Search News


Browse Archives

News

Broken Covenant

April 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At Covenant College, a Presbyterian institution in Georgia, a strategic planning process has triggered discussions of whether an institution should build up athletics at the same time it cuts academics.

The three-year strategic plan approved by the Board of Trustees in March is wide-ranging, with 17 goals and about 75 action items. Savings recouped by “right-sizing” the college -- a process that involves eliminating some faculty slots -- are identified in the plan, which also calls for increased investments in the athletics program.

“We’re basically financing an athletics program by whacking an academic program,” one professor said.

That is a common sentiment at Covenant – although not everyone would agree the connection is fair. “The conclusions that went into the right-sizing plan are conclusions that came out of a very careful process of evaluating every program. That savings -- call it a savings, the efficiencies, the better use of dollars -- that came out of that process, is something that would be going forward regardless of any new investment in any other program. Those are decisions we made to bring the college to a place where it’s more sustainable in the long term,” said Niel Nielson, Covenant's president.

"Generally, what we’re doing is we’re trying to appropriately resource all of our programs. We are committed to adjusting, and we had to use the word, ‘right-sizing,’ programs to fit the resources and the student population we have, and we’re doing that in all areas of the college as we try to respond to the economic challenges and enrollment challenges that everyone else is feeling.”

He added, of planned investments in athletics, that they're seeking to match resources with student interest there, too. “The investment in coaches is entirely contingent on our actually enrolling the students and filling out the rosters, which we believe -- which I believe with all my heart -- actually serves the overall college well because it brings us the students that we need to meet the enrollment objectives."

Such enrollment strategies are common at tuition-driven private colleges like Covenant. Especially in this economy, colleges are looking to athletics to attract students and strengthen the institution as a whole. At the same time, many other colleges are cutting sports for economic reasons. To take a couple of examples, in March, Quinnipiac University, in Connecticut, and Colorado College each cut three sports, citing financial considerations.

A Christian liberal arts college with about 1,000 traditional undergraduates, and located on top of Lookout Mountain, outside Chattanooga, Covenant calls itself "the college of the Presbyterian Church in America." College stakeholders originally entered into a 15-year strategic planning process, but shortened the horizon to three due to the uncertainty of the financial climate, Nielson said.

Covenant’s new strategic plan includes four “trajectories” – relating to the academic program, the learning environment (a subhead that encompasses athletics), “connections and communications” with external stakeholders, and the stewardship and growth of operations and resources (a subhead that includes the planned “right-sizing”). A draft version of the plan obtained by Inside Higher Ed identifies about $1.5 million in savings from the right-sizing, and investments of about $500,000 each in athletics and in a new Center for Vocation, to focus on career development and internships.

On athletics, Nielson repeatedly stressed that planned investments in new coaches are contingent upon the filling of rosters. No new sports are planned. Covenant, which is now affiliated with the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA), is in its "exploratory year" in terms of pursuing National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III membership. "We'll make that decision [on whether to apply] in May; the application would be due May 15," Nielson said.

Formal announcements on faculty cuts are also expected in May. Covenant faculty work on one-, three- and five-year contracts and do not have tenure. While names have already been named, and seem to be no secret on campus, faculty members are now awaiting final word. Reports are circulating of several faculty with 15, 20, even 30+ years of experience who expect to lose their jobs.

In short, uncertainty is in the air. Faculty critical of the plan declined to be identified by name in news coverage. Multiple Covenant professors, meanwhile, declined or did not respond to requests for interviews.

In terms of gauging a broad cross-section of faculty sentiment, faculty did narrowly approve the strategic plan, 28 to 24 with 11 abstentions, prior to the board vote in March. “I view it also as a non-affirmative vote,” said one professor who expressed a fundamental inability to get on board with a plan involving a redirection of funds from academics to athletics. “In my mind, while the number ultimately is larger in the affirmative it seems to me that one also could look at that vote and say there were more faculty that had hesitation about it.

"Everybody realizes we’re in some difficult economic times and all sorts of companies and organizations are cutting back, taking away benefits, doing various kinds of things to deal with losses. Schools are no exception… I understand that and I accept that. In terms of the outcomes and scenarios… I think there are other things that possibly could have been done rather than what was decided."

