Search News


Browse Archives

News

All for Wearing a Hijab

July 2, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Slma Shelbayah always wanted to be a Middle East television analyst. Now the former Georgia State University doctoral student and visiting instructor at the university's Middle East Institute is finding herself in the media for a different reason -- discrimination against her because of her Middle Eastern background.

Georgia State University is coming under scrutiny after the head of its Middle East Institute stepped down Wednesday, asserting in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint that both she and Shelbayah had been mistreated after an incident of racism. Dona Stewart, who is also a tenured professor of geography, alleges that after Shelbayah was harassed by a professor for wearing a traditional Islamic hijab, they were both subjected to a bout of hostile actions by the university. The EEOC is currently evaluating separate but related complaints filed by Shelbayah in November and Stewart in January.

"As professors, we are in powerful positions," said Stewart, who has been tenured since 2002 and worked at Georgia State since 1996. "We have an obligation not to abuse power, and in this case the professor clearly did that. I am simply not willing to sit by and watch this happen, and I'm shocked that our institution is willing to do so."

The chain of events began last August after Mary Stuckey, a professor of communications and graduate director for the department, was said to have made discriminatory comments about Shelbayah. Stuckey allegedly asked Shelbayah whether she had bombs underneath her hijab and made other references to her carrying bombs. After the incident, and another case where Stuckey made similar racist remarks, Shelbayah filed a grievance within the university, aided by Stewart. After going through the formal complaint process, Shelbayah believed that the issue had been worked out between her and Stuckey.

She wrote in a September 7 e-mail to the communications department chair, which was included in Stewart's EEOC complaint, that "I want you to know that this incident has touched me personally on several levels, but in the end of it all, I feel that it has left me with more positive than negative! I feel that I've grown and developed through it all! I also want to say that Dr. Stuckey and I both feel that it has only brought us to a better understanding of each other and has also strengthened our relationship and connection with one another."

A day later, the associate dean of Georgia State's College of Arts and Sciences informed Shelbayah that she could not remain a visiting instructor while also being a graduate student in the department of communications. Though she had been admitted into the Ph.D. program with the university's full endorsement that she would also be a visiting instructor -- and her previous office-mate had done both as well -- she was told that unwritten policies disallowed such a practice, Shelbayah said.

Stewart and Shelbayah worked together to try to fix the situation, but, according to the EEOC complaint, "the Communications Department refused to allow Slma to continue down the course of study for which it had accepted her prior to complaints against Dr. Stuckey."

Within the next few days, Shelbayah says, she was told that she could not run a study abroad trip to Egypt that she had already planned and advertised. She was also dropped from one of her core classes in the communications department, and administrators were unable to figure out how to fix it. Other annoyances like her insurance not working, she said, made her question whether all of the events were connected.

"I was doubting that it might be connected, but because it was happening really really fast, it was just so strange," she said.
Furthermore, Adamson told Stewart that she was no longer supporting the creation of a bachelor's degree program that Stewart had been planning through the Middle East Institute. The complaint states: "Since then, the [College of Arts and Sciences] Dean's office at the University [has] continued to undermine Dr. Stewart's programs."

Shelbayah recently decided that she would leave Georgia State and take the year off while searching for another communications doctoral program. Stewart's resignation as director of the Middle East Institute Wednesday caps a full academic year of university politics gone sour. She says that pressure from administrators within the college to step down, along with her inability to engage them on the issues she felt to be unjust, led to her ultimate decision. She will remain a tenured professor of geography, but go on leave next year.

"At this point my entire academic career is in question. It's difficult to move from institution to institution, and given my relationship with my administration, it's exceedingly difficult for me," Stewart said. Shelbayah "was an undergraduate and master's student at Georgia State. This is being done to someone who is deeply invested in the university, and I have been here for 13 years.... These are people I have worked with for years, so it took an awful lot to get to this point."

