Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Distance Ed Tipping Point

May 26, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

AUSTIN, TEX. -- As colleges moved into distance education, many questions were raised about how they could serve this new group of students. And colleges responded, with new ideas about online learning resources, academic advising online and so forth.

But what about after distance education takes off? At what point does the question shift from what a college does to offer quality online programs to how a college needs to change in its entirety when it reaches a tipping point in enrollments -- and at what point does such a change take place?

That was the focus of a discussion Monday at the annual meeting here of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development, a top meeting of community college faculty members and administrators. The discussion was led by officials from Cerro Coso Community College, a sprawling California district that in the last year saw a majority of its students, any way you count -- 3,500 by headcount, 6,000 by full time enrollment -- become distance students.

"What do we change -- if we change anything?" said Dylan D. Mattina, director of information technology, in introducing the session. "This is something that many institutions will have to deal with at some point."

Mattina and others from his college discussed several of the choices colleges need to make as they reach either 50 percent or some other critical mass where the institution is changed by the success of its distance offerings.

Faculty hiring and training: James Fay, vice president of academic affairs, said that online growth changes the nature of what search committees seek in new hires. While there isn't an expectation that all new hires have distance teaching experience, there needs to be a willingness to learn (including the college's online training program) and to embrace the differences between classroom and online instruction. "A good online class is not just like good classroom-based class," Fay said. "It's not just 'I'm going to move my lecture online,' " he said. When a college offers only some distance offerings, it can rely on those who are enthusiastic. When you reach critical mass, you need buy-in from everyone.

Fay said that he does not force faculty members to teach online, but that as enrollments have shifted, demand has gone down for classroom sections, so that there are fewer of those for professors filling out their schedules.

Karen O'Connor, associate professor of business at the college, said that one shift, as time has gone by, is that more professors realize that online courses are not easy and in fact may impose on their time. So another key factor, she said, is realism. "We need people thinking about how they will plan their time."

Further, she said, faculty members need training on things such as the evolution of cheating techniques online. Students can be savvier than faculty members, so there must be a commitment to keeping current.

O'Connor said that faculty hiring panels on which she sits now routinely ask all candidates about distance education issues -- and that she finds those starting out their academic careers have high familiarity.

Faculty expectations: Mary Retterer, president of the college, noted that every policy the college created over the years assumed that in-classroom instruction was the norm. How should those policies change, she asked, as more faculty time is spent online.

Local ties: Retterer also said she wondered about the long-term impact on community colleges' missions. "Do we continue in this direction or is there a point at which we should say that's enough," she said. The college covers a lot of ground (its service district, in one of California's less populated regions, is larger than Vermont) and the college works hard to help local communities. Now, 17 percent of online students are Californians outside the district, which would have been impossible before distance education. There is also a trickle from outside the state.

Retterer said that, given the reliance on state funds, she's not worried about taking in Californians. But she said she's less certain about the impact from out of state, even with the higher tuition such students pay.

Technology infrastructure: Fay said that as distance enrollments make up a larger share of enrollments, colleges that have let faculty or departments go their own way on course management systems may see the need to centralize. He said that many colleges start distance education piecemeal and programs are set up in different ways. When growth takes place, this makes tech support more expensive and more difficult, he said.

Further, he said that when 50 percent of students are online, the state of tech support becomes one of the most important issues around -- perhaps more important than would have been the case previously. "You can't afford to go down for a day," he said.

Audience members noted their own experiences. One administrator said that now that his college has 20 percent of enrollment online, it is starting to negotiate with its faculty union on changes in procedures so that online teaching is evaluated appropriately and is understood as central to the college's mission. He said that previous contracts haven't touched on the issues much.

Others described tipping points at different divisions of colleges. Julie A. Waskow, chair of philosophy and religion at Glendale Community College, in Arizona, said that her department started small with distance education. But in recent years, enrollment has grown such that half of enrollment is online. The department now has a deputy chair to focus on online issues and has just completed a strategic plan for distance education, looking at how the faculty members will judge success, evaluate courses and build the curriculum.

