Quick Takes

April 6, 2009

Call for 'Fairness and Equity' to ESL Instructors and Students

Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages has issued a statement calling for "fairness and equity" to such programs at times that colleges are cutting budgets and eliminating positions. "During turbulent economic times, educational programs that serve culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse student populations may be at a disadvantage when competing for reduced funding with programs that serve conventional, mainstream student populations," the statement says. "This disadvantage is particularly acute for English as second language (ESL) programs, which are often mischaracterized as being remedial in nature." Further, the statement noted that ESL instruction is is frequently provided by adjuncts who lack job protections. "Unfortunately, during difficult economic times, educational programs face the temptation of laying off part-time, adjunct, or contingent faculty educators that the institution is rarely under any legal or collectively bargained obligation to retain. Reductions of this kind only serve to reduce the level of continuity in high-quality instruction to which ESL students have become accustomed. TESOL strongly supports all ESL faculty's employment rights ─ part-time and full-time -- during these harsh economic times."

Vote of 'No Confidence' in Board That Abolished Tenure

On Friday, the faculty at Southeast Kentucky Community College passed a motion of “no confidence” in the president and Board of Regents of the Kentucky Community and Technical College system by a vote of 68 to 30. The motion cites the board’s recent decision to abolish tenure and retirement health benefits for all new employees hired after July 1. Southeast faculty behind the vote indicated that they expect many more faculty groups at the system’s 16 colleges to hold similar votes in the coming weeks. Richard Bean, chair of the Board of Regents, said the system leadership is “always listening” but did say he was “disappointed” in the college’s vote: “The board has listened for two years, and we had a very clear vote that we wanted to have the ability to meet the needs of Kentucky's students. We wish [the faculty who voted 'no confidence'] were as concerned about the students and population of the Commonwealth as [is the board]. We’re sorry that they don’t want the system to be agile enough to provide the type of education we want to provide and for the topics that need to be given at any given time.”

New School Eliminating Adjunct Jobs at Parsons

Arts groups and educators are protesting recent notices sent to a dozen fine arts instructors at Parsons the New School for Design, telling them that they will not be teaching next semester, The New York Times reported. Because Parsons relies on part-time instructors for fine arts courses, some see the move as destroying any sense of job security at the institution. Further, the move comes at a time of faculty and student anger over management of the New School, of which Parsons is a part. The arts faculty at Parsons sent a statement to New School leaders saying in part: “To not rehire faculty in this economic climate is both cruel and socially irresponsible. We therefore insist upon an immediate reversal of aforementioned summary firings.” New School officials said that nothing unusual was going on. “This is not a disciplinary action — no one’s been fired,” Tim Marshall, the interim provost, told the Times. “As you update the curriculum, you have to look at the best fit.”

Dispute Over Health Services at Catholic Colleges

The diocese of Scranton is asking four local Roman Catholic colleges to turn over documents related to student health services to provide "assurance" that the institutions are not providing or encouraging birth control, The Republican-Herald reported. The request followed a report in the student newspaper of St. Joseph University, in Philadelphia, that health services there strive for a "middle ground" between church teachings and student practices. The four Scranton institutions that received the request are King’s College, Misericordia University, Marywood University and the University of Scranton. They plan a joint response today.

U.S. Grants $150M for State Data Systems

The U.S. Education Department on Friday awarded $150 million in grants to help 27 states develop or upgrade longitudinal student data systems to track academic progress. While most of the grants, which range from $2.5 million to $9 million, are focused on data systems for elementary and secondary schools, many of them are aimed at helping to integrate the systems with postsecondary education systems or to allow data from the systems to be shared with college officials.

Medical Faculty Told to Limit Wine Spending to $75 a Bottle

The University of California at San Francisco has told medical faculty members that they cannot spend more than $75 in university money on a bottle of wine at a recruitment dinner or other official event, The San Francisco Chronicle reported. A by-the-glass limit of $15 was also set. A spokesman said that most professors understand the need to limit such spending, but that there have been periodic incidents that prompted the new rules. He noted one recently rejected expense voucher for a dinner for six people where half the bill was for wine.

