Search News


Browse Archives

News

Locking Out Danger

July 10, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Post-Virginia Tech, the image of a gunman roaming colleges' halls continues to spark discussion. At the University of Michigan, a physics professor has generated discussion over a seemingly simple request: to outfit classrooms with doors that can lock from the inside.

Keith Riles, the professor, was teaching a course in a high-rise building in February 2008 when a gunman at Northern Illinois University took the lives of six people. Riles realized that if such an incident were to occur at Michigan, he and his students would be vulnerable in the classroom, he said.

"If we were to receive a campus lockdown alert, those teaching in classrooms would be unable to respond by locking anything," he said. "How do you respond to a campus lockdown if you can't lock your door?"

Starting in May, officials from the Facilities and Operations department have been researching the amount of money and time it would take to install new doorknobs. Classroom doors currently have a single lock that is part of the doorknob, and replacing them with locks on the inside would likely come at a "considerable cost," said Diane Brown, a spokeswoman for the public safety department. The campus, which serves some 30,000 students, consists of 600 to 900 classrooms, some of which have as many as a dozen doors.

To comply with Michigan fire safety code, doors to rooms that hold at least 50 people must swing outward, Brown said. The law also requires that people need only make one action to exit.

"Unlike at home, where you might have a deadbolt lock and also a door handle, you can't do that with large classroom doors," she said. "Essentially you must push your hand and also be able to get the door open. Whether you turn down a knob or push down a crash bar, you can only do one thing to get out."

While the group's research remains in the unofficial stage, with no funding attached so far, its momentum points to the self-analysis undertaken by higher education institutions in the wake of on-campus tragedies that have occurred in the last two years. At Virginia Tech in 2007, a student named Seung Hui Cho shot to death 32 students and faculty and wounded more than a dozen before killing himself, adding up to one of the deadliest shootings in American history.

In a report released by the Virginia Tech Review Panel several months after the shooting, the panel observed that the campus's classrooms did not have door locks operable from the inside. "Whether to add such locks is controversial. They can block entry of an intruder and compartmentalize an attack," the report states. It continues, "On the other hand, a locked room can be a place of refuge when one is pursued." On balance, the panel generally thought having locks on classroom doors was a good idea.

In general, doors that lock from the inside have been in place on college campuses for several years, said Jesus M. Villahermosa Jr., president of Crisis Reality Training, which advises organizations on handling emergencies. He said that while it is impossible to eliminate risk entirely, in his experience "locks absolutely work. People are able to secure themselves in rooms and shooters haven't been able to get to them." He added that it cost one institution $5 million to install locks on the inside.

"Let's say we add a lock to this door," he said. "What does it change? It changes nothing. Now students and teachers have assurance that if they need to lock down, they can."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Locking Out Danger

  • Door locks
  • Posted by Brett Sokolow , President at NCHERM on July 10, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Don't bullets go through door locks and doors? I'm all for slowing a shooter down, but that's all we'll do. And the limited benefit is simply outweighed by the cost for most campuses. This is one of those knee-jerk remedies that makes people feel safe rather than actually making them safe. Shooters are usually members of our communities. They'll know we lock classroom doors. So, we'll just push the violence to the library, quad, cafeteria or other unlocked and unlockable venue.

    Brett A. Sokolow, NCHERM

  • Keep classrooms locked
  • Posted by Skeptical on July 10, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Adding an additional lock to classroom doors makes me uncomfortable; perhaps my discomfort is the result of my many years working in university housing on three different campuses. Lounges in the residence hall that were lockable from the inside were more prone to romantic trysts, vandalism, and theft because the involved parties did not need to worry about being interrupted.

    My fear is that classrooms that are lockable from the inside would be susceptible to these same problems. Rather than add an additional lock, why not keep all the classroom doors locked and issue keys or proximity cards to the faculty who teach in those rooms? This way if a lockdown alert were issued, the door could simply be shut.

  • Defensible space
  • Posted by Robert Sommer , Distinguished Professor of Psychology Emeritus at University of California, Davis on July 10, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • I believe that inside locks would make classrooms less safe. Several assaults occurred in campus bathrooms after hours when a rapist followed women into rest rooms and locked the door. As a result, the door locks were removed.
    Classrooms on this campus and many others are heavily used after hours for studying. I think inside locks could be very risky.

  • Posted by Laura on July 10, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I can see arguments against having the door locks. But there are very strong arguments for them, too. Romantic trysts are far, far less problematic than having gunment enter and shoot students and professors.

    To call suggestions that door locks are needed "knee-jerk" in the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings is pretty silly. Any prudent, reasonable steps that a person takes for safety is knee-jerk, I suppose. Seat belts? Knee-jerk. Locking my door at home? Knee-jerk.

  • locked doors
  • Posted by Bobbi , Assistant Professor/ Kinesiology at Southern Illinois University on July 10, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • I was an instructor at Northern Illinois University when the shootings occured. I taught in a classroom that was located on the inside of the building, so there were no windows students could escape from if a shooter entered our classroom (as some did at Virginia Tech). The doors did not lock and the doors opened outward so there was no real way to lockdown the classroom. The safety guidelines for an armed threat on campus is to get your students out of the building if you can, but if you can not then you are to secure your class in the classroom. How does one secure their students in a classroom if their are no locks and the doors open outward? After the shootings the issue of unlocked classrooms was one of the first to arise in department meetings and something my students brought up when we re-entered the classroom.

