Search News


Browse Archives

News

Count Me Out

April 7, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Want me to lay off staff? Fine, I quit.

That’s essentially what Nathan Sussman, a professor of economics at the University of Western Ontario, told his dean last week. Sussman, then-chair of his department, relinquished his leadership post rather than develop a plan for eliminating staff positions.

“This is a moral dilemma one has in these positions,” he said. “On the one hand, you’re part of an organization and you have to make some tough decisions. On the other, you are also responsible for the people that you lead. So it puts you in the position where you have to make hard choices.”

“I think the easy thing is to follow orders,” Sussman added. “That’s kind of the safe way.”

The university is facing a shortfall of some $41 million, in large part due to investment declines, university officials acknowledge. Sussman argues that the university should borrow money to address the shortfall.

Sussman further contends that the current budget problems are of the university’s own making. Western Ontario engaged in a “risky” investment strategy, wherein the university took operational funds provided by federal and provincial governments and played the stock market with the money, he said.

“It’s a policy they’ve pursued for many years. To put it bluntly, in a way that Americans will appreciate, basically they’re gambling away taxpayers’ money,” said Sussman, a native of Israel.

Gitta Kulczycki, vice president of resources and operations, told a university-staffed publication that Western Ontario’s investment strategy has a track record of success, generating an average return of 7.8 percent over 20 years. The university’s asset mix is 35 percent bonds, 5 percent hedge funds and 60 percent equities, according to Kulczycki.

Lance Lochner, an associate professor of economics who has supported Sussman's decision to step down, said the university should not have put funds it needed for operations in anything other than safe and “boring” investment vehicles like bonds. The fact that the university had some success with its strategy when the market was performing better doesn’t make a difference, he added.

“That’s like saying you went to the track for 10 days and won, and the next day you bet all of your rent on it and that’s somehow a good strategy,” Lochner said.

Lochner furthered his argument in Western News, a university publication, suggesting that administrators audit the university's "Investment 101" class to learn basic investment strategies for the future.

Dean 'Disappointed' by Resignation

All units at Western Ontario have been asked to cut an average of about 5.5 percent from their budgets.Brian Timney, dean of Faculty of Social Science, said he suggested potential staff reductions to Sussman, but left the former chair the flexibility to develop “creative” approaches to addressing the shortfall.

“We had identified potential positions in the department that we felt he might target,” said Timney, a professor of psychology and neuroscience. “However, we gave -- as with all the other chairs -- the option of coming up with alternative solutions.”

Timney would not say how many layoffs he suggested, but said he was disappointed Sussman hadn’t engaged in more of a dialogue.

“I’m disappointed because I don’t think we had enough chance to talk through what all the options were, and so he made the decision without giving me a chance to see if there was a way to work this out,” Timney said.

Sussman had some encouragement from fellow faculty members to resign, and there’s been widespread support of his decision across the department, according to Lochner.

“In some sense it’s a stand saying this is an unacceptable path,” Lochner said of Sussman’s decision.

While many in the economics department would argue that the university should engage in short-term borrowing to deal with the shortfall, Timney says some of the budget problems are long-term. Ontario recently lifted a requirement that university faculty retire at the age of 65, prompting many faculty to stay on, particularly because their pension investments have taken such a beating. The Faculty of Social Science engaged in aggressive hiring over the last several years in anticipation that retirements would occur, and now there are added expenses because the faculty aren’t leaving, Timney said.

“I think what has been ignored in all of this is, yes, we’ve lost a chunk of investment money, but in fact over the last several years expenditures have been rising much faster than revenues,” he said. “We need an overall correction.”

Since Sussman’s resignation, the department has been under the interim leadership of Julie McMullin, associate dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences. Sussman said the interim chair has moved forward with further negotiations with the dean, and he believes staff layoffs can be avoided this year. While he’s unsure of the cause and effect, Sussman said he’d like to think his resignation has forced a better way forward for his college.