In a statement, Georgia State spokeswoman Andrea Jones wrote: "The university takes very seriously any claims of discrimination. The student's complaint against Professor Stuckey was addressed using university procedure and appropriate action was taken in September of 2008. Due to federal privacy guidelines, the university cannot address the details of the complaint and its resolution. It was Dona Stewart's decision to resign as director of Middle East Institute. While she has resigned as director, Dr. Stewart is still an employee of Georgia State University and was recently promoted to full professor with the dean's support. In no way was retaliation taken against Professor Stewart nor the student as a result of the complaint."

The statement continued: "The university is fully cooperating with the EEOC on this investigation and looks forward to resolving this matter." Jones would not comment further due to the confidential nature of employee records.

This is not the first time Georgia State has been in the middle of controversy for discrimination practices. In 2007, Emelita Bryer, then a chemistry professor at Georgia State, filed a lawsuit against the university after she was denied tenure. She cited her Asian-American ethnicity as the reason. During her time at the university, she said she was subjected to comments regarding there being "too many Chinese" professors, and she asserted that she was paid $2,000 less than the rest of her colleagues. Bryer filed a lawsuit alleging that the university had denied her tenure for racial reasons and paid her less because of her race. Bryer would not speak to Inside Higher Ed, because she signed a confidentiality agreement with the university in the settlement of the case. However, in previous articles about her lawsuit, she has stressed that Georgia State, and indeed the country as a whole, needs to improve that way it deals with racial issues.

Stewart echoed the sentiment: "My hope is that the institution will learn and grow from this," she said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on All for Wearing a Hijab

  • Posted by SRD-BCCM on July 2, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • There is a lot of discrimination in academia. She is right about her observations. Minorities consistently go through one failure after another not realizing that, "someone near you is creating the conditions for you to fail". They-those in positions of authority usually white, have a legal duty to plant the seeds of non-discrimination but behind the scenes shift the momentum in the opposite direction.

    http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html

  • Trendy word
  • Posted by Confused on July 2, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Dear professors! The author use the trendy word "racism" for behavior of a person. Racism is ugly first of all because it suggests that people better than others or worse than others because of factors out of their control - color of skin, place of birth and so on. It seems to be so clear!

    Wearing hijab is a choice of person. Even in Islamic countries women have choice to wear hijab or not. I understand that the choice not to wear hijab in Islamic country may be oweful, but it is still her choice. For woman who lives in US the choice is even more free. Woman who wears hijab, espeaially outside Islamic country wants to show that she belongs to Islamic community. So any comment about wearing hijab can't be regarded as "racist".

    Unfortunately, Islamic brain wash confuses all definitions to find a new reason to cry out how "poor" they are. After all, the Muslim lady sais "Dr. Stuckey and I both feel that it has only brought us to a better understanding of each other and has also strengthened our relationship and connection with one another". I would say if Dr. Stuckey was keeping silence (nobdy can prohibit her to think) the communication would remain as bad as it was before. She gave to her college a reason to expalin something important about Muslims and they paid her with a complanint which may be a spot on her career. And they go to the media to cry even more.

    Be careful, ladies and gentlemen. Good example of how their mashine works.

  • Posted by Lawman on July 2, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Many claims like this one are hard to pin down. The student may have come under scrutinity b/c she filed a complaint against the professor and at that time some administrator concluded her "deal" violated university rules. As the Japanese say, the nail that sticks up gets hammered. This is not necessarily racism, but rather human nature.

  • Perpetuate the hate
  • Posted by A Muslim Academic on July 2, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • It seems like comments from "confused" will just continue the hate and ignorance. Having grown up in the US as a Muslim, I take offense to the comments made. The "muslim brain wash" and "good example of how their mashine (misspelled by the way) works" SMACKS of racism, does it not?!? I guess tolerance was only taught in my place of worship and not in “confused’s”.

    Thankfully, most people (whether they be Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu, Buddhist, Agnostic, Atheist) I know are interested in our similarities. Funny, how all humans (regardless of religion) put their pants on one leg at a time!

  • Posted by Not confused at all on July 2, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Hear, hear, Muslim Academic. If Confused takes issue with the word racism, he or she can substitute religious bigotry, as though that's any better. 