  • Doorknobs
  • Posted by Mary , Controller's at Kent State on July 10, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • Well, there are door knobs that have a key for the outside and a simple lock mechanism on the inside. Further, you just need to turn the knob to exit if you are inside and the door is locked... Check out your own front door.

    Further than that, many doors that don't have a separate mechanism to lock them from the inside may be locked by opening the door and changing the position of a mechanism in the door. That may save many changes from being needed.

    Yes, bullets go through doors, but often not the concrete block we tend to use for our buildings - so get around the perimeter of the room if it is not possible to escape - away from the door and not in line with it. Makes it much more difficult.

    Although we cannot prevent all injuries and deaths when someone is determined to wreck havoc, we should do whatever is reasonable to limit it.

  • On-Going Discussion
  • Posted by Robert , Facilities on July 10, 2009 at 4:30pm EDT
  • In the 1960's we removed the door locks due to a few sexual assaults across the country. Now due to a single incident there is discussion about spending millions to put them back. Yes in the VT incident they would have been useful.. In the NIU case they would have made no difference and could have been a hindrance to police response. In any case where a student is in a classroom with a gun they make it easier to hold the class hostage.

    We also looked at a set up where it would take a key to lock the room from the inside, but still allow code egress. That was rejected when someone asked what the chances were that a faculty member in a year or two, or five, would have the key when it was needed.

    Most campuses have rejected the door lock idea due to the uncertain benefit and known operational and safety issues.

  • The perception of safety
  • Posted by Professor G on July 10, 2009 at 8:15pm EDT
  • We've discussed this on our campus as well, and the response so far from the professional threat assessors is that locks would only increase the *perception* of safety rather than actual safety.   I see two flaws in their statement:  1) Unlike the good folks on the assessment team, I teach in those classrooms.  I have daily experience over 15+ years of getting in and out of academic buildings at both peak and off-peak times.  I can estimate with excellent accuracy how long it would take me to evacuate my students from a classroom assuming that we could get to the nearest stairway and exit. Based on my experience, even a few seconds of time that a door lock could buy us might save lives.  And 2), there is the inevitable reality of how this plays in public perception.  Any university that claims it cannot afford to install locks leaves itself open to legal action by the families of students and employees if, God forbid, a violent incident occurs.  How do you counter the image of a grieving mother on the evening news talking about how her dead child's classroom didn't even have a $5 lock on the door?  You don't.  Period.  

  • Computer locking mechanism
  • Posted on July 11, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • Another option would be program an override of the often used card swipe access system for classroom access. This would prevent people from locking the door from inside in normal situations, while it would allow for a system-wide lockout of classrooms to all except faculty and police. In many universities these systems already are installed, there just would need to be a way to have a real time ability to require a valid card swipe for access. This would prevent access from the hallway, but still allow for one action egress from the room. The current designs as implemented can automatically lock and unlock based on specific times of day, so it is possible to do. The trick would be figuring out how to do it fast enough to be helpful in a crisis.

  • Posted by jimbob on July 13, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • So, if I'm a distraught student who decides to go to class with a weapon, I can start firing away during class and no one will be able to get in to stop me (except the other students who have guns of course) Sounds good to me!

  • fear
  • Posted by Jane Doe , NOYB at NOYB Univ. on July 13, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • This is still more over-reaction to the possibility an extremely unlikely event. The only way to be "safe" is with 100% surveillance of our every move, wrapped in bullet proof bubble wrap, with built in life jackets, helmets, shatter proof goggles, ear plugs, and internet (etc.) filters, lest we be exposed to some idea that makes us snap & go on a shooting rampage. . . .

    Add locks, they'll shoot them or kick them in. You must add bullet proof locks, and doors, and windows, and walls, and cameras and intercom, always on, always monitored, so that hostage takers, rapists, etc. can't go into a room, take it over, and then lock the doors.

    In other news...complaints that higher education is spending too much money on non-academics, like adding locks to thousands of doors across campus. It's not just a $5 lock that's needed. It's thousands of locks, installed by locksmiths, keys distributed to "appropriate" people, inventoried annually. Then instead of the mother grieving for lack of a "$5" lock, it's the mother grieving for lack of a promptly replaced stop sign, a fence, better lighting on a staircase, a suicide prevention program, condoms, friends' common sense when their buddy passes out after 21 shots . . .

  • Brett Sokolow
  • Posted by DFS on July 13, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Slowing down a shooter is better than not slowing down a shooter. It's all focused on the first 5 minutes.

    Our campus has actually practiced this -- green or red cards in windows and/or threshholds of class doors in the hall, placed there by the professor, or at other rooms by someone else.

    All of the knee-jerk responses (not by you) came up -- like, if it's not 100% sure, why try at all to be sure?

    We all decided that to do something reasonable, for the sake of precious minutes while security personnel are sweeping, is better than throwing up our hands and running to the hills.

    Whatever works! The object is to minimize, if we cannot prevent, woundings or deaths.

  • Posted by Lonewolf on July 16, 2009 at 12:00am EDT
  • I'd agree that when the cost and effort is balanced against risk, it's not really worth it. Saying that not taking every preventative measure is silly...is just silly. If you wanted to be safer, you could also post guards at every door, or with every student.

    Also, as others have mentioned, the locks could also allow for more theft, vandalism, sexual assault (which are by far more prevalent than shootings) on campuses. Not to mention that it would also allow a potential shooter to hole up in a classroom more easily.