Search News


Browse Archives

News

Silencing a Staff Voice

May 4, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Two weeks ago, the Silver and Gold Record, the faculty and staff newspaper at the University of Colorado system, reported that university officials had told its editor that it faced a 24 percent budget cut.

It will end up having been one of the publication's last stories.

On Friday, as part of a major restructuring of the system office announced by President Bruce D. Benson, designed to save $6.2 million, the university said it would eliminate the weekly publication, arguably the only one of its kind in the country: editorially independent (with professional reporters and a faculty/staff editorial board), but financed with administration money.

The university still needs to communicate with its employees, which it will do through its existing campus publications, e-mails, and a new "electronic system-level communication vehicle," but it "cannot afford to be in the newspaper business," Benson said in a news release.

Supporters of the Silver and Gold Record are troubled by how the decision came about, and see something other than mere budget realities at play. On Thursday, Benson told a Faculty Senate meeting that the university would not make budget cuts without consulting with faculty leaders -- but the elimination of the Silver and Gold Record came without any such consultation, members of the newspaper's editorial board say.

And it is suspicious, says Nancy Ciccone, the faculty chair of editorial board, that 10 days after being told that it would lose 25 percent of its budget -- and reporting that fact, to the acknowledged dismay of university administrators -- the Silver and Gold Record learned that it would be wiped out entirely. "The university says it wasn't retaliatory," Ciccone says, "but it looks that way to us."

One of a Kind

The Silver and Gold Record is a highly unusual, if not unique, publication. It emerged, in part, because the University of Colorado at Boulder lost its student-run newspaper, formerly the Silver and Gold, in 1971, when it left campus to become an independent, professionally run publication. Believing they needed a newspaper to cover university governance and other issues important to them, faculty members pushed to create the Silver and Gold Record in 1972.

The publication, which distributes 8,500 copies a week on the system's three campuses for its 14,000-plus employees, focuses especially on state and university system governance, but covers other issues important to faculty and staff members.

As a newspaper aimed at faculty and staff members, reported by professional reporters who are university employees, but financed by the administration, it has at times had a bumpy ride -- especially when it has carried critical coverage of Colorado administrators, who have had more than their share of ups and downs in recent years. Its financing has frequently been at risk, and two years ago, then-President Hank Brown sought to appoint the publication's editor, which had historically been the purview of its employee-led editorial board.

In the current financial environment, where state funds for higher education (and everything else) are declining, all aspects of the three-campus university system's budgets are vulnerable. And Benson has made the operations of the system office that he heads a particular target, said Ken McConnellogue, a Colorado spokesman, to "make our system administration more efficient and effective."

As part of that process, various campus departments have prepared for budget cuts of varying sizes, as the projected size of university revenue shortfalls has changed virtually by the week, if not the day. Two weeks ago, system administrators told department managers to expect cuts of certain sizes in their 2009-10 fiscal year budgets. The editors of the Silver and Gold Record were told its budget would be reduced by 21 percent, or $125,000 a year. The publication's managers responded with a plan to cut staff salaries and make a series of changes in its publishing schedule and size, all of which was laid out in an April 23 article in its own pages about the cuts.

But a week later, after further review revealed that the planned level of cuts left the system "well short of target of where we need to be," according to McConnellogue, Colorado administrators announced a plan for deeper reductions yet -- a total of $6.2 million in the central system's budget, including 54 staff positions. The eliminated positions include the system's vice president for academic affairs and research, the systemwide diversity officer (within the next year) -- and all 6.5 full-time equivalent positions (nine employees total) at the Silver and Gold Record, essentially eliminating the publication.

"I highlight this move because I know the paper has been a part of CU for some time," Benson said in his budget communiqué. "CU certainly needs effective internal communications. But we cannot afford to be in the newspaper business, a model none of our peer universities follow."

Members of the publication's editorial board said they were deeply troubled by the decision and by how it was made. They noted that administrators had strongly objected to the April article the newspaper published about its planned budget cut, because the editors had been "told not to report on it because [university administrators] wanted no staff or faculty to know that they might be losing their jobs," said Ciccone, the publication's editorial board chair and an associate professor and chair in the English department at Colorado's Denver campus. Was the decision to end the Silver and Gold Record "retaliatory," she wondered?