She urged other departments to do the same, saying that at some point, the growth in enrollments demands that academic units look at where they are headed.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Distance Ed Tipping Point

  • Tipping Point
  • Posted by Eduardo J. Calle , Associate Professor at Miami Dade College on May 26, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Colleges are beginning to recognize, much to the disappointment of those who despise and fear distance education, that students no longer consider learning something that demands a specific time and place. For those who study the works educational leadership gurus, the fact that "customers" are voicing their preferences via exploding matriculation in distance courses demonstrates that change, powered by choice fueled by technology, is upon us. Additionally, Drucker's predictions about the demise of brick and mortar facilities are especially important as they appear to be right on track. 

    Based on market demands and the needs of an aging population desperately seeking the opportunities associated with lifelong learning via scheduling flexibility, colleges must focus on building and improving cyberinfrastructures and stop trying to force 21st century students to learn in ways that feel warm and fuzzy to those firmly stuck in the previous century. Regardless, the free market will settle the argument sooner than later. 

    The University of Phoenix, Nova Southeastern, Miami Dade College, and many more have chosen to increase learning opportunities for those challenged by time constraints. They offer students what they want and need and are enjoying the benefits of courageous efforts to embrace change. Others think that they can force students into brick and mortar classrooms and hybrid courses just because they refuse to offer customers what they demand. Meanwhile, online enrollment continues growing and growing.  

    Scholars assert that change is as constant as it is inevitable. Based on this premise, those who cannot and will not adapt to market demands likely face a fate similar to dinosaurs who could not understand their looming extinction stemming from the incoming fire from the sky. Dinosaurs were defenseless. Higher education is not. For those who worship brick and mortar: Hug those desks and chalkboards tightly - they may be useful during the next ice age.  

  • the extinction of the professor
  • Posted by adjunct professor on May 26, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • Soon we will witness not only the extinction of the "brick and mortar" but also the "professors" to administer the online courses. Self-motivated students will realize eventually that they can easily dispense with the prompts of a virtual professor and learn how to access quality content online on their own. (I know someone who has learned as much economics this way as any econ major from any institution.) We can then devise new ways to measure,recognize and accredit what these students have learned, and be done with colleges and universities as we now know them altogether. With a computer terminal and an internet connection we have all we need to educate ourselves. This is what it means to move into the twenty-first century.

  • Re: Professors' Extinction
  • Posted by Avron Barr , Member at LETSI.org on May 26, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • Learning is easy until it is not. At that point, you need a teacher to answer your questions or to ask you questions in order to figure out what exactly you're confused about.

    I am concerned that the focus on distance learning today is still centered on delivering content to self-motivated learners (Web 1.0) instead of on connecting teachers and learners (Web 2.0). Yes, the institutions and the job titles might change, but the teachers need to be in the loop. In fact, they are the origin of the value chain. The rest -- the schools, textbook publishers, and so on -- can indeed be disintermediated.

  • Learning vs. platform?
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on May 26, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • As with the original "correspondance schools" - what is your completion rate? Your drop-out rate? Student customers want an easy degree. Employers want some assurance that learning is happening in either brick and mortar or online colleges.

    Do you offer proctored exams or work strictly on the honor system? Can your graduates interface with other human beings in real time? on any platform of communications?

  • 21st Century Education?
  • Posted by bkay , Professor, Philosophy on May 27, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • I haven't really seen a serious debate about the movement from so called "bricks and mortar" to online education.

    For one thing, it is hard to see what are the proper questions to ask?

    For those of us who enjoyed and benefited from university life, the answer is easy to the following question: "Which is going to be the better education? Four years in an idyllic environment, a kind of retreat, in which it is possible to grow intellectually, to debate, to profoundly change the scope of your understanding, to explore essentially impractical worlds of philosophy, literature, and history and the other arts, or one which, like the rising Phoenix University, gives you nothing more than practical tools for success in the business world." That's your 21st century "education?"

    This transformation of the student to a customer and the teacher to a manager of commodities needs to be explored as an historical event of profound cultural change. Beginning in the conflicts of the 60s and 70's and realized in current times by means of computers, this history can teach us something about what we have lost and gained in this world of increasing automata and indiscriminate depersonalization. Is it really a profoundly improved democratizing phenomenon or is it merely another chapter in the downgrading of quality and the sensitive imagination that goes with an individual life.

