Quick Takes

June 24, 2009

State Policies and Remediation at Community Colleges

A new report, "Setting Up Success in Developmental Education," explores how state policies influence the chances of getting more students into college-level work at community colleges. The report, released Tuesday by Jobs for the Future, looks in details at approaches in 15 states, focusing on four issues: how to align standards to minimize the need for remedial work, how to assess students and place them in courses, how to evaluate innovations, and how to use incentives in measuring performance.

275 Layoffs at Harvard

Harvard University on Tuesday started the process of eliminating the jobs of 275 staff members, The Boston Globe reported. While many other universities have eliminated even more positions, the layoffs at Harvard -- which has a larger endowment than any other university, even after the declines of the last year -- are likely to receive more media attention than those at other institutions. The Globe article includes links to letters from Drew Faust, Harvard's president, and Marilyn Hausammann, the vice president for human resources. Beyond those losing jobs, an additional 40 staff members will be offered positions with reduced hours.

Senate Would Give $161.3 Million for NEH and NEA

The Senate Appropriations Committee approved legislation Tuesday that would provide $161.3 million each for the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts, less than the $170 million that the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee would provide for the 2010 fiscal year in parallel legislation it passed last week. The endowments are receiving $155 million in the current, 2009 fiscal year, and President Obama proposed spending $171.5 million on the NEH and $161.3 million on the NEA.

DOD Policy on Transferring GI Bill Benefits

The U.S. Department of Defense on Tuesday released its policy for transferring educational benefits to spouses and children under the new, Post-9/11 GI Bill. Intended in part as a retention incentive, service members wishing to transfer their GI Bill benefits must have served at least six years and commit to another four (although there are specific exceptions for those nearing retirement age). The ability for service members to transfer benefits to family members -- rather than use them or lose them, themselves -- has been highly anticipated by many in the military: “Transferability of GI Bill benefits is the most requested initiative we receive from our service members, and we believe it will assist us in retaining highly qualified military personnel," Bill Carr, the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy, said in a statement announcing the new policy. Down the road, the policy could potentially lead to shifts in who uses GI Bill benefits, and how. The Post-9/11 GI Bill goes into effect in August, and service members can make transfer designations online starting Monday.

Tufts Sees Positive Impact of Loan Repayment Plan

During the last year, Tufts University awarded grants to 288 alumni who work for nonprofit groups or in the public sector to help them repay their student loans. The grants -- which ranged from $500 to $5,000 and for which alumni may reapply annually -- are part of what may be the broadest program of its kind. Many colleges have programs to repay the loans of alumni in selected fields. The Tufts program, in contrast, is open to all of its alumni providing that they are working in government or for nonprofit groups, and provided that they are repaying loans they took out to attend the university.

Fewer Grants, Smaller Grants for Health Research

A survey by the Health Research Alliance of nongovernmental funders of health research and training (much of which takes place at universities) has found the following impacts of the economic downturn: 63 percent of funders are decreasing the number of awards, either by decreasing the number of awards granted per funding cycle for a given grant program and/or placing entire grant programs on hiatus for at least one funding cycle; 31 percent are delaying consideration of new initiatives or multi-year obligations for at least a year; 22 percent are decreasing the average amount of new awards; and 22 percent are making percentage reductions to the payment of existing grants.

AAUP Deplores Violence in Iran

The American Association of University Professors issued a statement Tuesday saying that it is "gravely concerned about state sponsored or state encouraged violence in Iran," which "has the potential to undermine further the already fragile status of academic freedom in Iranian universities." The statement added: "As an association devoted to the protection and expansion of free expression on university campuses, the AAUP supports the right of students and faculty to express their views of public events and national policy without fear of intimidation, arrest, or physical harm."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

Active vs. passive learning, in Academic Ecology.... Being accused of being too demanding, in Janus Professor....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Something seems not quite right here
  • Posted by Alan , Founder at Stuentloanjustice.org on June 25, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • I estimate that roughly, the Harvard layoffs will save about $20 million per year...less than a tenth of one percent of the current endowment size. Concurrently, I have heard nothing about the Harvard President (or any of the highest paid staff or faculty) volunteering a pay cut of any significance, nor have I heard of the school contemplating significant cuts in pay for its highest paid people.

    So Harvard 's decision makers would rather cut the compensation of 275 living, breathing, employees and neighbors by 100% before shaving a hair from their massive salaries? And this, for a relatively tiny budget shortfall. I think a message is being sent here, one that will be used as precedent by other universities.

    Which raises a good question: Has even one university president volunteered to take a significant pay cut (i.e. 10% or more) to deal with the current "financial crisis"? I think not. Apparently the concept of sacrifice carries no currency in these environs, but the concept of fear mongering is alive and well. A page out of the financial industry's playbook, I would say,.