basketball and other sports that brains don't usually win over physical skill, but everyone must succeed in some area, and normally most people don't succeed in all of them.

  • not a level field
  • Posted by daddypop , Assistant Professor on March 18, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • "BYU is also notable because its players are often older than most college players due to their service on LDS missions, which do not count against the maximum four years of college eligibility granted by the NCAA."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BYU_Cougars_basketball