    BKay

  • Ow, if were only this easy
  • Posted by Jim Fong , Consultant at Diagnostics Plus on May 27, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • As long as there is proof in the pudding that true learning and quality is in place, then why not distance education? For some though (and to my disagreement with a few of the posts), you are going to need the instructor/professor (to what degree, no pun intended, can be debated) ... you'll never get everyone to be self-motivated or self-directed. If they were, then the independent study and correspondence course model would have dominated and shut down the other parts of the college or university.While I respect the fact that online courses gives the learner flexibility and the ability to continue current employment, I do agree with the one post that time and place being less a priority is a bit disheartening.

  • Making it better
  • Posted by Roscoe Thornthwaite , Dean, Distance Learning at Trident Technical College on May 27, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Recently, we finalized our quality guidelines for online and mixed-mode (aka, hybrid) courses. My VP wanted to know if the guidelines could also be used for face-to-face. My answer was "with some minor modifications, they could be used." So, why did it take distance learning delivery to generate quality guidelines for face-to-face? It is because distance learning expands the vistas of face-to-face. It makes us better at teaching and learning. Don't get me wrong, I do not believe face-to-face instruction will ever be eliminated, but I do think distance learning expands our perceptions and our vision of teaching. I personally feel more engaged with my online students than my face-to-face students. I can say that after 32 years of teaching and with 23 years of teaching through distance learning modalities. Our college has grown from a few hundred online students to over 8,000 students over the past 13 years. What I have seen is instructors teaching better, engaging their students in more substantive interaction and using distance learning tools to enhance the clarity and delivery of content. Distance learning is changing the educational environment for the better. The only barriers lie within people's perceptual sets that cause them to disengage from powerful tools that enhance and expand student learning.

  • And the Debate Continues...
  • Posted by Jamie on May 27, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • I am amazed by the contentious nature of the debate concerning the quality of distance learning. I am weighing in for the first time with my own perspectives, and the context of BKay’s idyllic portrait of traditional learning.

    First, in response to BKay's remarks concerning the ideal undergraduate learning experiences. I think this commentator’s perspective is a unilateral and largely biased representation of traditional academic experiences It further fails to consider the limitations associated with the delivery of education in brick-and-mortar universities, and obscure the true experience of most contemporary college students who lack the funding to maintain an idyllic lifestyle for four (or more) years. Furthermore, based on my undergraduate and graduate experiences at a competitively ranked traditional "brick and mortar" university, the opportunities for debate in most undergraduate classes were extremely limited. A classroom of 100+ students prevents any meaningful conversation. Moreover, many of these undergraduate courses were taught by overwhelmed graduate students who lacked the professional training, preparation, and/or knowledge to promote and sustain serious discourse. Rather, much of the discussion and intellectual debate occurred outside the parameters of the classroom, and this discourse was not facilitated by anyone associated with the university professorate.

    Traditional universities and the educators employed by them do not necessarily promote the type of idyllic educational environments you described, BKay. In fact, I have encountered many students who have described their graduate experiences as abysmal and there are some common threads within all of these remarks. First, and foremost, graduate students complain about restricted access to professors. Two comments typically emerge: (1) Professors are either busy pursuing tenure, or, (2) having achieved tenure, these individuals have settled into their own idyllic professional lifestyle that does not include mentoring and advising duties, and certainly prohibits any intellectual debate with students. One caveat concerning the latter: Intellectual discourse, when it does occur, is typically restricted to a particular professor’s personal interests and ongoing research program.

    So, in retrospect, I graduated from my undergraduate and maters program, with honors, in spite of the constraints of this university and its employees. (Yes, I do consider professors employees!) Thus, when I decided to pursue a PhD, these factors weighed heavily in my decision-making processes. After visiting three universities I realized I had a choice: I could either surrender myself to the same type of learning experiences I encountered earlier, and relocate in the process. Alternatively, I could pursue my degree online with an accredited university. I chose to pursue my degree online, am in the middle of completing my dissertation, and do not regret my decision. Did I encounter problems along the way? Certainly but none of them were unique to the online environment (e.g., a couple of bad instructors, poorly written course materials, obscure learning objectives, poorly prepared classmates), except, perhaps, the intense workload associated with the writing requirements. However, with regard to the latter, I considered this a “value-added” part of the educational experience.

