Quick Takes

May 8, 2009

Bob Kerrey Will Leave New School Presidency -- in 2011

Bob Kerrey announced Thursday that he will leave the presidency of the New School in June 2011, when his contract expires. He said in a statement that his intent has long been to leave at that time, but he also acknowledged the controversies at the New School, whose student and faculty groups have become increasingly critical of his management. "To understate the case this has been a challenging semester for the university and my family," he said. "There have been moments when I reached the limit of my willingness to continue serving as your president. There have been moments when my tendency to fight and to directly engage in confrontation, argument and disputes have been counterproductive." A Web site maintained by students who have clashed with Kerrey offered its own analysis of Kerrey's plans and record, ending its commentary by saying "onward in struggle."

Cuts Could Eliminate LSU Press

Supporters are rallying around the Louisiana State University Press, which is on a list of units at LSU that may face deep cuts or even elimination. The many distinctions of the press include winning four Pulitzer Prizes, more than any other academic publisher. The press is also the only university press to have won Pulitzer Prizes in both fiction and poetry. Peter Givler, executive director of the Association of American University Presses and a member of the advisory board of the LSU Press, said, "Things are tough everywhere and everybody is making sacrifices, but the idea of shutting down a press that has brought so much national distinction and honor to LSU, and to Louisiana, is just plain nuts." LSU's chancellor, Michael Martin, issued this statement about the situation: "We hope the Governor and our Legislature will provide sufficient funding to maintain support of LSU Press, as it is a very valuable asset to this university, the people of the state and many beyond. We face, however, extraordinary economic conditions and we must protect the academic core of LSU first and foremost."

Murder Suspect Arrested; Wesleyan Resumes Operations

Wesleyan University will resume normal operations today, after a tense day in which most activities were called off after police found journals of a man suspected of murdering a student on Wednesday, and the suspect's writings indicated that he wanted to kill other students, especially Jewish students. The university issued security alerts to those on the campus, and informed students when the suspect turned himself in to police in a nearby town late Thursday. Wesleyan is providing counseling services and also pledging flexibility on final exams and academic work, given that students' lives were interrupted by the tragedy of a fellow student's murder and then considerable campus fear as they were finishing up a semester's work. An article in The New York Times explores how the suspect, Stephen Morgan, met his victim, Johanna Justin-Jinich, two years ago when both were enrolled in a summer program at New York University. At the time, she reported that he made harassing calls and sent her harassing e-mail messages.

Roosevelt U. Will Restore Athletics

Intercollegiate athletics, dormant at Roosevelt University for 20 years, will return. The university on Thursday announced a plan to create a minimum of 12 teams over the next five years, with the first squads competing in 2010. The university will not offer athletic scholarships. Students pushed for the return of athletics. While Roosevelt is best known for having nontraditional older students, in recent years it has been enrolling more full-time, traditional age undergraduates.

Study Disputes Link Between Facebook Use and Grades

A doctoral student's unpublished study suggesting a link between extensive Facebook use and lower grades received a ton of attention last month. Now a new study finds no such correlation. The new study, published in the journal First Monday, used large samples and found no negative relationship between grades and Facebook use. The new study was conducted by Eszter Hargittai, associate professor of communication studies at Northwestern University; Josh Pasek, a doctoral student at Stanford University; and eian more of the University of Pennsylvania’s Adolescent Risk Communication Institute.

Report Considers Sustainability in the Curriculum

Colleges have been quicker to green their facilities than their curriculums, as a 2008 National Wildlife Federation study showed, and a new report released by the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment Thursday aims to help colleges integrate "climate neutrality" and sustainability into their academic programs. "Education for Climate Neutrality and Sustainability: Academic Guidance for ACUPCC Institutions" includes more than 200 examples and resources.

Laureate Describes Plans for Santa Fe

Laureate Education Inc. has released a statement outlining its possible vision for the College of Santa Fe, a financially struggling private college that the for-profit chain may end up operating under a bailout plan being pushed in New Mexico. The college is known for its arts programs and Laureate is known for its campuses in many countries around the world, primarily educating people from countries other than the United States. While Laureate's statement was vague -- officials noted that negotiations are still going on -- it suggested that Santa Fe would become a "global center of excellence in the teaching of the arts," in which Laureate's students worldwide would gain from the expertise at Santa Fe.

Grove City Suspends Student for His Porn Career

Grove City College has suspended John Gechter, a molecular biology major, for his work in gay pornography, The Herald reported. Gechter had kept his job -- which he says he needed to pay tuition -- a secret. But the newspaper reported that another student spotted a photograph of him online, and forwarded the shot to many on the campus. College officials say that Gechter violated their code of conduct and that they are worried about the dangers he might face in porn. But Gechter told the newspaper: "I absolutely believe the college violated my rights. ... They [suspended] me based on my occupation. I was not doing anything illegal.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

Philosophers shoveling snow, in The Duck of Minerva.... Dual authors in anthropology, in Savage Minds....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Interested thoughts
  • Posted by Martin on May 8, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • I was sitting here this morning, doing what I normally do to start my day, which is to read Inside Higher Education, when the "Quick Takes" caught my eye, particularly the one on the gay porn star who has been suspended from Grove City College. While I am no lawyer, not gay, and don't really have a dog in this fight, I can't help but wonder if this young man's civil rights have somehow been violated. I am certainly a liberal by most standards, but a lot of us in higher ed are, but to me it's more than a liberal cause, it's a freedom of choice and a privacy issue of sorts. Now, I know the "privacy issue" does not hold a lot of water since starring in gay porn is intended for a certain public audience, but where do we draw the line on this. I think this will become a landmark case in higher education, should the young man chose to pursue this issue in court, and I for one support him, if not his chosen profession, to win.