  • Posted by Jane , African Studies at University of Kansas on July 2, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Discrimination can take many faces in the academia. Take it easy and move on but it is sad that this is happening in the 21st Century. Now I know where not to apply for a job.

  • Posted by KAli on July 2, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Both Lawman and Confused are both clueless and obviously know nothing about intsitutionalized discrimination or retaliation practices whether they be racially, religiously or ability based. They need to grow up. Many devious things are done by university administrators and professors and then citied as allowable under the pretense of some failed understanding of rules, procedueres and regulations based on their own flawed interpretations. All of the events that went on after the complaint smack to me of retaliation based on the original complaint. As someone who experienced this as a doctoral student, weathered the storm and came out on the just side with all of the willing and "clueless' perpertrators from professor's to vice chancellors and entire policies and offices getting reworked this is easy to spot. Talk what you know when you experience it-but wait these things are routinely either ignored, overlooked or implicitly supported by many of your ilk.

  • Posted by Also Confused on July 2, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • I don't understand why A Muslim Academic feels the need to belittle the language skills of a person who obviously does not speak English as his or her first language, and whose main point -- i.e., that however we view the offensive behavior in question, it is doubtful that it constitutes racism -- is at least tenable. If this is the kind of "tolerance" Muslim Academic learned in her or his place of worship, I think she or he should shop around.

  • Posted by adjunct on July 2, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Lawman, your citation of the expression about the nail sticking up sounds interesting. Knowing nothing of Japanese expressions, I found it fascinating; but it applies to many situations. Perhaps this is one, wherein quiet arrangements can be made--if all goes "well." There are so many hard lessons in life, and many are taught by people who do not love us. Mom said: Pick your battles.

  • Posted by DoveArrow on July 2, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • "Woman who wears hijab, espeaially outside Islamic country wants to show that she belongs to Islamic community. So any comment about wearing hijab can't be regarded as "racist"."

    Oh. My. God. You have got to be kidding me. You're saying that she invited bigoted comments about her religion and ethnicity because she chose to wear a hijab? Seriously? Does that mean that any comment made to a woman wearing a skirt can't be considered sexist either?

    Freedom of choice means freedom of choice! If she wants to wear a hijab in order to identify with a particular community, she should feel just as free to do that as any Christian who wears a cross necklace, or any sports fan who wears a ball cap.

  • southern Corruption
  • Posted by Philosking , Faculty/Counselor on July 2, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • This does not surprise me out of this institution but I am disheartened to hear that it is happening in academia outside of athletics, which seems to be common place for this tactic. This school is still offering the following to their student athletes and it is an NCAA violation per bylaw 16 and as a faculty member I find reprehensible to have another student "edit" another students paper, especially when the student is not present. "Other Services Provided
    Paper Editing Service: In addition, we provide assistance with paper editing. Student-athletes must turn papers in 24 hours in advance in order for them to be edited by a qualified English tutor. It will then be returned to the student-athlete so that they may make the appropriate corrections prior to handing it in. All papers must be typed. Please see the notice board located in the Athletic Learning Lab for current editing blocks and walk-in tutoring hours. At these times, student-athlete's may receive walk-in editing assistance." If this is the kind of acceptable practices for the institution and now I read a report like this I sure am glad I am not an employee. Both people are probably better off leaving the school because there are greener pastures.

  • boorish or racist?
  • Posted by Bradley Bleck , English Insrtuctor at Spokane Falls CC on July 2, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • If the attributed comments about the bomb under the hijab are true, and since I read no denial of them I assume they are, I'm not sure if the behavior on the part of Stuckey is merely boorish or racist. More context is needed to come down on one side or the other of that line in any definitive way. In any event, the comments demonstrate that we have a lot of people within the academy who certainly lack the skills and sense to be in positions of leadership, and maybe even anywhere near a classroom.

  • Not always against people of color
  • Posted by MartinT on July 2, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • Discrimination in academia is rampant, but not always do we see it as simply an issue of whites versus people of color. While working at an historically black university in the South, I was routinely denied advancement in my career because I was white, not African-American. This became an issue when a Board of Trustee memember came to me to say that I had been denied a promotion because of my race. As he put it, "Now you understand what Blacks have had to put up with for decades."