Asked about concerns regarding redirection of funds from academics to athletics, Scott Quatro, a management professor who chaired the strategic planning working committee said, “That is a logical conclusion that folks could reach. And let me also acknowledge that any time an organization goes through a strategic planning process, the inherent nature of strategic planning is that it involves tradeoffs."

Yet, Quatro continued, where the argument falls apart for him is in the link between curricular and co-curricular life at the college. "The increased investment in athletics largely has to do with professionalization of our coaching staff, so that the athletic program can be a more truly co-curricular component of a student’s experience at the college," he said. "If we want to do all things really well as an institution, especially co-curricular activities that come alongside or exist alongside our core academic programs, then we need to have as professional and well-engaged and as equipped a coaching staff as we do faculty. Otherwise we run the risk of our athletics programs really being too disconnected from what we’re doing as a larger institution.”

Quatro cited two other components of the strategic plan that he believes will well-position the college moving forward -- the investment in a new Center for Vocation and the development of an integrated marketing and communications campaign. "We have a rich heritage, we have a widespread recognition within academia for being an institution of high standards, of really bright and engaged and well-equipped students. We’ve got a unique perspective on higher education. Where we haven’t done a good job once again is connecting all of that to the broader world."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Broken Covenant

  • It is called 'survival'
  • Posted by Carlos on April 15, 2009 at 7:30am EDT
  • Colleges not subsidized by taxpayers under 5,000 students are at great risk of closing. The unnamed professors who are complaining -- would they be willing to subsidize their college? Help bring in more students? Because that is what is needed.

  • ????
  • Posted by PiledHigher&Deeper , Ph.D. on April 15, 2009 at 7:30am EDT
  • If we are going to take marketing as our model in academe, then we need to go ahead and tease out things a bit. When someone walks into McDonald's and orders a Whopper, the workers behind the counter laugh at the silliness ("ha ha--very funny") and tell the joker to go elsewhere. They don't start keeping record of how many people order their competitor's food to determine when they should re-think their mission as a McDonald's ("Perhaps we SHOULD be a Burger King").

    In my opintion, this is exactly what Covenant and similar institutions are doing--changing their identity to suit the demands of the customer/student. (By the way, Covenant, has it worked elsewhere?) But the marketing model cuts both ways. Successful organizations don't change their identity to draw in every Tom, Dick, and Harry (or, as Covenanters might say, "to become all things to all men"). Instead, theY, first, make sure they believe in their "product" (i.e., distinct form of education), then, second, find their market, promote their "product" to those who "like" it (i.e., if you are a small, evangelical, liberal arts college in Georgia, you probably will never draw in students who want the SEC sports scene). Sounds crass and calculating, I know, but it beats pandering.

  • Is Sports a Cure-All?
  • Posted by Justa Prof on April 15, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • Many colleges and universities are embarking on such all-out sports initiatives, building new sporting arenas, hiring highly-paid coaches and even assessing students additional tuition fees to fund this activity. This paradigm of survival in the current economic situation purports to bring in significantly more students, attract large donations by wealthy patrons and solve most of the problems in higher education. I do not believe that it will.

    In fact, has anyone proven that such endeavors work most of the time, or ever? By this, I mean opening the books to show how much it cost (be sure to include loss of academic programs) versus how much it brings in. Do sports really attract more students over the long term or is this a temporary spike in enrollment? And, I am suspicious of the quality of the students. If students are attracted by a winning team, then what happens during an off-season, for example. 

    If the goal is to attract students at all costs, then why not convert the student center into a casino? You know, all out gambling, free drinks, inexpensive dinner theaters, free condoms, professors who hold classes only during times convenient to the student and no grades.

    I believe the best way to attract quality students (who will complete degrees and become contributors in appreciation for having received a quality education) is to provide a reasonably priced, practical and high quality education.

  • Misplaced Priorities
  • Posted by Mike on April 15, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Where is the leadership on this campus? To participate at the NCAA Division III level, a college needs to sponsor a minimum of 5 men's sports that at least 3 are team sports as well as 5 women's sports that at least 3 are team sports. the average Division III Department of Athletics budget is $2.5 million. This does not include athletic scholarships.

    The athletic scholarships is the key component in this equation. Many colleges will claim participating in Division III they do not offer athletic grants-in-aid. This may be true but what the college does engage in to recruit the type of high quality student-athlete is to offer very lucrative need base and merit base scholarships. Therefore, the actual cost of the athletic enterprise is disguised. The additional cost of financial aid for student-athletes at a Division III institution is around $2.0 million. Combined with the operating budget, the athletic enterprise is approximately $4.5 million.

