Search News


Browse Archives

News

Black (Immigrant) Admissions Edge

March 17, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The election of Barack Obama -- African American because of his African father, distinguishing him from how the phrase is commonly used -- has brought unprecedented attention to the diversity of backgrounds of those covered by the term. Within higher education, one of the more sensitive issues in discussion of admissions and affirmative action in recent years has been the relative success of immigrant black Americans compared to black people who have been in the United States for generations.

A new study has found that among high school graduates, “immigrant blacks” -- defined as those who immigrated to the United States or their children -- are significantly more likely than other black Americans to attend selective colleges. In fact, immigrant black Americans are more likely than white students to attend such colleges.

The research -- published in the journal Sociology of Education (abstract available here) -- is the second major study in two years to try to define the “advantage” of some black applicants to top college. In 2007, a team of researchers published a study in The American Journal of Education finding that while only about 13 percent of black people aged 18 or 19 in the United States are first- or second-generation immigrants, they made up 27 percent of black students at the selective colleges studied.

The new study focuses on the entire population of high school graduates to see where they go to college, comparing immigrant black people, “native-born blacks” (the authors’ terms for others), and white students. The authors are two assistant professors of sociology -- Pamela R. Bennett of Johns Hopkins University and Amy Lutz of Syracuse University.

They begin their study by noting that previous research has documented that a smaller proportion of black high school graduates than white high school graduates enroll in college. But when students of similar socioeconomic status are compared, the black high school graduates are more likely than their white counterparts to enroll. Given the debate about the immigrant factor in analyzing black enrollments, the authors set out to determine “whether this net black advantage is very African American.”

Using data from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988, Bennett and Lutz found that among high school graduates, 75.1 percent of immigrant blacks enrolled in college, a slightly higher percentage than that of whites (72.5 percent) and substantially larger than for native blacks (60.2 percent).

In terms of the college destinations of those who enrolled in college, the rates for immigrant blacks compared to other black students were similar for two-year colleges and non-selective four-year colleges that are not historically black. The biggest gap was at selective colleges, which enroll only 2.4 percent of native black high school graduates but 9.2 percent of immigrant blacks (and 7.3 percent of whites). Native black students are more likely than immigrants to enroll at historically black colleges. But the authors noted that historically black colleges are clearly appealing to some percentage of the black immigrant population, even though those students wouldn’t have the same multi-generation ties to the colleges that are found among many African Americans.

Destinations of High School Graduates Who Enrolled in College

Type of College Native-born blacks Immigrant blacks Whites
Community college 41.9% 41.8% 38.7%
Historically black college 25.5% 18.9% 0.1%
Non-selective, non historically black four-year colleges 30.2% 30.0% 54.0%
Selective colleges 2.4% 9.2% 7.3%

The authors of the new study note that there are key differences in the demographics of the black Americans whose families are new to the United States and those who aren’t. Immigrant black students are more likely than other black students to grow up In two-parent families and to attend private schools -- both characteristics that, across all sorts of groups, tend to indicate a greater likelihood of attending a selective college.

While their study found success for non-immigrant black students in enrolling in some kinds of colleges, the authors note that the sector -- selective colleges -- in which this is less likely is also the sector most likely to lead to many kinds of high wage careers. More examination of the issue is needed, the authors write, to combat “continued socioeconomic inequality.”

That scholarly phrasing may not do justice to the tensions raised by such issues. In 2003, at a reunion of black alumni of Harvard University, Lani Guinier, a law professor, was quoted by The Boston Globe as raising the question of whether black students who are “voluntary immigrants” should be the beneficiaries of affirmative action.

"If you look around Harvard College today, how many young people will you find who grew up in urban environments and went to public high schools and public junior high schools?" she said. "I don't think, in the name of affirmative action, we should be admitting people because they look like us, but then they don't identify with us."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Black (Immigrant) Admissions Edge

  • Posted by Parent on March 17, 2009 at 7:30am EDT
  • A friend who has taught for over 25 years at an elite college that has aggressively recruited minority students has often commented on the differences between immigrant black students and native-born black students. He observes that immigrant black students generally do better academically than and often look down on the culture and work ethic of native-born black students.  Although this would probably be considered politically incorrect in the current environment, a closer look at the sub-cultures from which these two groups come might illuminate the statistics in this study.