  • Bob Kerrey Woes a Case Study
  • Posted by Jim on May 8, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Bob Kerrey's embattled presidency at the New School (and see also the Chronicle of Higher Ed's story at http://chronicle.com/daily/2009/05/17750n.htm?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en ) is a textbook example of the challenges of leading a modern university. His faculty critics accuse him of being high-handed, autocratic, and insufficiently collaborative, while he acknowledges that his experience in politics ill-suited him to understand the peculiar culture of academia. He is accused by critics as seeing the faculty as an impediment to his goals for the school.

    But these are generic complaints. When a faculty is unhappy with its president, nearly always the criticism is over the latter's alleged high-handedness, lack of respect for shared governance, and unwillingness to consult adequately and to defer to the will of the faculty. Of course, sometimes this criticism is valid, but sometimes it is not. In fact the pervasiveness of this kind of criticism suggests that deeper issues are often in play.

    Interestingly, one almost never hears the faculty criticize its president for being too indecisive, for appointing too many large committees, for failing to close weak and uneeded programs, for not toughening promotion and tenure standards, for not focusing resources, and for failing to increase accountability and performance expectations. But these latter actions are precisely those which boards of trustees usually seek in their president. That so few presidents are able to pull them off are what has led to the widespread impression of weak leadership in academia.

    To me, the deeper issue is mostly a struggle over power. At a time when universities are experiencing unprecedented challenges, faculty leaders often appear to resist the exercise of presidential leadership that those challenges call for. If only, the argument goes, the president would consult more widely and be more respectful of the faculty voice, then surely the faculty would exercise its responsibility by endorsing any needed changes. History suggests, however, that this is not the case. In fact, the pervasiveness of the faculty/administrative conflict at so many universities suggests the opposite, and that criticizing the "management style" of presidents and other administrators is frequently a defensive strategy for resisting change.

    I am not suggesting that concerns about presidential style are always unwarranted. But it is hard to escape the conclusion that many professors often prefer weak presidents who will maintain the status quo, and that they will resist angrily those who press for the changes that the institution really needs to move forward, or even survive.

    I don't know whether the charges levied at Mr. Kerrey are warranted or not, But it is possible that the criticism also reflects an ingrained structural problem in the culture at the New School. If I am right, and if the trustees do not face up to this problem, then the longterm well being of the New School is likely in jeapordy.

  • The issue is the Code of Contact
  • Posted by stm60 at UConn on May 8, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Martin, particularly since Grove City is a faith based school, I think your comments can be distilled down to whether a school's code of conduct can be enforced only for violations that are against the law or whether a a code of conduct for a school can cover other transgressions. Acting in porn is not illegal (in this particular case) but neither are certain types of cheating, vocal or written racist comments and plagerism that many codes of conduct prohibit.

  • Yes, but what about the right of free association?
  • Posted by Libertarian on May 8, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Though the student did his movies in his free time, Grove City College is a Christian college. Though students are not required to signh a statement of faith, they must attend Chapel, and, I presume, at least outwardly live according to Judeo-Christian moral code, which excludes pornography. Now i'm not a Jew nor a Christian, and would scream "discrimination" if this was a public college. But our religious brethren have the same right to free association as others.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grove_City_College

  • Interested Thoughts
  • Posted by SWNID on May 8, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Martin, I see it differently. GCC's policies clearly delineate that students cannot engage in sexual activity outside of marriage. This GCC has in common with dozens of faith-based institutions. Their standards have been legally reviewed and tested extensively. Courts have held that students enter such institutions voluntarily and so agree to abide by the terms set by the institution for behaviors that would otherwise be private. Only an unprecedented legal opinion could challenge this decision.

  • Re Grove City: Dude, dude, dude
  • Posted by Gus03 , PhD on May 8, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Dude, you pay for a faith-based education by working in the adult industry? Man, sell your story to the 'bloids and pay your ticket to a school that is ignorance-based (ignorance such as Socrates's) AND you can keep your day job! (at least until your body goes south)

  • Between a Rock and a Hard Place
  • Posted by Local Observer on May 8, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • GCC Communications Director Amy Clingensmith states that "the college’s main concern was for Gechter."

    “Clearly something happened since he’s been here for four years that led him down this unfortunate path,” she said. “We want to get him out of that type of life.” And that's why Gechter was "indefinitely suspend[ed]...for one year for his activities, pending his decision to appeal to the provost."

    Excuse me, but how does an "indefinite" year suspension indicate GCC's concern for Gechter? If anything, GCC is covering its own ---. Had GCC officials ignored the photograph that most if not all of the student body had seen, they would be hung out to dry by parents of existing students, alums, donors, etc. I fail to see the concern for Gechter in this action. He is now unable to complete his degree in a timely fashion. Wouldn't that have provided him with the credentials needed to get "out of that type of life"?

    Gechter was naive in thinking that he could keep his work secret, given the accessibility of most everything over the Web. But GCC officials are naive in thinking this is not a violation of privacy.