    What is the return to the college on this investment? The Vice President for Fiance would need to determine the net revenue generated from each student-athlete. Expressed in other terms, after subtracting all scholarship aid, how much money does each student-athlete pay to the college to cover the cost of education?

    The above exercise will help the college understand whether or not this is a good business decision?

    Afterall, net revenue generated from student enrollment in the main objective. The net revenue enables the college to reinvest in quality: hire more faculty, expand the academic curriculum, renovate and modernize classrooms, increase library holdings, etc.

    Faculty should demand a full budget analysis before proceeding.

  • Wrong Direction I think
  • Posted by Richard Godfrey , Adjunct, Psychology at TSTC, NTCC on April 15, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Yes economics are a determiner. However, this College needs to look at their purpose and their calling rather than at their market strategy. PCA isn't about the world we're in; it's about the eternity that Christians access, and bringing the goodness of that eternity to this world. That eternity has a Master who provides the resources to do His work here. Changing the focus of the College from His work to attracting students will change the source of their resources. I'll bet it won't find the resources to continue their precarious financial existence. I'll watch the fortunes of this experiment!

  • A Zero-Sum Game, at last!
  • Posted by DFS on April 15, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • That's the way it always is, in the Real World.
    Either start performing, professors, or help to realize others' gains at your expense.
    Such is the nature of competition.

  • athletic aid
  • Posted on April 15, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • In response to mike's comment regarding "hidden" athletic aid: NCAA requires DIII institutions to submit a student-by-student report on aid given to all students and to indicate which students are varsity athletes. They then run some kind of statistical test to ensure that there is no difference in the aid awarded to athletes and non-athletes. If athletes get more aid than non-athletes with similar need, the NCAA comes down on them.

  • Dump the Trustees
  • Posted by Board of Trustees' critic on April 16, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • After attending Board of Trustees' almost monthly meetings at a midwestern public education system for the past several years, I could only laugh when I read of 17 goals and 75 action items proposed by these Trustees? Why not 117 goals and 7500 action items? When will Trustees educate themselves about education--and consult with the professors and students? Get real.

    Enough already, especially with "political" appointees.

  • PiledHigher & Deeper Has It Right!
  • Posted by Dr. Rob on April 16, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Amen to PiledHigher & Deeper. The issue could not have been stated more clearly or succinctly!

    And, I have a question for Mr. Quatro who said:

    "If we want to do all things really well as an institution, especially co-curricular activities that come alongside or exist alongside our core academic programs..."

    Mr. Quatro, Please tell me, when did high school and college sports cease to be extra-curricular and become "co-curriculuar"? I have been in education for nearly 30 years. I have watched this problem, like a cancer grow. The over-emphasis upon sports in institutions of higher learning is appalling and offensive. Sadly, it has trickled down into high schools as well.

    You can try and justify and package Covenant's decision anyway you want, but here is the bottom line--Covenant cut academic programs and will let professors go (one half of what Professor Michael Olivas considers the heart of the university) while at the same put more money into atheletic programs (a part of the school that only benefits a small portion of your student body) so that you can "professionalize your coaching staff." Let me translate--"We're eliminating academic programs so we can reduce the payroll for professors in order to be able to pay COACHES more money. What a slap in the face!

  • Posted by Gene Frost , Head of School at Wheaton Academy on April 16, 2009 at 7:15pm EDT
  • According to the article, the college leadership claims that the restructuring of academic programs is independent of considerations regarding investment in athletics. It sounds like people on campus have differeing views about that, and readers here will surely make their various judgements as well. But coult it be that this college and its leadership are willing to take a serious look at all academic programs and make hard decisions about quality and sistainability? That would represent a positive trend, even with the inevitable tensions to which the article points. Such decisions will never gain broad support from faculty on any campus; in fact, it's amazing that the vote was even marginally favorable. History is full of academic programs and indeed whole institutions that became irrelevant because of their failure to address the questions Covenant is asking. Perhaps Covenant's example will encourage other institutions to address similar issues in their academic programs.

