Search News


Browse Archives

News

Not So Politically Incorrect

June 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Despite the recent dust-up at Liberty University, many politically liberal student groups continue to peacefully mingle at traditionally conservative institutions. Conversely, conservative groups continue to thrive in the minority at some colleges known for their more liberal leanings.

Liberty, a fundamentalist Baptist institution in Lynchburg, Va., founded by Rev. Jerry Falwell, set off a political firestorm last month when it revoked official recognition of a campus chapter of the College Democrats. Though administrators said they would not stop the group from meeting on campus, they dropped university sponsorship of the club because it supported candidates who favor abortion rights and other views which they said conflict with Liberty’s values.

As many politicians and outside commentators weigh in, the situation at the evangelical institution has remained at a standstill for weeks. Jerry Falwell, Jr., Liberty chancellor and son of the university’s now-deceased founder, has offered the College Democrats a compromise to which the student group has yet to respond: The university stated that it would renew official recognition of the club if it becomes a chapter of the Virginia Democrats for Life, a political group that opposes abortion.

Kindred Spirits

In Virginia Beach, about four hours east of Liberty, is Regent University, an interdenominational Christian university founded by the Southern Baptist televangelist Pat Robertson.

Last fall, when students formed a chapter of the College Democrats at Liberty, a small group of students at Regent created a similar chapter. The group overcame a number of hurdles to become officially recognized. But, to the surprise of its founders, the club’s major detractors were fellow students, not the administration or faculty.

“I did receive a few negative e-mails and messages on Facebook about starting the group,” said Heather Carr, co-founder of the club and a former Regent divinity student who has since transferred to Claremont Graduate University for personal reasons. “I was basically told to go to hell and that, for starting such a group on campus, that’s where I would probably be going anyway.”

The group did, however, have to make a few concessions to gain the university’s official recognition. Following the same protocol as any other student group at the institution, the Regent Democrats had to pen a constitution which potentially limits its actions in the event that they conflict with the institution’s values.

“It is understood that the University administration reserves the right to change or eliminate any procedure or action that is deemed inappropriate and not in accord with the spiritual standards established by the University,” the constitution reads.

Carlos Campo, vice president of academic affairs at Regent, said this restriction might equate to, for example, inviting a speaker who opposes abortion rights to balance a Regent Democrat-invited speaker who does support these rights. Still, he insisted there are plenty of tenets of the Democratic Party platform that are not “at odds with biblical teaching” on which the group can concentrate its efforts. One prominent example cited in the group’s mission statement is the party’s dedication to help the “poor and marginalized.”

“As the saying goes, God is neither a Democrat nor a Republican,” Campo said. “I’m proud that our students have respected one another, despite the fact that they may have different beliefs.”

Living within the restrictions set by Regent, the Democratic student group has attracted a wide variety of members, from left-leaning moderates to those so liberal that they almost feel out of place at the institution. The group’s co-founder, however, insists that this diverse membership has made the group even more vibrant.

“I am very liberal,” Carr said. “But we have some students who are very conservative Democrats. For me personally, I support gay marriage and a woman’s right to choose. But we have a wide spectrum of members. Just because everyone aligns themselves with the Democratic Party doesn’t mean that they support these issues.”

So far, the group has yet to experience any troubles on campus, and Carr and Campo predict smooth sailing for the near future, despite some of the unrest at Liberty. Robertson, Regent’s founder and several times a candidate for the Republican nomination for president, has even bestowed his blessing upon the group. Campo said Robertson “expressed very little resistance” to the club and supported promoting Regent as a “place for the free exchange of ideas.”

Not all liberal student groups at traditionally conservative campuses have had the support to stay both active and relevant, however. At Patrick Henry College, a Protestant institution in Purcellville, Va., and subject of the recent investigative book God’s Harvard, a campus chapter of the College Democrats was gone almost as soon as it was officially recognized by the institution.

“I don't presently know the status of the [Democratic] group on campus, but I can assure you no one in administration exerted any negative pressure on them to be low-profile, limit their activities, or disband,” wrote David Halbrook, Patrick Henry spokesman, in an e-mail. “From my understanding, it was never more than a couple of students at one time, and was never ‘active,’ per se.”

Efforts to contact any of the group’s remaining members were unsuccessful. The club’s Facebook group, however, suggests that a number of its founders have since transferred away from Patrick Henry. None of them could be reached.