“I’m hopeful,” he said. “Sometimes you need what I’d call a controlled detonation to shake something, and hopefully something positive will turn out of it. There’s no real crisis that I think we’re facing at this point.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Count Me Out

  • at what cost?
  • Posted by Richard Kurial , Dean of Arts at University of Prince Edward Island on April 7, 2009 at 8:15am EDT
  • Well, well, well, it must've taken a lot of courage for Professor Sussman to make such a strong statement. Just look at the cost. I mean, he abandoned his administrative responsibilities and now must return to the rank of a mere tenured professor. The sacrifice is astounding. If he really wanted to make a case, why didn't he resign his position. They're hiring at McDonald's.

  • What about the students
  • Posted by The Old Guy , Observer on April 7, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • I find it interesting that an entire article about the health of a college could be written without a mention of students... What does that say about the focus of this institution??

  • Taking the HIt
  • Posted by Prof, Dept Head at Midwestern University on April 7, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Our small department of 6 people was cut by 10%, effectively $25,000. As a result of previous cuts, we basically are operating on a salaries-only budget. That's right, no budget for supplies, telephone, equipment repairs or (don't even think about) travel funds. We've managed to survive only because we have an income revenue stream (though it is at low ebb, presently) as a result of services that we provide, beyond teaching. Serendipitously, the $25,000 cut was covered by the early retirement of one of our staff. More cuts are anticipated, certainly in the next fiscal year.

    What is our strategic plan? Obviously, if we cannot increase revenue, salaries are the only budget line left to cut. I've always felt that cuts must come from the TOP, not the bottom. Therefore, I will take the hit. Possibly, I would go to a reduced percentage appointment, say 75%. Another possibility would be for me to take early retirement and be re-hired as a part-timer. In that case, I could possibly make more than I presently do.

    Cuts are less painful when taken from the top. I hope the highly paid administrators and football coaches are willing to take a hit for the team. I'm not holding my breath.

  • Where's the Story?
  • Posted by Chuck on April 7, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Nathan Sussman was unable to perform the duties of department chairman as expected of him by his Dean. So he resigned and returned to a full-time teaching position.

    I reckon Sussman had been elected Chairman by a majority of the faculty in the Economics Department and that his Dean ratified their choice.

    If a Chairman cannot perform the duties required by his Dean, then he should resign. Sussman did that.

    This hardly warrants more than a one-sentence blip on the web site of the University of Western Ontario. 

  • What a leader - not!
  • Posted by College employee on April 7, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • So the bottom line is that Nathan Sussman did not want to act as department chair when the situation become difficult, did not want to attempt to develop ways to address the budget issue (lay offs were not mandated), and did not feel strongly enough about the University's investment strategy to resign his deanship any earlier. And he was the leader of the department!? I agree with Richard Kurial's comment: if his intention was to make a statement, Sussman should have resigned his faculty position as well.

  • I agree with Richard Kurial
  • Posted by Liz Claire , Office Specialist at University of Minnesota on April 7, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • It is not really a stand if all you do is ignore the problem in hopes that it goes away. The better thing to do would be for him to stay and work it out. Or leave the University entirely. I am sure that his mere tenured professor salary is probably enough to cover the cuts needed.

  • Good for him
  • Posted by One Chair's Point of View on April 7, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Gee some people have been drinking bitter coffee today. The chair was taking a stand. Why should he have have to resign to do so? As for as those who say he's not a "leader." If there is one phrase I don't want to hear anymore its "creative solutions," which is some administrator speak for, "we messed up, put you in a lousy position, and we want you to clean up our mess." Department chairs have very little leverage. Letting the upper administration know that they're going to have a hard time finding people to do the job if they make it impossible is one. And don't think there's not a sacrifice to giving up a job many people go into because they want to be good leaders and help their colleagues.

  • Bravo Professor! Bravo!
  • Posted by Dennis , Former Department Chair at University of Houston on April 7, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • The chair of an academic department may serve at the pleasure of the dean, but does not serve the dean. The department chair is in that gray area between administratum and academe, holding allegiance to his peers and held accountable by his dean. Given varying degrees of autonomy, budget, responsibility, authority, the department chair is facilitator, governess, counselor, parent, accountant, resourcer, salesperson, hatchet man, janitor (literally and figuratively) and in general, a herder of cats. It is interesting that the department chair is the only administrative position in the university that is elected. That fact is key. Some of us serve "our time in the tub"; others serve to keep someone else from doing the job; still others do it because they want to make a difference.