    Well, at the time I was in a place in my life where I wanted to move on anyway, so I quietly left the university and sought employment in the North, where I have routinely been given more responsibility and praise for my work. So, before we simply make this an issue of caucasions being discriminatory against people of color, understand that it is a double-edged sword in Higher Education. Those in posititions of power, regardless of race, act and react the same.

  • Hmmmm....Words Mean Things
  • Posted by SeeYa! , SeeYa! at SeeYa! on July 2, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Kids:

    Not to be a bore, but, words mean things (see Webster's or your choice) to confirm this. Racism. Prejudice. Discrimination. They are NOT interchangeable. And, like most of life, they exist in multitudinous shades of grey. It is important to use language properly. Accurately. And with intention. Put another (far more eloquent) way:

    "Words mean things. When you put them together they speak. Yes, sometimes they flatten out and nothing they say is real, and that is one kind of magic. But sometimes a vision will rip up from them and shriek and clank wings clear as the sweat smudge on the paper under your thumb. And that is another kind." — Samuel R. Delany (Equinox) Something about this story seems....curious. The glowing email from the doctoral student ex-post-facto is not consistent with the formal (incendiary) actions launched. To be sure, if an actionable offense occurred, then kudos to her for having the....ovaries to launch this bold action. Likewise, kudos to Stewart for stepping down/speaking up etc. Frankly, Stuckey sounds like a Cold-War hire who needs to be retired (god knows, we don't have any of those hanging around academe, right?). Boorish and ignorant (check the meaning) communication is not appropriate, acceptable, or attractive (is she really in Communications?!). Beyond that, I think we need transcripts to know how it all went down. What do we want to call this? Here is what concerns me: That email smells like a frightened student caught in political blowback, unequipped to deal with the firestorm she had set off, and completely out of her depth in the treacherous waters of academe. I believe it is the responsibility of the grownups (esteemed professors) to protect, educate, and socialize students. I think being a good professor is part parenting, part job training. A big part of that job is (a) understanding yourself and (b) educating your graduate students about "how the world works." There are ways to handle this sort of thing without blowing yourself up (and everyone around you). Sometimes (not always) you can even have a (truly) positive outcome. If you do not have the savvy, temperance, skills, and perseverance for this tiny, ridiculous, petty game (academe)--then get out. Variously attributed to Kissinger/Sayre/etc. but....(horribly paraphrased)..."the reason the fights are so vicious is precisely because the stakes are so low." This is NOT A NORMAL world. I have worked both on the outside and on the inside (pardon the prison imagery:-), and I can tell you that academe bears very little resemblance to the real work world. (Save your rage for later:-) It is true. We have a lot of wonderful, caring, and devoted colleagues, do we not? However, we also have a huge overrepresentation of poorly socialized, self-absorbed, non-team-playing, inappropriate, highly-educated, and ill-equipped-to-mold-young-minds colleagues. And they are not only tolerated, their idiosyncrasies are protected, harbored, and thus allowed to flourish. (As a friend of mine--also a professor--likes to say: "Academe provides employment for many who would otherwise be unemployable.") Let's own it! Let's also be careful, accurate, and precise about what we call their actions and words. I am returning to the "real" world (rage, later, please:-). I am a (about to be former) member of the esteemed illiterati (and no, that is not a language-skills issue, A-Muslim-Academic, it is a deliberate attempt at levity, that is to say, in place of "illuminati") at a large and "diverse" (more on this word later) university. I have sat in (open) meetings where good, honorable, committed people speak freely (using outside-head words) of the need to "replace white faces with brown ones." Repeatedly. No one even blinks. When it is talked about (off line) it is with a strangely apathetic, ironic, and resigned air. It is apparently such established wisdom, that it no longer receives even cursory inspection. Curiouser and curiouser.... What shall we call that? Or should we begin to think about moving away from easy labels and instead--now I know this is crazy--but, begin talking about the real issues behind the words. Just a thought... Affectionate farewells, A former colleague

  • bottom line
  • Posted by Can Demir , - on July 2, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • All the comments miss the main issue.

