Quick Takes

July 21, 2009

Arrest of Henry Louis Gates Brings Charges of Profiling

Cambridge police arrested Henry Louis Gates Jr., a Harvard University professor who is one of the leading figures in African-American studies, outside his home on disorderly conduct charges Thursday in an incident some see as racial profiling, The Boston Globe reported. According to the police, someone walking saw Gates trying to get into his own home without a key. (Gates has said that his door was jammed.) When police arrived and questioned Gates, the police report characterizes him as argumentative, while friends who have spoken to Gates said that he did cooperate, and that a white professor outside his own home would never have been treated in the same way. “It’s unbelievable,’’ Lawrence Bobo, a Harvard sociologist who visited Gates at the police station Thursday and drove him home, told the Globe. “I felt as if I were in some kind of surreal moment, like ‘The Twilight Zone.’ I was mortified.... This is a humiliating thing and a pretty profound violation of the kind of trust we all take for granted.’" The Root published a statement on behalf of Gates, in which his lawyer describes how Gates says he cooperated and was still arrested at his own home.

Rutgers Postdocs Unionize

New Jersey has certified that postdoctoral fellows at Rutgers University have voted to unionize, affiliating with the joint American Federation of Teachers-American Association of University Professors union that represents more than 5,000 faculty members and graduate students at the university. The Rutgers postdocs are the third such union nationally, following those at the Universities of California and Connecticut.

Ave Maria U. Fires Theologian

Ave Maria University has fired Rev. Joseph Fessio, a theologian who was previously fired as provost, The Naples Daily News reported. Fessio's dismissal as provost provoked protests by students and supporters at the college, which prides itself on close adherence to Roman Catholic teachings. Father Fessio is a friend of and former student of Pope Benedict XVI. According to the Naples newspaper, Ave Maria's split with Father Fessio is rooted in financial disagreements, not theology. Father Fessio recently told the university's founder that it was at "great risk" because of its reliance on real estate development -- a view that has been expressed by others, but that is apparently not shared by university leaders.

U. of Illinois Found Job for Trustee's Future Son-in-Law

At least one member of the University of Illinois board -- a body under scrutiny for pulling strings to get politically connected applicants admitted -- may have engaged in more traditional patronage by having the university create a job for his future son-in-law. The Chicago Tribune reported that the board chair, Niranjan Shah, encouraged the hiring of his future son-in-law and that several aspects of the hiring were unusual. The future son-in-law was paid $115,000 a year, more than most other employees with the same title in the division of business and industry services. And the university had to use campus reserve funds to hire him as the position wasn't funded by the department that employed him.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Around the Web

How to teach writing to non-humanities majors, in Acephalous.... The adjunct career, in Literature Should Mean Something in Your Life....

FREE Daily News Alerts

Comments on Quick Takes

  • Illinois
  • Posted by Illinois Dad on July 21, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • Haven't you taken up enough space with Illinois yet? I'm sure you could uncover 1,000 similar situations across American campuses if you wanted to.

  • Note to Prof. Gates
  • Posted by Legal Beagle on July 21, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • Here's some wisdom I've picked up over the years: when dealing with the police, it's a good idea not to insult them.

  • Racial Profiling of Professor Gates
  • Posted by Mihrtaches , Chemistry and Biochemistry at University of California Santa Barbara on July 21, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Why are you surprised Professor Gates? Boston? Racial profiling continues to prevail in this American society. No matter your status and/or numerous accolades, some legal policies still support this elicit behavior. It is obscene that people pass on these racial stereotypes that a black man is a vile subject of society. Press charges Professor Gates. We must continue to struggle against this ludicrous behavior.

  • Gates In Need of Attention
  • Posted by Chuck on July 21, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Poor Prof. Gates. 

    Cops come to his house and ask him for some routine identification and a few questions after a good and concerned neighbor noticed something odd going on at his front door.

    As Mark Twain noted long ago, "if the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."

    In Gates' world, every act, inquiry, criticism or humor is just another sign that racism is endemic and systemic in the American society, his lucrative and cushy job at Harvard aside. 

    No wonder that increasingly so many people take him and his passe racial shadows with such pity and contempt.

  • Chuck
  • Posted by Malvern Hill on July 21, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • Are you personal friends with anyone who's been racially profiled, or who come from a background of humiliating experiences?

    Being close friends with some people of color I can certainly understand why it would be hard to remain calm under the circumstances.

    If a similar thing happened to me, it is a quality of white privilege that at least I wouldn't have to wonder if it was due to my skin color. I would be upset enough as it is without that extra question.

    My guess, also, is that once the officer "was led to believe" that Skip Gates really lived there, he did not exactly apologize to the man. Professionalism, Courtesy, Respect.

    If all police training and Criminal Justice degrees included a solid background in real history it would be easier for all of us to remain calm.

    I also think we should get to know our neighbors and make friends across cultural lines. See things from others' points of view.

    The police must deal with violence, harsh conditions and potential violence every day. And their lives are in danger. But I think their jobs would be easier and safer if they had a stronger sense of American history.