    Six weeks into my turn as the department chair job, a senior professor came to my office, shut the door, set down in the only empty chair and said, "I have been diagnosed with liver cancer." This robust, brilliant man, whose papers I had studied as a doctoral student, 30 years my senior, began to cry. He told me about his wife, his children, his church, his research, his colleagues, and his students. When the tears stopped, he stood up, walked around my desk, bear hugged me and said, "I am so glad you're my department chair," and walked out. At his funeral, his colleagues, his dean and his department chair were there.

    If all the department chair is supposed to do is implement the edicts of the dean, then the dean can be the department chair. Bravo Professor. Bravo.

  • Count Me Out
  • Posted by lbw , Human Resources at Butler University on April 7, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • So, when the going gets tough, the tough resign...what a wuss!

  • Courage??
  • Posted by Richard Gelles , Dean School of Social Policy & Practice at University of Pennsylvania on April 7, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Uhh? Does Dr. Sussman believe that he has demonstrated courage and integrity? He abandoned his responsibilities at exactly the moment his department, school, and university needed talent, creatively, and yes, the ability to carry out instructions. Why is it that so manay in the academy think the rules of leadership and management do not apply to them???

  • About Friends …
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on April 7, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • First, two things about Chuck …

    1. His statement, “This hardly warrants more than a one-sentence blip on the web site of the University of Western Ontario” is right on the button.

    2. Once Chuck wrote about me, “Whether the subject is freedom of expression, racial preferences, gender double-standards, politicization of the classroom, or the excesses of the brown-shirts of political correctness in the modern university, when there is nothing more to be said about a topic, no one says it better than Frizbane Manley.”

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/10/30/khalidi

    I love that cut … one of the best ever. And just to prove him right, let me tell you about two of my tennis buddies.

    One was president of an Ann Arbor bank that, several years ago, was purchased by a mega-bank. Obviously, a large number of my friend’s bank’s employees had to be fired (let go, outplaced, decruited, outsourced, realigned, re-orged, de-excessed, down-sized … take your pick). So my friend spent the next six weeks firing his employees … one by one … and all with severance packages that were quite pathetic. Then, of course, the mega-bank fired him … in a meeting that lasted about three minutes.

    Six months later my friend found work as a mortgage broker, but it ruined his concentration to the extent that he could never focus his concentration when hitting a backhand and had to revert to one of those girly two-handed backhands just to keep from embarrassing himself on the court.

    My second friend was a “big wig” at Pfizer … which recently closed down its research facility in Ann Arbor and fired 2,500 workers there (more than 10,000 altogether), about 600 of whom were so-called scientists. He decided to take early retirement, but Pfizer convinced him to stay on for nine additional months and participate in firing (transitioning, dehiring, destaffing, releasing, … you know, making workforce imbalance corrections) and paying off most of the 2,500.

    http://www.siteselection.com/issues/2002/may/p310/

    I asked him why he would do that, and he owned up to the fact that it was for the money. Prior to that experience, he and I were great doubles partners (he had a vicious spin serve), but when it was over he sold his three houses in Michigan (his Ann Arbor residence, his Whitmore Lake house, and the six-bedroom cottage that guys like him have “Up North”) and bought a large house in Steamboat Springs, where he spends his time skiing. I hardly see him anymore, but when I do, he invariably says, “It was dirty work, but someone had to do it.”

    So, Richard Kurial, Chuck, College Employee, Liz Claire, lbw, and Richard Gelles – those of you who love those sports’ truisms like “When the going gets tough, the tough get going” – I wish for you many, many opportunities to perform Professor Sussman’s work. I know I’d love to do it … and I bet with no adverse effect on my backhand.

    P.S. Every time I think of our wonderful euphemisms for “you’re fired!” I am reminded of that old Paul Simon ditty, “Fifty Ways To Fleece Your Brother” … or something like that.

