Search News


Browse Archives

News

Out of the Loop

June 12, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Sixty-four percent of American faculty members at four-year colleges believe that their institutions have a "strong emphasis" on a "top down management style," according to an international survey of professors being released today at the annual meeting of the American Association of University Professors. Only 31 percent said that they believed there was a strong emphasis on collegiality in decision making, and only 30 percent believe that there is a strong emphasis on good communication between management of higher education and academics.

British professors in the survey had an even gloomier view on those measures of shared governance. Professors in China saw a bit more collegiality (35 percent) and less of a top down management style (57 percent).

The research project was conducted by William K. Cummings, a professor of international education and international affairs at George Washington University, and Martin J. Finkelstein, a professor of education at Seton Hall University. The survey was conducted in 2007, before the current economic downturn that has led, on many campuses, to difficult and controversial decisions that have left some professors wondering about the state of shared governance.

Generally, academics in industrialized democratic nations don't appear to believe that higher education is getting better. Asked whether conditions in higher education are "very much" or "much" improved over the course of their careers, 38 percent of Americans said Yes -- while the figures were 16 percent for Britain, 22 percent for Canada and 13 percent for Japan. In contrast, academics are much more likely to feel that they are seeing major improvements in China (61 percent), Malaysia (55 percent) and Mexico (47 percent).

Faculty members in the United States continue to believe that they are the primary decision makers with regard to faculty hiring and tenure. But relatively low percentages of faculty members believe that they have primary influence in many other factors of academic life. Some of these are in more traditionally administrative areas (budgets) but some are very much academic (evaluating teaching and research, setting research priorities, starting new academic programs). While professors in other Western nations also tend not to see themselves as the primary decision makers in many areas, American professors appear to feel less in control than do academics in Britain and Canada.

Percent of Faculty Members Who Believe Professors

Area U.S. Britain Canada
Selecting key administrators 10% 31% 33%
Choosing new faculty 62% 53% 84%
Making faculty tenure/promotion decisions 51% 51% 71%
Determining budget priorities 2% 26% 7%
Determining the overall teaching load of the faculty 11% 40% 21%
Setting admissions standards for undergraduates 20% 37% 37%
Approving new academic programs 37% 55% 41%
Evaluating teaching 26% 51% 25%
Setting internal research priorities 35% 55% 53%
Evaluating research 45% 43% 59%
Establishing international linkages 30% 57% 47%

 

Generally, American faculty members in the survey feel they have more influence at the departmental level than other levels of their institutions. Asked if faculty members are "very or somewhat influential" at American colleges, 73 percent said they did at the departmental level, 49 percent said they did at the level of school within a university, and only 21 percent said that they did at the institutional level.

While the survey results suggest that American (and other) faculty members don't feel that they have as much influence as many would like, they data also suggest that relatively few see this as a major crisis or worry about student involvement in decision-making. Between 1992 -- when a comparable survey was conducted -- and 2007, there was a modest increase in the percentages of American professors who believe their top administrators are competent (although that is still a minority opinion) and a modest decrease in the percentage who think their administrations support academic freedom.

American Faculty Attitudes 1992 and 2007

View % Who Agreed, 2007 % Who Agreed, 1992
Top administrators are providing competent leadership 41% 38%
Faculty are kept informed about what is going on at their institution 43% 41%
Lack of faculty involvement is a real problem 32% 43%
Students should have a stronger voice in determining policy that affects them 23% 27%
The administration supports academic freedom 59% 65%

The survey also asked faculty members around the world how much time they spend on various activities. American faculty members reported totals that, on average, well exceed a 40-hour work week and that allocate more time to teaching than those of their counterparts in many other countries. Several countries' academics reported that they spend more time on research, on average, than do their American counterparts.

Average Hours Per Week Reported by Faculty Members on Various Activities

Country Teaching Research Service Administration Other Academic Activities
U.S. 21.6 12.2 4.2 7.4 3.3
Britain 15.0 10.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Canada 20.6 16.0 5.3 8.5 4.8
Japan 21.8 17.6 4.6 7.9 3.3
Korea 21.4 18.2 4.9 5.2 4.3
Hong Kong 19.9 16.0 4.0 8.5 3.6
China 20.1 16.4 4.8 8.3 3.6
Malaysia 20.1 10.0 2.0 10.0 2.0
Brazil 18.9 9.7 2.5 4.8 2.6
Mexico 21.5 7.6 0.9 7.9 5.6
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Out of the Loop

  • I'm living it
  • Posted by RM on June 12, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • I'd comment on this, but I have too much to do.

  • poor profs
  • Posted by fred lapides on June 12, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • simple solution: get a tough union instead of wishy washy
    non-collective bargaining guilds.

  • Only themselves to blame
  • Posted by LM on June 12, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Well, if faculty would participate instead of complain and if research were not the be-all and end-all, things might be different. A wonderful colleague of mine just did not get tenure because though he has numerous articles in peer-reviewed journals, he did not have a book (though no one told him/us that this was to be a requirement 5 years ago). He has worked on innumerable committees, participated in College governance, and read carefully documents he was asked to read. Sorry guys, we're making our own bed, now we have to lie in it.

  • Faculty communication
  • Posted by John C. Bednar , Retired Professor at Clemson University on June 13, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • One factor affecting Faculty participation in academic governance is the simple ability to communicate with each other electronicly. With over a thousand faculty members at Clemson, no one has the ability to discuss subjects of concern through email, addressing the WHOLE faculty (unless you spend untold hours establishing your own listserve). No one can raise a concern and express it to all of the other faculty members. And over the past ten years, departmental and college meetings have practically ceased to exist. The Administration, on the other hand, can address the entire faculty at will, using their listserve. In today's Internet world, I think this is abridging the right to free speech.

  • plenty of shared governance
  • Posted by ka on June 13, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • There are not shortages of opportunities for shared governance. The problem is two fold: 1) only a small subset of faculty are really interested in shared governance and they take every opportunity to engage in governance; the rest of the faculty are too self-absorbed to engage with governance of the university (but not too engaged to whine when things happen that they don't approve of); 2) only a subset of the former subset can be counted on to participate with integrity; far too many of them have agendas and operate in counter-productive fashion to support their agendas. I'm speaking as a faculty member who has worked in administration and served on countless committees in both capacities. "Active" faculty and apathetic, self-focused faculty are their own worst enemies.

  • Posted by Perry on June 14, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • We have a strong union and an active Academic Senate and we are still having two-day/mo furloughs imposed on us (10% salary cut), increased class sizes, freezes on hiring and travel, etc. This strikes me as "blame the victim". Our main mistake has been to work in California.

  • Information control
  • Posted by Mila on June 14, 2009 at 6:45am EDT
  • John Bednar makes a very good point: university administrators have monopoly control over the means of internal communication and therefore they control the "conversation." Last year I and others wanted to rally support of colleagues against the closure of a department, which had been decided by the dean without any faculty consultation. I asked the school's IT administrator for the email list of college faculty and some days later was told that was "against school policy." Translation: it was against the dean's policy to let the playing field be a little more level.