  • ..."Do You Know Who I AM"?
  • Posted by ...Just an Adjunct , Critical Thinking at Northeastern Liberal Arts on July 21, 2009 at 3:45pm EDT
  • ..With all due respect to Professor Skip Gates; he displayed the holier-than-thou mentality typical of many elite, liberal, New Englanders who think they are smarter than everyone else. During the heated exchange he asked Officer Crowley: "Do you know who I am"? The hard working police officer concerned with public safety, knowing this home had been broken into before and dispatched via a 911 call from a frightened neighbor - thought to himself: "Right now I don't know who you are and that is why I am asking you for identification". Gates, tired, cranky and just back from a trip to China, could have responded with tact, diplomacy and his Southern gentility. Instead he threw-down the race card: "your a racist."

    This isn't about racism. Its about a snooty Harvard Professor full of self-importance thinking he is above the law. His comments make a mockery of the Civil Rights movement and will bring out the circusy cast of characters drawn to these kinds of spectacles.

    Maybe Gates should get to know his neighbors better so they don't call the police on him.

    ..next time Professor Smarty-Pants, just show some identification and keep your racist comments to yourself.

  • Jumping to Conclusions
  • Posted by Michael on July 21, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • What is amazing is that we do not know what took place between Professor Gates and the Police, and yet people comment as though the facts are clear. What we know is that a neighbor called the police, they did not adequately identify the professor as the homeowner, and arrested him after an exchange of words. There has been no verification of any version of the facts that justifies the highly charged opinions that have been posted. Maybe everyone should wait until there is some actual evidence offered before they jump to conclusions.

  • " ....Do you know Who I Am"?
  • Posted by ..Just an Adjunct , Critical Thinking at Northeast Liberal Arts on July 21, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Michael,

    Professor Gates was arrested last Thursday 7/16. This is now public information. The Cambridge Police report was posted to the Boston Globe and The Boston Herald. Inside Higher Ed posted the link or you can go to Boston.com and review the police report. It is in today's paper. Professor Gates has commented publicly as well as through an attorney representing him. Both sides of this unfortunate event are available in multiple media. Professor Gates will have his day in court.

    I have a great deal of respect for Professor Gates his contribution to African American studies and his years of scholarship. However, his dealings with an ordinary police officer on a routine response to a 911 call reveal a man-on-the-edge. He took his frustrations out on the police officer.

    What is he so angry about? He has a privileged background, a high paying cushy job at Harvard, free housing, access to celebrities and presidents and a police officer checking up on him to make sure he's safe.

  • What is he angry about? Well, let's see...
  • Posted by Professor G on July 21, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • As Just An Adjunct states, we do know some basic info about this incident, including the following: Professor Gates was inside his own home when this incident occurred. He produced ID. The police continued to question him. He was returning from a trip to China, which would mean he was most likely tired from travel and jet-lagged. Perhaps the officers who responded were polite and professional to him, though as long as we're citing facts, Boston's long history of racial conflicts can't be ignored. Perhaps Professor Gates did get more upset than they thought was merited (though I wonder how those two officers would react to being arrested in their respective homes?)

    I would guess that after 58 years of being black in America and dealing with the daily slights and exclusions of that, Professor Gates was quite reasonably furious. And for everyone out there who's reading "Do you know who I am?" as uppity -- which is a telling reading in itself -- how about an alternative interpretation: that even Dr. Gates, a world-renowned scholar who has seemingly "made it", has good reason to fear that no matter his intellectual contributions or awards or degrees, he'll always be seen as a black man, and therefore a threat, first. Even in his own home.

  • Racism?
  • Posted by James , MSW at Cambridge College on July 21, 2009 at 9:30pm EDT
  • I agree with your points. However, If Professor Gate's own neighbor didn't know who he was, why would a Police Officer responding to a suspicious entry know who he was? The difficulty came about when Gates filled with his own self-importance, got angry at the police officer when the officer went right-by-the-book securing what may have been a crime scene. There is no indication that the Police officer felt "threatened" by Mr. Gates who was hobbling around without his cane. Mr Gates did provide identification but not without first hurling insults and accusations of racism.

    However, the poor black man in America argument doesn't fly like it used to. As they say: "That tired old ship has sailed" In America we have a black President and in Massachusetts we elected our first black governor: Deval Patrick. This incident happened in Cambridge not Boston proper. There is no place in America more liberal, culturally aware, diverse or friendly to black men than Cambridge, Massachusetts. Additionally, a black police officer was present during the time of the arrest.

    In the Police report, when Officer Crowley asked Professor Gates to step-out on to the front porch to talk, Gates allegedly replied: " I'll talk to your Momma on the front porch." If this statement is true, is this appropriate language coming from any person never mind from a distinct and honorable professor at the top of the academic pyramid? Did his 58 years of experience compel him to speak this way to a police officer? What does this say about him?

    True victims of racism respect the law.

     

  • Infelicity?
  • Posted by Karin Foster on July 22, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • James,
    I myself am given to infelicites in online discussions, despite proofreading, whereupon I wince upon seeing the result.

    Perhaps you'd like to revise your last sentence, "True victims of racism respect the law"?