    Regardless why she wore what she did or the people did what they did. The issue is whether such behavior is acceptable or a faulty one. This isnt one of those grey areas.

    It seems given previous issues that the this is simply an issue of senior management's inability to instill principles of equality and justice for all in its administration, the only real moral high ground that counts.

    Such issues if left un-corrected tend to fester much greater ones. Given this is done by the academics themselves the problem will only multiply as it plays out in the student population both in campus and later in their professional lives. Some as evidenced in above comments will see this as a under-the-table approval others will see it as a flexibility they too can play on.

    A strong statement and example needs to be made to discourage future events, underlining that racism is not accepted must be done in a results oriented way.

    Of course that begs the question of what the real beliefs of the administration are...

  • Stop the Excuses
  • Posted by Jose Cruz , Program Director on July 2, 2009 at 8:30pm EDT
  • I notice that many comments here are attempting to excuse or rule out the possibility of racism or discrimination in this case. Someone even calls it "human nature," an easy cop out. Since we don't have access to all the details, I think it's best to consider all possibilities in determining the intentions of the people at play, especially those behind the scenes. Contrary to popular belief, institutions of higher education can be some of the most conservative and political organizations. They have a tendency to reject change as most "humans" do, but this does not excuse discrimination or racism. Humans also have the ability to consciously make dignified choices based on moral convictions and a sense of integrity.

  • The Hijab
  • Posted by Dr. Calin on July 3, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Unfortunately, the United States has a fetish for religion. Hence the legality of wearing the hijab. France has a much better policy. No ostentatious religious symbol or garb is allowed in the public schools and in government offices. The hijab is stricly forbidden. The same should be the case with us. The hijab is a cultural artifact, a way that an immigrant has of stating that he is not American and has no intention of becoming one. Assimilation is the only answer.

  • Re: The Hijab
  • Posted by richard on July 3, 2009 at 8:00pm EDT
  • Yes, Dr. Calin, assimilation is the only answer! One country, one people....

    Completion of the reference left as an exercise for the reader.

  • Posted by kgotthardt on July 5, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • "Dr." Calin, I don't know about you, but I prefer to live in a country that protects freedom of religion and expression, a country that at least presumes to frown on discrimination, racism and random acts of cruelty.

  • astounding
  • Posted by Wineplz on July 6, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • that a tenured professor would make multiple, inflammatory remarks to a doctoral student/visiting professor and not be disciplined for it, even after a grievance is filed. Even worse is that the university seems to embrace that professor and instead, punishes the student and a supporting member of the faculty.

  • To Dr. Calin
  • Posted by Christopher T on July 7, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Don't you think we should also prohibit our nuns from wearing tunics and prohibit jews from wearing the yarmulkes and mitpachats? Or you're just picking on muslims. FYI, the USA was founded on freedom of religion, speech, and the choice to wear a hijab or a mini skirt.

  • Posted by Firdous , Student on July 10, 2009 at 5:15am EDT
  • All I can say is people are going to be ignorant regardless, and the best way to handle such pricks is to put them in their spot so no other person for any religion, race, gender gets attacked! It saddens me to know that a professor for a university still lacks knowledge, and the University is doing absolutely nothing about this. Shame on them!

  • Still Shocked
  • Posted by SF , HIstory at Northeastern University on October 22, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • ...as a former GSU student who worked with manyof those in Middle East Studies, I am sticll shocked when I recall these incidents. Under Dona's guidance, Middle East Studies was among the fastest growing institutes GSU had! And on an intensely international campus ike GSU's, the actions of Dr. Stuckey and the administration generally are not only insulting to Slma and Dona and the student body, but to most of the graduates who have a history at Geogria State. The work of "growing" middle east studies at GSU was doing quite a lot to change the university's less-than-stellar reputation..... this contriversy seems to have shot the school back into the dark ages.