That assertion is "wholly inaccurate," said McConnellogue, the Colorado spokesman. Yes, he said, Leonard Dinegar, the university's vice president for administration, told Silver and Gold Record staff members Friday that there have been "articles in the paper that made me wince over the years," and that the article about the budget cut was one of them.

But that was largely because the information about the proposed budget cut was shared with the publication's editors in their capacity as managers of a university department, not as journalists, McConnellogue said, and the numbers and effective dates of the potential cuts were not set in stone. Although university officials were unhappy that the Silver and Gold Record reported the preliminary information in the way that it did, McConnellogue said, the fact that Editor Jefferson Dodge did so "is a testament to the fact that he had the independence to do that." (Of course, that's an independence the publication might not have after June 30....)

The other major point raised by supporters of the Silver and Gold Record was that the paper's faculty/staff editorial board and other faculty leaders were not consulted about the decision to eliminate the publication. That runs counter to all the talk from President Benson and other university leaders about how the budget cutting process "will be open and transparent and will be informed by governance groups and the university community," one of several governing principles they have repeatedly cited, Ciccone said Friday. "We were notified today that it was over, and this decision was made without any co-governance or any transparency. Those have been buzzwords around the campus, and now we know they are just buzzwords."

It's wrong for Silver and Gold Report backers to characterize the elimination of the publication as a failure of shared governance, McConnellogue said, given that the publication is a unit of the president's office. "The budget for that operation rests within the president's office, and president has to make those budget decisions," he said. "Ideally everyone sits around the table and has a chance to make their arguments, but at the end of the day, when it comes to administrative budgets, the president has to make difficult decisions.

"That's what happened in this case," McConnellogue added, "and not just related to the newspaper."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Silencing a Staff Voice

  • Spin Control Mission Accomplished
  • Posted by Loyal reader at University of Colorado on May 4, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Silencing a voice is exactly what's going on here. With the Rocky Mountain News, one of two Denver's papers, out of business, and with The Denver Post having pared its staff so that it no longer has a full-time higher ed reporter, the reporters at the Silver & Gold were the lone remaining watchdogs looking out for the interests of the faculty and staff at CU. President Benson clearly did not like having a group of journalists that he was paying for, but had no/little control over, and budget needs made this a simple way to eliminate this little problem. CU will face much less fair and unbiased scrutiny now. Mission accomplished. 

  • Why we're being shut down
  • Posted by Marianne Goodland , Silver & Gold Record at University of Colorado on May 4, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • During the May 1 meeting, we broached the idea of finding another funding source with Leonard Dinegar. We asked that if such a source could be found (and we were already in discussions about this, with some positive ideas put forward) would he or Benson reconsider the shutdown. He said no, the decision is irreversible. That should tell you all you need to know about why we're being shut down. It isn't, and never was, about the money.

  • Posted on May 4, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • By definition the paper isn't independent if it requires university funding. And by definition, if the paper gets independent funding, it doesn't matter whether the president wants the paper or not. If the university funded the paper, it ultimately gets editorial control... just as Disney ultimately has editorial control over ABC News, regardless of whether or how actively it chooses to exercise it.

  • Three Cheers for Benson!
  • Posted by Education is a Business on May 4, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • I'm not sure why Ciccone and the two folks posting comments here are complaining.

    Benson was hired by the board of regents, and there was never any confusion about his mission, which is to transform the University of Colorado system from a bloated and antiquated backwater of leftist ideals into an institution that can compete in the 21st century.

    Let's face it. Universities need to be run like businesses. They are in the business of providing credentials, not fomenting so-called "critical thinking" in the service of left-wing agenda items like tenure, health-care, and giving employees a "voice".

    I applaud Benson on this first step toward eliminating the chaff from the wheat at CU. Let's hope that he can continue to gain momentum and eliminate irrelevant programs like art, history, english, social science, abstract mathematics and any other programs that suck money out of the system by claiming to serve a social function, while diverting from actually useful programs like business.