  • Maybe open the kitchen window . . .
  • Posted by Prufrock , New Dean/Former Chair on April 7, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • . . . if you can't handle the heat. As a new dean, I walked right into the budget crisis (from my program chair's position) as part of a division-wide changing of the guard. My "new" team consisted on a green dean, and three program chairs all relatively new to campus leadership (though each had been active in other ways for years). Within months of assuming their new positions, these new chairs were faced with a mandate to slash their program budgets by 10-15%, including the possibility of tenured lay-offs. Though new to their roles, each of these chairs responded as leaders should, consulting with their faculty, working through various scenarios, meeting regularly with their now battle-hardened dean (that's me), until they were able to formulate plans that met the budget demands, while still considering student needs and faculty concerns. They did not quit in protest. They stepped up. They worked long hours. They spent sleepless nights. They fought for their faculty and their students. Still, they did their jobs. They are chairs and leaders. So, I guess my point is it can be done, but it takes the right people. Obviously, he just was not that person. Better his dean and his school know it now, because things are only going to get worse for the next year or so. And no, my chairs are not on the market. They are quite happy here. And I am for working with them.

  • Anne Frank … Or The Incas???
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on April 7, 2009 at 8:45pm EDT
  • Ahhh, when I read Dean Prufock’s humor I didn’t know whether to respond with the tragedy of Anne Frank or the tragic tale of the Incas …and you’ve got to admit that’s the epitome of societal variance. I mean, what’s not to like about those whose operational perspectives are “Damn the torpedoes … full speed ahead!”

    But I really love tales of heroic figures doing their level best in support of the system … and to Hell with the individuals who suffer the consequences. Our dear Dean Prufock had the quite wonderful support of his sniveling, groveling chairs – Yas Masta … you da man – and I assume his timely, don’t mind the heat, glory be to the budget, all for the team, big-time campus “leadership,” slash and bash, consult with-your-underlings, respond to what I told you to do, hard working, sleepless nights, sticking-it to-your-colleagues, don’t forget those student customers (tuitions) paying the bills directives must have ruled the day

    What I love about Dean Prufock’s gang is that they are the "right people." They "did their jobs." They "are leaders." They know it can be done and they did it. And "they are happy" … "they are not on the market." If I’m not mistaken, I just repeated what he said in his post. Damn, I love that guy.

  • Do I dare disturb the universe?
  • Posted by Prufrock , Dean on April 8, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • Yes, Frizbane, has called this one right. My above mentioned chairs, the heroic figures he notes, though I am not so sure of his sincerity, are somewhat guilty, I guess. After all, should they not reject the very existence of any budget crisis as being just another adminstrative ploy to undermine faculty strength. Why these "sniveling, groveling chairs" even dared to listen to our govenor and legislature as they openly condemned higher education finances (as well as our individual contributions to our health care and retirement funds, but hey, why should we react to that either?). Oh Frizbane, I do see your point. Why think that the chairs decided to find the best solutions in the worst situations? After all, they're chairs. They must be lackeys. A good chair should resign his post in protest, right!? Oh well, I share your love and truly appreciate my "you" at each and every division meeting. Too bad we don't work together; I had a great buy-out to offer you, and I'm sure the chairs would have been quite encouraging. Take good care.

  • All for one and one for all?
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on April 8, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • With such a social, well-educated bunch, it seems there should be at least one "middle way" that we're not considering? Won't anyone even suggest everyone in the department taking a 10% cut (15% from the chair, 20% from the dean) to save a colleague's job? Certainly that won't keep everyone afloat for long or keep the wolf (taxman, mortguage collector, bookie, etc.) from the door, but perhaps it would buy time and demonstrate true solidarity.

    As to the wisdom of institutions playing the stock market, gamble only what you can afford to lose.

  • Just My Guess …
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on April 10, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • I have been around American higher education for about fifty years – interacting with academic administrators (and even being one) along the way – and my previous posts were based on my obviously incomplete knowledge of the circumstances at the University of Western Ontario. Now I have become embroiled in an inconsequential “debate” with those who are ripping on Nathan Sussman, even though I have no details of the situation that inspired his resignation.

