Search News


Browse Archives

News

Aligning Jobs and Training

July 14, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Jobs requiring only an associate degree or skills certificate are projected to grow slightly faster than those requiring at least a bachelor’s degree in the coming decade, according to a new report from President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors.

The report comes on the eve of a massive federal plan President Obama is about to unveil to help America's community colleges. An early draft included billions for job training, low-interest loans for building projects and other funding streams to create free online courses.

Though prior research shows that the attainment of any community college credential can significantly increase one’s income, not all degrees and certificates awarded by two-year institutions were found to have the same financially beneficial value. The Council of Economic Advisors' report finds “that the most valuable credentials are those in quantitatively-oriented fields or high-growth/high-need occupations such as health care.”

The latest projections from the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, which break down industry growth by sector, seem to indicate that the economies of 2008 and 2016 will look somewhat similar. For example, the government, retail and financial services sectors are projected to remain relatively static during the next eight years. Health and education services, however, are projected to “contribute most substantially to job growth in the future.” So-called “green jobs” are also projected to experience a noticeable growth in the near term.

The report argues that America’s community colleges could do more to direct today’s students to these high-demand jobs of the future.

“We need to be aligning curricula with skills that employers really need and want,” said Christina Romer, chair of the Council of Economic Advisors and economics professor at the University of California at Berkeley, in an interactive videoconference Monday. “That’ll be something that’ll really help displaced workers.”

To help create more “occupationally focused” curricula, the report argues that more institutions should consider the creation of middle colleges, or programs that allow students to earn college credit while still enrolled in high school. It also maintains that “career pathway” or “career cluster” programs need to be in place prior to college to help students “generate marketable skills” that can later be “linked to the demands of a specific job.”

The report argues that training programs should also provide “flexible” schedules and “adequate levels of support services” for working and other nontraditional students.

Washington State’s Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training program, an initiative aimed at helping “underserved students,” was cited as an exemplar. Both literacy and skills training are taught in conjunction within this model. For instance, the report notes, a “student in a nursing program might learn technical medical language, while having an English instructor on hand to aid in general vocabulary.”

In conclusion, the report chides the federal job training system for being too complicated.

Certain educational programs that are achieving some level of success, such as the model in Washington State, often cannot easily gain government funding “because basic skills and occupational training are funded under different streams, each with its own requirements and restrictions.” This cumbersome process, the report argues, “discourages the creation of new, more effective, training models.”

“While it is easy to identify the need to simplify, it is a far greater challenge to streamline in a way that improves efficiency, maintain accountability, and reduces duplication of services but does not undermine the effective targeting of resources to populations in need,” the report reads. “Nevertheless, it is crucial to the design of new, more effective, training models.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Aligning Jobs and Training

  • Obama is middling
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof at www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com on July 14, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • If a lifetime of adjuncting positions wasn't bad enough, the job forecast for the next 8 years seems to be worse. Instead of just teaching the low-end courses that tenured faculty no longer want, the English adjunct can also help out the struggling nursing student (how is not made clear--etymology?) get a two-year degree.

    At the risk of being cast out of acceptable society, I have to say that Obama, on this, is shortsighted and wrong. By middling, pandering to the job sector, he is asking higher education to limit its mission. When has the limitation of the exploration of ideas into what is marketable ever benefited anyone?

    Put away the Shakespeare and Romantic Poets, our kids need to learn advanced PowerPoint and how to sort their Excel spreadsheets. Or, they need to know how to properly take the dictation of the really educated Doctor class.

    By the sound of this article, the administration wants more workers, less thinkers, and expects a lot less of its citizens.

  • Posted by Another Guy With An Opinion on July 14, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • PPP,

    I'm inclined to agree with your assessment here. Obama's plan/suggestion gets at the heart of what we believe the term "education" should encompass. Can--Should?--educators limit the content of their lessons, particularly at the community college level, to mastering PowerPoints and spreadsheets? The disposability of that which is not immediately and obviously relevant is already an alarming aspect of so many corners of our modern culture; it seems that, for instance, having an English teacher on "stand-by" in a nursing class decreases rather than increases that teacher's necessity (and, by extension, the skills s/he teaches).

    Do we really want "occupationally focused" students? Whatever happened to well-rounded students? Of course, we want our students to remain viable job candidates and to prepare them for the job market that will exist by the time they exit our institutions rather than the job market that exists now. But, while I realize that excoriation by those who champion all things Obama is a possible result of my comment, I don't think he quite "gets it" here.

  • Jobs for the future
  • Posted by Richard M. Romano , Research Associate at Cornell University on July 14, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • A complement to the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) report mentioned is a volume just released on the Occupational Outlook for Community College Students (New Directions for Community Colleges, Vol 46, summer, 2009). It provides BLS job projections for community college type occupations to 2016 using specially prepared BLS data. Like the CEA report it argues that the jobs of the future will require students to have more analytical and interactive skills. In fact, when looking at the skills necessary for the jobs of the future, it finds that the very general education courses that produce desirable citizenship and social good, dovetail with producing a more productive workforce.

  • BRAVO Romano
  • Posted on July 14, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • BRAVO Romano! One wonders what happens when the jobs of 2016 become obsolete in 2025. Do we then allow these 40+-year-olds to beccome permanently unemployed because their learned skills are now obsolete, or do we invest new billions in order to make them once again occupationally skilled? Somebody had better understand the long-range importance of training minds as well as hands.

  • Piss Poor Prof
  • Posted by DFS on July 14, 2009 at 9:30pm EDT
  • Don't worry about that, guy. Mr. Obama's plan is to collapse any private industry, and therefore all such jobs, so that everyone will end up getting some kind of government paycheck -- oops, I mean allowance.

    That is, as long as other Powers in the world leave us be.

    As long as we diminish core education, no one will be able to 'roll with the punches' when specific jobs become antiquated. The people won't have the core knowledge, and therefore the wherewithall, to cope.

  • Reality Check...please!
  • Posted on July 15, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • I am so sorry that some people don't understand. I also agree that every citizen should be well rounded but when a person is sleeping in their car, I can guarantee you that the last thing they are thinking about is Shakespeare!

    Let’s face reality, if everyone is doing such a great job in educating our youth why in the world should a nursing student need support from and English professor? Could it be that she lacks the fundamentals? How in the world did that happen? That’s the problem.

    Educating a person today so they can be well rounded at the age of forty does not help bring food to the table TODAY. It does not help the sick person in a hospital TODAY when there is a shortage of hospital staff. As a country and workforce, employers should encourage all employees to continue with their education and reward them monetarily when they do so, so by the time they are forty they will have the all knowing knowledge of a college graduate.

    There will be time to learn but if a student cannot continue to go to school because they lack the skills to get a good paying job to fuel their education, then we will find ourselves in a true crisis. We need to put our egos aside and join forces with a country that needs to pick its self up from its educational bootstraps.

    I applaud that English professor that acknowledges the need to help students that are in dire need of assistance. What a champion.

    No one should ever say that educators should limit the content of their lessons at our community colleges; that is absurd. I would like to think that educators at a community college would know the importance of challenging their students even more and providing them the best education because these students might not have the opportunity to continue. We have a moral obligation to our youth to “raise the bar” and assist them every step of the way, even if it means belittling ourselves to be of service to a struggling student.

    I wish our country the very best education, at all levels!