A College Dynasty (Not in Basketball)

For the fifth time in nine years, the University of Maryland Baltimore County won the national college chess championship Sunday, the Baltimore Sun reported.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

How to teach writing to non-humanities majors, in Acephalous.... The adjunct career, in Literature Should Mean Something in Your Life....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • No Confidence Vote
  • Posted by William Patrick Leonard , Director, Academic and Student Services at SolBridge International School of Business on April 6, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • The Southeast Kentucky Community College vote of no confidence cannot be a surprise. It simply represents a flawed defense of a tradition that is rapidly losing it viability in a fluid global economy. When compared to other professions, the professorate alone enjoys enviable conditions of employment that have uniquely endured in spite of the dramatic changes within the rest of the evolving economy. While bankers’ hours and Wednesday golf have become anachronisms, the professorate continues to enjoy its long-standing agreeable life style. With many community college faculty members teaching a maximum of 15-credit hours per semester, along with advising and governance the remainders of their two semester (nine or ten month) responsibilities are freed for the pursuit of their individual bliss however expressed. With fall, spring and holiday breaks coupled with summers off, they enjoy an enviable work schedule and salary scale. Tenure, unique to the education sector, all but guarantees lifetime employment once a relatively brief apprenticeship has been served. On the surface, it is a life style without equal. I am sure that more votes of no confidence will follow.

  • Posted on April 6, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Mr. Leonard seems blind to the fact that faculty even at community colleges scarcely get "summers off" - they may not be teaching, but they are preparing for the next term's courses, perhaps even doing research in their own field in order to keep up to date. Couple that with often working 55-60 hours a week during the school year - every hour in front of a classroom requires several hours of preparation, plus committee work, advising, grading, and so on - and faculty scarcely have a "life style without equal."

  • Posted by Adjunct George on April 6, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I support Mr. Lenord's comments. I support those who voted to get rid of tenure. It is about time to get rid of the caste society that is in the universities.

  • Kentucky loss of tenure
  • Posted by Higher Ed Staffer , Academic Affairs on April 6, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • As a staff member who has worked in higher education for over 25 years, I am glad to see more colleges are eliminating tenure. Despite my long-time career and dedication to the field, I can never have the promise of a "job for life" and neither should professors. I have no academic freedom although I can be let go tomorrow for something as trivial as not getting to work on time; yet professors often just teach their classes and go home, or work higher-paid jobs on the side (depending on their specialty). It's about time universities realize that other workers have value, too, but work without a contract, summers off, or a multitude of other benefits that profs take for granted.

  • Tenure and globalization
  • Posted by Jeffrey Mask , Professor of Religion at Wesley College (Delaware) on April 6, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • If we can do for American higher education by eliminating tenure what we've done for manufacturing through outsourcing and "free trade," or for banking by choosing to ignore the irresponsible and selfish actions of a few incredibly greedy people who have enriched themselves at the expense of everyone else on the planet, then we probably should. Why shouldn't American higher education be as bankrupt as other American institutions?

    Tenure is not expensive. Sure, you get some dead wood that way, but you also get a lot of dedicated, engaged, and creative scholars and teachers that you do not get with a rent-a-prof model. Faculty in Kentucky who protested the abolition of tenure were not acting in knee-jerk self-interest. They were expressing a lack of confidence in a board of regents who apparently do not understand either the differnces between education and business or the wrong-headedness of the dominant business practices of the last quarter-century or more.

  • Puh-leeeeze!
  • Posted by R2 on April 8, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • The professoriate has tenure for the same reason that Supreme Court Justices have tenure: to protect those holding the position from being blown off a cliff by prevailing political winds. Given the recent attempted takeover of the Justice Department by those of a certain religious persuasion, I would think that the anti-tenure crowd would have the good grace to shut up and stand in the corner looking sheepish. I have to admit, framing tenure as "job for life" is a pretty effective fallacy, convincing to those who think that being a university professor is in some way equivalent to holding down a nine-to-five job.

    I'm just so bone-tired of this insistance on seeing academia (or any other situation where money changes hands) as just another business. The primary purpose of a business is to produce a profit for its owner. Is that really what we want from our universities?

    By the way, I don't have tenure, and I never will have it. I'm just a fan of independent thought and an enemy of totalitarianism.