Strangers in a Strange Land

Almost as far away from Regent and Patrick Henry politically as it is geographically is Hampshire College, a private liberal arts institution in Amherst, Mass. The college, which opened in 1970, is known for its non-traditional curriculum, in which students create their own programs of study and receive “narrative evaluations” instead of grades.

What better place, a trio of students thought, to establish a campus chapter of the Young Republicans than alongside an outdoor club, an organic foods group and a student bicycle-sharing program. Though the club was officially recognized this spring semester, its founders acknowledge that keeping it going at a place like Hampshire will be a challenge.

“Republican. The word is blasphemy on this campus,” writes Benjamin Saucier, the club’s president and a rising junior, on its Web site. “We, as some sort of collective community of students, are united in a common enemy: the Republicans. However, regardless of my personal political opinions, I feel it is this exact notion that is extremely problematic to our college and its growth as an institution.”

Still, despite the club’s ambitions of bringing another viewpoint to what Saucier describes as an ongoing campus debate “strictly between liberals and radical liberals,” it has faced almost no opposition.

“The backlash has been surprisingly minimal,” Saucier said. “Most of the level-headed kids that I’ve talked to about the group think it will be good for the campus. We’ve been in the corner just waiting for a fight and it’s not coming. We came armed to the teeth ready to go, and it’s just not there. As long as you argue your point well, people will respect it here.”

Surprising to Hampshire's Young Republicans is the fact that there is not even a Democratic student group on campus with whom they can debate or plan social events. Michael Evanczuk, founding member of the group, said he might even cross the aisle in the fall and attempt to start a campus chapter of the College Democrats. The competing club, he argued, would only help further legitimize the Young Republicans.

“It’d be great to have a debate,” Evanczuk said. “Our meetings, right now, are really just the three of us. There are at least seven Republicans on this campus; I’m just not sure that they know about the club yet. We’re just trying to plan events and get more publicity.”

While the conservative club has not been able to accomplish much on its liberal campus, it has set its sights on bigger battlegrounds. Saucier said the group has been working with the Republican Party on local and statewide elections in Massachusetts, noting that it would make more of a difference there than at Hampshire. In what may be a sign of the group’s initial successes, Ricky Tsay, one of its members, was recently elected chair of the Massachusetts Alliance of College Republicans.

The irony of having a Hampshire student elected the head of the largest Republican student group in the state was not lost on Saucier, who said that when he introduced himself at a recent meeting of the group, many exclaimed, “You’re from where?!”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Not So Politically Incorrect

  • Ironic name
  • Posted by David , Professor/English at Jefferson Community and Technical College on June 2, 2009 at 7:15pm EDT
  • There is no political liberty at "Liberty University." I love irony. This illustrates the danger of having sectarian colleges and universities. Some such as Notre Dame rise above narrow views; others like Liberty oppose any group that does not share its ideology. It seems strange that a church school would mandate that all their students be Republicans because that party shares its antiquated views on abortion and probably homosexuality as well.What ever happened to separation of church and state? Shame on Liberty University where the only liberty is on a sign in front of the school.

  • Peacefully Mingling
  • Posted by DFS on June 3, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Go to zombietime.com for some guidance on this issue, in general.

  • Liberty Means Liberty: Choose the Right School
  • Posted by H.E.Z. , Historical Sciences Department Chair on June 6, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • It never fails that one entrenched in a certain political party (democrat) must refer to name calling and lambasting to make one's point of view to those opposed to them if one is a republican. I came from a long generational history of democrats and their philosophies who held local democrat offices over the years until I began to do deep research for myself and not just follow the traditions of relatives over the years. I, too, held a local democrat seat. Myself and my immediate family members became the first ones to leave the party with much disdain from many relatives and friends and co-workers as the democratic party changed from what it use to be. During that time as a republican, I voted for democrats I knew who shared my views. Give me a blue dog democrat or none at all. Then the drive-by-media made sure any republican since 2000 was to be highly scrutinized and openly shamed by the public even if we didn't know these people nor said a word to them.