  • Athletics
  • Posted by Paul Crilly , Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at University of Tennessee on April 21, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • When will the trustees and administration ever figure out that a good education and not sports is the ticket to success (at least materially) in life. Few athletics get drafted in the pros, but students who are strong in academics get good middle class jobs. Strong academics may not put Covenant in the top 10 of some U.S. News and World Report category, but at least the students will get decent jobs when they graduate or get into good professional and graduate schools. Furthermore, I suggest Covenant's trustees and administration read Mark Noll's book, "The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind."

  • Be wary
  • Posted by Jason Richardson-White , Alumnus (Class of 1992) on April 26, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • There is so much left unsaid that a balanced judgment is almost impossible. How *much* more money will be provided to athletics? *Which* positions are being cut? What percentage of the *total budget* is impacted by these decisions? It is easy to blow matters out of proportion. Frankly, the journalism in this article is a bit suspect. Either the piece should not have been written, or it should have given us a better sense of the details. In my present field, Information Technology, we have a phrase for this: FUD. "Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt." I am not enough apprised of the College's financial matters to know whether we are seeing a trend, or only a necessary corrective to its direction.

    Having said all of that, my personal tendency is to be wary. Having lived near, and worked in, Athens, GA -- home of the University of Georgia's "Bulldogs" -- for over ten years, I can testify to the aggravation among many faculty in working for an institution that clearly *does* (in my opinion) overemphasize athletics. I've heard one member of faculty introduce himself as a member of the "amateur sports franchise otherwise known as the University of Georgia." May it never be so at Covenant.

    One more word, and I'll stop. Ultimately, the governance of an institution of higher education ought no more to be a democracy than is that of the kingdom of God. It is, and ought to be, a benevolent dictatorship. The Board of Trustees ought to be setting priorities based on the historical vision of the Institution. If that vision cannot be supported under the current economic climate -- if the vision is in danger of being twisted in order to preserve the institution's existence -- then so much the worse for the institution. If Covenant cannot put the vision of a high quality, truly Reformed education within the financial grasp of the average graduating student, without distorting that vision, then let it perish. Or let it wait on better times, shrinking and waiting on Providence. Sirs, it is your duty. If you find yourself favoring athletics *merely* because it is to financial advantage, or merely because the majority of prospective students favor lots of athletics, then reconsider.

  • Posted by Josephine on April 29, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • I think Mr. Frost at Wheaton got it exactly right when he pointed out that the decision to trim down some academic departments and the decision to enhance our athletic recruitment were independent decisions about long term quality and sustainability. As a member of the Covenant community, I believe I can add insight and understanding rather than speculation and judgment. Covenant is doing a wise and responsible thing by taking a hard look at our programs and figuring out which are most sustainable and which attract most students, all while supporting the mission of the college. In this economy, resources are more scarce and Covenant wants to ensure that its resources are being utilized by the best possible programs the college can offer.

    On the other side, Covenant has seen that over the past years, the number of students involved in athletics has grown significantly. Athletics has been a proven method of recruitment, and Covenant is committing to putting resources into athletics as long as it continues to be a proven method of recruitment. As the article stated, if not enough students come to Covenant and fill out the rosters, we will not put the money into it.

    The idea that Covenant is cutting academics to pour money into athletics is an incorrect and incomplete view. Covenant is being wise in trying to figure out the most long-term and sustainable programs, and each decision has been carefully and prayerfully considered. Though these are hard discussions in which not everyone will agree, Covenant is making decisions based upon the best thing for the vision and mission of the college.

  • Posted by coldfusion on May 29, 2009 at 6:00pm EDT
  • Colleges are no longer keepers of the halls of knowledge. They are training grounds for aspiring athletes. That is just the way things are these days.

    It takes courage to focus on what colleges ought to be. In light of that, it seems to me that Covenant College has become soft and forgot the true meaning of what higher education means.

    If you want to bolster enrollment, athletics is not the way to go. Hardly anyone gets drafted for a sports career in div III. But offer programs that are practical that relate to working in the real world, and you will bolster enrollment.

    For example, look at the video game industry. A multi-billion dollar business that is still doing well. And, let's say my son wants to do that for a living and help design these games. If I show him options that relate to his interest, he is most likely going to choose a tech school over Covenant.

    What I am saying here is that there are more people working real jobs in the real world rather than in athletics. Covenant's priorities here are misplaced and misguided. Upgrade your technology courses, your in demand career options (medical, scientific, etc...) - not your sports program. It's unthinkable to believe that sports programs. But Covenant will realize this after their enrollment drops below 1000.