    Do I think this approach is a good fit for everyone? Absolutely not; students who are unable to effectively self-regulate their cognition, motivation, affect, behavior, and environment will fail. Moreover, based on my own experiences as an online instructor and a distance learning student, they do fail, and in disproportionate numbers. However, it is worth noting that many traditional universities and colleges have poor retention rates among their undergraduate populations, and produce a fair share of terminal ABD’s as well. These completion rates may be attributed to the failure of the same self-regulatory systems that contribute to the success/failure among online students.

    Now, back to BKay’s comment regarding discourse and intellectual debate. In distance learning, much of this communication occurs in written form within the online discussion boards. However, in contrast with my traditional face-to-face experiences, these discussions are facilitated by the professors who, for the most part, have been well trained. Moreover, I have enjoyed unprecedented access to my professors, and more recently, my dissertation committee. While much of this contact is by e-mail, conference calls and phone conversations are also commonly used methods of communication. Is it possible to engage in stimulating intellectual debate and discourse in writing? This question seems absurd when you consider an irrefutable fact: The vast majority of our professional and intellectual enterprise is published in books and journals. What is the value of telephonic communication? Well, yes, and it is certainly better than no communication at all!

  • Leadership of online faculty
  • Posted by Marion Jewell , Assistant Dean at baptist School of Health Professions on May 27, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  •  

    Online education continues to evolve and grow at our institutions. Research has looked at the process of course design, the teaching strategies that have evolved for online learning, and how faculty learn to work with and use the online platforms and technology. Online courses are now global and with such change has come a new group of faculty committed to creating a rich online learning environment. These faculties are not necessarily geographically tied to a resident campus. The growth of online has created an increase in virtual faculty who teach at a distance. The author has noted that although attention has been given to the planning and administration of distance education, there is an absence of research and lack of understanding of the leadership models needed to support distance education. Leadership of virtual faculty and virtual faculty satisfaction will be our new challenge.

  • Concern is Integrity of Course Development
  • Posted by R. DeBlasio , Instructional Designer on May 27, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Distance Learning is poised to cruise smoothly with the learning process of individuals accelerating at a comfortable pace. The concern I have is the course development design of some asychronous online courses that I have experienced "behind the scenes." I abandoned my position as an Instructional Designer at Argosy University and South University because they were breaking all the rules of helping people learn. If one considers an online curriculum, I would highly recommend the following: Make certain it is not being managed like a sweat shop factory with its leadership least interested in an individuals learning and most interested in making money. This will soon be felt by the learner and they will likely drop out. Next, make certain that the course is written in the US and not in a foreign country. I was astonished to see elements of American history and business culture being incorrectly written from some unknown or out dated perspective. For example, who uses the term "perculator" instead of a coffee pot? If you want your learners to blend into the course, you must open the door for them. Then, once government assistance money for education is allocated and the learner takes a few courses only to discover that the course was poorly designed by a Howdy Doody, then is there any money left to transfer to another school? A good learning experience needs a good strategic within the course, utilizing motivating adult learning tools. Make certain that a course has good learning objectives and articulated rubrics to help lay the blueprint and expectations of a cours outcome. i think you have the idea, and I am not saying that all online providers play at this level, but an online curriculum can be as good as a brick and mortar school, but, please, think of the learner first.

  • Posted by a student on May 28, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • As I read through the comments, I have one question. Where is the student voice in this? Are students choosing online/distance education because they want to, or is it because they have no alternatives? What would the students prefer? I see the numbers of enrolments in online learning increasing, and I wonder what is the cause of it...is it truely choice or has the institutions structured it so that there is no other option? Or is the student working and that is the only way the can continue on with their education? What is the experience of the online learning class for the student - that is are students posting in the community? Are they getting support from faculty? Do students enrol into another online class by choice (as opposed to the next online course being a required course or a prerequisite to another required course).

    I see a lot of statements being made about being student-centred or doing it for students, but the experience for both online AND face-to-face is far from a student-centric one.

  • Giving Credit Where Learning Has Occurred
  • Posted by John B. on May 29, 2009 at 10:45pm EDT
  • The current model for distance education is still very tied to the old bricks and mortar model where the institution decides what needs to be learned and by conferring a degree, they place a value on that learning for society. We need a complete paradigm shift from this top down system of knowledge valuation to one in which institutions evaluate what learners have decided is most valuable to them and confer degrees that legitimize that learning.

    However, I do not believe most 18 year olds have the maturity or wisdom to be self-directed learners.