    My wife was on an elevator full of sudents in a Southern community college to meet one of our college children for lunch around election time 2004. Signs were everywhere denouncing Bush including the outside and inside of instructors and heads of departments offices. She had on a t-shirt about America and praying for our country. That could be something any religion or no certain religion could have worn with any political or no political persuasion. It was a simple shirt with hardly any writing whatsoever and not political to her. It was just a circle with a picture of Washington, D.C. Before she knew it, a young man verbally shouted at her about it and accused her of going to the polls to vote for Bush! No one came to her defense but leered at my wife! We instructed our family who spent 5 years there to never wear any controversial t-shirts on any of the school campuses. My wife and I followed suit. It was the chosen school with the most scholastic scholarships and living at home to prepare for university life and their costs. We could have sent them to a faith college with some rules and regulations we would respect and follow or a private college with theirs, but this worked out better over the other ones in costs and student loans. As to this above incident and otherse, we studied up and chose no political party to follow as not one has all the answers including the republicans followed by our becoming independents. Later we just referred to our political affiliation as American.

    It's 2009, and STILL "the powers that be" whose higher percentage of democrats occupy the Congress and White House won't let it be. Let's just MOVE along to the betterment of our country and fellow men and women and children. There is this continuation of "blame Bush" and "blame the republicans" mantra. So many of us who vote every time the precinct is open (jury duty follows next!) is sick of the past and look to the next day and future. Bury the past. When a politician goes home AFTER serving, it's over. Politics should not be a career but a service job for a time being the peoples servant doing what they were asked to do. The new man or woman comes in to replace them. I say blame them all no matter what political name they embrace when they stay too long and become corrupted by the voices, arm twisting of the old guard still there, and lobbyists around them.....may there be a pox on these people and their parties! They are no longer useful to the people and their needs but become a service to themselves! What goes around comes around. My family and I are not going to walk lock step with anyone. This should be a time period of settling our economic situations and not spending like drunken sailors (said about the republican party). Both parties have done so. We informed and erudite Americans are not fooled by any politician. My family listens to all sides of the media in print and on television or in person whether conservative or progressive or whatever or whoever they are. Then WE decide who and what shapes our decisions. The "change to believe in" should begin with the White House and Congress by not bringing up others faults. How many married men or women would stay with their partner if their transgressions (seen only by the complaining spouse and told to his/her spouse's relatives and his/her friends and her/his co-workers) were continually brought up and told out in the open? That marriage would either not be around very long or end up in continual domestic violence affecting the whole family. We have enough deaths from this type of tragic killing and/or verbally abusive mates and/or bruising the one they pledged their love for in the beginning.

    I am continually amazed by those who don't know the "Constitution of the United States" nor have never read the "Federalist Papers" nor been to or lived in the Washington, D.C. area (as my family has lived in the metro area at one time) visiting all the historical sites all around and inside these buildings and walls who always say this phrase "separation of church and state" including the politicians! Someone better read "The Communist Manifesto" which says outright that there is a "separation of church and state!" Our Founding Fathers words are so distorted today. Our Constitution says that there should NOT be any ONE religion as we should practice according to our own beliefs and not hinder others. But what we see is the bashing of Christianity and their people and their colleges or schools. You'd never get away with mistreating the loving type of Muslims who want to practice their faith! That phase of "seperation of church and state" divides us even more and could be fearsome to some or many people. Acceptance should be what rules the hearts and minds of individuals and not trying to change them to fit one's agenda!

    Lastly, when a person chooses a college of faith, they should follow its rules and regulations and already know from various readings about it and what the internet taught them about that place and visiting it; in many colleges, one will find them on myspace, facebook, and twitter what one is going to find as a student or parent of a student. Parents pay alot to send their grown children to their first or final destination; students contribute to their own costs of education in loans and/or working waiting to be accepted to one of several places one applied to either secular or faith or private institutions. Many work as they attend their chosen school. If the rules are not acceptable, one doesn't go there, or peaceably leaves for a better student college fit. I would hope one who chose a special place for their years of education would be happy there and proud to say they are a graduate of that institution of higher learning. Later that one can contribute financially to their alma matre and perhaps verbally share their experiences with one's family, friends, and others as well.

    Choose the Right School

    H.E.Z.

  • and we decry the madrasahs
  • Posted by Alex , Professor of Linguistics at Mutton College on June 24, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • H.E.Z sings the praises of censorship, closed-mindedness, and contempt for the Constitutional rights of free speech and freedom of assembly. (Yeah, I know, the grounds of these "faith-based" institutions are private property, even though such institutions take taxpayer money to operate their operations.)

    What a sad and miserable college education it is to hide (or be kept away) from views that differ from yours. What great training in rational discourse and tolerance.

    How exciting it must be for first-year students to meet others whose ideas are indistinguishable from their own. What a broadening of the mind! What a challenge!

    These propaganda mills should be treated as the intellectual puppy mills they are.