    When are people going to get it? We've got to compete in a global marketplace, and the only way that we can do that is to completely and totally eliminate any barriers that prevent us from competing on an even playing field with nations like China. If this means getting rid of a leftist newspaper and firing a bunch of irrelevant hippy intellectuals so that we can get down to the important work of making money and turning CU into a school that creates the corporate workers of tomorrow, then all the better!

  • A great loss for more than the university
  • Posted on May 4, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • As a person who had long term association with CU, I really do understand the sense of loss that many will feel on all four (bureaucratically now three) CU campuses and the communities along the Front Range. The newspaper served to keep the community along the Front Range in touch with the CU in good positive ways. Its advertising served a useful purpose. I used it personally even when I lived out of state was to obtain housing during research leaves by doing exchanges with CU professionals. When I lived in Colorado, I found that paper a breath of fresh air and worth reading regularly.

    "Education is a Business" is one naive person. Had this person ever spent time in a country without democracy, he/she would know that the first thing strutting dictators of left or right inclination do is to seize control of the press and the nation's communication systems.  There are plenty of campuses today run by presidents in a way similar to the way Castro runs Cuba . What "Education is Business" advocates as the Regents' "business" is converting the state's university system into an arm of the lunatic fringe of the Republican Party. I'm glad I moved on to a well run state system where I don't have to put up with Democrats or Republicans using the universities to place political appointees into control of education. 

    The residents of Colorado ought to use their well-justified referendum system to pry the political parties' fingers out of their universities. Using these for refuges for people who don't know how to have a life term limits is really hurting your educational system.   

  • Posted by at CU on May 5, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Education is a Business, if students want mere career training after high school, there are plenty of places they can get that: technical colleges, online institutions, etc.. A university has a larger mission: to educate.

  • Education As a Business
  • Posted by cts on May 5, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • "Universities need to be run like businesses. They are in the business of providing credentials, not fomenting so-called "critical thinking" in the service of left-wing agenda items like tenure, health-care, and giving employees a "voice"."

    Providing credentials? You mean, selling credentials? That is not what good universities do; they offer education.

    Tenure, health-care, and giving employees a voice are 'left wing agenda items'? The rock from under which you are peeking must be on another planet.

  • Education as a Business
  • Posted by Marianne Novy , Professor of English at University of Pittsburgh on May 5, 2009 at 7:30pm EDT
  • This comment was made as a satire--at least, when he speaks positively of "eliminating irrelevant programs like art, history, English, social science, and abstract mathematics,"
    I hope it is a satire, meaning the opposite of what it says.

  • Better Place to cut?
  • Posted by RBG on May 6, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • Given the financial situation of the school I have to say this was a good move. Sure - there's going to be unhappy people - but would it be preferable to have kept the newspaper - which quite clearly is NOT something that most colleges have or pay for - and fire faculty and staff? (Yes, I know - the newspaper had staff too - but most schools don't have that sort of staff.) Would it have been preferable to reduce everyone's salary by a certain percentage - like so many other colleges are doing right now? How about a big tuition and fee increase?

    This was a good move.

  • When free speech is eliminated, everyone loses
  • Posted by Education is a Democracy on May 7, 2009 at 9:30pm EDT
  • If we set aside the profit/loss arguments about S&G, an important fact remains: the paper was shut down without consultation with the faculty.

    Shutting down an independent voice on a college campus has terrible overtones: that speech isn't free, isn't tolerated, can't be afforded. This is why university's take plagiarism so seriously--it harms their mission, their "brand" if we must.

    Vigorous and open inquiry are the heart of a university's "product" (if that word must be used). When inquiry is circumvented--as the inquiry into whether S&G could or should survive was--the mission of the university itself is repudiated. In this case, the repudiator-in-chief seems to be the President. What a message that sends--to CU's students, potential students, alumni, faculty, staff, and donors.

    There is still time to correct this. Find another way to keep--even fund--the very dissent that proves that CU is a real, first-class institution of higher learning.