  • Culture and Identity Politics
  • Posted by Roger Clegg , President and General Counsel at Center for Equal Opportunity on March 17, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • There are three key paragraphs, IMHO. Here’s the first:

    **The authors of the new study note that there are key differences in the demographics of the black Americans whose families are new to the United States and those who aren’t. Immigrant black students are more likely than other black students to grow up in two-parent families and to attend private schools -- both characteristics that, across all sorts of groups, tend to indicate a greater likelihood of attending a selective college.**

    In other words, culture matters.

    Here are the other two:

    **That scholarly phrasing may not do justice to the tensions raised by such issues. In 2003, at a reunion of black alumni of Harvard University, Lani Guinier, a law professor, was quoted by The Boston Globe as raising the question of whether black students who are “voluntary immigrants” should be the beneficiaries of affirmative action.

    "If you look around Harvard College today, how many young people will you find who grew up in urban environments and went to public high schools and public junior high schools?" she said. "I don't think, in the name of affirmative action, we should be admitting people because they look like us, but then they don't identify with us."**

    In other words, not even the Left really believes the “diversity” argument. If it did, then it would be happy with admitting plenty of immigrants or immigrants’ children, because of course those folks can claim more diverse backgrounds and experiences. But it’s not about diversity, really; it’s about identity politics.

  • Different Emphasis needed?
  • Posted by Bob on March 17, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • Judging from the article and the comments, perhaps is is time to put more emphasis on the economics of the poor than on race. The poor constitute the largest (and getting larger) economic class. Lots of diversity among the poor!

  • It's about affirmative action
  • Posted by Phil on March 17, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • In response to Roger Clegg, you seem so intent on abolishing a clear need. Of course it's about diversity in recruiting "native blacks". Of course it's more than skin color, and of course it's culture. It's all of those things. 

    And, of course there is still a need to apply action affirmatively, which is why most states, most universities, the vast majority of Fortune 500 companies, and the effing federal government all still employ affirmative action principles in hiring and admission.

    Your single-minded pursuit is as old and tired as the single issue politicos who thunder against the evils of democratic socialism and gay marriage. Silly. We've already got those things, they are just expanding because people are getting smarter, not dumber (more of them have gone to college).

  • immigrant African Americans
  • Posted by ronald williams , vice president at the college board on March 17, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • It seems to me to be much ado about nothing. While the first generation of black immigrants identify, for the most part, with the cultire of the parents' country, that identification is lost by the second generation which identifies itself as African American. Since these people will stay in the country, if the issue really is about advancing the opportunities of African Americans, then, I say wait one generation. All of those who identify West Indian or African will soon be calling themselves African American. Still, I am sympathetic the the native born's claims. They remind me of the 1960's in Barbados when St. Lucians, French-speaking and Catholic, came to Barbados to cut sugar cane that Barbadians did not want to cut. The Barbadians' reactions were exactly the same, sort of a Barbados for Barbadians kind of thing. Yet, today, accents lost and religion ignored, it is impossible to tell the difference between the the groups, largely because there is no difference. As for the issue of foreign-born black-skinned people looking down on native-born African Americans, there may be a smidgin of truth to this in the first generation, but it pales in comparison to the many cultural attributes of African Americans these very people assume. It is true that they see themselves, and this is a gross generalization, as more industrious and more focussed in school, but again, the comaprison of these groups should be seen as between native and immigrant groups rather than as simply between two black groups. The immigrant status is not unimportant in this conversation since we are often comparing the most highly motivated group of their nation with the broad base of native African Americans. In the final analysis, I think the issue should be left alone. It will resolve itself.

  • The Differing Cultures Starts Early
  • Posted by Meredith on March 17, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • My daughter's private high school class was 12% African-American. Some entered the school at Kindergarten, others in 7th grade. Every single one of them had immigrant parents that would be considered at least middle class in their native countries. Each student received generous summer academic tutoring, SAT classes, and free summer programs offered from top colleges. One student told my daughter that she wasn't African-American, she was African-Caribbean. They all got into top 30 universities and colleges and the majority are attending top Ivy League institutions. While I don't discredit the capabilities of these students, I think more needs to be done to attract descendants of American slaves to the early education programs that feed into scholarship programs at private schools and highly ranked public schools.

  • Black like whom?
  • Posted by Ralphinjersey on March 17, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • I found Lani Guinier's comments highly offensive -- and I'm white. She seems to believe that racists distinguish between U.S.-born and immigrant blacks in deciding whom to persecute.