    Otherwise it appears as though you may be harboring just the kind of unconscious attitude that many people of color encounter on a daily basis. Put yourself, then, in their place. It doth accumulate!

    The point is that no one should be a victim of racism, nor should any of us respect any such "unstated" Law which says, "Stay in your place."

    This kind of incident brings out not just racial pain, but class resentment, as evidenced by Just an Adjunct's remarks. White men (but all of us, really) alternately admire and resent social hierarchies (I think mostly the latter at the more unconscious level). That's bad enough. Then when women and people of color surpass white men, it becomes unbearable for white men, and women, studies show often unconsciously feel guilty. (Of course, Gates, a distinguished Harvard professor, is yet a long way from the top of the class structure, in any case.)

    Yet our society INSISTS on a class structure. And such insistence generates its own kind of pain, doesn't it? We can no longer, legally, tell women or people of color to "stay in your place." (But we go on sending and receiving just that message in our daily lives!) And white men, too, thus experience that message in a particularly galling form. As long as we have an overclass, we'll have an underclass, and resentful middle class gradations in between.

    "In the current preoccupation with minorities," writes Terry Eagleton, "one vital insight is in danger of being obscured. The astonishing fact of global capitalism is that it is the MAJORITY who are dispossed. There are, to be sure, degrees of dispossion, and shipyard workers are by no means destitute. But while the idea of a social order which excludes certain vilified minorities is familiar enough, and these expulsions are visibly on show, the mind-shaking truth of a class analysis is that social orders have always invisibly shut out the majority" (Terry Eagleton, Sweet Violence: The Idea of Tragedy, 2003).

  • Racism?
  • Posted by James , MSW at Cambridge College on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • There has never been a better time to be a black man in America and most thoughtful people understand this. We have a black President, Massachusetts has a black Governor and Cambridge Massachusetts has a black female mayor.

    I can't speak for all black Americans nor can I speak for all white Americans but I do resent the fact that upon my suggestion that Gates because he acted-out and made a fool of himself is wrong, I am somehow "unconsciously" a racist.

    Here is something else I resent: Professor Gates didn't want equal treatment he wanted "special" treatment because its 2009 in America and he is a privileged black man who doesn't think he should be required to play by the rules. This event didn't happen in Selma Alabama it happened in the most liberal city in America: Cambridge, Mass.

    No pop-psycholgy or double-speak will convince me that this dunder-head of a police officer arrested Gates because he was black. He arrested Gates for disturbing the peace and not following the rules and the commands of a police officer who was their to protect the public. I would expect any police officer to have a healthy dose of skepticism during this type of encounter. Additionally, Gates insulted the Police officer. For your informtaion: insulting a person doesn't win friends and influence people (Dale Carnegie).

    My neighbor and his family came to this country from China. When he arrived he had just one question: "what are the rules"? Twelve years later his daughter is a cardiologist. He didn't ask that America change the rules. Additionally, his families success didn't happen by magic. When his daughter struggled to learn English did he blame white America (or his former Japanese Oppressors)? No. My neighbor never asked for special treatment; just an equal opportunity. Do I resent his families success? Absolutely not. As an American his success is my success.

    True victims of racism obey the law,respect law and order and law enforcement officers even when its inconvenient. Why? Because true victims of racism understand and trust that our legal system is there to protect them too. Yes, the same legal system that helped propel Professor Gates to the lofty station he now enjoys.

  • Gates Should Apologize
  • Posted by carolinem on July 22, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Professor Gates should be grateful at a police officer's willingness to investigate a possible burglary to protect Gates' property, while possibly risking his life, instead of ranting about racism.  It was Gates, himself, who showed intolerance by his assumption that the police were out to get him.  If this is any example of the tone of black studies at universities, it is time for an overhaul.  No doubt Gates would be screaming racism if a REAL burglar were breaking into his house, and the police refused to investigate.  Gates owes the police department an apology for his outburst, and he should apologize to his students and university for embarrassing them by letting his biases and fears erupt against an innocent officer.

  • True Victims of Racism?
  • Posted by Karin Foster on July 22, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • "True victims of racism obey the law, respect law and order and law enforcement officers even when its inconvenient."

    O.K. So Dr. Gates isn't a true victim of racism since he raised a ruckus. Or people who are truly victims have no recourse. I'm puzzled and wish you would explain what you mean by "true victims of racism." Otherwise it sounds like you mean true victims of racism should quietly stay in their place and remain true victims.

    Evidently, the Terry Eagleton quote about you and Gates being in the same boat (the majority) in relation to global capitalism didn't impress you. Care to have another look at my post above?

    Go to www.democracynow.org for Cornel West's appraisal of an America which has now elected a black president, particularly his speech on Obama looking to "the wrong Lincoln." Also his analysis of Obama's performing "socialism for the rich."

    Could it be that we're all victims to varying degrees (fighting among ourselves over race) while the upper echelons get away with murder? Could it be we, the majority, are enabling that when we should be forming coalitions to change the very structure that generates these conflicts?

    Or is it that true victims of classism must respect the very Law that puts us in that predicament?