Quick Takes

May 20, 2009

BYU-Idaho Bans Political Parties

Brigham Young University's Idaho campus has shut down the student groups that back the Democratic and Republican parties, The Rexburg Standard Journal reported. University officials said that the move was designed to assure that the campus is seen as politically "neutral," but some students are complaining, noting that campus chapters of political parties are common at other institutions.

Addressing the Tuition v. Fee Conundrum for California Vets

Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon (R-Cal.) introduced legislation Tuesday that would address one, California-specific inequity in the funding formula under the new Post-9/11 GI Bill. Maximum benefits payable under the new GI Bill, which goes into effect in August, are tied to the maximum charges assessed by public colleges in each state. In California, which by a quirk of state law calls tuition “fees,” that trick of semantics leaves veterans exactly $0 that they could apply toward a private college tuition bill (they can apply $6,586.54 per term toward their fees, but that does them little good at most private institutions). “California’s prohibition on tuition was meant to hold college costs down, not unfairly drive them up for our state’s veterans,” Rep. McKeon said in a statement announcing the introduction of the Veterans Educational Equity Act, which would allow veterans to use the full $6,586.54 to offset tuition and fees at private colleges.

With Loan Fight Pending, Kennedy to Return to Senate

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy has been a major player in nearly every important piece of higher education legislation for at least the last two decades, and with Congress poised to take on a potentially enormous higher ed challenge -- President Obama's proposal to transform the Pell Grant and student loan programs -- the Massachusetts senator appears likely to be in the thick of things again. The Hill newspaper, citing Congressional Democratic sources, reported Tuesday that Kennedy's brain cancer is in remission and that he is set to return to the Senate after the Memorial Day recess. Kennedy has been promising for months that he would return to lead Congressional efforts to enact President Obama's health care reform plan, but lots of commentators have played down that possibility. Kennedy heads the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that would play a central role in reform of both health care and the student aid programs. The Obama proposal to end the guaranteed loan program and use the proceeds to make Pell Grants an entitlement will get its first Congressional hearing tomorrow before the House Education and Labor Committee, the House equivalent of Kennedy's panel.

U. of Chicago Paper Retracts Column About 'Tramps'

The Chicago Maroon, a student newspaper of the University of Chicago, has retracted, apologized for and re-edited a column criticizing students for shedding too much clothing when spring arrives. While the column said that both male and female students were leaving too little to the imagination, references to "skanks" and "tramps" in the original column led many to argue that it was sexist and offensive. The column (after being edited in response to the criticism) may be found here. The newspaper's apology is here. The Chi-Town Daily News saw the original and altered versions of the column. One change that was made was to alter a question about “do our students become tramps to more effectively enjoy the weather, or do they use the weather as an excuse to more effectively become tramps?” to “do these students shed their clothing to more effectively enjoy the weather, or do they use the weather as an excuse to shed their clothing?”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

How to teach writing to non-humanities majors, in Acephalous.... The adjunct career, in Literature Should Mean Something in Your Life....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • The Real Offense
  • Posted by CAN on May 20, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • I doubt any genuine "tramps" or "skanks" could be reached for comment as to whether they took offense, but the U of C should be ashamed of the ignorance displayed by the split infinitives in this article. What a skanky trampling over grammar at this prestigious institution!

  • Posted by Eveningsun on May 20, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • There's nothing wrong with splitting infinitives, CAN.

  • Posted by Adjunct George on May 20, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • So much for freedom of the press to publish unpopular views!

  • Posted by Dan on May 20, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • The real shame here is that prescriptivist grammar-police didn't put down their copy of Fowler 50 years ago, and give up on pointless and arbitrary rules of English grammar, like the "split infinitive". While English is a Germanic language, we get our grammar from the Latins, who by definition couldn't split their single-word infinitives. But even the majority of old Anglo-Frisian infinitives were formed as a single word. So if the rule has no historical basis, and it does nothing to clarify meaning (how else would one clearly modify an infinitive), why not attempt to most efficiently use the vast abilities our language does allow us?

  • Political Correctness
  • Posted by Dr. Anonymous on May 20, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • I am sure that the discussion about split infinitives is fascinating. Still, I would like to address another issue. That pressure was put on the editors, and indeed they did yield to the pressure, apologize, and rewrite the article. Once again political correctness inhibits freedom of expression. It is especially unfortunate that a student newspaper bows down and submits and that this should take place at an institution of the prestige of the University of Chicago.

  • Or Dr. Anonymous is wrong
  • Posted by error-prone on May 21, 2009 at 8:15am EDT
  • and the editors realized the criticism was valid.

  • Fowler, puritanism, etc.
  • Posted by Steve , Associate Professor of Philosophy at Clemson University on May 22, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • I find the suggestion to put down one's Fowler to be bizarre. Fowler's article on split infinitives is a good one. He gives examples of when infinitives are to be split and when not; although of course this is in the end a matter of judgment, he does what he can, within the small compass of the entry in his usage guide, to encourage the development of one's judgment in this regard; for Fowler, the highest priority seems to be that of communication: silly rules like that of not splitting an infinitive must never be allowed to stand in the way of communication -- which is what language is all about.

    The other thing that I find bizarre here is that college students would have some problem with female students shedding some clothes in the spring. These problems seem to me to stem from puritanism -- which has always been a latent force in this country -- and have nothing to do with so-called political correctness.