Search News


Browse Archives

News

Free Textbooks, Big Price for 'Bama

June 12, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The University of Alabama is paying the price for abuse of a free textbook program it offers its scholarship athletes.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Division I Committee on Infractions announced Thursday that it had levied significant penalties on Alabama’s athletics program for “major violations” involving 16 sports, including its high-profile football and baseball teams. More than 200 athletes “misused the university’s textbook distribution program,” according to the infractions report. The retail value of the improperly awarded books totaled nearly $40,000. Still, not all of these athletes purposely violated rules.

Only 22 of the 201 athletes in question were identified as “intentional wrongdoers,” or those who purposely took extra textbooks and received what the NCAA calls “improper benefits.” The textbooks redistributed to friends and significant others by these athletes ranged in value from one book worth $32.30 taken by a women’s track athlete to a lot of books, worth $3,947.19, purloined by a football player. Only when a bookstore employee at Alabama tipped off the university in 2007 to some of these suspiciously high charges for textbooks did the institution take action and investigate.

Most of the “intentional wrongdoers,” 14, were men’s and women’s track and field athletes. The four most valuable lots of books taken, however, were by members of the football team.

None of these athletes were found to have resold textbooks or other materials for a profit. In addition, none of the athletes were found to have received any “non-academic” items, such as electronic devices or clothing, free from the bookstore.

Despite this, the report notes that “there was a sharp increase in the total cost of books and supplies over a two-year period” from the 2004-5 to 2006-7 academic years as a result of these violations. The Committee on Infractions stated that this should have been a warning sign to administrators, leading to the finding that the university "failed to monitor" this program. The university was unable to supply textbook records prior to the fall of 2005, leaving officials uncertain if any similar violations had taken place in the past.

As punishment for these infractions, the NCAA placed Alabama on three years' probation, and ordered it to pay a $43,900 fine -- the approximate value of the books obtained by “intentional wrongdoers,” multiplied by two.

Most prominently, however, Alabama’s football team must vacate all wins in which the seven players who have been identified as “intentional wrongdoers” participated. Some sports news sources, including ESPN, estimate this could amount to as many as 21 games during the tenure of the former head coach Mike Shula and the current head coach, Nick Saban.

Individual records of “intentional wrongdoers” from the men’s tennis team and the men’s and women’s track and field teams must also be vacated. Team point totals in these sports must also be adjusted accordingly.

This is the fourth time since 1995 Alabama has been convicted of NCAA infractions. Most recently, in 2002, the university’s football team was penalized for recruiting violations. Previously, in 1999, the men’s basketball team was penalized for similar recruiting infractions.

Paul Dee, chair of the Committee on Infractions and lecturer of law and education at the University of Miami, said the university’s status as a “repeat offender” did play a role in determining its punishment. Still, he acknowledged that the most severe penalty possible, the so-called "death penalty" of suspending a program for an entire season or longer, was not considered by the committee.

“I think the penalty is the appropriate one,” said Dee, arguing that it still sends a strong message to other potential repeat violators. “The vacation of records properly addresses those involved.”

Mal Moore, director of athletics at Alabama, said that the university “acknowledged” the violations and “accepted” its punishment. He noted that the institution “failed to monitor” its free textbook program in the past but asserted that policies have been put into place to prevent similar violations in the future. In addition, he made sure to point out that these were violations that were limited to athletes only.

“No coach or staff member was involved in this violation,” Moore said. “No sport gained a competitive advantage, and not one athlete pocketed one dollar.”

Still, near the end of a conference call Thursday afternoon, Moore knew what most Alabamans were really concerned about.

“In no way does this impact the ability of our football team to compete in the future,” he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Free Textbooks, Big Price for 'Bama

  • Posted by bevo on June 12, 2009 at 6:15am EDT
  • How does this behavior not constitute fraud? If this behavior does represent a fraud, then the punishment appears extremely light.

  • NCAA violations-The University of Alabama
  • Posted by Edward Blackwelder , Executive Director at Criminology Research Project, Inc. on June 12, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • The University of Alabama did violate certain NCAA regulations. However, it must be pointed out, again, that no university official, member of the Department of Athletics, or institutional representative knew about these violations. When discovered, immediate action was taken, the SEC and NCAA notified, and appropriate measures taken to prevent the problem from re-occuring.

    While I understand the necessity of a student-athlete abiding by institutional, SEC, and NCAA rules and regulations, I do not understand the rationale of some.

    As a retired professor, not at The University of Alabama, I regularly "recommended" certain text books in addition to the "required" text books. The Professor knows what is needed in his or her particular class to maximize the potential of the learning experience for the student, not the NCAA.

    The NCAA openly promotes high academic standards but, at the same time, restricts what a student-athlete can purchase for a particular class. This makes no sense.

    The University of Alabama will survive but one must re-assess the reasoning of certain NCAA regulations.

  • Does anyone find this story funny?
  • Posted by Ironic? on June 12, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • So athletes get free books (why is that?) and they decide that friends of theirs might need them or be helped by getting them so they give them to their friends for free They're probably right! Their friends don't get this perk. For athletes, there is some kind of deal whereby they can get unlimited books and no one is monitoring it, except for someone at the bookstore. I'm sorry. I think this story is slightly hilarious. We're nto talking about BMWs or fancy sneakers. Books. For free. And somehow no one knew it was against the rules to take their free books and give them to someone else. The athletic department may have inadvertantly helped the academic side of the university.

  • Please please please
  • Posted by Retired and Happy , Distinguished Professor Emeritus of English on June 12, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • For the love of heaven, please, please, please tell all of your editorial writers that one does not make an adverb out of a noun. I learned that lesson before my age hit double digits. "Purposely" is not a word, no matter how hard TV's talking heads try to make it. Please, please, please, let's have a bastion here against the massacre of grammar. Am I the only reader bothered by this kind of lapse in skill?

  • Purposely IS a word
  • Posted by Emily on June 12, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • According to Merriam & Webster, purposely is an adverb meaning "with a deliberate or express purpose" dating back to the 15th century.

    See: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/purposely

    Retired & Happy, maybe your brain is a little bit rusty from, well, being retired and happy? Purposely is definitely a word.

    Just for kicks, here it is in a word-choice lesson on the website of an English professor at Washington State University: http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/purposely.html

  • Yeah, me, too.
  • Posted by Laura on June 12, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • I'm with you, Ironic. My first reaction to this story was an outloud (and somewhat perplexed) utterance of, "so athletes get free books..."

    Who knew?

    Apparently the NCAA.

  • Posted by Cassandra on June 12, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • I'm not sure how clear this was, but I think some commenters were interpreting things a bit different than I think was meant in the article (which, by the way, means it was bad journalism):

    I think the athletes involved in this situation were, presumably, on scholarship that granted a book allowance. This is not that strange as scholarships go, but the open-ended nature of the allowance is, well, boggling.

    It seems to me that some student-athletes were using their open-ended book allowance to not only buy their own books but also those of various and sundry others. It wasn't like they were passing along last semester's texts, but, rather, buying $3947.19 (in the worst case) in books for other people just because they had the open-ended line-of-credit at the bookstore.

    I agree with others: This is a clear case of fraud and the players should be severely reprimanded.

    Now, if indeed these student WERE NOT on a book allowance due to a scholarship, I think Alabama has some 'splain' to do about why student-athletes get free books and the rest of the student-plebes have to pay for them.

  • Nastiness is inappropriate
  • Posted by JO'B on June 16, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Advice for Emily -- cut the nastiness when you comment. It's inappropriate and certainly not necessary.