  • Black Immigrants
  • Posted by Ezekiel Ette , Professor. Social Work at Northwest Nazarene University on March 17, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • The study shows nothing except the usual first generation effect which is usually present with the children of immigrants. Whether the immigrants are from Andora or Zimbabwe,white or black, children of immigrants have historically done better than native-born because of the push from parents who see America as a land that presents them with opportunities that were not available to them in their homeland. Making an issue out of it among black groups will only bring disunity. I wonder if the authors thought about comparing the rate of admission of black immigrants to other immigrant children.

  • Researchers need to do their homework - more qualitative study
  • Posted by Hilary Lewis , TA at Regional Public on March 17, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  • Some of the assertions of the researchers are factually questionable - for example, that most immigrant black students at selective universities went to private schools.
    This may be true because they may be the sons and daughters of the priviledged class.
    Many, many, many immigrant black students come from middle class, lower middle class and impoverished backgrounds and only do better because for them their education is their singular opportunity to a better life. The value for education is simply part of the culture that is very deeply engrained.
    Immigrant black students DO NOT look down upon American born black students - they only sometimes wonder why they do not take advantage of greater amount of opportunities available to them from birth.
    Immigrant blacks revere the leaders of black America from Rosa Parks to MLK - many immigrant blacks experienced colonialism and participated in the struggle for freedom from colonialists. An experience which has many similarities to the civil rights movement.
    Also, the immigrant black experience has not been as researched as that of other communities. Immigrant blacks face the racial challenges of being black, the challenges of being foreigners per se, the challenges of language, the challenges of negative perceptions of Africa/Caribbean as being "primitive" places, plus the socio-economic challenges that any and every American experiences. Education has proved to be the way to ultimately cope with these challenges and pursue ones dreams like every other person.

  • Black (Immigrant) Admissions Edge
  • Posted by George Patsourakos , Retired Administrator at Harvard University on March 17, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • Immigrant black Americans are more likely to attend selective colleges than black people who have been in the U.S. for generations, according to recent research. This research has failed to address the role of the black family in the U.S. The fact is that third, fourth, and fifth generations of American blacks have a very high percentage of single-parent families. Consequently, many of the children of these single-parent families need to work by the time they are 16 or 18 years old to help to put food on the table; college is not an option for them. In fact, I recently read an article relating to black students in Detroit -- a city with a large black population -- and the article emphasized how sad it is that only 20 percent of black males who attend high school in Detroit graduate!

  • President and Mrs. Obama
  • Posted on March 17, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • President Obama was American-born and raised by a 100% American family. He is not 2nd generation--his absentee father was here on a student visa and did not immigrate. His was not an immigrant household. Instead, he is an African American male whose father left him and his mother. Michelle Obama,on the other hand, is a highly successful black American from a 2-parent household in the South Side of Chicago.

  • Scott Jaschik
  • Posted by DFS on March 17, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • I attended a HBCU for two degrees. I am a white guy.

    I had an African classmate in graduate school. That's right, I said "African." His first name was Justice, and he was black. He often commented about how his "black kindred" (his terms) were not prepared for either college or life, in general.

    I had another classmate, some white guy originally from South Africa, who was unceremoniously denied further "African-American" scholarships after two years (yes, the PC police caught up to him) because he was not such, in the eyes of Americans, although he was African-American in the eyes of his home country, Justice included.

    This was a mild stink there. There were several opinions which were publicly altered. After all of these "alterations," it became apparent to all that that was what was meant by institutional racism.

    (I just wanted to toss these anecdotes into the mix.)

  • Duh
  • Posted by Jack , Assoc Prof on March 17, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • This comes as no surprise to anyone paying attention in cities with large populations of such recent immigrants. Catholic high schools in NYC, for example, are full of such students.

    I am however baffled by Ronald Williams remarks: What's the "issue" that will resolve itself? The success of a  subgroup of Americans with African heritage? WIll we welcome their decline into the same achievement levels as non-immigrant families?

    (Besides, he's likely wrong, as these high-achieving students will continue their success once out of college and their kids will benefit in turn.)

  • Relevant documentary
  • Posted by Kofi Sutherland , Student at Bates College on March 21, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • http://neoafricanamericans.blogspot.com/

    We invited this speaker to our campus to talk about this issue. Here is a trailer of his documentary.