    So, to lbw, whose input is “So, when the going gets tough, the tough resign...what a wuss!” and Richard Gelles who asks, “Uhh? Does Dr. Sussman believe that he has demonstrated courage and integrity?” I will respond as follows:

    What more than 90% of academic managers – I wouldn’t flatter them by calling them “leaders” – really excel at are (1) implementing the trivia that is necessary for the day-to-day operation of the organization (making schedules, assigning course sections, making sure the student evaluation forms show up on exam day, occasionally sending a new course to the Academic Policies Committee, pretending to listen to students’ complaints, etc.) and (2) when confronted with a matter of importance – and they rarely initiate them; those matters are invariably thrust upon them – try to read the handwriting on their “bosses” walls and get there as quickly and quietly as possible. Furthermore, about 98.6% of their time is occupied with the trivia and the remaining 1.4% (or less) is important. In truth, I would be surprised if the typical department chair had to handle more than one tough problem per academic year … all the while pretending hir responsibilities couldn’t be – but probably are – easily handled by a marginally competent administrative assistant whose salary is 20% of hir bosses’.

    I will express another of my prejudice about department chairs and deans since it is clearly pertinent to Professor Sussman’s situation. In my opinion, when it comes to “going to bat for faculty” – and despite their effusive professions of support behind closed doors -- with $5.00 and the promised support of a department chair (or a dean) you can purchase an overpriced, high calorie, cup of fluffy stuff that Starbucks calls coffee.

    So, I’m imagining that, for the past two years, Sussman, has faithfully exercised his responsibilities vis-à-vis all of that trivia, all the while sitting there watching those geniuses at the dean, VP, and president levels mismanage the University’s assets in ways that any dork would recognize as being non-optimal, at best, and inefficient, at worst. Then when the shit hit the fan – as he knew it would -- he is told to develop a plan for firing colleagues (even though the big-timers invariably call them “staff”). He reads the handwriting on his bosses’ walls – academic managers are good at that – gets input from his faculty (most of whom apparently supported his decision) and responds, “You know, given my responsibilities around here, and given the brilliance of the deans, VPs, and president who caused this problem to begin with, and given the probability these guys want anything but a “yes man” to follow their orders, let those jackasses deal with it themselves.”

    But then Dean and former Chair Prufrock comes along. S/he’s a guy with the right stuff (in the Tom Wolfe sense), s/he’s one of those “if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen” kind of guys, s/he’s all about teamwork (they all resort to that, but only when they don’t know how to handle the problems themselves), and s/he starts whining when a department chair like Sussman looks hir in the eye and says, “You can take this job and shove it right up the old wazoo!”

    P.S. I am not only not a fan of so-called business management strategies in colleges and universities; I am not a fan of business management of American corporations (it’s a disaster). But I am not surprised to learn that the University of Western Ontario and Dean Prufrock’s university (wherever it is) mismanaged their organizations’ assets and resources right up to the point where, in their minds, they only had two solutions to their problems … slash budgets and fire people. I love those damned geniuses. I don’t know whether you did the right thing or the wrong thing Professor Sussman, but after reading of this article and all of the posts, I haven’t encountered too many individuals I’d want as trusted colleagues … that is besides yourself.

  • why do always the litttle guys are let go?
  • Posted by Assoc Prof in Midwest on April 10, 2009 at 3:15pm EDT
  • Why is it that it is always the "little guys" that are let go? In this case it certainly appears that the upper administration mismanaged the finances of their institution. Have those people involved in the decisions to use operating funds to gamble in the stock market asked to resign, have they been fired? Or is it that the deficit has been pushed down to the "staff", and that is where all the cuts are happening? It is mighty easy when you have the assurance from your bosses that "we keep you, if you just cut enough of your staff" to step up to the plate, it is much more difficult and takes courage to say NO, you guys messed up, you fid your own solution, which in fact very often should be their very own resignation for screwing up. Granted, it is NOT always the case that the administration screwed up, but it seems to be in this case. It is galling, as just recently happenend to me, when you sit in a meeting where 4 big wigs with a combined income of well over 1 Million dollars, explain to a roomful of "staff", none of which makes 1/2 the amount any of the 4 big wigs make, that there will be cuts, possible furloughs etc. and the only ones not, or the least, affected are the 4 big wigs.